Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of the Secura clinical study is to evaluate the overall system safety and clinical performance of the Secura DR Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD)
The Secura ICD is an investigational dual chamber ICD that provides atrial and ventricular tachyarrhythmia detection and therapy, cardioversion, defibrillation, dual chamber rate-responsive bradycardia pacing and diagnostics.
The study will be a prospective, non-randomized, multicenter clinical study, conducted in approximately 15 centers.
To allow for sufficient experience with the device, a maximum of 80 subjects may be implanted with the Secura device. Data will be collected at baseline (enrollment), implant, 1-, 3-, and 6- months post implant and every 6 months thereafter or until study closure (whichever occurs first), Unscheduled Follow-up visits, System Modifications, Technical Observations, Study Deviations, Study Exit, upon notification of new or updated Adverse Events and in case of death.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Secura ICD implant | Experimental | Secura ICD device implanted |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Secura ICD | Device | Secura Implantable Cardioverter Defibrillator (ICD) will be implanted |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Freedom From Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effects at 1-month Post Implant. | Criteria to assess the results of the primary objective safety analysis is to demonstrate that the percentage of subjects experiencing an Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effect (USADE) is lower than 10% at one-month post-implant, with one month considered to be the same as 28 days. A pre-specified interim analysis is included in the study which, if the primary objective was met, is to also be considered the final analysis. | 1 month |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| System Performance Assessed by Holter Records | The first 21 digital Holter records that were successfully collected in the total of 80 implanted participants will summarize any anomalous or unintended operation and describe device features, ventricular arrhythmia detection times and device classification of ventricular arrhythmias. | 1 month |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Secura Clinical Study Team | Medtronic Cardiac Rhythm and Heart Failure | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wels | Austria | |||||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20231152 | Derived | Murgatroyd FD, Helmling E, Lemke B, Eber B, Mewis C, van der Meer-Hensgens J, Chang Y, Khalameizer V, Katz A. Manual vs. automatic capture management in implantable cardioverter defibrillators and cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillators. Europace. 2010 Jun;12(6):811-6. doi: 10.1093/europace/euq053. Epub 2010 Mar 14. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Secura ICD Implant | Participants were implanted with a Secura Implantable Cardiac Defibrillator (ICD) |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
80 participants were implanted with a Secura ICD, but the primary objective analysis was done on 44 participants.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Secura Implant | Patients implanted with Secura device |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Freedom From Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effects at 1-month Post Implant. | Criteria to assess the results of the primary objective safety analysis is to demonstrate that the percentage of subjects experiencing an Unanticipated Serious Adverse Device Effect (USADE) is lower than 10% at one-month post-implant, with one month considered to be the same as 28 days. A pre-specified interim analysis is included in the study which, if the primary objective was met, is to also be considered the final analysis. | Forty-four (44) out of the 80 subjects completed at least one-month (28 days) of follow-up post-implant and were included in the (interim) analysis for the primary objective. One subject of the 80 implanted subjects died prior to the 1-month follow-up. | Posted | Number | 97.5% Confidence Interval | percentage of patients | 1 month |
|
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRDM Core Clinical Organization | Medtronic CRDM | 800-328-2518 | jamie.l.reynolds@medtronic.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013610 | Tachycardia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001145 | Arrhythmias, Cardiac |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D000075224 | Cardiac Conduction System Disease |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Adverse Events |
Number of Adverse Events reported in the implanted subjects. |
| 1 Month |
| System Performance Assessed by Save to Disk Files | The Save to Disk files from 79 implanted participants collected after implant and 1 month follow up were reviewed to identify any anomolous or unintended device operation, examine device features, observe ventricular arrhythmia detection times and device classification of ventricular arrhythmias. | 1 month follow-up |
| System Performance Assessed by Technical Observations | Reported technical observations will be reviewed to determine if there are any device performance issues. | 1 month follow-up |
| Tampere |
| Finland |
| Goettigen | Germany |
| Hanover | Germany |
| Homburg/Saar | Germany |
| Kaiserslautern | Germany |
| Lüdenscheid | Germany |
| Münster | Germany |
| Athens | Greece |
| Breda | Netherlands |
| Enschede | Netherlands |
| Riyadh | Saudi Arabia |
| Lund | Sweden |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | System Performance Assessed by Holter Records | The first 21 digital Holter records that were successfully collected in the total of 80 implanted participants will summarize any anomalous or unintended operation and describe device features, ventricular arrhythmia detection times and device classification of ventricular arrhythmias. | All implanted participants underwent Holter recording. The first 21 Holter recordings that were successful were analyzed. | Posted | Number | anomalous or unintended operation | 1 month | Holter recordings | Holter recordings |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Adverse Events | Number of Adverse Events reported in the implanted subjects. | Posted | Number | adverse events | 1 Month |
|
|
|
| Secondary | System Performance Assessed by Save to Disk Files | The Save to Disk files from 79 implanted participants collected after implant and 1 month follow up were reviewed to identify any anomolous or unintended device operation, examine device features, observe ventricular arrhythmia detection times and device classification of ventricular arrhythmias. | Save to Disk files were collected for all participants implanted with a Secura ICD after implant and 1 month follow up. | Posted | Number | anomolous or unintended device operation | 1 month follow-up |
|
|
|
| Secondary | System Performance Assessed by Technical Observations | Reported technical observations will be reviewed to determine if there are any device performance issues. | One (1) technical observation was reported in the 79 participants that were implanted with a Secura ICD. | Posted | Number | device performance issues | 1 month follow-up | Reported Technical Observations | Reported Technical Observations |
|
|
|
In most cases, contracts allow investigators to publish study results per the publication plan/protocol following Medtronic's review to determine whether Confidential Information (CI) is disclosed. Any such CI is deleted prior to publication/presentation. Medtronic may not censor/interfere with the publication except as described. Investigators may not publish any single-site publications until the main multi-site study publication has occurred.
| D010335 | Pathologic Processes |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |