Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The aim of this study is to validate the ability of Capsule Endoscopy (CE) to accurately diagnose small bowel (SB) Crohns disease in patients with symptoms of abdominal pain and diarrhea.
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate whether Capsule Endoscopy prior to colonoscopy will improve diagnosis in patients with suspected Crohns disease when compared to standard diagnostic testing.
Crohn's disease is a chronic, inflammatory disorder (IBD) affecting any part of the gastrointestinal tract but frequently involves the small and large bowel. Typical presenting symptoms include abdominal pain and diarrhea. Patients with this disorder may also have extraintestinal manifestations including arthritis, uveitis and aphthous stomatitis, erythema nodosum and pyoderma gangrenosum. The etiology of Crohn's disease is unknown. It affects populations around the globe and occurs at any age but it has a predilection to affect those between the ages of 15 and 35.
While about one half of patients have involvement of the ileum and large bowel, another third have disease isolated to the small bowel. Frequently, small bowel Crohn's disease can be difficult to diagnose using the traditional methods of evaluation including colonoscopy with ileoscopy and contrast radiography. Mucosal features of Crohn's disease are often subtle and difficult to identify by small bowel follow through (SBFT). The SBFT has traditionally been relied on to evaluate the small intestine for evidence of Crohn's disease but it has been shown to have a relatively low accuracy of only 30%. This has led to delays in the diagnosis of Crohn's disease with reports ranging from one to three years.
In the past few years, capsule endoscopy has sparked renewed interest in the investigation of IBD and Crohn's disease of the small bowel. A PillCamâ„¢ SB2 capsule (Given Imaging Ltd, Yoqneam, Israel) is an ingestible, disposable video camera that transmits high quality images of the small intestinal mucosa. This enables the small intestine to be readily accessible to physicians investigating for the presence of small bowel disorders which in the past was inaccessible to physicians. A number of small pilot studies demonstrated capsule endoscopy efficacy in diagnosing SB Crohn's disease. Diagnostic yields of 70% have been reported in small series of studies performed in suspected small bowel Crohn's disease.
This study is designed to determine the yield and clinical impact of Capsule Endoscopy (CE) in detecting suspected IBD and suspected Crohn's Disease of the small bowel when compared to SBFT.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capsule Endoscopy | Device | Pillcam Platform with RAPID5 software and supporting SB2 capsules |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic Yield in Suspected Crohn's Patients (CE Prior to IC vs. IC and SBFT) | To evaluate whether capsule endoscopy (CE) prior to ileocolonoscopy (IC) improves the diagnostic yield in patients with suspected Crohn's disease when compared to IC and SBFT. McNemar test was preformed in order to evaluate the diagnostic yield of IC combined with CE as compared to the diagnostic yield of IC combined with SBFT. | four months from enrollment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Diagnostic Yield (CE vs. SBFT) | McNemar test was preformed in order to evaluate the diagnostic yield of PillCam SB (CE) as compared to the diagnostic yield of small bowel follow through (SBFT). | four months from enrollment |
| Diagnostic Yield (CE vs. IC) |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients ages 10-65 years, inclusive
Patient suffers from either
Patient suffers from at least one of the symptoms / lab abnormalities listed below:
Patient is indicated for Ileo-Colonoscopy
Patient or legal guardian agrees to sign consent form
Exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jonathan Leighton, MD | Mayo Clinic | Principal Investigator |
| Peter Legnani, MD | Private Practice New York, New York | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mayo Clinic Arizona | Scottsdale | Arizona | 10128 | United States | ||
| Atlanta Gastroenterology |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24075891 | Derived | Leighton JA, Gralnek IM, Cohen SA, Toth E, Cave DR, Wolf DC, Mullin GE, Ketover SR, Legnani PE, Seidman EG, Crowell MD, Bergwerk AJ, Peled R, Eliakim R. Capsule endoscopy is superior to small-bowel follow-through and equivalent to ileocolonoscopy in suspected Crohn's disease. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Apr;12(4):609-15. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.09.028. Epub 2013 Sep 27. |
Not provided
Not provided
98 patients enrolled in this study. 18 cases excluded due to the following: 15 cases were excluded due to noncompliance with the protocol.
1 patient withdrew consent before any study procedure.
1 patient could not ingest the capsule.
1 patient refused to undergo the ileocolonoscopy and SBFT. Therefore 80 patients were included in the analysis
Study started on September 2007 and data collection completed on October 2010. Study conducted in 10 clinical sites (hospitals and private clinics) in the USA, Sweden, Canada and Israel
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | SB Capsule Then Standard Ileocolonoscopy | Capsule endoscopy was ingested .The purpose was to detect patients with crohn Patients subsequently had standard ileocolonoscopy and small bowel follow through as comparison. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
98 patients enrolled in this study. 18 cases excluded due to the following: 15 cases were excluded due to noncompliance with the protocol.
1 patient withdrew consent before any study procedure.
1 patient could not ingest the capsule.
1 patient refused to undergo the ileocolonoscopy and SBFT. Therefore 80 patients were included in the analysis
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | SB Capsule Then Standard Ileocolonoscopy | Capsule endoscopy was ingested.The purpose was to detect patients with Crohn's Disease. Patients subsequently had standard ileocolonoscopy and small bowel follow through as comparison. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Diagnostic Yield in Suspected Crohn's Patients (CE Prior to IC vs. IC and SBFT) | To evaluate whether capsule endoscopy (CE) prior to ileocolonoscopy (IC) improves the diagnostic yield in patients with suspected Crohn's disease when compared to IC and SBFT. McNemar test was preformed in order to evaluate the diagnostic yield of IC combined with CE as compared to the diagnostic yield of IC combined with SBFT. | The number of found and missed pathologies (i.e. ulcers, lesions, etc.) were calculated for the combination of procedures. | Posted | Number | percentage of yield | four months from enrollment | pathologies | pathologies |
|
Adverse event monitoring was performed for each visit during the visit and the following 1-3 days. Participation lasted for up to 12 months.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Adverse Events | All subjects received both the capsule endoscopy procedure and the ileocolonoscopy procedure |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Capsule Retention | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Weakness | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director, Clinical Affairs | Given Imaging | +972-4-9097777 | Hila.Debby@givenimaging.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003424 | Crohn Disease |
| D015212 | Inflammatory Bowel Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005759 | Gastroenteritis |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D053704 | Capsule Endoscopy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016099 | Endoscopy, Gastrointestinal |
| D016145 | Endoscopy, Digestive System |
| D004724 | Endoscopy |
| D003949 | Diagnostic Techniques, Surgical |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
McNemar test was preformed in order to evaluate the diagnostic yield of PillCam SB (CE) as compared to the diagnostic yield of ileocolonoscopy (IC). |
| four months from enrollment |
| Atlanta |
| Georgia |
| 30342 |
| United States |
| Stan Cohen | Atlanta | Georgia | 30342 | United States |
| John Hopkins - Department of Medicine | Baltimore | Maryland | 21287 | United States |
| UMass Memorial Medical Center | Worcester | Massachusetts | 01612 | United States |
| Minnesota Gastroenterology Associates | Plymouth | Minnesota | 55446 | United States |
| Private Practice | New York | New York | 10128 | United States |
| Thomas Jefferson University | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19107 | United States |
| McGill University Health Center | Montreal | Quebec | H3G 1A4 | Canada |
| Rambam Medical Center | Haifa | 31096 | Israel |
| Malmo University Hospital UMAS | Malmö | 20502 | Sweden |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Small Bowel Follow Through (SBFT) and Ileo-colonoscopy |
Following ingestible capsule, same patients also underwent ileo-colonoscopy (IC) and small bowel follow through (SBFT). |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Diagnostic Yield (CE vs. SBFT) | McNemar test was preformed in order to evaluate the diagnostic yield of PillCam SB (CE) as compared to the diagnostic yield of small bowel follow through (SBFT). | The number of found and missed pathologies (i.e. ulcers, lesions, etc.) were calculated for the combination of procedures. | Posted | Number | percentage of yield | four months from enrollment | pathologies | pathologies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Diagnostic Yield (CE vs. IC) | McNemar test was preformed in order to evaluate the diagnostic yield of PillCam SB (CE) as compared to the diagnostic yield of ileocolonoscopy (IC). | The number of found and missed pathologies (i.e. ulcers, lesions, etc.) were calculated for the combination of procedures. | Posted | Number | percentage of yield | four months from enrollment | pathologies | pathologies |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 80 |
| 1 |
| 80 |
| 8 |
| 80 |
| Abdominal Pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Capsule retention | Product Issues | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Blood in stool | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin irritation | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| dehydration | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D019937 | Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures |
| D003933 | Diagnosis |