Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
enrollment halted in order to have all patients complete follow-up by Jan 2011
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Novartis Pharmaceuticals | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Myfortic (enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium) has been shown to have similar effectiveness to CellCept (mycophenolate mofetil) in preventing rejection in kidney transplant recipients. However, enteric coated mycophenolate sodium has been thought to possibly be associated with fewer gastrointestinal side effects. Mycophenolate mofetil and enteric coated mycophenolate sodium pharmacokinetics (how the drug is absorbed and broken down) have not been well-studied in African American kidney transplant recipients. The investigators are interested in studying enteric coated mycophenolate sodium and mycophenolate mofetil pharmacokinetics and gastrointestinal side effects in African American kidney transplant recipients.
African American patients often experience more gastrointestinal (GI) complications after kidney transplant than Caucasian patients. In addition, African American kidney transplant recipients also experience a higher incidence of acute rejection and have worse outcomes compared with all other ethnic groups. Reasons accounting for these differences are not well understood.
In light of the increased risk of GI complications in African American patients, we will compare in a pilot study, different regimens (described below) that we commonly use in our clinical practice in this population. As part of this study, patients will also fill out a GSRS survey at specified time points to help describe gastrointestinal side effects after transplant.
Pharmacokinetic studies (studies looking at how the drugs are absorbed and broken down) for mycophenolate mofetil or enteric coated mycophenolate sodium have largely been performed in Caucasian populations. There is little information available in African-American patients. This is particularly concerning in the face of the worst clinical outcomes observed after transplantation in African American kidney transplant recipients.
Comparisons: Patients will be randomized to one of two groups
Since toxicity of mycophenolate mofetil and enteric coated mycophenolate sodium may be influenced by pharmacokinetics (studies that look at how the drugs are absorbed and broken down) of these respective drugs, we will compare the pharmacokinetics of enteric coated mycophenolate sodium and mycophenolate mofetil in a subset of patients. This pharmacokinetic data may have the additional valuable benefit of helping to optimize dosing parameters for mycophenolate mofetil and enteric coated mycophenolate sodium in African American kidney transplant patients in the future.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enteric coated mycophenolate sodium | Active Comparator | Patients in this group will receive Myfortic (enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium) at a target dose of 720 mg orally twice daily for 6 months after transplant. |
|
| Mycophenolate mofetil | Active Comparator | Patients in this group will receive CellCept (mycophenolate mofetil) or its generic equivalent manufactured by Sandoz, at a target dose of 1000 mg orally twice daily for 6 months after transplant. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Enteric coated mycophenolate sodium | Drug | Patients in this group will receive Myfortic (enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium) in combination with Thymoglobulin (rabbit Anti-thymocyte globulin) induction immunosuppression, Prograf (tacrolimus) or its generic equivalent, and corticosteroid immunosuppression. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Gastrointestinal Toxicity Due to Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil or Its Generic Equivalent Formulation Manufactured by Sandoz | At 24 weeks, we assessed the number of patients at this timepoint who required permanent dose decrease or discontinuation of either enteric coated mycophenolate sodium or mycophenolate mofetil or its generic equivalent formulation manufactured by Sandoz related to gastrointestinal toxicity. | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The Incidence of the Requirement of Full Dose Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients on Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil or Its Generic Equivalent Manufactured by Sandoz | If patients were not on any medications from a medication class known as H-2 antagonists, they were started on ranitidine 150 mg orally twice daily after transplant (with dose adjusted for renal function). Patients were excluded if they were on proton pump inhibitor at time of study screening, however some patients required addition of proton pump inhibitor post-study enrollment. If a patient had upper gastrointestinal side effects such as acid reflux unreleived on ranitidine therapy or nausea, they were switched to a proton pump inhibitor. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Roy Bloom, MD | University of Pennsylvania-Renal Electrolyte and Hypertension Division | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104-4322 | United States |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients were not randomized until they were transplanted.
Recruitment occured at the Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania March 2007-June 2010. Living donor kidney recipients were approached in clinic at pre-transplant visit (within 30 days or less of transplant. Recipients of deceased donor kidney transplants were approached inpatient at transplant or 2 days thereafter.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Myfortic Comparator Group | Patients in this group will receive Myfortic (enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium) 180 mg tablets administered as 720mg (4 tablets) orally twice daily (adjusted for side effects as needed) in addition to immunosuppressants: Thymoglobulin (Rabbit antithymocyte globulin), Prograf (tacrolimus) or its generic equivalanet and corticosteroids. |
| FG001 | CellCept Comparator Group | Patients in this group will receive CellCept (mycophenolate mofetil) 250mg capsules administered as 1000mg (4 capsules) orally twice daily (adjusted for side effects as needed) in addition to immunosuppressants: Thymoglobulin (rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin) Prograf (tacrolimus) or its generic equivalent and corticosteroids. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Myfortic Comparator Group | Patients in this group will receive Thymoglobulin (rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin) induction immunosuppression in combination with Myfortic (enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium), Prograf (tacrolimus) or its generic equivalent and corticosteroid immunosuppression |
| BG001 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Gastrointestinal Toxicity Due to Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil or Its Generic Equivalent Formulation Manufactured by Sandoz | At 24 weeks, we assessed the number of patients at this timepoint who required permanent dose decrease or discontinuation of either enteric coated mycophenolate sodium or mycophenolate mofetil or its generic equivalent formulation manufactured by Sandoz related to gastrointestinal toxicity. | Based on the number of patients who were participating in the trial at that timepoint and had not withdrawn at 24 weeks | Posted | Number | participants | 6 months |
|
6 months
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Myfortic Comparator Group | Patients in this group will receive Thymoglobulin (rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin) induction immunosuppression in combination with Myfortic (enteric-coated mycophenolate sodium), Prograf (tacrolimus) or its generic equivalent and corticosteroid immunosuppression |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| graft dysfunction due to rejection | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Muscle cramps | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Limitations of our study include small sample size and patient drop out-though not significantly different between the MMF and EC-MPS groups and limited follow-up
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Roy Bloom, MD | University of Pennsylvania | 215-662-4643 | roy.bloom@uphs.upenn.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009173 | Mycophenolic Acid |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002208 | Caproates |
| D000144 | Acids, Acyclic |
| D002264 | Carboxylic Acids |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
Not provided
Not provided
This study consisted of 2 parallel active comparator arms.
Not provided
Not provided
Masking description is not applicable since no masking was used in this study.
Not provided
|
|
| Mycophenolate mofetil | Drug | Patients in this group will receive CellCept (mycophenolate mofetil) or its generic equivalent formulation manufactured by Sandoz, in combination with Thymoglobulin (rabbit Anti-thymocyte globulin) induction immunosuppression, Prograf (tacrolimus) or its generic equivalent, and corticosteroid immunosuppression. |
|
|
| 6 months |
| The Incidence of Intolerance (Defined as Transient Dose Reduction or Transient Discontinuation of Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil or Its Generic Equivalent Manufactured by Sandoz | The incidence of intolerance was defined as transient dose reduction or transient discontinuation of enteric coated mycophenolate sodium or mycophenolate mofetil or its generic equivalent manufactured by Sandoz meaning doses could subsequently be resumed or increased back to original starting dose, once intolerance resolved. | 6 months |
| Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Score Changes From Baseline to 24 Weeks After Transplant in Patients on Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil or Its Generic Equivalent Manufactured by Sandoz | The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) is a 15-item self-administered questionnaire to assess symptoms associated with common gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, and has been validated in renal transplant recipients. It uses a seven-graded Likert scale, where 1 represents the most positive option and 7 the most negative one and the patient grades symptoms based on the past 7 days. A score of ≥ 2 indicates the presence of GI symptoms. Higher values indicate more unfavorable conditions. The questionairre is divided into 5 sub-scales: diarrhea, indigestion, constipation, abdominal pain, and reflux and a mean score is calculated for each dimension. The lowest mean score possible for each dimension is 1 and the highest is 7. Patients completed a GSRS survey at baseline (pre-transplant to two days after transplant), and at weeks 1,4,12 and 24 after transplant. | baseline (pre-transplant to two days after transplant) and at 6 months after transplant. |
| The Incidence of the Occurrence of Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms Per GSRS Scale Ratings in Patients on Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil or Its Generic Equivalent Formulation Manufactured by Sandoz | The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) is a 15-item self-administered questionnaire to assess symptoms associated with common gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, and has been validated in renal transplant recipients. It uses a seven-graded Likert scale, where 1 represents the most positive option and 7 the most negative one and the patient grades symptoms based on the past 7 days. A score of ≥ 2 indicates the presence of GI symptoms. Higher values indicate more unfavorable conditions. The questionairre is divided into 5 sub-scales: diarrhea, constipation, abdominal pain, indigestion and reflux and a mean score is calculated for each dimension. The lowest mean score possible for each dimension is 1 and the highest is 7. Patients completed a GSRS survey at baseline (pre-transplant to two days after transplant), and at weeks 1,4,12 and 24 post-transplant. | 6 months |
| The Incidence of the Occurrence of Lower Gastrointestinal Symptoms Per GSRS Scale Ratings in Patients on Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil or Its Generic Equivalent Manufactured by Sandoz | The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) is a 15-item self-administered questionnaire to assess symptoms associated with common gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, and has been validated in renal transplant recipients. It uses a seven-graded Likert scale, where 1 represents the most positive option and 7 the most negative one and the patient grades symptoms based on the past 7 days. A score of ≥ 2 indicates the presence of GI symptoms. Higher values indicate more unfavorable conditions. The questionairre is divided into 5 sub-scales: diarrhea, constipation, abdominal pain, indigestion and reflux and a mean score is calculated for each dimension. The lowest mean score possible for each dimension is 1 and the highest is 7. Patients completed a GSRS survey at baseline (pre-transplant to two days after transplant), and at weeks 1,4,12 and 24 post-transplant. Patients who withdrew from the study only had data included up to the point of withdraw. No values were carried forward. | 6 months |
| The Incidence of Rejection in Patients on Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil or Its Generic Equivalent Manufactured by Sandoz. | All rejection episodes of the kidney transplant were proven by kidney transplant biopsy and were measured at 24 weeks for all patients still participating in the study at that timepoint. | 6 months |
| Serum Creatinine in Patients on Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil or Its Generic Equivalent Manufactured by Sandoz | Serum creatinine lab values were used as part of a measure of renal function at 24 weeks for any patient that was still participating in the study at this time-point. | 6 months |
| Modification of Diet and Renal Disease (MDRD) Measured Glomerular Filtration Rates in Patients on Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil or Its Generic Equivalent Manufactured by Sandoz | Modification of Diet and Renal Disease (MDRD) Measured Glomerular Filtration Rates were used as part of a measure of renal function and measured at 24 weeks in patients who were still participating in the study at that point. | 6 months |
| Pharmacokinetics (Mycophenolic Acid Trough Levels) of Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil or Its Generic Equivalent Manufactured by Sandoz in a Sub-set of Patients | Pharmacokinetics is the study of how a drug is absorbed and broken down in the body. Pharmacokinetics of enteric coated mycophenolate sodium and mycophenolate mofetil are measured by a level called mycophenolic acid level. Mycophenolic acid levels in this pharmacokinetic study were drawn starting in the morning at time zero (immediately prior to morning dose, also known as trough), then at 0.5, 1,1.5, 2, 2.5, 3,3.5,4,6, 8 and 12 hours post dose. Data was also dose-normalized (concentration was divided by dose). | 1 and 6 months |
| Pharmacokinetics (Mycophenolic Acid Maximum Concentration) of Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil or Its Generic Equivalent Manufactured by Sandoz in a Sub-set of Patients | Pharmacokinetics is the study of how a drug is absorbed and broken down in the body. Pharmacokinetics of Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil are measured by a level called mycophenolic acid level. Mycophenolic acid levels in this pharmacokinetic study were drawn starting in the morning at time zero (immediately prior to morning dose, also known as trough), then at 0.5, 1,1.5, 2, 2.5, 3,3.5,4,6, 8 and 12 hours post dose. Data was also dose-normalized (concentration was divided by dose).A mycophenolic acid drawn at the peak level is called C Max or maximum concentration. | 1 and 6 months |
| Pharmacokinetics (Mycophenolic Acid Area Under the Curve) of Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil or Its Generic Equivalent Manufactured by Sandoz in a Sub-set of Patients | Pharmacokinetics is the study of how a drug is absorbed and broken down in the body. Pharmacokinetics of Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil are measured by a level called mycophenolic acid level. Mycophenolic acid levels in this pharmacokinetic study were drawn starting in the morning at time zero (immediately prior to morning dose, also known as trough), then at 0.5, 1,1.5, 2, 2.5, 3,3.5,4,6, 8 and 12 hours post dose. Data was also dose-normalized (concentration was divided by dose). A mycophenolic acid area under the curve value, also known as AUC represents drug exposure. | 1 and 6 months |
| CellCept Comparator Group |
Patients in this group will receive Thymoglobulin (rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin) induction immunosuppression in combination with CellCept (mycophenolate mofetil) or its generic equivalent, Prograf (tacrolimus) or its generic equivalent and corticosteroid immunosuppression. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| OG001 | CellCept Comparator Group | Patients in this group will receive Thymoglobulin (rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin) induction immunosuppression in combination with CellCept (mycophenolate mofetil) or its generic equivalent, Prograf (tacrolimus) or its generic equivalent and corticosteroid immunosuppression. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | The Incidence of the Requirement of Full Dose Proton Pump Inhibitors in Patients on Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil or Its Generic Equivalent Manufactured by Sandoz | If patients were not on any medications from a medication class known as H-2 antagonists, they were started on ranitidine 150 mg orally twice daily after transplant (with dose adjusted for renal function). Patients were excluded if they were on proton pump inhibitor at time of study screening, however some patients required addition of proton pump inhibitor post-study enrollment. If a patient had upper gastrointestinal side effects such as acid reflux unreleived on ranitidine therapy or nausea, they were switched to a proton pump inhibitor. | Based on number of patients participating in study at 6 months | Posted | Number | participants | 6 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | The Incidence of Intolerance (Defined as Transient Dose Reduction or Transient Discontinuation of Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil or Its Generic Equivalent Manufactured by Sandoz | The incidence of intolerance was defined as transient dose reduction or transient discontinuation of enteric coated mycophenolate sodium or mycophenolate mofetil or its generic equivalent manufactured by Sandoz meaning doses could subsequently be resumed or increased back to original starting dose, once intolerance resolved. | Based on number of patients participating in the study at 6 months | Posted | Number | participants | 6 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) Score Changes From Baseline to 24 Weeks After Transplant in Patients on Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil or Its Generic Equivalent Manufactured by Sandoz | The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) is a 15-item self-administered questionnaire to assess symptoms associated with common gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, and has been validated in renal transplant recipients. It uses a seven-graded Likert scale, where 1 represents the most positive option and 7 the most negative one and the patient grades symptoms based on the past 7 days. A score of ≥ 2 indicates the presence of GI symptoms. Higher values indicate more unfavorable conditions. The questionairre is divided into 5 sub-scales: diarrhea, indigestion, constipation, abdominal pain, and reflux and a mean score is calculated for each dimension. The lowest mean score possible for each dimension is 1 and the highest is 7. Patients completed a GSRS survey at baseline (pre-transplant to two days after transplant), and at weeks 1,4,12 and 24 after transplant. | Patients who withdrew from the study before 24 weeks were excluded from this analysis. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | baseline (pre-transplant to two days after transplant) and at 6 months after transplant. |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | The Incidence of the Occurrence of Upper Gastrointestinal Symptoms Per GSRS Scale Ratings in Patients on Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil or Its Generic Equivalent Formulation Manufactured by Sandoz | The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) is a 15-item self-administered questionnaire to assess symptoms associated with common gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, and has been validated in renal transplant recipients. It uses a seven-graded Likert scale, where 1 represents the most positive option and 7 the most negative one and the patient grades symptoms based on the past 7 days. A score of ≥ 2 indicates the presence of GI symptoms. Higher values indicate more unfavorable conditions. The questionairre is divided into 5 sub-scales: diarrhea, constipation, abdominal pain, indigestion and reflux and a mean score is calculated for each dimension. The lowest mean score possible for each dimension is 1 and the highest is 7. Patients completed a GSRS survey at baseline (pre-transplant to two days after transplant), and at weeks 1,4,12 and 24 post-transplant. | Any patient with mean GSRS subscale score >1 from dimensions: abdominal pain, indigestion, or reflux were considered to have upper GI symptoms. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 6 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | The Incidence of the Occurrence of Lower Gastrointestinal Symptoms Per GSRS Scale Ratings in Patients on Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil or Its Generic Equivalent Manufactured by Sandoz | The Gastrointestinal Symptom Rating Scale (GSRS) is a 15-item self-administered questionnaire to assess symptoms associated with common gastrointestinal (GI) disorders, and has been validated in renal transplant recipients. It uses a seven-graded Likert scale, where 1 represents the most positive option and 7 the most negative one and the patient grades symptoms based on the past 7 days. A score of ≥ 2 indicates the presence of GI symptoms. Higher values indicate more unfavorable conditions. The questionairre is divided into 5 sub-scales: diarrhea, constipation, abdominal pain, indigestion and reflux and a mean score is calculated for each dimension. The lowest mean score possible for each dimension is 1 and the highest is 7. Patients completed a GSRS survey at baseline (pre-transplant to two days after transplant), and at weeks 1,4,12 and 24 post-transplant. Patients who withdrew from the study only had data included up to the point of withdraw. No values were carried forward. | Any patient with a mean GSRS subscale score > 1 on dimensions constipation or diarrhea were considered to have lower GI symptoms. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 6 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | The Incidence of Rejection in Patients on Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil or Its Generic Equivalent Manufactured by Sandoz. | All rejection episodes of the kidney transplant were proven by kidney transplant biopsy and were measured at 24 weeks for all patients still participating in the study at that timepoint. | Included any patient who experienced rejection while enrolled in the study up to 6 months post-transplant. | Posted | Number | participants | 6 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Serum Creatinine in Patients on Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil or Its Generic Equivalent Manufactured by Sandoz | Serum creatinine lab values were used as part of a measure of renal function at 24 weeks for any patient that was still participating in the study at this time-point. | Any patient with serum creatinine values available at 24 weeks | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | serum creatinine mg/dL | 6 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Modification of Diet and Renal Disease (MDRD) Measured Glomerular Filtration Rates in Patients on Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil or Its Generic Equivalent Manufactured by Sandoz | Modification of Diet and Renal Disease (MDRD) Measured Glomerular Filtration Rates were used as part of a measure of renal function and measured at 24 weeks in patients who were still participating in the study at that point. | Any patient with Modification of Diet and Renal Disease (MDRD) Measured Glomerular Filtration Rates at 24 weeks was included in the analysis | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | MDRD (mL/min/1.73m2) | 6 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Pharmacokinetics (Mycophenolic Acid Trough Levels) of Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil or Its Generic Equivalent Manufactured by Sandoz in a Sub-set of Patients | Pharmacokinetics is the study of how a drug is absorbed and broken down in the body. Pharmacokinetics of enteric coated mycophenolate sodium and mycophenolate mofetil are measured by a level called mycophenolic acid level. Mycophenolic acid levels in this pharmacokinetic study were drawn starting in the morning at time zero (immediately prior to morning dose, also known as trough), then at 0.5, 1,1.5, 2, 2.5, 3,3.5,4,6, 8 and 12 hours post dose. Data was also dose-normalized (concentration was divided by dose). | Any participant who completed at least one pharmacokinetic studies was included in this analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mg/L | 1 and 6 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Pharmacokinetics (Mycophenolic Acid Maximum Concentration) of Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil or Its Generic Equivalent Manufactured by Sandoz in a Sub-set of Patients | Pharmacokinetics is the study of how a drug is absorbed and broken down in the body. Pharmacokinetics of Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil are measured by a level called mycophenolic acid level. Mycophenolic acid levels in this pharmacokinetic study were drawn starting in the morning at time zero (immediately prior to morning dose, also known as trough), then at 0.5, 1,1.5, 2, 2.5, 3,3.5,4,6, 8 and 12 hours post dose. Data was also dose-normalized (concentration was divided by dose).A mycophenolic acid drawn at the peak level is called C Max or maximum concentration. | Any participant who completed at least one pharmacokinetic studies was included in this pharmacokinetic analyses. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mg/L | 1 and 6 months |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Pharmacokinetics (Mycophenolic Acid Area Under the Curve) of Enteric Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil or Its Generic Equivalent Manufactured by Sandoz in a Sub-set of Patients | Pharmacokinetics is the study of how a drug is absorbed and broken down in the body. Pharmacokinetics of Enteric-Coated Mycophenolate Sodium or Mycophenolate Mofetil are measured by a level called mycophenolic acid level. Mycophenolic acid levels in this pharmacokinetic study were drawn starting in the morning at time zero (immediately prior to morning dose, also known as trough), then at 0.5, 1,1.5, 2, 2.5, 3,3.5,4,6, 8 and 12 hours post dose. Data was also dose-normalized (concentration was divided by dose). A mycophenolic acid area under the curve value, also known as AUC represents drug exposure. | Any participant who completed at least one pharmacokinetic studies was included in this pharmacokinetic analyses. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mg*hr/L | 1 and 6 months |
|
|
|
|
| 18 |
| 18 |
| 18 |
| 18 |
| EG001 | CellCept Comparator Group | Patients in this group will receive Thymoglobulin (rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin) induction immunosuppression in combination with CellCept (mycophenolate mofetil) or its generic equivalent, Prograf (tacrolimus) or its generic equivalent and corticosteroid immunosuppression. | 19 | 19 | 17 | 19 |
| non-infectious related diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| lymphocele | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
|
| graft failure due to antibody mediated rejection | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment | Occurred during 30 day safety follow-up period when patient was found to be non-adherent with immunosuppression. Antibody mediated rejection was considered non-reversible and patient progressed to graft failure. |
|
| dialysis fistula thrombosis | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment | Patient had dialysis fistula thrombosis during treatment for antibody mediated rejection that progressed to graft failure in 30 day safety follow-up period due to non-adherence. |
|
| urinary leak post renal transplant | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| diabetic complications | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| dehydration | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| graft dysfunction not found to be related to rejection | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment | causes included acute tubular necrosis, chronic allograft nephropathy, recurrent focal segmental glomerulosclerosis |
|
| anemia managed during hospitalization | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| failure to thrive | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| high potassium (hyperkalemia) requiring hospitalization for management | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| cervical arthritis and related neuropathy | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment | patient redmitted for dehydration and vomiting |
|
| thrombocytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bacterial infections | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment | infection |
|
| Viral infections | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment | infection |
|
| wound seroma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment | wound seroma |
|
| heart complications | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment | non-sustained ventricular tachycardia, pericardial effusion, myocardial infarction |
|
| wound complications | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment | wound vac placement |
|
| recurrence of renal disease | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment | recurrent primary disease FSGS |
|
| drug induced rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment | thought to be related to rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin induction |
|
| Leg pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment | unrelated to vascular complications or infection |
|
| high blood pressure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Heartburn | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diabetic Complications | Endocrine disorders | Systematic Assessment | worsening pre-transpalnt diabets blood sugar control |
|
| superior vena cava syndrome | Vascular disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| bacterial infection not requiring hospitalization | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment | urinary tract infection |
|
| soft stools without diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| high potassium (hyperkalemia) not requiring hospitalization | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| urinary retention not requiring hospitalization | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| low white blood cell count (leukopenia) | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| accidental anti-anxiety pill overdose not requiring inpatient hospitalization | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
|
| increased bowel movement frequency | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| delayed graft function of renal transplant | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment | nausea resulted in subsequent weight loss not requiring hospitalization in one cellcept patient and associated also with vomiting in one patient on cellcept |
|
| low platelet count (thrombocytopenia) | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| nephrotic range protein in urine (proteinuria) | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| blurry vision | Eye disorders | Systematic Assessment | did not require any intervention and resolved on own |
|
| low red blood cell count (anemia) | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| shortness of breath and fluid related weight gain not requiring hospitalization | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| hemmorhoids | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| back pain after fall on ice | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| viral cold infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment | resolved on its own without treatment |
|
| hip-pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment | no source found in one patient and other patient had history of pre-transplant avascular necrosis |
|
| tertiary hyperparathyroidism | Endocrine disorders | Systematic Assessment | treated with oral medication as outpatient |
|
| root canal | Surgical and medical procedures | Systematic Assessment |
|
| high hemoglobin | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment | treated with outpatient phlebotomy |
|
| mild increase in liver function tests (transaminitis) | Hepatobiliary disorders | Systematic Assessment | patient had history of pre-transplant hepatitis B infection |
|
| hypoglycemia (low blood sugars) | Endocrine disorders | Systematic Assessment | patient was using sliding scale for elevated blood sugars but experienced hypoglycemia-resolved upon stopping insulin and patient did not need any further therapy |
|
| bled through non-functioning dialysis graft not requiring inpatient hospitalization | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment |
|
| bk virus infection | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment | was BKV nephropathy in one myfortic patient |
|
| high cholesterol (hyperlipidemia) | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment | Patient was on maximum statin dose. Symptoms resolved with diet, exercise and decreased prednisone dose. |
|
| abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment | symptoms improved over time without any specific treatment |
|
| skin itching thought to be related to dry skin | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| metabolic acidosis | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment | treated as outpatient with oral bicarbonate and resolved |
|
| blood in urine and mild transplant rejection | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment | treated as outpatient with pulse steroid doses |
|
| renal dysfunction and edema | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment | found to be related to SVC in 30+ day follow-up in MMF group patient |
|
| low phosphorous | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Systematic Assessment | corrected with diet |
|
| bowel urgency | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| unilateral lower leg swelling | General disorders | Systematic Assessment | not transplant related and negative for deep vein thrombosis |
|
| low potassium | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | Systematic Assessment | resolved with change in diet |
|
| neck itching | Immune system disorders | Systematic Assessment | patient thought symptoms may be related to allergy and resolved with otc medication product change. |
|
| muscle leg pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Systematic Assessment | resolved with prescription muscle relaxant |
|
| ongoing high blood pressure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment | ongoing high blood pressure on medications |
|
| hot flashes | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| lymphocele or seroma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Systematic Assessment | stable on outpatient ultrasound |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D005227 |
| Fatty Acids |
| D008055 | Lipids |
| Mycophenolic Acid Trough(mg/L) at week 24 |
|
|
Sample size was arbitrarily determined as 40 patients (20 in CellCept group and 20 in the Myfortic group) in this proof of concept study. |
| Kruskal-Wallis |
| 0.58 |
This represents p value for week 24 data. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| Superiority |
| Mycophenolic Acid C max (mg/L) at week 24 |
|
|
sample size was arbitrarily determined as 40 patients (20 in the CellCept group and 20 in the Myfortic Group) in this proof of concept study. |
| Kruskal-Wallis |
| 0.046 |
This p value was for data at week 24. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| Superiority |
Sample size was arbitrarily determined as 40 patients (20 in the CellCept group and 20 in the Myfortic group) in this proof of concept study |
| Kruskal-Wallis |
| 0.23 |
p value represents data for week 24. A p value of less than 0.05 was considered significant. |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| Superiority |