Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Objective: To compare micropulse 810nm diode laser photocoagulation versus argon laser photocoagulation for treatment of diabetic macular edema. Micropulse laser technique will be determined by an initial clinical trial comparing single versus double density laser photocoagulation techniques for treatment of diabetic macular edema.The single density is based on the Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) grid photocoagulation technique and the double density increases the number of spots.
Methods: Patients with diabetic macular edema will be assigned to receive either micropulse 810nm diode laser photocoagulation or argon laser photocoagulation therapy. First, in a smaller clinical trial, patients will be assigned to single or double density micropulse 810nm diode laser to determine best strategy for this therapy. Visual acuity, fundus photographs and fluorescein angiography, and optical coherence tomography measurements , autofluorescence and mfERG were obtained at baseline and at 1, 3 and 6 months and 12 months.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | Micropulse 810nm diode laser |
|
| 2 | Active Comparator | Argon laser photocoagulation |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Laser photocoagulation | Device | Laser therapy is applied using a slit lamp and specific laser contact lens. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Macular thickness measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT) | 12 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Safety profile | 12 months | |
| Selectivity of laser therapy (autofluorescence and mfERG) | 12 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Daniel Lavinsky | Contact | 55-11-7658-8669 | lavinsky@via-rs.net | |
| Jose A Cardillo | Contact | 55-16-8115-1000 | hospitaldeolhos@uol.com.br |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jose A Cardillo | Federal University of Sao Paulo- Department of Ophthalmology | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision Institute, Federal University of Sao Paulo | Recruiting | São Paulo | São Paulo | Brazil |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21345996 | Derived | Lavinsky D, Cardillo JA, Melo LA Jr, Dare A, Farah ME, Belfort R Jr. Randomized clinical trial evaluating mETDRS versus normal or high-density micropulse photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2011 Jun 17;52(7):4314-23. doi: 10.1167/iovs.10-6828. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided