Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| City of Hope National Medical Center | OTHER |
| Providence Cancer Center, Earle A. Chiles Research Institute | OTHER |
| Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
High-dose interleukin 2 (Proleukin, Novartis) (IL-2) is approved by the U.S Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of metastatic kidney cancer and is a standard treatment of this disease. At the present time, IL-2 is the only therapy for kidney cancer that can produce a remission of disease that lasts after treatment is completed. However, most patients who receive IL-2 do not benefit and all patients experience potentially dangerous side effects.
Recent research has suggested that certain patients may respond better to IL-2 than others. The Cytokine Working Group is currently conducting a clinical trial that aims to identify and confirm this research and narrow the application of IL-2 to those patients most likely to benefit.
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
Secondary
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| HD IL2 | Experimental | Participants received high-dose (HD) IL2, 600,000 IU/kg/dose (Prometheus Laboratories Inc.) i.v. every 8 hours for 5 days (maximum of 14 doses) beginning on day 1 and again on day 15. One course generally consisted of 5 days of treatment, 9 days of rest, 5 more days of treatment, and 9 weeks of rest, followed by up to two additional courses of HD IL2 for patients who benefited and tolerated most of the planned IL2 doses. A treatment delay of up to 4 weeks was allowed for resolution of side effects between courses. Patients were eligible to receive a maximum of three courses of treatment. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HD IL2 | Drug |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Objective Response in ISM Good Risk Group | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by investigator assessment of radiographs. | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Objective Response Rate in ISM Poor Risk Group | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on treatment on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| David F McDermott, MD | Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center | Study Chair |
| Kim Margolin, MD | City of Hope National Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Walter Urba, MD | Chiles Cancer Center | Principal Investigator |
| Marc Ernstoff, MD | Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Theodore Logan, MD | Indiana University | Principal Investigator |
| Joseph Clark, MD | Loyola University | Principal Investigator |
| Janice Dutcher, MD | Our Lady of Mercy Cancer Center | Principal Investigator |
| Michael Wong, MD | Roswell Park Cancer Institute | Principal Investigator |
| Allen Pantuck, MD | University of California, Los Angeles | Principal Investigator |
| Leslie Oleksowicz, MD |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center | Boston | Massachusetts | 02215 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Participants enrolled from 13 institutions between November 2006 and November 2008.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | HD IL2 | Participants received high-dose (HD) IL2, 600,000 IU/kg/dose (Prometheus Laboratories Inc.) i.v. every 8 hours for 5 days (maximum of 14 doses) beginning on day 1 and again on day 15. One course generally consisted of 5 days of treatment, 9 days of rest, 5 more days of treatment, and 9 weeks of rest, followed by up to two additional courses of HD IL2 for patients who benefited and tolerated most of the planned IL2 doses. A treatment delay of up to 4 weeks was allowed for resolution of side effects between courses. Patients were eligible to receive a maximum of three courses of treatment. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
The analysis dataset is comprised of all treated participants.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | HD IL2 | Participants received high-dose (HD) IL2, 600,000 IU/kg/dose (Prometheus Laboratories Inc.) i.v. every 8 hours for 5 days (maximum of 14 doses) beginning on day 1 and again on day 15. One course generally consisted of 5 days of treatment, 9 days of rest, 5 more days of treatment, and 9 weeks of rest, followed by up to two additional courses of HD IL2 for patients who benefited and tolerated most of the planned IL2 doses. A treatment delay of up to 4 weeks was allowed for resolution of side effects between courses. Patients were eligible to receive a maximum of three courses of treatment. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Objective Response in ISM Good Risk Group | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by investigator assessment of radiographs. | The analysis dataset is comprised of all treated patients with available tumor tissue/data for ISM analysis and classified as ISM good risk. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | proportion of participants | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). |
Adverse events were assessed continuously throughout treatment. Treatment duration was a median of 3 courses (duration of 12 weeks each) in this study cohort. Note: one grade 2 serious adverse event (SAE), one grade 3 other adverse event (OAE) and one grade 4 OAE are missing from the tables because codes/description of these events are unknown but these patients are included in the overall number affected.
Serious AEs: AE that results in death; is life-threatening; requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization; results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity; is a congenital anomaly or birth defect; or is an important medical event when, based upon appropriate medical judgment, it may jeopardize the participant and require medical or surgical intervention to prevent one of the above outcomes. Other AEs: Remaining AEs (max grade) with trt-attribution of possibly, probably or definitely.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | HD IL2 | Participants received high-dose (HD) IL2, 600,000 IU/kg/dose (Prometheus Laboratories Inc.) i.v. every 8 hours for 5 days (maximum of 14 doses) beginning on day 1 and again on day 15. One course generally consisted of 5 days of treatment, 9 days of rest, 5 more days of treatment, and 9 weeks of rest, followed by up to two additional courses of HD IL2 for patients who benefited and tolerated most of the planned IL2 doses. A treatment delay of up to 4 weeks was allowed for resolution of side effects between courses. Patients were eligible to receive a maximum of three courses of treatment. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hemoglobin | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Renal failure | Renal and urinary disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| David F. McDermott, MD | Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center | dmcdermo@bidmc.harvard.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002292 | Carcinoma, Renal Cell |
| D009362 | Neoplasm Metastasis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000230 | Adenocarcinoma |
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C082598 | aldesleukin |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Indiana University |
| OTHER |
| Loyola University | OTHER |
| Our Lady of Mercy Medical Center | OTHER |
| Roswell Park Cancer Institute | OTHER |
| University of California, Los Angeles | OTHER |
| University of Cincinnati | OTHER |
| University of Pittsburgh | OTHER |
| University of Virginia | OTHER |
| Vanderbilt University | OTHER |
| Wayne State University | OTHER |
| Dana-Farber Cancer Institute | OTHER |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). |
| Objective Response Rate (Independent Assessment) | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks.. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). |
| Overall Survival | Overall survival based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the time from treatment start to date of death or censored at the date of last documented contact. | Participants were followed for survival up to 7 years. |
| 3-Year Progression-Free Survival Rate | 3-year progression-free survival rate is defined as the proportion of patients absent death or progression based on WHO criteria by 3 years since time of treatment start. PD is a >/=25% increase in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters of all measurable lesions. Further, PD is the appearance of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Long-term follow-up occurred every 3 m for 2 yrs, semi-annually for yr 3 and annually for yrs 4 and 5. Relevant for this endpoint was disease status at 3 y. |
| Objective Response Rate by MSKCC Risk Group | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). |
| Objective Response Rate by UCLA SANI Score | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). |
| Objective Response Rate by Tumor Type | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). |
| Objective Response Rate by Clear Cell Histology Risk Group | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Response status was confirmed by an independent assessment of radiographs. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. |
| Objective Response Rate by CA-9 Score (CAIX Classification) | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). |
| Objective Response Rate by PD-L1 Tumor | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). |
| Objective Response Rate by B7-H3 Tumor | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). |
| Objective Response Rate by CA-9 SNP | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). |
| Progression-Free Survival | Progression-free survival based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the duration of time from treatment start to date of disease progression (PD) or death. Per WHO criteria: PD is a >/=25% increase in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters of all measurable lesions. Further, PD is the appearance of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Participants who were event-free were censored at the date of their last disease evaluation. | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Long-term follow-up occurred every 3 m for 2 yrs, semi-annually for yr 3 and annually for yrs 4 and 5. Median survival follow-up was X months (95% CI: ). |
| University of Cincinnati |
| Principal Investigator |
| Leonard Appleman, MD | University of Pittsburgh | Principal Investigator |
| Geoffrey Weiss, MD | University of Virginia | Principal Investigator |
| Jeffrey Sosman, MD | Vanderbilt University | Principal Investigator |
| Ulka Vaishampayan, MD | Wayne State University | Principal Investigator |
| Background |
| Atkins M, Regan M, McDermott D, Mier J, Stanbridge E, Youmans A, Febbo P, Upton M, Lechpammer M, Signoretti S. Carbonic anhydrase IX expression predicts outcome of interleukin 2 therapy for renal cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2005 May 15;11(10):3714-21. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-04-2019. |
| 25424850 | Result | McDermott DF, Cheng SC, Signoretti S, Margolin KA, Clark JI, Sosman JA, Dutcher JP, Logan TF, Curti BD, Ernstoff MS, Appleman L, Wong MK, Khushalani NI, Oleksowicz L, Vaishampayan UN, Mier JW, Panka DJ, Bhatt RS, Bailey AS, Leibovich BC, Kwon ED, Kabbinavar FF, Belldegrun AS, Figlin RA, Pantuck AJ, Regan MM, Atkins MB. The high-dose aldesleukin "select" trial: a trial to prospectively validate predictive models of response to treatment in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Clin Cancer Res. 2015 Feb 1;21(3):561-8. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-14-1520. Epub 2014 Nov 25. |
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Adverse Event |
|
| Death |
|
| Achieved Stable Disease |
|
| Other |
|
| Misc |
|
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| MSKCC Risk Group | Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSKCC) Risk Group: MSKCC developed a nomogram that is used to classify patients into 3 renal cell carcinoma (RCC) 5-year disease recurrence risk groups (low, intermediate, and high) using data from patients treated at MSKCC. The components of the nomogram include RCC histology, disease symptoms, pT stage, and tumor size. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| UCLA SANI Score | University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) Survival After Nephrectomy and Immunotherapy (SANI) score: This tool also predicts RCC patient's survival based on lymph node status, metastases, sarcomatoid feature, and TSH level. Patients are classified into 3 groups (low, intermediate, and high). [Leibovich et al. Cancer 2003] | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| ISM Risk Group | ISM [Atkins et al CCR 2005] Pathology [Upton et al. J Immunother 2005] CAIX (carbonic anhydrase IX) [Bui et al. CCR 2003] Poor: Poor predictive pathology OR the combination of intermediate predictive pathology and low CAIX staining Good: Good predictive pathology OR the combination of intermediate predictive pathology and high CAIX staining | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OG000 | ISM Good Risk Group | ISM [Atkins et al CCR 2005]: Good predictive pathology OR the combination of intermediate predictive pathology and high CAIX staining Pathology [Upton et al. J Immunother 2005] Good predictive pathology: clear-cell histology AND no papillary features AND >50% alveolar features AND no granular features Intermediate predictive pathology: clear-cell histology AND no papillary features AND some (>0%) alveolar features AND 50% granular features CAIX [Bui et al. CCR 2003] High CAIX staining: >85% of CAIX positive tumor cells |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Objective Response Rate in ISM Poor Risk Group | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on treatment on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | The analysis dataset is comprised of all treated patients with available tumor tissue/data for ISM analysis and classified as ISM poor risk. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | proportion of participants | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Objective Response Rate (Independent Assessment) | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks.. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | The analysis dataset is comprised of all treated patients. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | proportion of participants | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Overall Survival | Overall survival based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the time from treatment start to date of death or censored at the date of last documented contact. | The analysis dataset is comprised of all treated patients. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | Participants were followed for survival up to 7 years. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | 3-Year Progression-Free Survival Rate | 3-year progression-free survival rate is defined as the proportion of patients absent death or progression based on WHO criteria by 3 years since time of treatment start. PD is a >/=25% increase in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters of all measurable lesions. Further, PD is the appearance of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. | The analysis dataset is comprised of all treated patients. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | proportion of participants | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Long-term follow-up occurred every 3 m for 2 yrs, semi-annually for yr 3 and annually for yrs 4 and 5. Relevant for this endpoint was disease status at 3 y. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Objective Response Rate by MSKCC Risk Group | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | The analysis dataset is comprised of all treated patients with available tumor tissue/data. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | proportion of participants | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Objective Response Rate by UCLA SANI Score | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | The analysis dataset is comprised of all treated patients with available tumor tissue/data. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | proportion of participants | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Objective Response Rate by Tumor Type | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | The analysis dataset is comprised of all treated patients with available tumor tissue/data. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | proportion of participants | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Objective Response Rate by Clear Cell Histology Risk Group | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. | The analysis dataset is comprised of all treated patients with available tumor tissue/data. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | proportion of participants | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Response status was confirmed by an independent assessment of radiographs. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Objective Response Rate by CA-9 Score (CAIX Classification) | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | The analysis dataset is comprised of all treated patients with available tumor tissue/data. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | proportion of participants | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Objective Response Rate by PD-L1 Tumor | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | The analysis dataset is comprised of all treated patients with available tumor tissue/data. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | proportion of patients | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Objective Response Rate by B7-H3 Tumor | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | The analysis dataset is comprised of all treated patients with available tumor tissue/data. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | proportion of participants | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Objective Response Rate by CA-9 SNP | The objective response rate (ORR) was defined as the proportion of participants achieving complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) on treatment based on World Health Organization (WHO) criteria. [Miller et al. Cancer 1981] Per WHO, evaluation of tumor measurements of measurable lesions centers on the percent change from baseline in the sum of the perpendicular diameters. Complete Response (CR) is disappearance of all clinical and laboratory evidence of disease; Partial Response (PR) is a >/= 50% decrease. PR status also requires no simultaneous increase in the size of any metastatic lesion, absence of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. CR and PR status needs confirmation within 4 weeks. Response status was determined by independent assessment of radiographs. | The analysis dataset is comprised of all treated patients with available tumor tissue/data. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | proportion of participants | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Participants received up to 3 courses of 12 weeks duration each. Median (range) days on treatment: 20 (1-262). |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Progression-Free Survival | Progression-free survival based on the Kaplan-Meier method is defined as the duration of time from treatment start to date of disease progression (PD) or death. Per WHO criteria: PD is a >/=25% increase in the sum of products of the perpendicular diameters of all measurable lesions. Further, PD is the appearance of one or more new metastatic lesions and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Participants who were event-free were censored at the date of their last disease evaluation. | The analysis dataset is comprised of all treated patients. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | Disease was evaluated radiologically at baseline and during weeks 8 and 12 of each course. Long-term follow-up occurred every 3 m for 2 yrs, semi-annually for yr 3 and annually for yrs 4 and 5. Median survival follow-up was X months (95% CI: ). |
|
|
|
| 3 |
| 120 |
| 15 |
| 120 |
| 2 |
| 120 |
| Cardiac-ischemia | Cardiac disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pericardial effusion (non-malignant) | Cardiac disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cardiac-other | Cardiac disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fever w/o neutropenia | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Constitutional, other | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Liver dysfunction/failure | Hepatobiliary disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lymphopenia | Investigations | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Platelets | Investigations | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bilirubin | Investigations | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Creatinine | Investigations | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypocalcemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypophosphatemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hyponatremia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Confusion | Psychiatric disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Renal failure | Renal and urinary disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Edema, larynx | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rash/desquamation | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypotension | Vascular disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Uveitis | Eye disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D007680 | Kidney Neoplasms |
| D014571 | Urologic Neoplasms |
| D014565 | Urogenital Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
| D005261 | Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D007674 | Kidney Diseases |
| D014570 | Urologic Diseases |
| D052801 | Male Urogenital Diseases |
| D009385 | Neoplastic Processes |
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |