Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Pfizer | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Cancer is the second leading cause of death in the United States, with approximately 90% of deaths resulting from patients with metastatic spread. Save for notable exceptions such as testicular cancer, chemotherapy alone cannot cure patients with metastases. Some patients with limited metastatic deposits (most commonly colon cancer spread to the liver) can be cured with surgery followed by chemotherapy. Therefore, some patients with metastases should be considered for aggressive local therapy (surgery and/or radiation).
Even though chemotherapy has improved significantly, patients treated with conventional chemotherapy and/or biologically targeted therapy are not cured of their disease. For the most common types of cancer, chemotherapy alone can shrink or stabilize tumors for an average of 6 months before the tumors regrow. Both chemotherapy and biologically targeted therapy have major limitations preventing cure of these patients.
Radiation therapy is an effective modality of treating cancer. Until recently, radiation for metastases was used only to relieve symptoms resulting from local tumor growth. Technological advances, including stereotactic radiotherapy, allow for radiation to be more precisely delivered to the tumor while sparing nearby normal organs. Stereotactic radiotherapy can completely eradicate local tumors with minimal side effects. Stereotactic radiotherapy has never been combined with drug therapy. Sutent is a new F.D.A. approved cancer therapy that targets tumor blood vessels. It is effective against two types of cancer that rarely respond to chemotherapy (GI stromal tumors and kidney cancer). We propose combining biologically targeted drug therapy with physically targeted stereotactic radiotherapy. Our goal is to determine if this is a safe regimen and the best method of combining these treatments. Ultimately, our goal is to cure some patients with previously incurable metastatic cancer with this combination.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment | Experimental | Participants treated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| sunitinib malate (Sutent) | Drug | Sutent administered PO QD from days 1 to 28 Two weeks after completion of any chemotherapy, maintenance Sutent in 6 week cycles (consisting of Sutent 50 mg PO QD weeks 1-4 followed by no treatment weeks 5-6) until progression or death If no chemotherapy is planned, maintenance Sutent (as described above) will start on day 43. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) | Sunitinib (SU) and radiation (IGRT) doses were sequentially escalated using a ping-pong strategy according to a 3 + 3 design phase 1 study. The starting dose was sunitinib 25 mg and IGRT 40 Gy. MTD reflects the highest dose that did not cause a dose limiting toxicity. Toxicity was in assessed in patients at regular intervals by using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events criteria (version 3.0). Dose limiting events were defined as any grade 4 or 5 toxicity and unexpected grade 3 toxicity. Expected grade 3 toxicities from radiation include mucositis or esophagitis lasting ≤7 days. Grade 3 metabolic and hematologic toxicities are considered expected events with sunitinib and therefore were not considered DLTs | 2 years |
| Number of Participants With Particular Disease Status | Number of participants who have no evidence of disease and number of participants with distant metastases. | 5 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Patients With Toxicity Grade 3 or Higher | % of patients experienced one or more grade ≥ 3 toxicities. Toxicity is graded as mild (Grade 1), moderate (Grade 2), severe (Grade 3), or life-threatening (Grade 4),and death (Grade 5). | 5 years |
| Percentage of Patients With Local Control |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Zubrod Performance Scale 0-1
Metastatic disease confirmed by biopsy or imaging
5 or fewer sites of metastatic disease on tumor staging (either CT chest/abdomen/pelvis plus bone scan or whole body FDG-PET)
All tumors measure < 6 cm
Age > 18
Chemotherapy must be completed at least 2 weeks prior to radiation
Signed informed consent
Adequate bone marrow function, defined as follows;
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Max Sung, MD | Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai | New York | New York | 10029 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19536893 | Result | Kao J, Packer S, Vu HL, Schwartz ME, Sung MW, Stock RG, Lo YC, Huang D, Chen SH, Cesaretti JA. Phase 1 study of concurrent sunitinib and image-guided radiotherapy followed by maintenance sunitinib for patients with oligometastases: acute toxicity and preliminary response. Cancer. 2009 Aug 1;115(15):3571-80. doi: 10.1002/cncr.24412. | |
| 22761653 |
Not provided
Not provided
One patient withdrew prior to starting treatment and was excluded from analysis.
Phase 1: 21 patients in Phase 1 in dose-escalating study to find maximum-tolerated dose Phase 2: 25 patients on the recommended phase II dose, 37.5mg
Recruitment period began January 2007 and was open for recruitment through July 2014 with 47 patients enrolled in the study between February 2007 and September 2010.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Advanced Solid Tumor Malignancy | Patients were eligible if they had histologically or cytological documented advanced solid tumor malignancy with radiographic evidence of 1 to 5 sites of active metastatic disease. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1-Radiation 40 Gy + Sunitinib 25mg |
| |||||||||||||
| Phase 1-Radiation 40 Gy+Sunitinib 37.5mg |
| |||||||||||||
| Phase 1-Radiation 50 Gy+Sunitinib 37.5mg |
| |||||||||||||
| Phase 1-Radiation 50Gy +Sunitinib 50mg |
| |||||||||||||
| Phase 2-Radiation 50Gy +Sunitinib 37.5mg |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Phase I | N=21 participants Patients enrolled between Feb 2007 and May 2008 |
| BG001 | Phase II Advanced Solid Tumor Malignancy | Patients were eligible if they had histologically or cytological documented advanced solid tumor malignancy with radiographic evidence of 1 to 5 sites of active metastatic disease. N=26 participants Patients enrolled between February 2008 and September 2010 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT) | Sunitinib (SU) and radiation (IGRT) doses were sequentially escalated using a ping-pong strategy according to a 3 + 3 design phase 1 study. The starting dose was sunitinib 25 mg and IGRT 40 Gy. MTD reflects the highest dose that did not cause a dose limiting toxicity. Toxicity was in assessed in patients at regular intervals by using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events criteria (version 3.0). Dose limiting events were defined as any grade 4 or 5 toxicity and unexpected grade 3 toxicity. Expected grade 3 toxicities from radiation include mucositis or esophagitis lasting ≤7 days. Grade 3 metabolic and hematologic toxicities are considered expected events with sunitinib and therefore were not considered DLTs | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 2 years |
|
Patients from Phase I and patients from Phase II, various doses of sunitinib (25mg to 50mg) and radiotherapy (40 to 50Gy). Median follow up was 3.6 years. Patients were followed until death.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Phase 1 | N=21 participants Patients enrolled between Feb 2007 and May 2008 | 13 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Johnny Kao | Good Samaritan Hospital Medical Center | (631) 376-4444 | johhny.kao@chsli.org |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077210 | Sunitinib |
| D011878 | Radiotherapy |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D011758 | Pyrroles |
| D001393 | Azoles |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| radiotherapy | Procedure | Radiation is to be delivered to each site over 10 fractions separated by at least 16 hours. Up to 5 sites may be treated |
|
|
Local control was defined as a tumor volume equal to or less than the tumor volume at start of radiotherapy. |
| 4 years |
| Percentage of Patients With Distant Control | Distant control defined as distant metastasis contained outside of the radiation field within months of treatment. | 4 weeks |
| Quality of Life | 4-6 weeks after radiation therapy |
| Number of Participants According Failure and Survival | 4 years |
| Tong CC, Ko EC, Sung MW, Cesaretti JA, Stock RG, Packer SH, Forsythe K, Genden EM, Schwartz M, Lau KH, Galsky M, Ozao-Choy J, Chen SH, Kao J. Phase II trial of concurrent sunitinib and image-guided radiotherapy for oligometastases. PLoS One. 2012;7(6):e36979. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0036979. Epub 2012 Jun 27. |
| 23660867 | Result | Kao J, Chen CT, Tong CC, Packer SH, Schwartz M, Chen SH, Sung MW. Concurrent sunitinib and stereotactic body radiotherapy for patients with oligometastases: final report of a prospective clinical trial. Target Oncol. 2014 Jun;9(2):145-53. doi: 10.1007/s11523-013-0280-y. Epub 2013 May 10. |
|
|
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| ECOG Performance status | ECOG performance status is an attempt to quantify cancer patients' general well-being and activities of daily life. 0 Fully active, able to carry on all predisease activities with restriction
| Number | participants |
|
| Prior systemic chemotherapy | Number | participants |
|
| Prior radiation therapy | Number | participants |
|
| Number of metastases | Number | participants |
|
| Largest Tumor size | Number | participants |
|
| Number of involved organs | Number | participants |
|
| Phase 1 - Radiation 40Gy + Suniitnib 37.5 mg |
| OG002 | Phase 1 - Radiation 50Gy + Sunitinib 37.5mg |
| OG003 | Phase 1 - Radiation 50Gy + Sunitinib 50mg |
|
|
| Primary | Number of Participants With Particular Disease Status | Number of participants who have no evidence of disease and number of participants with distant metastases. | Phase 2 only | Posted | Number | participants | 5 years |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With Toxicity Grade 3 or Higher | % of patients experienced one or more grade ≥ 3 toxicities. Toxicity is graded as mild (Grade 1), moderate (Grade 2), severe (Grade 3), or life-threatening (Grade 4),and death (Grade 5). | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 5 years |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With Local Control | Local control was defined as a tumor volume equal to or less than the tumor volume at start of radiotherapy. | the 4-year estimates for local control | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | 4 years |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With Distant Control | Distant control defined as distant metastasis contained outside of the radiation field within months of treatment. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | 4 weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Quality of Life | data not collected | Posted | 4-6 weeks after radiation therapy |
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants According Failure and Survival | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 4 years |
|
|
|
| 21 |
| 13 |
| 21 |
| 21 |
| 21 |
| EG001 | Phase 2 | Patients were eligible if they had histologically or cytological documented advanced solid tumor malignancy with radiographic evidence of 1 to 5 sites of active metastatic disease. N=26 participants Patients enrolled between February 2008 and September 2010 | 18 | 26 | 13 | 26 | 26 | 26 |
| Neutropenia | Immune system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| LFT abnormalities | Hepatobiliary disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment | liver function test |
|
| Thrombocytopenia | Immune system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bleeding | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Metabolic abnormalities | Endocrine disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Increased creatinine | Renal and urinary disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea/vomiting | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lymphopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| LFT abnormalities | Hepatobiliary disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Thrombocytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Mucositis/stomatitis | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea/vomiting | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin changes | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypertension | Cardiac disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bleeding | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Metabolic abnormalities | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Increased creatinine | Renal and urinary disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hand foot syndrome | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypothryrodism | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lymphopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D007211 |
| Indoles |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
|
| dead from local progression |
|
| dead from comorbid illness |
|
| dead from treatment-related toxicities |
|