Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to is to evaluate the success of the GYNECARE PROSIMA* system in women with symptoms for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) requiring surgical correction of POP.
(*TRADEMARK)
The GYNECARE PROSIMA* system provides a simplified mesh repair, avoiding the need for dissection outside the pelvic cavity.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Prosima Pelvic Floor Repair System |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GYNECARE PROSIMA* Pelvic Floor Repair System | Device | procedure for pelvic organ prolapse |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Success based on overall POP-Q score at 12 months post-procedure. | Success is determined by achievement of an overall POP-Q score of ICS Stage ≤1, without further re-intervention for POP. | 12-months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Success based on overall POP-Q score at 24 months post-procedure. | Success is determined by achievement of an overall POP-Q score of ICS Stage ≤1, without further re-intervention for POP | 24 months |
| Success based on treated compartment ICS POP-Q stage |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Women over 18 with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse of ICS POP-Q Stage II or III, suitable for surgical repair
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| David Robinson, M.D. | Ethicon, Inc. | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Specialists in Urology | Naples | Florida | 34102 | United States | ||
| Female Pelvic Medicine and Urogynecology Institute of Michigan |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20934681 | Result | Zyczynski HM, Carey MP, Smith AR, Gauld JM, Robinson D, Sikirica V, Reisenauer C, Slack M; Prosima Study Investigators. One-year clinical outcomes after prolapse surgery with nonanchored mesh and vaginal support device. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Dec;203(6):587.e1-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2010.08.001. | |
| 22143448 | Result |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D056887 | Pelvic Organ Prolapse |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011391 | Prolapse |
| D020763 | Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Success will be determined by achievement of treated compartment POP-Q score of ICS Stage ≤1, without further re-intervention for POP. |
| 12 months |
| Success based on treated compartment ICS POP-Q stage | Success will be determined by achievement of treated compartment POP-Q score of ICS Stage ≤1, without further re-intervention for POP. | 24 months |
| Success defined as the leading edge within the hymen | Success defined as the leading edge within the hymen (i.e. all POP-Q values to be less than 0, without further re-intervention for POP) | 12 months |
| Success defined as the leading edge within the hymen | Success defined as the leading edge within the hymen (i.e. all POP-Q values to be less than 0, without further re-intervention for POP) | 24 months |
| Mean PFDI-20 score | 12 months |
| Mean PFDI-20 score | 24 months |
| Mean change from baseline in PFDI-20 scores | 24 months |
| Mean change from baseline in PFDI-20 scores | 12 months |
| Mean POPDI score | POPDI is a sub score of PFDI-20 | 12 months |
| Mean POPDI score | POPDI is a sub score of PFDI-20 | 24 months |
| Mean change from baseline in POPDI score | POPDI is a sub scores of PFDI-20 | 12 months |
| Mean change from baseline in POPDI score | POPDI is a sub score of PFDI-20 | 24 months |
| Mean CRADI score | CRADI is a sub score of PFDI-20 | 12 months |
| Mean CRADI score | CRADI is a sub score of PFDI-20 | 24 months |
| Mean change from baseline in CRADI score | CRADI is a sub score of PFDI-20 | 12 months |
| Mean change from baseline in CRADI score | CRADI is a sub score of PFDI-20 | 24 months |
| Mean UDI score | UDI is a sub score of PFDI-20 | 12 months |
| Mean UDI score | UDI is a sub score of PFDI-20 | 24 months |
| Mean change from baseline in UDI score | UDI is a sub score of PFDI-20 | 12 months |
| Mean change from baseline in UDI score | UDI is a sub score of PFDI-20 | 24 months |
| EuroQol (EQ-5D health state) change from baseline | 12 months |
| EuroQol (EQ-5D health state) change from baseline | 24 months |
| Mean PFIQ-7 score | 12 months |
| Mean PFIQ-7 score | 24 months |
| Mean change from baseline in PFIQ-7 score | 12 months |
| Mean change from baseline in PFIQ-7 score | 24 months |
| Mean POPIQ score | POPIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7 | 12 months |
| Mean POPIQ score | POPIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7 | 24 months |
| Mean change from baseline in POPIQ score | POPIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7 | 12 months |
| Mean change from baseline in POPIQ score | POPIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7 | 24 months |
| Mean CRAIQ score | CRAIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7 | 12 months |
| Mean CRAIQ score | CRAIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7 | 24 months |
| Mean change from baseline in CRAIQ score | CRAIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7 | 12 months |
| Mean change from baseline in CRAIQ score | CRAIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7 | 24 months |
| Mean UIQ score | UIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7 | 12 months |
| Mean UIQ score | UIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7 | 24 months |
| Mean change from baseline in UIQ score | UIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7 | 12 months |
| Mean change from baseline in UIQ score | UIQ is a sub-score of PFIQ-7 | 24 months |
| Mean PISQ-12 score | In subjects sexually active at baseline, assessment of sexual function | 12 months |
| Mean PISQ-12 score | In subjects sexually active at baseline, assessment of sexual function | 24 months |
| Mean change from baseline in PISQ-12 score | In subjects sexually active at baseline, assessment of sexual function | 12 months |
| Mean change from baseline in PISQ-12 score | In subjects sexually active at baseline, assessment of sexual function | 24 months |
| Incidence of new onset dyspareunia, resolution or continuance of pre-existing dyspareunia | ongoing |
| Length of procedure | From time to first incision to time of last suture used to secure VSD | perioperative |
| Pain score measured using Visual Analog Scale (VAS). | 24 hours post surgery and at the 3-4 week visit |
| Discomfort of balloon removal, measured using VAS at time of removal. | 24 hrs post-surgical |
| Subject perception of VSD: Awareness | Measured by visual analogue scale | 3-4 week visit |
| Subject perception of VSD: Discomfort | Measured by visual analogue scale | 3-4 week visit |
| Subject perception of VSD: Acceptability of discharge | Measured by visual analogue scale | 3-4 week visit |
| Subject global impression | assessed on a 5 point Likert scale | 12 month visit |
| Subject global impression | assessed on a 5 point Likert scale | 24 month visit |
| Dearborn |
| Michigan |
| 48124 |
| United States |
| Female Pelvic Medicine & Urogynecology | Grand Rapids | Michigan | 49506 | United States |
| The Institute for Female Pelvic Medicine & Reconstructive Surgery | Allentown | Pennsylvania | 18104 | United States |
| Magee Women's Hospital of the Universtiy of Pittsburgh | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15213 | United States |
| Royal Women's Hospital | Melbourne | 3053 | Australia |
| Bereich Urogynakologie | Halle | 06097 | Germany |
| Universitatsklinik Tubingen | Tübingen | 72076 | Germany |
| Addenbrookes Hospital | Cambridge | CB2 0QQ | United Kingdom |
| North Hampshire Hospital | Hampshire | RG24 9NA | United Kingdom |
| St. Mary's Hospital | Manchester | M13 0JH | United Kingdom |
| Sayer T, Lim J, Gauld JM, Hinoul P, Jones P, Franco N, Van Drie D, Slack M; Prosima Study Investigators. Medium-term clinical outcomes following surgical repair for vaginal prolapse with tension-free mesh and vaginal support device. Int Urogynecol J. 2012 Apr;23(4):487-93. doi: 10.1007/s00192-011-1600-3. Epub 2011 Dec 6. |