Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Anal sphincter preserving operations are now commonplace for both cancer and non-cancerous rectal diseases. However, this has not always been the case and this development has been facilitated by the invention of circular stapling instruments, which allow the bowel to be reconnected to the anal sphincters, where it would almost be impossible to do so manually. Nevertheless, some patients still require a permanent ostomy, as even with stapling devices ultra low joins of the bowel and sphincter muscles cannot always be performed by a conventional surgery. Therefore, a variety of alternative techniques have been proposed to avoid a permanent ostomy, but these have not become widespread due to the technical difficulty in performing them, their failure to completely eradicate rectal disease, and the damage they inflict upon the anal sphincters resulting in poor bowel function after surgery.
The ideal ultra low sphincter preserving operation should remove the rectal disease entirely, allow the small or large bowel to be safely joined to the anal sphincters under direct vision, and retain the sphincter mechanism in its entirety. We propose such a technique that we term the APPEAR procedure, which approaches the lower third of the rectum via an incision between the scrotum or vagina, and the anal sphincters. This procedure preserves sphincter integrity, and allows either a stapled or manual join of the bowel to the sphincter mechanism, under direct vision. This trial is being conducted as a pilot study, with the procedure only offered to patients for whom a conventional sphincter saving procedure was technically impossible, or contraindicated.
This study is recruiting patients with distal third rectal pathology, for whom a conventional sphincter saving procedure is contraindicated, or likely to be technically impossible.
Recruited patients will initially undergo trial dissection by conventional sphincter preserving surgical techniques, which if successful will result in patients entering study arm 1.
However, should this not be possible, a trial anterior perineal dissection will be attempted, with patients entered into study arm 2 if perineal dissection is adequate to allow full rectal excision, and preserve sphincter integrity.
If during a trial of anterior perineal dissection it is decided that sphincter preservation is not safe, or will not allow eradication of rectal disease, conventional proctectomy will be performed, with patients entering study arm 3.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 | Active Comparator | Patients for whom a standard abdominal approach is adequate to excise the distal third of the rectum (without jeopardising oncological clearance if appropriate). |
|
| Arm 2 | Experimental | Combined abdominal and trans-perineal approach to excise the distal third of the rectum, while preserving the anal canal |
|
| Arm 3 | Active Comparator | Standard proctectomy to excise the distal third of the rectum and the anal canal |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Standard abdominal approach for rectal excision | Procedure | Standard abdominal approach for rectal excision |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Yield (within each arm of study) | 5 years | |
| Functional assessment (faecal continence) | 5 years | |
| Surgical Safety Assessment | 1 year | |
| Oncological safety assessment - where appropriate | 5 years |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Prof Norman S Williams, MS FRCS | Centre for Academic Surgery, Queen Mary University of London | Study Chair |
| Charles H Knowles, PhD FRCS | Centre for Academic Surgery, Queen Mary University of London | Study Director |
| Khalid El-Gendy, MBBS MRCS | Centre for Academic Surgery, Queen Mary University of London | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Centre For Academic Surgery, The Royal London Hospital | London | England | E1 1BB | United Kingdom |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18438111 | Derived | Williams NS, Murphy J, Knowles CH. Anterior Perineal PlanE for Ultra-low Anterior Resection of the Rectum (the APPEAR technique): a prospective clinical trial of a new procedure. Ann Surg. 2008 May;247(5):750-8. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31816b2ee3. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012004 | Rectal Neoplasms |
| D017091 | Colitis, Ischemic |
| D003093 | Colitis, Ulcerative |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015179 | Colorectal Neoplasms |
| D007414 | Intestinal Neoplasms |
| D005770 | Gastrointestinal Neoplasms |
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000078542 | Proctectomy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000099090 | Surgical Procedures, Colorectal |
| D013505 | Digestive System Surgical Procedures |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| APPEAR Procedure | Procedure | Perineal incision to reach the distal rectum |
|
|
| Proctectomy | Procedure | standard rectal excision which does not preserve the anal canal |
|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| D012002 | Rectal Diseases |
| D003092 | Colitis |
| D005759 | Gastroenteritis |
| D003108 | Colonic Diseases |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D015212 | Inflammatory Bowel Diseases |