Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A one month study which will determine the safety and efficacy of bimatoprost eye drops in patients with glaucoma or ocular hypertension
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | bimatoprost eye drops |
|
| 2 | Placebo Comparator | placebo |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| bimatoprost eye drops | Drug | 1 drop in each eye daily for 1 month |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Mean Peak Macroscopic Conjunctival Hyperemia at Month 1 | Change from Baseline in macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia (or visible eye redness). Macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia is graded by the investigator who compares the patient's visual appearance of eye redness to standard photographs using a 5-point scale (Scale 0 to +3: none, trace, mild, moderate, severe). The peak change is calculated for each eye by subtracting the largest score across the hourly measurements at baseline from the largest score across the hourly measurements at month 1. A positive number severity grade change from baseline indicated an increase in redness. | Baseline, Month 1 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Patients With an Increase in Macroscopic Conjunctival Hyperemia in Either Eye at Month 1 | Percentage of patients with a >= 1 unit increase in macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia in either eye at the Month 1, 8 AM time point. Macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia is graded by the investigator who compares the patient's visual appearance of eye redness to standard photographs using a 5-point scale (Scale 0 to +3: none, trace, mild, moderate, severe). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Medical Director | Allergan | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atlanta | Georgia | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21188155 | Background | Craven ER, Liu CC, Batoosingh A, Schiffman RM, Whitcup SM. A randomized, controlled comparison of macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia in patients treated with bimatoprost 0.01% or vehicle who were previously controlled on latanoprost. Clin Ophthalmol. 2010 Dec 6;4:1433-40. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S14915. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Bimatoprost Eye Drops | Bimatoprost eye drops |
| FG001 | Placebo | Placebo |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Bimatoprost Eye Drops | Bimatoprost eye drops |
| BG001 | Placebo | Placebo |
| BG002 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | Number |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Mean Peak Macroscopic Conjunctival Hyperemia at Month 1 | Change from Baseline in macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia (or visible eye redness). Macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia is graded by the investigator who compares the patient's visual appearance of eye redness to standard photographs using a 5-point scale (Scale 0 to +3: none, trace, mild, moderate, severe). The peak change is calculated for each eye by subtracting the largest score across the hourly measurements at baseline from the largest score across the hourly measurements at month 1. A positive number severity grade change from baseline indicated an increase in redness. | Modified Intent-to-Treat (m-ITT). The m-ITT population included all patients who were enrolled in the study, received at least 1 dose of study medication and were evaluated for macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia at baseline and the month 1 visits. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Number on a scale (score) | Baseline, Month 1 |
|
Not provided
The safety population consisted of all patients who were randomized, received at least 1 dose of masked study medication and had at least 1 post-baseline visit.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Bimatoprost Eye Drops | Bimatoprost eye drops |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Conjunctival hyperaemia | Eye disorders | MedDRA (11.0) | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Therapeutic Area Head | Allergan, Inc. | 714-246-4500 | clinicaltrials@allergan.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005901 | Glaucoma |
| D009798 | Ocular Hypertension |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005128 | Eye Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| placebo |
| Drug |
1 drop in each eye daily for 1 month |
|
| Month 1 |
| Change From Baseline in Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Month 1 | Change from baseline in mean (average) IOP at Month 1 8 AM timepoint. IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. For each eye, the IOP was either the average of the 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement was required, the median of the 3 measurements. A negative number change from Baseline indicated a reduction in IOP. | Baseline, Month 1 |
| Percentage of Physicians Who Were Very or Extremely Willing to Continue Patient on Drug, if Drug Were Marketed at Month 1 | Percentage of physicians who were very or extremely willing to continue patient on drug if drug were marketed based on their reported response to the question. Physicians were asked "Overall, based on how well this drug lowered THIS patient's IOP, balanced with any adverse events she/he may have experienced, would you consider continuing THIS medication (if the drug was marketed)?". The responses were extremely willing, very willing, somewhat willing and not willing. If not willing, physician was asked for reason. | Month 1 |
| Percentage of Patients Who Were Very or Extremely Willing to Use This Glaucoma Medication at Month 1 | Percentage of patients who were very or extremely willing to continue to use this glaucoma medication based on their reported response to the question. Patients were asked "Overall, based on how well this drug lowered your IOP, your concern about the preservation of your vision, balanced with any side effects you may have experienced using your medication, would you be willing to continue this medication (eye drops) if your physician prescribed it?". The responses were extremely willing, very willing, somewhat willing and not willing. If not willing, patient was asked for reason. | Month 1 |
| Percentage of Patients Who Reported No Change in the Appearance of Their Eyes Since the Beginning of the Study at Month 1 | Percentage of patients who reported no change in the appearance of their eyes since the beginning of the study. Patients were asked "Are you experiencing a change in how your eye looks now since you began your current glaucoma medication?". The responses were yes or no. If yes, patient was asked for primary reason and if better, worse or as expected based on what the doctor's office told them to expect. | Month 1 |
| Total |
Total of all reporting groups |
| participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Bimatoprost Eye Drops |
Bimatoprost eye drops |
| OG001 | Placebo | Placebo |
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With an Increase in Macroscopic Conjunctival Hyperemia in Either Eye at Month 1 | Percentage of patients with a >= 1 unit increase in macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia in either eye at the Month 1, 8 AM time point. Macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia is graded by the investigator who compares the patient's visual appearance of eye redness to standard photographs using a 5-point scale (Scale 0 to +3: none, trace, mild, moderate, severe). | Modified Intent-to-Treat (m-ITT). The m-ITT population included all patients who were enrolled in the study, received at least 1 dose of study medication and were evaluated for macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia at baseline and the month 1 visits. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Patients | Month 1 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Mean Intraocular Pressure (IOP) at Month 1 | Change from baseline in mean (average) IOP at Month 1 8 AM timepoint. IOP is a measurement of the fluid pressure inside the eye. For each eye, the IOP was either the average of the 2 measurements, or, if a third measurement was required, the median of the 3 measurements. A negative number change from Baseline indicated a reduction in IOP. | Modified Intent-to-Treat (m-ITT). The m-ITT population included all patients who were enrolled in the study, received at least 1 dose of study medication and were evaluated for macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia at baseline and the month 1 visits. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | millimeters of mercury (mmHg) | Baseline, Month 1 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Physicians Who Were Very or Extremely Willing to Continue Patient on Drug, if Drug Were Marketed at Month 1 | Percentage of physicians who were very or extremely willing to continue patient on drug if drug were marketed based on their reported response to the question. Physicians were asked "Overall, based on how well this drug lowered THIS patient's IOP, balanced with any adverse events she/he may have experienced, would you consider continuing THIS medication (if the drug was marketed)?". The responses were extremely willing, very willing, somewhat willing and not willing. If not willing, physician was asked for reason. | Modified Intent-to-Treat (m-ITT). The m-ITT population included all patients who were enrolled in the study, received at least 1 dose of study medication and were evaluated for macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia at baseline and the month 1 visits. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Physicians | Month 1 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients Who Were Very or Extremely Willing to Use This Glaucoma Medication at Month 1 | Percentage of patients who were very or extremely willing to continue to use this glaucoma medication based on their reported response to the question. Patients were asked "Overall, based on how well this drug lowered your IOP, your concern about the preservation of your vision, balanced with any side effects you may have experienced using your medication, would you be willing to continue this medication (eye drops) if your physician prescribed it?". The responses were extremely willing, very willing, somewhat willing and not willing. If not willing, patient was asked for reason. | Modified Intent-to-Treat (m-ITT). The m-ITT population included all patients who were enrolled in the study, received at least 1 dose of study medication and were evaluated for macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia at baseline and the month 1 visits. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Patients | Month 1 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients Who Reported No Change in the Appearance of Their Eyes Since the Beginning of the Study at Month 1 | Percentage of patients who reported no change in the appearance of their eyes since the beginning of the study. Patients were asked "Are you experiencing a change in how your eye looks now since you began your current glaucoma medication?". The responses were yes or no. If yes, patient was asked for primary reason and if better, worse or as expected based on what the doctor's office told them to expect. | Modified Intent-to-Treat (m-ITT). The m-ITT population included all patients who were enrolled in the study, received at least 1 dose of study medication and were evaluated for macroscopic conjunctival hyperemia at baseline and the month 1 visits. | Posted | Number | Percentage of Patients | Month 1 |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 150 |
| 10 |
| 150 |
| EG001 | Placebo | Placebo | 0 | 71 | 2 | 71 |
A disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 90 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication and cannot extend the embargo