Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study will evaluate the efficacy of 1-Hz rTMS applied to the right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC) in patients with Panic Disorder (PD) and comorbid Major Depressive Disorder (MDD) who have not fully responded to conventional therapies.
The investigators hypothesize that:
This study tests the efficacy of repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of Panic Disorder (PD) with comorbid Major Depression (MDD).
Despite major advances in the treatment of PD, standard therapeutic interventions are not effective for all patients, and the most common reasons for treatment failure in PD are side effects and major depression comorbidity. rTMS is a non-invasive procedure that allows stimulation of the brain using magnetic fields. Some studies have reported that rTMS may be helpful in reducing panic and depressive symptoms. While promising, prior research has several limitations (e.g., relatively small sample sizes, relatively short durations of treatment, and lack of sham (placebo) comparison).
This study addresses the drawbacks of prior work, and will provide data that will be important in determining whether rTMS can be useful for PD patients with comorbid MDD and resistant to conventional therapies. In this trial, 20 adult outpatients with PD and comorbid MDD, that have been only partially responsive to conventional therapies, will be randomly assigned to one of two treatment groups (active low frequency (1 Hz) rTMS or sham-placebo) applied to the right Dorsolateral Prefrontal Cortex (DLPFC) daily for up to four weeks. If rTMS will be added onto ongoing pharmacotherapy, the doses must have been stable for 1 month prior to study entry. The right DLPFC was selected because it is one among several brain regions implicated in PD, and functional abnormalities in DLPFC have also been consistently replicated in MDD. Pilot work indicates that stimulation of right DLPFC with low frequency rTMS was beneficial in patients with PD and MDD. Low frequency rTMS has the added benefit of a better safety profile (i.e. low risk of seizure) compared to high frequency rTMS.
Rating scales for symptom change will be obtained at baseline, during the rTMS course, and at the end of 4 weeks of treatment. Patients who do not meet response criteria after four weeks of sham will be offered an open-label cross-over phase for an additional four weeks of daily active rTMS treatment while partial responders to either active or sham will be offered an open-label cross-over phase for an additional four weeks of daily active rTMS treatment. Patients who meet response criteria in either the randomized phase or the cross-over phase will continue routine clinical care under the supervision of their treating psychiatrist, and will be invited back for a repeat assessment at 1, 3 and 6 months to determine the persistence of benefit.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Active rTMS | Active Comparator | Active Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) |
|
| Sham rTMS | Sham Comparator | Sham Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Active Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) | Device | Strong electromagnetic field (~2Tesla) generated briefly (~1ms) but repetitively (1Hz) for 30min, five sessions a week for up to eight weeks. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS) | The Panic Disorder Severity Scale is a questionnaire developed for measuring the severity of panic disorder symptoms. The PDSS consists of seven items, each rated on a 5-point scale, which ranges from 0 to 4. The items assess panic frequency, resulting distress, panic-focused anticipatory anxiety, phobic avoidance of situations and of physical sensations, impairment in occupational and social functioning. The overall assessment is made by a total score, which is calculated by summing the scores for all seven items. The total scores range from 0 to 28. Higher scores indicate high levels of panic symptomatology. Reduction in score from baseline indicates clinical improvement of panic symptoms. | 4 weeks |
| Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), 28 Item Version | The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) is a multiple item questionnaire used to provide an indication of depression severity. The 28-, rather then 17- or 24-, item version was used to assess subjects in this protocol. 28-item minimum score = 0 28-item maximum score = 84 Higher scores indicate high levels of symptomatology. Reduction in score from baseline indicates clinical symptom improvement. | 4 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Improvement (CGI-S) | Minimum CGI-S score: 1 Maximum CGI-S score: 7 Higher scores indicate the presence of high symptom severity. Decrease in scores from baseline reflects clinical symptom improvement. Patients will be classified as responders with a CGI-S = 1 or 2; and partial responders CGI-S = 3.
|
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Other exclusion criteria include those common to every TMS protocol:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Antonio Mantovani, MD | Columbia University | Principal Investigator |
| Sarah H Lisanby, MD | Columbia University | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| New York State Psychiatric Institute | New York | New York | 10032 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11823280 | Background | Zwanzger P, Minov C, Ella R, Schule C, Baghai T, Moller HJ, Rupprecht R, Padberg F. Transcranial magnetic stimulation for panic. Am J Psychiatry. 2002 Feb;159(2):315-6. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.159.2.315-a. No abstract available. | |
| 9821564 | Result | Nordahl TE, Stein MB, Benkelfat C, Semple WE, Andreason P, Zametkin A, Uhde TW, Cohen RM. Regional cerebral metabolic asymmetries replicated in an independent group of patients with panic disorders. Biol Psychiatry. 1998 Nov 15;44(10):998-1006. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(98)00026-2. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Study summary on Brain Stimulation Division web site | View source |
Not provided
No enrolled participant was excluded from the trial. Twenty-five patients were recruited.
Patients were recruited between January 2008 and December 2010 from the Brain Behavior Clinic and the Anxiety Disorders Clinic of New York State Psychiatric Institute/Columbia University.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Active | Active repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) (active) : Strong electromagnetic field (~2Tesla) generated briefly (~1ms) but repetitively (1Hz) for 30min, five sessions a week for up to eight weeks. |
| FG001 | Sham |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Sham Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) | Device | Generates a field with the same parameters as active rTMS (see active arm for parameters), however, the actual magnetic fields are blocked by an electromagnetic shield built into a sham coil. The field is impeded from stimulating the brain. |
|
|
| 4 weeks |
| 15580167 | Result | Prasko J, Horacek J, Zalesky R, Kopecek M, Novak T, Paskova B, Skrdlantova L, Belohlavek O, Hoschl C. The change of regional brain metabolism (18FDG PET) in panic disorder during the treatment with cognitive behavioral therapy or antidepressants. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2004 Oct;25(5):340-8. |
| 12113998 | Result | Pizzagalli DA, Nitschke JB, Oakes TR, Hendrick AM, Horras KA, Larson CL, Abercrombie HC, Schaefer SM, Koger JV, Benca RM, Pascual-Marqui RD, Davidson RJ. Brain electrical tomography in depression: the importance of symptom severity, anxiety, and melancholic features. Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Jul 15;52(2):73-85. doi: 10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01313-6. |
| 12217271 | Result | Garcia-Toro M, Salva Coll J, Crespi Font M, Andres Tauler J, Aguirre Orue I, Bosch Calero C. [Panic disorder and transcranial magnetic stimulation]. Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2002 Jul-Aug;30(4):221-4. Spanish. |
| 14557145 | Result | Fitzgerald PB, Brown TL, Marston NA, Daskalakis ZJ, De Castella A, Kulkarni J. Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the treatment of depression: a double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2003 Oct;60(10):1002-8. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.60.9.1002. |
| 10197825 | Result | Klein E, Kreinin I, Chistyakov A, Koren D, Mecz L, Marmur S, Ben-Shachar D, Feinsod M. Therapeutic efficacy of right prefrontal slow repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation in major depression: a double-blind controlled study. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 1999 Apr;56(4):315-20. doi: 10.1001/archpsyc.56.4.315. |
| 17215046 | Result | Mantovani A, Lisanby SH, Pieraccini F, Ulivelli M, Castrogiovanni P, Rossi S. Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of panic disorder (PD) with comorbid major depression. J Affect Disord. 2007 Sep;102(1-3):277-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2006.11.027. Epub 2007 Jan 9. |
| 15982444 | Result | Mantovani A, Lisanby SH, Pieraccini F, Ulivelli M, Castrogiovanni P, Rossi S. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) in the treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and Tourette's syndrome (TS). Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2006 Feb;9(1):95-100. doi: 10.1017/S1461145705005729. Epub 2005 Jun 28. |
| 9448663 | Result | Cowley DS, Ha EH, Roy-Byrne PP. Determinants of pharmacologic treatment failure in panic disorder. J Clin Psychiatry. 1997 Dec;58(12):555-61; quiz 562-3. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v58n1208. |
| 22858212 | Derived | Mantovani A, Aly M, Dagan Y, Allart A, Lisanby SH. Randomized sham controlled trial of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex for the treatment of panic disorder with comorbid major depression. J Affect Disord. 2013 Jan 10;144(1-2):153-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2012.05.038. Epub 2012 Aug 1. |
Placebo repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) (sham) : Generates a field with the same parameters as active rTMS (see active arm for parameters), however, the actual magnetic fields are blocked by an electromagnetic shield built into a sham coil. The field is impeded from stimulating the brain. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Active | Active repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) (active) : Strong electromagnetic field (~2Tesla) generated briefly (~1ms) but repetitively (1Hz) for 30min, five sessions a week for up to eight weeks. |
| BG001 | Sham | Placebo repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) (sham) : Generates a field with the same parameters as active rTMS (see active arm for parameters), however, the actual magnetic fields are blocked by an electromagnetic shield built into a sham coil. The field is impeded from stimulating the brain. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Panic Disorder Severity Scale (PDSS) | The Panic Disorder Severity Scale is a questionnaire developed for measuring the severity of panic disorder symptoms. The PDSS consists of seven items, each rated on a 5-point scale, which ranges from 0 to 4. The items assess panic frequency, resulting distress, panic-focused anticipatory anxiety, phobic avoidance of situations and of physical sensations, impairment in occupational and social functioning. The overall assessment is made by a total score, which is calculated by summing the scores for all seven items. The total scores range from 0 to 28. Higher scores indicate high levels of panic symptomatology. Reduction in score from baseline indicates clinical improvement of panic symptoms. | Posted | Number | responders | 4 weeks |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), 28 Item Version | The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRSD) is a multiple item questionnaire used to provide an indication of depression severity. The 28-, rather then 17- or 24-, item version was used to assess subjects in this protocol. 28-item minimum score = 0 28-item maximum score = 84 Higher scores indicate high levels of symptomatology. Reduction in score from baseline indicates clinical symptom improvement. | Posted | Number | responders | 4 weeks |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Clinical Improvement (CGI-S) | Minimum CGI-S score: 1 Maximum CGI-S score: 7 Higher scores indicate the presence of high symptom severity. Decrease in scores from baseline reflects clinical symptom improvement. Patients will be classified as responders with a CGI-S = 1 or 2; and partial responders CGI-S = 3.
| Posted | Number | responders (CGI-S = 1 or 2) | 4 weeks |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Active | Active repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) (active) : Strong electromagnetic field (~2Tesla) generated briefly (~1ms) but repetitively (1Hz) for 30min, five sessions a week for up to eight weeks. | 0 | 12 | 0 | 0 | ||
| EG001 | Sham | Placebo repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) (sham) : Generates a field with the same parameters as active rTMS (see active arm for parameters), however, the actual magnetic fields are blocked by an electromagnetic shield built into a sham coil. The field is impeded from stimulating the brain. | 0 | 13 | 0 | 0 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Antonio Mantovani | Columbia University Department of Psychiatry, City University of New York | 212-650-5417 | AMantovani@med.cuny.edu |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016584 | Panic Disorder |
| D003865 | Depressive Disorder, Major |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001008 | Anxiety Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| D003866 | Depressive Disorder |
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Participants |
|
|
| Participants |
|
|