| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2007-005439-27 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The objective of this historical-controlled trial is to demonstrate the efficacy and safety of conversion to Lacosamide monotherapy in subjects with Partial-onset Seizures who are withdrawn from 1 to 2 marketed antiepileptic drugs.
Sudden unexplained death in epilepsy have been reported in epilepsy patients. A causal relationship with the administration of antiepileptic drugs has not been established. The most important known risk factor for sudden unexplained death in epilepsy (SUDEP) is the occurrence and frequency of generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS). Twenty-seven patients with only GTCS were enrolled in the conversion to monotherapy study. In this study, two patients with only GTCS had SUDEP. Due to the potential increased risk of SUDEP in patients with only GTCS in a trial setting, the 1 remaining patient with only GTCS was withdrawn from this study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lacosamide 400 mg/day | Experimental | Lacosamide 400 mg/day |
|
| Lacosamide 300 mg/day | Active Comparator | Lacosamide 300 mg/day |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lacosamide | Drug | 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 200 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Subjects (Using Kaplan-Meier) Who Are Identified As Meeting At Least 1 Pre-defined Exit Criteria By Day 112 Relative To The Start of Withdrawal of Background Antiepileptic Drug(s) | Pre-defined exit criteria:
| 16 Weeks Maintenance Period (approximately 112 days) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Time to First Occurrence of Any Exit Event During The Maintenance Period | The time to first occurrence (days) of any exit event was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and was based on the time from the start of the Maintenance Phase to the earliest date a subject met an exit criterion. Subjects who discontinued during the Maintenance Phase due to non-exit criteria reasons or who completed the Maintenance Phase before 112 days and did not meet an exit criterion were censored as of the last Maintenance Phase dose date. Subjects completing 112 days in the Maintenance Phase were censored as of Day 112. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| UCB Clinical Trial Call Center | +1 877 822 9493 (UCB) | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 48 | Alabaster | Alabama | United States | |||
| 10 |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24915838 | Derived | Wechsler RT, Li G, French J, O'Brien TJ, D'Cruz O, Williams P, Goodson R, Brock M; ALEX-MT Study Group. Conversion to lacosamide monotherapy in the treatment of focal epilepsy: results from a historical-controlled, multicenter, double-blind study. Epilepsia. 2014 Jul;55(7):1088-98. doi: 10.1111/epi.12681. Epub 2014 Jun 10. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| FDA safety Alerts and Recalls | View source |
Not provided
Subjects were randomized 3:1 to one of two therapeutic doses of Lacosamide, 400 mg/day or 300 mg/day, to ensure a study design comparable to the historical control.
The study was conducted at 160 sites in the United States of America (USA), Canada, Europe, and Australia.The maximum duration of a subject's trial participation is 30 weeks.
The Participant Flow refers to the Safety Set (SS) population which consists of all patients who received at least one dose of study medication.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Lacosamide 300 mg/Day | Lacosamide 300 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 150 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. Subjects were randomized 3:1 to one of two therapeutic doses of Lacosamide, 400 mg/day or 300 mg/day, to ensure a study design comparable to the historical control. |
| FG001 |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Lacosamide | Drug | 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 150 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. |
|
|
| 16 Weeks Maintenance Period (approximately 112 days) |
| Percentage of Subjects (Using Kaplan-Meier) Who Are Identified as Meeting at Least 1 Pre-defined Exit Criteria by Day 112, Withdrew Due to Adverse Event (AE) or Withdrew Due to Lack of Efficacy During The Maintenance Period | Subjects were classified as having an exit event if they experienced at least 1 of the following events during the Maintenance Phase as of Day 112:
The date the subject experienced the event was set to the earliest date the subject met an exit criterion or the date of the last Maintenance Phase dose for subjects not meeting an exit criterion but withdrawing due to an AE or lack of efficacy. The secondary analysis is only conducted on the Lacosamide 400 mg/day group. | 16 Weeks Maintenance Period (approximately 112 days) |
| Duration of Monotherapy Treatment During the Monotherapy Phase of The Maintenance Period (Visit 9 - Visit 12) | Days on Monotherapy Treatment were defined as the number of days during the Monotherapy Phase when the subject took Lacosamide (LCM) only (ie, the total number of days exposed to LCM during the Monotherapy Phase minus any days where a concomitant or rescue Anti-epileptic Drug (AED) was taken by the subject). The days on Monotherapy Treatment did not need to be consecutive. | Visit 9 - Visit 12 (approximately 10 weeks) |
| Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) From Baseline To Last Visit | For the assessment of the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC), the investigator should provide his/her assessment of the subject's clinical status, compared to Baseline, including an evaluation of seizure frequency and intensity, the occurrence of AEs, and subject's functional status. He was asked the following:Please check the number that best describes the subject's condition over the past 4 weeks compared to Baseline:
| Baseline; Last Visit (approximately 27 weeks) |
| Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) From Baseline To Last Visit | For the assessment of the Patient's Global Impression of Change, the subject should provide his/her assessment of his/her own clinical status, compared to Baseline, including an evaluation of seizure frequency and intensity, the occurrence of AEs, and subject's functional status.The subject was asked to answer the following: Over the past 4 weeks, how have you felt compared to before you entered this clinical trial? (Please check the number that best describes your condition.)
| Baseline; Last Visit (approximately 27 weeks) |
| Birmingham |
| Alabama |
| United States |
| 18 | Huntsville | Alabama | United States |
| 42 | Northport | Alabama | United States |
| 14 | Phoenix | Arizona | United States |
| 151 | Phoenix | Arizona | United States |
| 9 | Phoenix | Arizona | United States |
| 150 | Sun City | Arizona | United States |
| 103 | Tucson | Arizona | United States |
| 102 | Jonesboro | Arkansas | United States |
| 7 | Little Rock | Arkansas | United States |
| 86 | Little Rock | Arkansas | United States |
| 120 | La Habra | California | United States |
| 156 | Loma Linda | California | United States |
| 59 | Los Angeles | California | United States |
| 76 | Los Angeles | California | United States |
| 45 | Newport Beach | California | United States |
| 21 | Santa Monica | California | United States |
| 107 | Torrance | California | United States |
| 60 | Aurora | Colorado | United States |
| 25 | Fairfield | Connecticut | United States |
| 133 | Dover | Delaware | United States |
| 37 | Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | United States |
| 94 | Doral | Florida | United States |
| 108 | Gainesville | Florida | United States |
| 130 | Gulf Breeze | Florida | United States |
| 55 | Maitland | Florida | United States |
| 123 | Miami | Florida | United States |
| 132 | Miami | Florida | United States |
| 77 | Orlando | Florida | United States |
| 49 | Panama City | Florida | United States |
| 109 | Pinellas Park | Florida | United States |
| 129 | Port Charlotte | Florida | United States |
| 50 | Sarasota | Florida | United States |
| 81 | Sarasota | Florida | United States |
| 4 | Tallahassee | Florida | United States |
| 163 | Tampa | Florida | United States |
| 79 | Atlanta | Georgia | United States |
| 72 | Canton | Georgia | United States |
| 40 | Savannah | Georgia | United States |
| 58 | Boise | Idaho | United States |
| 131 | Hines | Illinois | United States |
| 146 | Peoria | Illinois | United States |
| 11 | Springfield | Illinois | United States |
| 78 | Indianapolis | Indiana | United States |
| 73 | Ames | Iowa | United States |
| 124 | Manhattan | Kansas | United States |
| 160 | Wichita | Kansas | United States |
| 23 | Wichita | Kansas | United States |
| 119 | Lexington | Kentucky | United States |
| 164 | Lexington | Kentucky | United States |
| 62 | Louisville | Kentucky | United States |
| 29 | Scarborough | Maine | United States |
| 20 | Baltimore | Maryland | United States |
| 34 | Baltimore | Maryland | United States |
| 19 | Bethesda | Maryland | United States |
| 65 | Pikesville | Maryland | United States |
| 137 | Waldorf | Maryland | United States |
| 41 | Detroit | Michigan | United States |
| 30 | Golden Valley | Minnesota | United States |
| 71 | Hattiesburg | Mississippi | United States |
| 31 | Chesterfield | Missouri | United States |
| 105 | Columbia | Missouri | United States |
| 66 | St Louis | Missouri | United States |
| 174 | Omaha | Nebraska | United States |
| 17 | Lebanon | New Hampshire | United States |
| 43 | Edison | New Jersey | United States |
| 67 | Voorhees Township | New Jersey | United States |
| 36 | Albany | New York | United States |
| 83 | Buffalo | New York | United States |
| 69 | Cedarhurst | New York | United States |
| 154 | Mineola | New York | United States |
| 122 | New York | New York | United States |
| 27 | New York | New York | United States |
| 175 | Schenectady | New York | United States |
| 3 | Asheville | North Carolina | United States |
| 63 | Durham | North Carolina | United States |
| 152 | Rocky Mount | North Carolina | United States |
| 117 | Wilmington | North Carolina | United States |
| 47 | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | United States |
| 15 | Cleveland | Ohio | United States |
| 61 | Columbus | Ohio | United States |
| 2 | Toledo | Ohio | United States |
| 147 | Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | United States |
| 8 | Medford | Oregon | United States |
| 157 | Portland | Oregon | United States |
| 100 | Greensburg | Pennsylvania | United States |
| 32 | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States |
| 26 | Tarentum | Pennsylvania | United States |
| 24 | Beaufort | South Carolina | United States |
| 114 | Chattanooga | Tennessee | United States |
| 1 | Nashville | Tennessee | United States |
| 138 | Austin | Texas | United States |
| 111 | Dallas | Texas | United States |
| 22 | Dallas | Texas | United States |
| 46 | El Paso | Texas | United States |
| 51 | Houston | Texas | United States |
| 53 | Houston | Texas | United States |
| 98 | San Antonio | Texas | United States |
| 82 | Temple | Texas | United States |
| 136 | Layton | Utah | United States |
| 161 | Alexandria | Virginia | United States |
| 16 | Charlottesville | Virginia | United States |
| 106 | Richmond | Virginia | United States |
| 125 | Winchester | Virginia | United States |
| 74 | Renton | Washington | United States |
| 80 | Madison | Wisconsin | United States |
| 28 | Milwaukee | Wisconsin | United States |
| 421 | Capmerdown | New South Wales | Australia |
| 425 | Chatswood | New South Wales | Australia |
| 423 | Herston | Queensland | Australia |
| 422 | Maroochydore | Queensland | Australia |
| 420 | Adelaide | South Australia | Australia |
| 429 | Clayton | Victoria | Australia |
| 427 | Parkville | Victoria | Australia |
| 204 | Innsbruck | Austria |
| 127 | Calgary | Alberta | Canada |
| 140 | Halifax | Nova Scotia | Canada |
| 116 | Hamilton | Ontario | Canada |
| 93 | London | Ontario | Canada |
| 91 | Greenfield Park | Quebec | Canada |
| 110 | Montreal | Quebec | Canada |
| 113 | Montreal | Quebec | Canada |
| 223 | Aarhus | Denmark |
| 220 | Copenhagen | Denmark |
| 402 | Bron | France |
| 404 | Dijon | France |
| 405 | Ramonville-Saint-Agne | France |
| 465 | Berlin | Germany |
| 461 | Mainz | Germany |
| 240 | Dublin | Ireland |
| 442 | Bologna | Italy |
| 449 | Catanzaro | Italy |
| 443 | Ferrara | Italy |
| 441 | Milan | Italy |
| 450 | Perugia | Italy |
| 448 | Pisa | Italy |
| 445 | Reggio Calabria | Italy |
| 447 | Torrette Di Ancona | Italy |
| 284 | Częstochowa | Poland |
| 286 | Gdansk | Poland |
| 282 | Gdynia | Poland |
| 280 | Krakow | Poland |
| 283 | Lublin | Poland |
| 290 | Lublin | Poland |
| 289 | Szczecin | Poland |
| 281 | Warsaw | Poland |
| 287 | Warsaw | Poland |
| 158 | San Juan | Puerto Rico |
| 323 | Granada | Spain |
| 324 | Santa Cruz de Tenerife | Spain |
| 360 | Blackpool | United Kingdom |
| 364 | London | United Kingdom |
| 369 | London | United Kingdom |
| 361 | Manchester | United Kingdom |
| 363 | Middlesbrough | United Kingdom |
| 368 | Stoke-on-Trent | United Kingdom |
| 367 | Truro | United Kingdom |
| Lacosamide 400 mg/Day |
Lacosamide 400 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 200 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. Subjects were randomized 3:1 to one of two therapeutic doses of Lacosamide, 400 mg/day or 300 mg/day, to ensure a study design comparable to the historical control. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
The Baseline Analysis Population refers to the Safety Set (SS) which includes the unique randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study medication.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Lacosamide 300 mg/Day | Lacosamide 300 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 150 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. Subjects were randomized 3:1 to one of two therapeutic doses of Lacosamide, 400 mg/day or 300 mg/day, to ensure a study design comparable to the historical control. |
| BG001 | Lacosamide 400 mg/Day | Lacosamide 400 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 200 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. Subjects were randomized 3:1 to one of two therapeutic doses of Lacosamide, 400 mg/day or 300 mg/day, to ensure a study design comparable to the historical control. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Height | Mean | Standard Deviation | centimeter |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Weight | Mean | Standard Deviation | kilogram |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Body Mass Index (BMI) | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m^2 |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Average Baseline Seizure Frequency per 28 days | Mean | Standard Deviation | seizures/28 days |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Subjects (Using Kaplan-Meier) Who Are Identified As Meeting At Least 1 Pre-defined Exit Criteria By Day 112 Relative To The Start of Withdrawal of Background Antiepileptic Drug(s) | Pre-defined exit criteria:
| The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS included subjects who completed the Titration Phase and started withdrawing background Anti-epileptic Drugs (AEDs) (ie, entered the Maintenance Phase and took at least 1 dose of Maintenance medication). The primary analysis is only conducted on the Lacosamide 400 mg/day group. | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects | 16 Weeks Maintenance Period (approximately 112 days) |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Time to First Occurrence of Any Exit Event During The Maintenance Period | The time to first occurrence (days) of any exit event was estimated using Kaplan-Meier methods and was based on the time from the start of the Maintenance Phase to the earliest date a subject met an exit criterion. Subjects who discontinued during the Maintenance Phase due to non-exit criteria reasons or who completed the Maintenance Phase before 112 days and did not meet an exit criterion were censored as of the last Maintenance Phase dose date. Subjects completing 112 days in the Maintenance Phase were censored as of Day 112. | The Analysis Population refers to a subset of the Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS included subjects who completed the Titration Phase and started withdrawing background Anti-epileptic Drugs (AEDs). In addition to being a member of FAS, subjects also met at least one of the exit criterion noted under the Primary Outcome Measure. | Posted | Median | Full Range | days | 16 Weeks Maintenance Period (approximately 112 days) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects (Using Kaplan-Meier) Who Are Identified as Meeting at Least 1 Pre-defined Exit Criteria by Day 112, Withdrew Due to Adverse Event (AE) or Withdrew Due to Lack of Efficacy During The Maintenance Period | Subjects were classified as having an exit event if they experienced at least 1 of the following events during the Maintenance Phase as of Day 112:
The date the subject experienced the event was set to the earliest date the subject met an exit criterion or the date of the last Maintenance Phase dose for subjects not meeting an exit criterion but withdrawing due to an AE or lack of efficacy. The secondary analysis is only conducted on the Lacosamide 400 mg/day group. | The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS included subjects who completed the Titration Phase and started withdrawing background Anti-epileptic Drugs (AEDs) (eg, entered the Maintenance Phase and took at least 1 dose of Maintenance medication). | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects | 16 Weeks Maintenance Period (approximately 112 days) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Duration of Monotherapy Treatment During the Monotherapy Phase of The Maintenance Period (Visit 9 - Visit 12) | Days on Monotherapy Treatment were defined as the number of days during the Monotherapy Phase when the subject took Lacosamide (LCM) only (ie, the total number of days exposed to LCM during the Monotherapy Phase minus any days where a concomitant or rescue Anti-epileptic Drug (AED) was taken by the subject). The days on Monotherapy Treatment did not need to be consecutive. | The Analysis Population refers to a subset of the Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS included subjects who completed the Titration Phase and started withdrawing background Anti-epileptic Drugs (AEDs).This subset of the FAS included subjects who entered the Maintenance Phase but who never achieved Lacosamide (LCM) monotherapy. | Posted | Median | Full Range | days | Visit 9 - Visit 12 (approximately 10 weeks) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC) From Baseline To Last Visit | For the assessment of the Clinical Global Impression of Change (CGIC), the investigator should provide his/her assessment of the subject's clinical status, compared to Baseline, including an evaluation of seizure frequency and intensity, the occurrence of AEs, and subject's functional status. He was asked the following:Please check the number that best describes the subject's condition over the past 4 weeks compared to Baseline:
| The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS included subjects who completed the Titration Phase and started withdrawing background Anti-epileptic Drugs (AEDs) (eg, entered the Maintenance Phase and took at least 1 dose of Maintenance medication). | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline; Last Visit (approximately 27 weeks) |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Patient's Global Impression of Change (PGIC) From Baseline To Last Visit | For the assessment of the Patient's Global Impression of Change, the subject should provide his/her assessment of his/her own clinical status, compared to Baseline, including an evaluation of seizure frequency and intensity, the occurrence of AEs, and subject's functional status.The subject was asked to answer the following: Over the past 4 weeks, how have you felt compared to before you entered this clinical trial? (Please check the number that best describes your condition.)
| The Analysis Population refers to the Full Analysis Set (FAS). The FAS included subjects who completed the Titration Phase and started withdrawing background Anti-epileptic Drugs (AEDs) (eg, entered the Maintenance Phase and took at least 1 dose of Maintenance medication). | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline; Last Visit (approximately 27 weeks) |
|
Adverse Events (AEs) were collected from Baseline (week -8) up to the end of the study (week 22). Only Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) are presented.
Further detailed information about Sudden Unexplained Death in Epilepsy (SUDEP) is reported in the "Detailed Description" section.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Lacosamide 300 mg/Day | Lacosamide 300 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 150 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. Subjects were randomized 3:1 to one of two therapeutic doses of Lacosamide, 400 mg/day or 300 mg/day, to ensure a study design comparable to the historical control. | 4 | 106 | 74 | 106 | ||
| EG001 | Lacosamide 400 mg/Day | Lacosamide 400 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 200 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. Subjects were randomized 3:1 to one of two therapeutic doses of Lacosamide, 400 mg/day or 300 mg/day, to ensure a study design comparable to the historical control. | 21 | 319 | 215 | 319 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Inappropriate antidiuretic hormone secretion | Endocrine disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Food poisoning | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrointestinal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Glossitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sudden unexplained death in epilepsy | General disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypersensitivity | Immune system disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Limb injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Polytraumatism | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Subdural haematoma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Convulsion | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Epilepsy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Status epilepticus | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Subarachnoid haemorrhage | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Toxic induced encephalopathy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abnormal behaviour | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Conversion disorder | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hallucination, auditory | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hallucination, visual | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Psychotic disorder | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory acidosis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Drug eruption | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vision blurred | Eye disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Convulsion | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Somnolence | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tremor | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cognitive disorder | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCB Clinical Trial Call Center | UCB | +1 877 822 9493 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004827 | Epilepsy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000078334 | Lacosamide |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000081 | Acetamides |
| D000577 | Amides |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D000085 | Acetates |
| D000144 | Acids, Acyclic |
| D002264 | Carboxylic Acids |
Not provided
Not provided
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Black |
|
| Asian |
|
| Other |
|
|
|
| OG001 | Lacosamide 400 mg/Day | Lacosamide (LCM) 400 mg/day Lacosamide : 50 mg and 100 mg tablets provided for 200 mg twice daily dosing for up to 20 weeks. This study had a single inferential test of the primary efficacy variable for the LCM 400 mg/day treatment arm which was to be compared to an external historical control. As such, no adjustment for multiplicity was required. Additional analyses of the primary efficacy variable for the LCM 400 mg/day and LCM 300mg/day treatment arms was for exploratory or supportive purposes only. The analysis of the LCM 300 mg/day arm is exploratory due to the 3 :1 randomization ratio. Therefore the LCM 300 mg/day arm is not reported for this Outcome Measure. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|