Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
For more than 100 years, surgery has been the standard of care of varicose veins of the legs. The down side of surgery is that it requires anesthesia, leaves scars, and has a relatively high recurrence rate in the long term (up to 40%). In the last decade, several new techniques have become available but they have not yet been compared to surgery. This trail will evaluate the effectiveness, patients' perspective and cost effectiveness of surgery and non-invasive techniques such as ultrasound guided sclerotherapy with foam and endovenous laser therapy.
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Primary outcomes:
1. anatomical success using US (absence of GSV or flow) (at 3 months, 1 and 5 year)
Secondary outcomes:
Included patients: total of 240 (80 per arm)
Study start: May 2007 (recruitment ongoing) Study completion: May 2011
Follow up after 3 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years
Location: department of dermatology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
Principle investigators: M. Kockaert, T. Nijsten & M. Neumann
Publications:
Rasmussen LH, Bjoern L, Lawaetz M, Blemings A, Lawaetz B, Eklof B. Randomized trial comparing endovenous laser ablation of the great saphenous vein with high ligation and stripping in patients with varicose veins: short-term results. J Vasc Surg. 2007 Aug;46(2):308-15. Epub 2007 Jun 27.
Sharif MA, Lau LL, Lee B, Hannon RJ, Soong CV. Role of endovenous laser treatment in the management of chronic venous insufficiency. Ann Vasc Surg. 2007 Sep;21(5):551-5.
Mundy L, Merlin TL, Fitridge RA, Hiller JE. Systematic review of endovenous laser treatment for varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2005 Oct;92(10):1189-94.
Jia X, Mowatt G, Burr JM, Cassar K, Cook J, Fraser C.Systematic review of foam sclerotherapy for varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2007 Aug;94(8):925-36.
Subramonia S, Lees TA.The treatment of varicose veins.Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2007 Mar;89(2):96-100.
Bohler K. Varicose veins: disfigurement or disease? Herz. 2007 Feb;32(1):18-25.
Bamigboye AA, Smyth R. Interventions for varicose veins and leg oedema in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007 Jan 24;(1):CD001066.
van den Bos R, Arends L, Kockaert M, Neumann M, Nijsten T. New endovenous therapies of truncal varicosities are more effective than surgical stripping and sclerotherapy: meta-analysis and meta-regression. Lancet, Submitted
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Active Comparator | Surgery: crossectomy plus short stripping |
|
| 2 | Active Comparator | ultrasound guided sclerotherapy with foam (3% polidocanol) |
|
| 3 | Active Comparator | Endovenous laser therapy (940 nm, about 70 J/cm) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| crossectomy and short stripping | Procedure | under spinal or complete anaesthesia |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| anatomical success rate (absence or obliteration of GSV on US examination) | 3 months, 1 and 5 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| treatment related adverse events and complications | 3 months, 1 and 5 years | |
| patient reported outcomes (HRQOL and treatment satisfaction) | 3 months, 1 and 5 years | |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Role | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael Kockaert, MD | Contact | 31 10 4634580 | M.KOCKAERT@ERASMUSMC.NL | |
| Tamar Nijsten, MD, PhD | Contact | 31 10 4631019 | t.nijsten@erasmusmc.nl |
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Martino Neumann, MD, PhD | Erasmus Medical Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Erasmus MC dermatology | Recruiting | Rotterdam | 3000 CA | Netherlands |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 26132315 | Derived | van der Velden SK, Biemans AA, De Maeseneer MG, Kockaert MA, Cuypers PW, Hollestein LM, Neumann HA, Nijsten T, van den Bos RR. Five-year results of a randomized clinical trial of conventional surgery, endovenous laser ablation and ultrasound-guided foam sclerotherapy in patients with great saphenous varicose veins. Br J Surg. 2015 Sep;102(10):1184-94. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9867. Epub 2015 Jul 1. | |
| 23769603 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014648 | Varicose Veins |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ultrasound guided sclerotherapy with foam |
| Procedure |
1 part 3% polidocanol mixed with 3 parts of air. Between 3cc - 12 cc per varicose vein> |
|
| endovenous laser therapy | Procedure | 940 nm Diode laser. About 70 J/cm will be administered. Disposables from Angiocare (registered) will be used. |
|
| cost effectiveness analysis |
| 3 months, 1 and 5 years |
| Derived |
| Biemans AA, Kockaert M, Akkersdijk GP, van den Bos RR, de Maeseneer MG, Cuypers P, Stijnen T, Neumann MH, Nijsten T. Comparing endovenous laser ablation, foam sclerotherapy, and conventional surgery for great saphenous varicose veins. J Vasc Surg. 2013 Sep;58(3):727-34.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2012.12.074. Epub 2013 Jun 13. |