Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Study terminated due to reproducibility issues with genomics prediction model.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Eli Lilly and Company | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study assigned subjects to either cisplatin/vinorelbine or cisplatin/pemetrexed chemotherapy using a genomic based expression profile to determine chemotherapy sensitivity in completely resected early stage non-squamous non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The vinorelbine-sensitive tumors group received Vinorelbine followed by cisplatin, while the pemetrexed-sensitive tumors group received pemetrexed followed by cisplatin. The primary objective of this trial was to determine whether genomic-based adjuvant chemotherapy treatment increased the 2-year progression-free survival rate in completely resected patients with NSCLC compared to historic controls. Secondary objectives included: 1) estimation of the percentage of completely resected NSCLC tumors that can be adequately analyzed and used to direct specific adjuvant chemotherapy; 2) estimation of the proportion of patients who are assigned to treatment with vinorelbine and pemetrexed; 3) evaluation of drug sensitivity patterns of cisplatin and pemetrexed in both treatment arms; 4) description of the overall median survival experience of treated patients; and 5) assessment of patient understanding and perceptions of participating in a clinical trial evaluating cancer genomics for adjuvant treatment of early stage lung cancer.
The proposed study is a multi-center open label phase II study of the chemotherapy doublets cisplatin/vinorelbine and cisplatin/pemetrexed as adjuvant therapy in early stage non-squamous NSCLC.
Eligible patients had no previous treatment for the current diagnosis of NSCLC. The two treatment groups of patients will be determined by gene expression profile analysis of each patient's tumor: one group of vinorelbine-sensitive patients and one group of pemetrexed-sensitive patients. The genomic expression profiling that was utilized generated a percentage for likelihood of chemotherapy sensitivity. Patients were directed to receive the chemotherapy regimen for which the percentage of predicted sensitivity is highest. For instance, if the model predicted the likelihood of tumor sensitivity was 46% to vinorelbine and 48% to pemetrexed, then the adjuvant chemotherapy would be directed to cisplatin/pemetrexed. Patients whose tumors could not be adequately analyzed for gene expression were offered adjuvant therapy off protocol as deemed appropriate by their primary oncologist. Patients with either squamous or non-squamous cell histology were eligible to participate in this study as indicated in study protocols dated prior to January 25, 2010. An amendment to the protocol on January 25, 2010 indicated inclusion of only non-squamous histology. However, because of low accrual after January 25, 2010 (5 patients, including 2 screen failures), this report reflects the original study outcomes that includes both squamous and non-squamous histologies.
Thirty-one patients with stage IB (> 4 cm), II or IIIA non-squamous NSCLC were enrolled, from which 24 were assigned treatment. The vinorelbine-sensitive tumors group received Vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 days 1 and 8, followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 day 1, every 21 days for 4 cycles. The pemetrexed-sensitive tumors group received pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 day 1 followed by cisplatin 75 mg/m2 day 1, every 21 days for 4 cycles. Standard pre-medication regimens included dexamethasone, vitamin B12 and folate supplementation in the pemetrexed group. Patients in both groups will receive up to a maximum of 4 cycles of therapy.
Subsequent reevaluation of the genomic signatures of chemotherapy sensitivity have shown that they were irreproducible, suggesting inaccurate patient assignments into the two treatment arms. As a result, it would be inappropriate to separately analyze outcomes for the different treatment groups. Instead, information from both arms will be combined to reflect the overall measure of two-year progression-free survival in this study. Similarly for secondary objectives, both arms will be combined to address endpoints.
To assess patient understanding and perceptions of participating in a clinical trial evaluating cancer genomics for adjuvant treatment of early stage lung cancer, patients provided responses for the following questions at baseline:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm A-Vinorelbine | Other | Resected tumor was used for genomic expression profiling. Patients with a genomic expression pattern suggestive of vinorelbine sensitivity were given cisplatin + vinorelbine. |
|
| Arm B-Pemetrexed | Other | Resected tumor was used for genomic expression profiling. Patients with a genomic expression pattern suggestive of pemetrexed sensitivity were given cisplatin + pemetrexed. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vinorelbine followed by Cisplatin | Drug | Vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 IV over 6-10 minutes on days 1 and 8, followed by Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 IV over 60 minutes on day 1 (every 21 days x 4 cycles). |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| 2-Year Progression-Free Survival Rate in Patients With Completely Resected Stage IB, II, or IIIA NSCLC | Progression-free survival time was defined as the time from initiation of study treatment to the first date of disease progression or death as a result of any cause. Progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Time was censored at the date of the last follow-up visit for patients who were still alive and have not progressed. The two-year progression free survival rate is a percentage, representing the fraction of treated patients who, after two years, are disease free or alive. | 2 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Patients With Completely Resected NSCLC Tumors That Can Be Analyzed and Used to Direct Adjuvant Chemotherapy | The percentage of patients with completely resected NSCLC tumors who had successful genomic analysis and assigned to treatment among patients. All 31 patients enrolled in the study had completely resected tumors. These tumors included a mixture of squamous and non-squamous histologies as indicated the original protocol. However, an amendment dated January 25, 2010 limited eligibility to patients with non-squamous disease. Given that only 5 patients were accrued into the study after this amendment, results reported will consider all histologies. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients are eligible to be included in the study only if they meet all of the following criteria:
Patients with completely resected stage IB (> 4 cm), II, or IIIA Non-Squamous NSCLC. Patient must be enrolled and begin therapy within 4 to 12 weeks from the date of complete surgical resection.
Fresh tissue must be available for genomics expression profiling.
ECOG performance status of 0 or 1.
NO prior chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or biologic/targeted therapy within the last 5 years. Prior therapy with low dose methotrexate or similar medications is allowed if therapy used to treat non-malignant conditions.
Age ≥ 18 years.
No previous or concomitant malignancy in the past 5 years other than curatively-treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin.
No other serious medical or psychiatric illness.
Signed informed consent.
Required laboratory data within one week of enrollment:
Females of child-bearing potential (not surgically sterilized and between menarche and 1 year post menopause) must test negative for pregnancy within 7 days prior to or at the time of enrollment based on a serum pregnancy test. Both sexually active males and females of reproductive potential must agree to use a reliable method of birth control, as determined by the patient and their health care team, during the study and for 3 months following the last dose of study drug.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients will be excluded from the study if they meet any of the following criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Neal Ready, Ph.D., M.D. | Duke University Medical Center, Hematology/Oncology, Duke Cancer Institute | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Palm Beach Cancer Institute | West Palm Beach | Florida | 33401 | United States | ||
| University of Chicago Medical Center |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16899777 | Background | Potti A, Mukherjee S, Petersen R, Dressman HK, Bild A, Koontz J, Kratzke R, Watson MA, Kelley M, Ginsburg GS, West M, Harpole DH Jr, Nevins JR. A genomic strategy to refine prognosis in early-stage non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2006 Aug 10;355(6):570-80. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa060467. |
|
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Clinical Trials at Duke Cancer Institute | View source |
Not provided
A total of 31 patients were registered, but 7 patients were not assigned treatment due to genomic screening failure or study ineligibility. The remaining 24 patients were assigned to the vinorelbine and pemetrexed treatment arms.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Arm A-Vinorelbine | Resected tumor was used for genomic expression profiling. Patients with a genomic expression pattern suggestive of vinorelbine sensitivity were given cisplatin + vinorelbine. |
| FG001 | Arm B-Pemetrexed |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Pemetrexed followed by Cisplatin | Drug | Pemetrexed 500 mg/m2 IV infusion over approximately 10 minutes on day 1, followed by Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 IV over 60 min on day 1 (every 21 days x 4 cycles) |
|
|
| 4 years |
| 2-Year Overall Survival in Patients Treated for NSCLC | Overall survival time was defined as the time from initiation of study treatment to the date of death as a result of any cause. Time was censored at the date of the last follow-up visit for patients who were still alive. The two-year overall survival rate is a percentage, representing the fraction of treated patients who, after two years, are alive | 2 years |
| Patient Understanding and Perceptions of Participating in a Clinical Trial Evaluating Cancer Genomics for Adjuvant Treatment of Early Stage Lung Cancer | Do to space limitations, see the Detailed Description in the study protocol for the wording of the questions used in the Patient Expectations Questionnaire. | Baseline |
| Compare Drug Sensitivity Patterns of Cisplatin and Pemetrexed in Both Treatment Arms | Using genomics-based prediction models previously developed separately for cisplatin and pemetrexed, the probability that each patient was sensitive or would respond to treatment was computed. Quartiles describe the patterns of drug sensitivity probabilities. The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd quartiles are the sensitivity levels at which 25%, 50%, and 75% of patients have lower sensitivity. There is lack of integrity regarding the available data due to irreproducible genomic signatures. Therefore the results of this outcome are not presented. | 2 years |
| Chicago |
| Illinois |
| 60637 |
| United States |
| Presbyterian HealthCare | Charlotte | North Carolina | 28204 | United States |
| Duke University Medical Center | Durham | North Carolina | 27710 | United States |
| Maria Parham Hospital | Henderson | North Carolina | 27536 | United States |
| Scotland HealthCare System (Scotland Memorial Hospital) | Laurinburg | North Carolina | 28352 | United States |
| Southeastern Regional Medical Center, Gibson Cancer Center | Lumberton | North Carolina | 28358 | United States |
| Duke Raleigh Hospital | Raleigh | North Carolina | 27609 | United States |
| Johnston Memorial Hospital Authority | Smithfield | North Carolina | 27577 | United States |
| Columbus County Hospital | Whiteville | North Carolina | 28472 | United States |
| Beaufort Memorial Hospital | Beaufort | South Carolina | 29902 | United States |
| Coastal Cancer Center | Myrtle Beach | South Carolina | 29572 | United States |
| Community Memorial Health Center | South Hill | Virginia | 23970 | United States |
| 17057710 | Background | Potti A, Dressman HK, Bild A, Riedel RF, Chan G, Sayer R, Cragun J, Cottrill H, Kelley MJ, Petersen R, Harpole D, Marks J, Berchuck A, Ginsburg GS, Febbo P, Lancaster J, Nevins JR. Genomic signatures to guide the use of chemotherapeutics. Nat Med. 2006 Nov;12(11):1294-300. doi: 10.1038/nm1491. Epub 2006 Oct 22. |
|
Resected tumor was used for genomic expression profiling. Patients with a genomic expression pattern suggestive of pemetrexed sensitivity were given cisplatin + pemetrexed.
| FG002 | Screen Failures | Patients who were registered and underwent protocol-based procedure (e.g. biopsy, genomic screening), but were not assigned to or administered genomics-directed, protocol-based therapy. Note that two patients who were assigned protocol-based treatment (1 in each arm) did not receive the treatment and were added to the 7 initially identified as screen failures within the summary of baseline characteristics and outcome measures. |
| Assigned Treatment |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
One patient in each of the vinorelbine and pemetrexed arms did not undergo protocol-based treatment, resulting in 22 total patients who were treated with either vinorelbine or pemetrexed. These two enrolled patients who were not administered treatment were added to the 7 original screen failures.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Arm A-Vinorelbine | Resected tumor was used for genomic expression profiling. Patients with a genomic expression pattern suggestive of vinorelbine sensitivity were given cisplatin + vinorelbine. |
| BG001 | Arm B-Pemetrexed | Resected tumor was used for genomic expression profiling. Patients with a genomic expression pattern suggestive of pemetrexed sensitivity were given cisplatin + pemetrexed. |
| BG002 | Screen Failures | Patients who were registered and underwent protocol-based procedure (e.g. biopsy, genomic screening), but were not assigned to or administered genomics-directed, protocol-based therapy. Note that two patients who were assigned protocol-based treatment (1 in each arm) did not receive the treatment and were added to the 7 initially identified as screen failures within the summary of baseline characteristics and outcome measures. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | 2-Year Progression-Free Survival Rate in Patients With Completely Resected Stage IB, II, or IIIA NSCLC | Progression-free survival time was defined as the time from initiation of study treatment to the first date of disease progression or death as a result of any cause. Progression was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter (LD) of target lesions taking as references the smallest sum LD recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Time was censored at the date of the last follow-up visit for patients who were still alive and have not progressed. The two-year progression free survival rate is a percentage, representing the fraction of treated patients who, after two years, are disease free or alive. | Due to the irreproducible nature of the genomic signatures of chemotherapeutic sensitivity, analyses based on separate treatment groups were inappropriate. Therefore, all enrolled participants (initiated for treatment) from both treatment arms were analyzed together. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of treated patients | 2 years |
|
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With Completely Resected NSCLC Tumors That Can Be Analyzed and Used to Direct Adjuvant Chemotherapy | The percentage of patients with completely resected NSCLC tumors who had successful genomic analysis and assigned to treatment among patients. All 31 patients enrolled in the study had completely resected tumors. These tumors included a mixture of squamous and non-squamous histologies as indicated the original protocol. However, an amendment dated January 25, 2010 limited eligibility to patients with non-squamous disease. Given that only 5 patients were accrued into the study after this amendment, results reported will consider all histologies. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | 4 years |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | 2-Year Overall Survival in Patients Treated for NSCLC | Overall survival time was defined as the time from initiation of study treatment to the date of death as a result of any cause. Time was censored at the date of the last follow-up visit for patients who were still alive. The two-year overall survival rate is a percentage, representing the fraction of treated patients who, after two years, are alive | Due to the irreproducible nature of the genomic signatures of chemotherapeutic sensitivity, analyses based on separate treatment groups were inappropriate. Therefore, all enrolled participants (initiated for treatment) from both treatment arms were analyzed together. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of treated patients | 2 years |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Patient Understanding and Perceptions of Participating in a Clinical Trial Evaluating Cancer Genomics for Adjuvant Treatment of Early Stage Lung Cancer | Do to space limitations, see the Detailed Description in the study protocol for the wording of the questions used in the Patient Expectations Questionnaire. | Twenty-six questionnaires were returned. There was insufficient numbers to provide for substantive analysis. | Posted | Baseline |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Compare Drug Sensitivity Patterns of Cisplatin and Pemetrexed in Both Treatment Arms | Using genomics-based prediction models previously developed separately for cisplatin and pemetrexed, the probability that each patient was sensitive or would respond to treatment was computed. Quartiles describe the patterns of drug sensitivity probabilities. The 1st, 2nd, and 3rd quartiles are the sensitivity levels at which 25%, 50%, and 75% of patients have lower sensitivity. There is lack of integrity regarding the available data due to irreproducible genomic signatures. Therefore the results of this outcome are not presented. | There is lack of integrity regarding the available data due to irreproducible genomic signatures. Therefore the results of this outcome are not presented. | Posted | 2 years |
|
|
Not provided
No adverse events were observed for patients considered screen failures.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Arm A-Vinorelbine | Resected tumor was used for genomic expression profiling. Patients with a genomic expression pattern suggestive of vinorelbine sensitivity were given cisplatin + vinorelbine. | 4 | 8 | 8 | 8 | ||
| EG001 | Arm B-Pemetrexed | Resected tumor was used for genomic expression profiling. Patients with a genomic expression pattern suggestive of pemetrexed sensitivity were given cisplatin + pemetrexed. | 2 | 14 | 14 | 14 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tinnitus | Ear and labyrinth disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| General disorders and administration site conditions - Other, specify: Smell alteration | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infections and infestations - Infection with Grade 3 or 4 neutrophils : Abdomen NOS | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infections and infestations - Infection with Grade 3 or 4 neutrophils: Blood | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infections and infestations - Infection with Grade 3 or 4 neutrophils: Lung (pneumonia) | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sepsis | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ischemia cerebrovascular | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nervous system disorders - Other, specify: Left interal carotid artery stenosis | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrial flutter | Cardiac disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac disorders - Other, specify: Tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ear and labyrinth disorders - Other, specify: vibrations and muffling | Ear and labyrinth disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hearing impaired | Ear and labyrinth disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tinnitus | Ear and labyrinth disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Blurred vision | Eye disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dry eye | Eye disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Eye disorders - Other, specify: Decreased visual acuity | Eye disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Watering eyes | Eye disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal distension | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cheilitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspepsia | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Enterocolitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Esophagitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Flatulence | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrointestinal disorders - Other, specify: feeling of stomach fullness | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hemorrhoidal hemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Mucositis oral | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chills | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Edema face | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Edema limbs | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fever | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| General disorders and administration site conditions - Other, specify: Smell alteration | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injection site reaction | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiac chest pain | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain | General disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Allergic reaction | Immune system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Immune system disorders - Other, specify: hives | Immune system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Conjunctivitis infective | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gum infection | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infections and infestations - Other, specify: infected cyst on neck | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin infection | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory infection | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alkaline phosphatase increased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholesterol high | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Creatinine increased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Investigations - Other, specify: Decreased chloride | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Neutrophil count decreased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Platelet count decreased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight gain | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight loss | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| White blood cell decreased | Investigations | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anorexia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperglycemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperkalemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypermagnesemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertriglyceridemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperuricemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoalbuminemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypocalcemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypokalemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypomagnesemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyponatremia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypophosphatemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest wall pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Generalized muscle weakness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle weakness lower limb | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorder - Other, specify: Leg cramp | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysgeusia | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ischemia cerebrovascular | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Memory impairment | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nervous system disorders - Other, specify: Left interal carotid artery stenosis | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral motor neuropathy | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peripheral sensory neuropathy | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tremor | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary retention | Renal and urinary disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Allergic rhinitis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchospasm | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspnea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Epistaxis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hiccups | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoxia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders - Other, specify: left base crackle/pleural rub | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinus disorder | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Voice alteration | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Alopecia | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperhidrosis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Photosensitivity | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash acneiform | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash maculo-papular | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders - Other, specify: Chapped lips | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin ulceration | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypotension | Vascular disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Phlebitis | Vascular disorders | CTCAE (4.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Neal Ready, PhD, MD | Duke University Medical Center | 919-681-6932 | neal.ready@duke.edu |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002289 | Carcinoma, Non-Small-Cell Lung |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002283 | Carcinoma, Bronchogenic |
| D001984 | Bronchial Neoplasms |
| D008175 | Lung Neoplasms |
| D012142 | Respiratory Tract Neoplasms |
| D013899 | Thoracic Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077235 | Vinorelbine |
| D002945 | Cisplatin |
| D000068437 | Pemetrexed |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014748 | Vinca Alkaloids |
| D046948 | Secologanin Tryptamine Alkaloids |
| D026121 | Indole Alkaloids |
| D000470 | Alkaloids |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D007211 | Indoles |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D054836 | Indolizidines |
| D007212 | Indolizines |
| D017606 | Chlorine Compounds |
| D007287 | Inorganic Chemicals |
| D017672 | Nitrogen Compounds |
| D017671 | Platinum Compounds |
| D006147 | Guanine |
| D007042 | Hypoxanthines |
| D011688 | Purinones |
| D011687 | Purines |
| D005971 | Glutamates |
| D024342 | Amino Acids, Acidic |
| D000596 | Amino Acids |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D000600 | Amino Acids, Dicarboxylic |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
|
|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|