Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Protein Sciences Corporation | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study was to evaluate a single dose of FluBlok in terms of safety, efficacy and effectiveness in prevention of influenza and influenza-like illness and assess clinical lot-to-lot consistency in manufacturing by evaluating and comparing the immunogenicity of three different lots of FluBlok in a subset of participants.
All currently licensed influenza vaccines in the United States were produced in embryonated hen's eggs. There were several well-recognized disadvantages to the use of eggs as the substrate for influenza vaccine. Eggs required specialized manufacturing facilities and could be difficult to scale up rapidly in response to an emerging need such as a pandemic. It was usually necessary to adapt candidate vaccine viruses for high-yield growth in eggs, a process that could be time consuming, was not always successful, and could select receptor variants that might have suboptimal immunogenicity. In addition, agricultural diseases that affected chicken flocks, and that might be an important issue in a pandemic due to an avian influenza virus strain, could easily disrupt the supply of eggs for vaccine manufacturing. Therefore, development of alternative substrates for influenza vaccine production had been identified as a high-priority objective.
One potential alternative method for production of influenza vaccine was expression of the influenza virus hemagglutinin (HA) using recombinant deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) techniques. This alternative avoided dependence on eggs and was very efficient because of the high levels of protein expression under the control of the baculovirus polyhedrin promoter.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| FluBlok (Lots A, B, C) | Experimental | Participants received a single 0.5 milliliters (mL) dose of FluBlok vaccine from any of the Lots A, B, or C, intramuscularly on Day 0 (Visit 1). Participants were followed up to 6 months after vaccination. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to FluBlok, intramuscularly on Day 0 (Visit 1). Participants were followed up to 6 months after vaccination. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FluBlok® | Biological | Dose: 0.5 mL, single dose; Route of administration: intramuscular. Recombinant Trivalent Hemagglutinin Influenza Vaccine containing 45 microgram (mcg) of each hemagglutinin derived from A/Solomon Islands/3/2006 (H1N1), A/Wisconsin/67/2005 (H3N2), and B/Malaysia/2506/2004 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection Site (Local) Reactions | Solicited reaction (reactogenicity event) was an adverse event (AE) that was pre-listed in electronic case report form(eCRF), considered to be related to vaccination and recorded by participant by means of memory aid. Injection sites reaction included pain,bruising,redness,swelling. Pain and bruising:Grade0: didn't have it at all; Grade1: noticed it, but it didn't interfere with usual activities at all; Grade2: had it, and it was bad enough to prevent a significant part of usual activities; Grade3: had it, and it prevented most or all of normal activities, or had to see a doctor for prescription medicine, Redness and swelling: participants measured largest diameter of any injection site reaction and grade them from 0 to 3, where Grade0: measured less than(<)10 milliliters(mm); Grade1: larger than or equal to(>=) 10mm and <20mm; Grade 2: >=20mm and <50mm; Grade3: >=50mm. Participants with multiple symptoms in same category were counted once per category using symptom with maximum grade | Within 7 days post vaccination |
| Number of Participants Reporting Solicited Systemic Reactions | Solicited reaction (reactogenicity event) was an AE that was pre-listed in eCRF, considered to be related to vaccination recorded by the participant by means of a memory aid between the day of vaccination (Day 0) and Day 7 post vaccination. Systemic events included fever, fatigue, shivering, joint pain, muscle pain, headache, and nausea. Fever: >=100.4 degree Fahrenheit (ºF) to <101.1ºF; >=101.2ºF to <102.2ºF; >=102.2ºF; Fatigue, shivering, joint pain, muscle pain, headache and nausea: Grade 0: didn't have it at all; Grade 1: noticed it, but it didn't interfere with usual activities at all; Grade 2: had it, and it was bad enough to prevent a significant part of usual activities; and Grade 3: had it, and it prevented most or all of normal activities, or had to see a doctor for prescription medicine. Participants with multiple symptoms in the same category were counted once per category using the symptom with the maximum grade. | Within 7 days post vaccination |
| Number of Participants Reporting Unsolicited Adverse Events | An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a study vaccine, whether or not considered to be related to the study vaccine. An unsolicited AE was an observed AE that did not fulfill the conditions prelisted (i.e., solicited) in the eCRF in terms of symptom and/or onset post-vaccination, ascertained during follow-up visit or telephone contact up to (and including) the Day 28 contact, whether reported spontaneously by the participant or in response to general questions about current or interim health status. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With Seroprotection to Influenza Vaccine Antigens After Vaccination With FluBlok | Anti-influenza antibodies were measured using an HAI assay for 3 strains: A/Solomon Islands [H1N1], A/Wisconsin [H3N2] and B/Malaysia. Seroprotection was defined as a post-vaccination HAI antibody titer of >=1:40. | 28 days post vaccination |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| John J Treanor, MD | University of Rochester | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Impact Clinical Trials | Beverly Hills | California | 90211 | United States | ||
| Benchmark Research - Sacramento |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21835220 | Background | Treanor JJ, El Sahly H, King J, Graham I, Izikson R, Kohberger R, Patriarca P, Cox M. Protective efficacy of a trivalent recombinant hemagglutinin protein vaccine (FluBlok(R)) against influenza in healthy adults: a randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Vaccine. 2011 Oct 13;29(44):7733-9. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2011.07.128. Epub 2011 Aug 9. | |
| 28325769 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Related Info | View source |
Not provided
Qualified researchers may request access to patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi's data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://vivli.org
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 4648 participants were randomized in the study. Participants were randomized in 1:1 ratio to receive FluBlok or Placebo. The FluBlok assignment was further stratified into three lots, A, B and C to assess lot consistency.
The study was conducted at 24 active centers in the United States from 15-September-2007 to 28-May-2008.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | FluBlok (Lots A, B, C) | Participants received a single 0.5 milliliters (mL) dose of FluBlok vaccine from any of the Lots A, B, or C, intramuscularly on Day 0 (Visit 1). Participants were followed up to 6 months after vaccination. |
| FG001 | Placebo |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| Placebo | Biological | Dose: 0.5 mL normal saline for injection, single dose; Route of administration: intramuscular |
|
| From Day 0 (post-vaccination) through Day 28 post vaccination |
| Lot Consistency: Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) of Influenza Vaccine Antibodies Following FluBlok Vaccination | GMTs of anti-influenza antibodies were measured using a single radial immunodiffusion (SRID) assay for 3 strains: A/Solomon Islands [H1N1], A/Wisconsin [H3N2], and B/Malaysia. Titers were expressed in terms of 1/dilution. | Day 28 post vaccination |
| Percentage of Participants With Positive Cell Culture/Culture-Confirmed Influenza Like Illness as Defined by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC-ILI) | CDC-defined ILI was defined as fever (body temperature >=100ºF oral accompanied by cough and/or sore throat, on the same day or on consecutive days) due to strains represented in the vaccine. | 14 days post vaccination through and up to 6 months |
| Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion to Influenza Vaccine Antigens After Vaccination With FluBlok | Anti-influenza antibodies were measured using an HAI assay for 3 strains: A/Solomon Islands [H1N1], A/Wisconsin [H3N2] and B/Malaysia. Seroconversion was defined as a post-vaccination titer of >=1:40 in participants with undetectable baseline antibody (HI titer = <1:10) or a >=4-fold rise in antibody in participants with a baseline titer of >=1:10, with the achievement of post-vaccination titer of at least 1:40. | 28 days post vaccination |
| Sacramento |
| California |
| 95816 |
| United States |
| Benchmark Research - San Francisco | San Francisco | California | 94102 | United States |
| University Clinical Research, Inc | Pembroke Pines | Florida | 33024 | United States |
| Vince and Associates | Overland Park | Kansas | 66212 | United States |
| Kentucky pediatric /Adult Research | Bardstown | Kentucky | 40004 | United States |
| Benchmarch Research - New Orleans | Metairie | Louisiana | 70006 | United States |
| University of Maryland - Baltimore | Baltimore | Maryland | 21201 | United States |
| Saint Louis University | St Louis | Missouri | 63110 | United States |
| Meridian Clinical Research | Omaha | Nebraska | 68134 | United States |
| Regional Clinical Research, Inc. | Endwell | New York | 13760 | United States |
| Rochester Medical Center | Rochester | New York | 14642 | United States |
| Carolina Medical Trials | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27103 | United States |
| Sterling Research | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45246 | United States |
| Primary Physicians Research - Pediatric Alliance St. Clair | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15241 | United States |
| Primary Physicians Research | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15241 | United States |
| Vanderbilt University Medical Center | Nashville | Tennessee | 37232 | United States |
| Benchmarch Research - Austin | Austin | Texas | 78705 | United States |
| Benchmark Research - Fort Worth | Fort Worth | Texas | 76135 | United States |
| Baylor College of Medicine | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| Benchmark Research - San Angelo | San Angelo | Texas | 76904 | United States |
| Jean Brown Research | Salt Lake City | Utah | 84124 | United States |
| University of Virginia Health System | Charlottesville | Virginia | 22908 | United States |
| Marshfield Clinic | Marshfield | Wisconsin | 54449 | United States |
| Rajendran M, Nachbagauer R, Ermler ME, Bunduc P, Amanat F, Izikson R, Cox M, Palese P, Eichelberger M, Krammer F. Analysis of Anti-Influenza Virus Neuraminidase Antibodies in Children, Adults, and the Elderly by ELISA and Enzyme Inhibition: Evidence for Original Antigenic Sin. mBio. 2017 Mar 21;8(2):e02281-16. doi: 10.1128/mBio.02281-16. |
| 26787832 | Derived | Nachbagauer R, Choi A, Izikson R, Cox MM, Palese P, Krammer F. Age Dependence and Isotype Specificity of Influenza Virus Hemagglutinin Stalk-Reactive Antibodies in Humans. mBio. 2016 Jan 19;7(1):e01996-15. doi: 10.1128/mBio.01996-15. |
Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to FluBlok, intramuscularly on Day 0 (Visit 1). Participants were followed up to 6 months after vaccination. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Analysis performed on safety population that included participants who received study vaccine, according to the treatment (FluBlok or Placebo) actually received.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | FluBlok (Lots A, B, C) | Participants received a single 0.5 mL dose of FluBlok vaccine from any of the Lots A, B, or C, intramuscularly on Day 0 (Visit 1). Participants were followed up to 6 months after vaccination. |
| BG001 | Placebo | Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to FluBlok, intramuscularly on Day 0 (Visit 1). Participants were followed up to 6 months after vaccination. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants Reporting Solicited Injection Site (Local) Reactions | Solicited reaction (reactogenicity event) was an adverse event (AE) that was pre-listed in electronic case report form(eCRF), considered to be related to vaccination and recorded by participant by means of memory aid. Injection sites reaction included pain,bruising,redness,swelling. Pain and bruising:Grade0: didn't have it at all; Grade1: noticed it, but it didn't interfere with usual activities at all; Grade2: had it, and it was bad enough to prevent a significant part of usual activities; Grade3: had it, and it prevented most or all of normal activities, or had to see a doctor for prescription medicine, Redness and swelling: participants measured largest diameter of any injection site reaction and grade them from 0 to 3, where Grade0: measured less than(<)10 milliliters(mm); Grade1: larger than or equal to(>=) 10mm and <20mm; Grade 2: >=20mm and <50mm; Grade3: >=50mm. Participants with multiple symptoms in same category were counted once per category using symptom with maximum grade | Analysis was performed on safety population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Within 7 days post vaccination |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Number of Participants Reporting Solicited Systemic Reactions | Solicited reaction (reactogenicity event) was an AE that was pre-listed in eCRF, considered to be related to vaccination recorded by the participant by means of a memory aid between the day of vaccination (Day 0) and Day 7 post vaccination. Systemic events included fever, fatigue, shivering, joint pain, muscle pain, headache, and nausea. Fever: >=100.4 degree Fahrenheit (ºF) to <101.1ºF; >=101.2ºF to <102.2ºF; >=102.2ºF; Fatigue, shivering, joint pain, muscle pain, headache and nausea: Grade 0: didn't have it at all; Grade 1: noticed it, but it didn't interfere with usual activities at all; Grade 2: had it, and it was bad enough to prevent a significant part of usual activities; and Grade 3: had it, and it prevented most or all of normal activities, or had to see a doctor for prescription medicine. Participants with multiple symptoms in the same category were counted once per category using the symptom with the maximum grade. | Analysis was performed on safety population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Within 7 days post vaccination |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Number of Participants Reporting Unsolicited Adverse Events | An AE was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (e.g., a clinically significant abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a study vaccine, whether or not considered to be related to the study vaccine. An unsolicited AE was an observed AE that did not fulfill the conditions prelisted (i.e., solicited) in the eCRF in terms of symptom and/or onset post-vaccination, ascertained during follow-up visit or telephone contact up to (and including) the Day 28 contact, whether reported spontaneously by the participant or in response to general questions about current or interim health status. | Analysis was performed on safety population. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | From Day 0 (post-vaccination) through Day 28 post vaccination |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Lot Consistency: Geometric Mean Titers (GMTs) of Influenza Vaccine Antibodies Following FluBlok Vaccination | GMTs of anti-influenza antibodies were measured using a single radial immunodiffusion (SRID) assay for 3 strains: A/Solomon Islands [H1N1], A/Wisconsin [H3N2], and B/Malaysia. Titers were expressed in terms of 1/dilution. | Analysis was done on evaluable population that included all participants who had met the study entry criteria and had titers taken at Baseline (Day 0) and after vaccination (Day 28). Data for this outcome measure was planned to be collected and analyzed for each FluBlok lot separately and not planned to be collected for placebo, as pre-specified in protocol. | Posted | Geometric Mean | 95% Confidence Interval | Titer (1/dilution) | Day 28 post vaccination |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Positive Cell Culture/Culture-Confirmed Influenza Like Illness as Defined by Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC-ILI) | CDC-defined ILI was defined as fever (body temperature >=100ºF oral accompanied by cough and/or sore throat, on the same day or on consecutive days) due to strains represented in the vaccine. | Analysis was performed on safety population. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | 14 days post vaccination through and up to 6 months |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Seroprotection to Influenza Vaccine Antigens After Vaccination With FluBlok | Anti-influenza antibodies were measured using an HAI assay for 3 strains: A/Solomon Islands [H1N1], A/Wisconsin [H3N2] and B/Malaysia. Seroprotection was defined as a post-vaccination HAI antibody titer of >=1:40. | Analysis was performed on evaluable population. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for placebo group, as pre-specified in protocol. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | 28 days post vaccination |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With Seroconversion to Influenza Vaccine Antigens After Vaccination With FluBlok | Anti-influenza antibodies were measured using an HAI assay for 3 strains: A/Solomon Islands [H1N1], A/Wisconsin [H3N2] and B/Malaysia. Seroconversion was defined as a post-vaccination titer of >=1:40 in participants with undetectable baseline antibody (HI titer = <1:10) or a >=4-fold rise in antibody in participants with a baseline titer of >=1:10, with the achievement of post-vaccination titer of at least 1:40. | Analysis was performed on evaluable population. Data for this outcome measure was not planned to be collected and analyzed for placebo group, as pre-specified in protocol. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | 28 days post vaccination |
|
|
Unsolicited non-serious AEs: Day 0 to Day 28 post vaccination, Solicited reactions: within 7 days post vaccination, SAE: through the end of influenza season (up to 6 months)
Solicited reaction was AE that was prelisted (i.e., solicited) in the eCRF and considered to be related to vaccination (adverse drug reaction). An unsolicited AE was an observed AE that did not fulfill the conditions prelisted (i.e., solicited) in the eCRF in terms of symptom and/or onset post-vaccination. Analysis was performed on Safety population.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | FluBlok (Lots A, B, C) | Participants received a single 0.5 mL dose of FluBlok vaccine from any of the Lots A, B, or C, intramuscularly on Day 0 (Visit 1). Participants were followed up to 6 months after vaccination. | 1 | 2,344 | 30 | 2,344 | 152 | 2,344 |
| EG001 | Placebo | Participants received a single dose of placebo matched to FluBlok, intramuscularly on Day 0 (Visit 1). Participants were followed up to 6 months after vaccination. | 1 | 2,304 | 34 | 2,304 | 120 | 2,304 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Iron deficiency anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lymphadenopathy | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Angina pectoris | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pericardial effusion | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinus tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Supraventricular tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rathke's cleft cyst | Congenital, familial and genetic disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Retinal haemorrhage | Eye disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Crohn's disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Inflammatory bowel disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Small intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Accidental death | General disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-cardiac chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Biliary colic | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholelithiasis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Appendicitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatitis viral | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infected insect bite | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Infectious mononucleosis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Kidney infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Perianal abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peritonsillar abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pharyngitis streptococcal | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Postoperative infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyelonephritis acute | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Staphylococcal abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tonsillitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acetabulum fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cervical vertebral fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fibula fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hand fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Head injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ligament injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Open fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tibia fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hyperglycaemic hyperosmolar nonketotic syndrome | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aseptic necrosis bone | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intervertebral disc protrusion | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Breast cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Liposarcoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Uterine leiomyoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoaesthesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ectopic pregnancy | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pregnancy induced hypertension | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Adjustment disorder | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bipolar disorder | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Suicidal ideation | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Suicide attempt | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nephrolithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Adnexa uteri mass | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysfunctional uterine bleeding | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dysmenorrhoea | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyspareunia | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Endometrial disorder | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Menometrorrhagia | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Menorrhagia | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ovarian cyst | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Uterine haemorrhage | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Uterine prolapse | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pleural effusion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Prolapsed bladder | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasal congestion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pharyngolaryngeal pain | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 10.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
The Sponsor must have the opportunity to review at least 60 days prior to submission for publication or presentation. If review indicates that potentially patentable subject matter would be disclosed, publication or public disclosure may be delayed for a maximum of an additional 60 days to allow for filing the necessary patent applications.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trial Transparency Team | Sanofi Pasteur | 800-633-1610 | 1# | Contact-US@sanofi.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007251 | Influenza, Human |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012141 | Respiratory Tract Infections |
| D007239 | Infections |
| D009976 | Orthomyxoviridae Infections |
| D012327 | RNA Virus Infections |
| D014777 | Virus Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C528512 | FluBlok |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Black/African-American |
|
| Latino/Hispanic |
|
| Asian |
|
| American Indian/Alaska Native |
|
| Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander |
|
| Other-unspecified |
|
| Injection site pain- Grade 2 |
|
| Injection site pain- Grade 3 |
|
| Injection site bruising- Grade 0 |
|
| Injection site bruising- Grade 1 |
|
| Injection site bruising- Grade 2 |
|
| Injection site bruising- Grade 3 |
|
| Injection site redness- Grade 0 |
|
| Injection site redness- Grade 1 |
|
| Injection site redness- Grade 2 |
|
| Injection site redness- Grade 3 |
|
| Injection site swelling- Grade 0 |
|
| Injection site swelling- Grade 1 |
|
| Injection site swelling- Grade 2 |
|
| Injection site swelling- Grade 3 |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
Participants received a single 0.5 mL dose of FluBlok vaccine from Lot C, intramuscularly on Day 0 (Visit 1). Participants were followed up to 6 months after vaccination.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|