Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that the safety and efficacy of the Lumax HF-T with optimized interventricular delay biventricular pacing (OPT) is non-inferior to the Lumax HF-T with simultaneous biventricular pacing (SIM) in patients with heart failure requiring cardiac resynchronization therapy.
This study is a randomized, double-blinded, crossover, multi-center, prospective trial. The study will consist of up to 122 subjects who require treatment of advanced heart failure through cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) with back-up defibrillation capabilities. Eligible patients will have a successfully implanted BIOTRONIK Lumax HF-T CRT-D system and have received simultaneous biventricular pacing for a minimum of 90 days prior to enrollment. The 90-day period is being required to allow the treatment effect of CRT therapy with SIM to be complete and to ensure the patient is receiving a stable and optimal CHF medical regimen. The patients will have the interventricular delay feature programmed after a standardized optimization procedure. Patients, along with study personnel evaluating the study endpoint measures, will be blinded to the type of CRT therapy delivered during the study follow-up period.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simultaneous 1st, Optimized 2nd | Experimental | Lumax HF-T device programmed to simultaneous biventricular pacing first for 30 days, followed by optimized biventricular pacing for 30 days. |
|
| Optimized 1st, Simultaneous 2nd | Experimental | Lumax HF-T device programmed to optimized biventricular pacing first for 30 days, followed by simultaneous biventricular pacing for 30 days. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Optimized interventricular delay biventricular pacing | Device | Lumax HF-T with optimized interventricular delay biventricular pacing |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Subjects Classified as "Not Worsened" for Changes in the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire and Six-minute Walk Distance Between Periods of Optimized and Simultaneous Biventricular Pacing | The purpose is to evaluate the effectiveness of optimized pacing (OPT) compared to simultaneous pacing (SIM). The hypothesis is evaluated based on a responder classification. Subjects are classified "not worsened" if after 30 days of OPT the quality of life (QOL) score is no more than 10 points higher and the six-minute walk distance is no more than 35 meters lower than after 30 days of SIM. The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire, a 21 question patient-completed survey, was used for QOL. Each question had a possible score of 0 (best) to 5 (worst), for a total of 0 to 105. | 60 days after enrollment |
| Percent of Subjects That Did Not Experience an Adverse Event That Require Additional Invasive Intervention to Resolve, Specifically Related to the Interventricular Delay Feature of the Lumax HF-T Heart Failure Device | The purpose of primary endpoint two is to evaluate adverse events that require additional invasive intervention to resolve, specifically those events that are directly related to the interventricular delay feature of the Lumax HF-T heart failure device. These adverse events include any software issues related to the programming of the interventricular delay or any event that occurs after optimization of the interventricular delay and that can be directly attributed to the use of the feature. | 60 days after enrollment |
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Solano Cardiology | Fairfield | California | 94533 | United States | ||
| Cardiac Arrhythmia Associates |
All subjects enrolled in the study were previously implanted with a Lumax HF-T heart failure device. The study utilized an intention-to-treat analysis where subjects were analyzed according to the randomized treatment order, regardless of whether they received the treatment in the order stipulated by the protocol.
Subjects were recruited from each investigator's general patient population at the medical clinic and selected according to the study inclusion/exclusion criteria.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Simultaneous 1st, Optimized 2nd | Lumax HF-T device programmed to simultaneous biventricular pacing first for 30 days, followed by optimized biventricular pacing for 30 days. |
| FG001 | Optimized 1st, Simultaneous 2nd |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| First Treatment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| La Jolla |
| California |
| 92307 |
| United States |
| Sansum Clinic | Santa Barbara | California | 93110 | United States |
| Cardiology Associates Medical Group | Ventura | California | 93003 | United States |
| Cardiac Disease Specialists, P.C. | Atlanta | Georgia | 30309 | United States |
| Georgia Arrhythmia Consultants | Macon | Georgia | 31201 | United States |
| Fananapazir | Cumberland | Maryland | 21502 | United States |
| St. Elizabeth's Medical Center | Boston | Massachusetts | 02135 | United States |
| Michigan Cardiovascular Institute | Saginaw | Michigan | 48601 | United States |
| SSM Medical Group | St Louis | Missouri | 63117 | United States |
| Gateway Cardiology | St Louis | Missouri | 63128 | United States |
| Salem Cardiology | Salem | Oregon | 97302 | United States |
| Palmetto Cardiology | Columbia | South Carolina | 29204 | United States |
| Pee Dee Cardiology | Florence | South Carolina | 29505 | United States |
| Cardiology Consultants | Spartanburg | South Carolina | 29303 | United States |
| Lone Star Heart Center | Amarillo | Texas | 79106 | United States |
| Cardiac Associates of Dallas | Dallas | Texas | 75230 | United States |
| Yakima Heart Center | Yakima | Washington | 98902 | United States |
| University Hospital Zurich | Zurich | Switzerland | Switzerland |
Lumax HF-T device programmed to optimized biventricular pacing first for 30 days, followed by simultaneous biventricular pacing for 30 days.
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Second Treatment |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Simultaneous 1st, Optimized 2nd | Lumax HF-T device programmed to simultaneous biventricular pacing first for 30 days, followed by optimized biventricular pacing for 30 days. |
| BG001 | Optimized 1st, Simultaneous 2nd | Lumax HF-T device programmed to optimized biventricular pacing first for 30 days, followed by simultaneous biventricular pacing for 30 days. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Age Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Subjects Classified as "Not Worsened" for Changes in the Minnesota Living With Heart Failure Questionnaire and Six-minute Walk Distance Between Periods of Optimized and Simultaneous Biventricular Pacing | The purpose is to evaluate the effectiveness of optimized pacing (OPT) compared to simultaneous pacing (SIM). The hypothesis is evaluated based on a responder classification. Subjects are classified "not worsened" if after 30 days of OPT the quality of life (QOL) score is no more than 10 points higher and the six-minute walk distance is no more than 35 meters lower than after 30 days of SIM. The Minnesota Living with Heart Failure questionnaire, a 21 question patient-completed survey, was used for QOL. Each question had a possible score of 0 (best) to 5 (worst), for a total of 0 to 105. | Study utilized an intention-to-treat analysis. 111 out of 122 enrolled subjects completed the primary endpoint follow-up. 106 of these subjects met analysis criteria based on paired quality of life and six-minute walk data at the one and two month visits. Subjects not included in analysis either withdrew consent or had incomplete study measures. | Posted | Number | Percent of Subjects | 60 days after enrollment |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Percent of Subjects That Did Not Experience an Adverse Event That Require Additional Invasive Intervention to Resolve, Specifically Related to the Interventricular Delay Feature of the Lumax HF-T Heart Failure Device | The purpose of primary endpoint two is to evaluate adverse events that require additional invasive intervention to resolve, specifically those events that are directly related to the interventricular delay feature of the Lumax HF-T heart failure device. These adverse events include any software issues related to the programming of the interventricular delay or any event that occurs after optimization of the interventricular delay and that can be directly attributed to the use of the feature. | Posted | Number | Percent of Subjects | 60 days after enrollment |
|
Adverse event data was collected at each study visit until the final study visit at 6 months post enrollment.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Simultaneous 1st, Optimized 2nd | Lumax HF-T device programmed to simultaneous biventricular pacing first for 30 days, followed by optimized biventricular pacing for 30 days. | 3 | 60 | 7 | 60 | ||
| EG001 | Optimized 1st, Simultaneous 2nd | Lumax HF-T device programmed to optimized biventricular pacing first for 30 days, followed by simultaneous biventricular pacing for 30 days. | 5 | 62 | 14 | 62 | ||
| EG002 | Total Subjects | Total subjects enrolled in study. | 8 | 122 | 21 | 122 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Atrial arrhythmia requring invasive intervention to resolve | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Ventricular arrhythmia requiring invasive intervention to resolve | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Non-heart failure cardiac symptoms requiring invasive intervention to resolve | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Other cardiac condition requiring invasive intervention to resolve | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Worsening heart failure | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Other cardiac symptom | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Clay Cohorn | BIOTRONIK, Inc. | 503-387-2614 | clay.cohorn@biotronik.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006333 | Heart Failure |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Switzerland |
|
The non-inferiority hypothesis utilized an objective performance criteria of 63% with a clinically significant difference of 12%. For the non-inferiority hypothesis, the one-sided Type I error was set to 0.05 and the statistical power was set to 80%.
|
|
|