Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Bayer | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The primary objective of the study is to assess the risks of intrauterine device (IUD) use in a study population that is representative for the actual users of the individual IUDs. The primary clinical outcome of interest is the uterine perforation rate.
This is a large, multinational, prospective, controlled, long-term cohort study that follows a series of cohorts. The cohorts consist of new users of different groups of intrauterine devices (IUDs). Primarily, a non-interference approach - with exception of the standardized diagnostic workup to identify uterine perforations - will be used to provide standardized, comprehensive and reliable information on these IUDs under routine medical conditions.
The primary objective of the study is to assess the risks of intrauterine device (IUD) use in a study population that is representative for the actual users of the individual IUDs. The primary clinical outcome of interest is the uterine perforation rate. Secondary objectives are among others:
The combined cohort will include 60000 women recruited in six European countries. Enrollment should begin in November 2006 and end in 2012. Patients should undergo follow-up for at least 1 year.
Recruitment of the cohort members will be conducted via a network of approximately 2000 gynecologists.
Enrollment procedures should not interfere with the prescribing behavior of physicians or with the individual needs of the participating women. Influence on the preference for specific oral contraceptives is to be avoided but significant efforts are to be undertaken to ensure standardized, comprehensive and reliable documentation of all baseline characteristics and adverse events during the follow-up period.
The study participants are women aged 18 or older who have a new insertion of an IUD and who are willing to participate in this cohort study. There are no specific medical inclusion or exclusion criteria. However, women who are not cooperative may be excluded from study participation. Also women with a language barrier will not be eligible for study inclusion.
This study will maintain scientific independence and will be governed by an independent Advisory Council. The Center for Epidemiology and Health Research in Berlin, Germany and its research team will be accountable for the Advisory Council (AC) in all scientific matters. The members of the AC wil be international experts in relevant scientific fields (e. g. epidemiology, gynecology and cardiology).
The study started after all relevant legal and ethical requirements had been fulfilled. Information on the identity of the patients and treating physicians will be kept separated from the clinical information throughout the study. All relevant national data protection laws will be followed.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mirena® | ||
| 2 | Copper IUD |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Uterine Perforation Rate | Uterine perforation is a potentially serious complication of intrauterine device (IUD) use. The absolute risk of uterine perforation associated with the LNG IUS in routine medical practice has not hitherto been well defined. It is also unknown whether the perforation rate is higher with this IUD than with copper IUDs. | 12 months after insertion |
Not provided
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Contraceptive Failure | Intrauterine contraceptive methods have low Pearl Indices. Nevertheless, there is a lack of comparative data between LNG IUS users and copper IUD users. Women with unintended pregnancies were explicitly aked whether the pregnancy occured despite IUD use. The 29 pregnancies that occured after unrecognized IUD expulsion were considered to have resulted from a failure of the contraceptive method and were therefore included in the analysis. |
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Recruitment of cohort members will be conducted via a network of approximately 2000 gynecologists.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Klaas Heinemann, MD, PhD | Center for Epidemiology and Health Research, Germany | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Center for Epidemiology and Health Research | Berlin | 10115 | Germany |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 25601352 | Result | Heinemann K, Reed S, Moehner S, Minh TD. Risk of uterine perforation with levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices in the European Active Surveillance Study on Intrauterine Devices. Contraception. 2015 Apr;91(4):274-9. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.007. Epub 2015 Jan 16. | |
| 25601350 | Result |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Overall, 63,194 patients were recruited for the EURAS-IUD study, and 1,746 patients were excluded due to protocol violations. Of these, information on the IUD inserted at baseline is missing for 859 women. Therefore, 859 recruited patients could not be assigned to one of the cohorts and are not counted in the table displaying the participant flow.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | LNG IUS | New users of Mirena® IUS |
| FG001 | Copper IUD | New users of Copper IUD |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | LNG IUS | New users of Mirena® IUS |
| BG001 | Copper IUD | New users of Copper IUD |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Uterine Perforation Rate | Uterine perforation is a potentially serious complication of intrauterine device (IUD) use. The absolute risk of uterine perforation associated with the LNG IUS in routine medical practice has not hitherto been well defined. It is also unknown whether the perforation rate is higher with this IUD than with copper IUDs. | Intention-to-treat (ITT) population. "Number of Participants" referring to the initially inserted IUS/IUD or the initial IUD insertion attempt. | Posted | Number | participants | 12 months after insertion |
|
Information on adverse events was collected over a time period of 12 months.
All participants and health care providers were asked for adverse events at the follow-up 12 months after baseline.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | LNG IUS | New users of Mirena® IUS |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Venous thromboembolic event | Cardiac disorders | ICD10 | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
In observational studies like EURAS-IUD, the possibility of bias and residual confounding can never be entirely eliminated. Thus, for risk estimates smaller than 2-fold, causality cannot be inferred confidently in view of alternative explanations.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Klaas Heinemann | Center for Epidemiology and Health Research, Germany | 0049 (0) 30 945 101 20 | k.heinemann@zeg-berlin.de |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014595 | Uterine Perforation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014597 | Uterine Rupture |
| D014591 | Uterine Diseases |
| D005831 | Genital Diseases, Female |
| D052776 | Female Urogenital Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Within 12 months |
| Heinemann K, Reed S, Moehner S, Minh TD. Comparative contraceptive effectiveness of levonorgestrel-releasing and copper intrauterine devices: the European Active Surveillance Study for Intrauterine Devices. Contraception. 2015 Apr;91(4):280-3. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2015.01.011. Epub 2015 Jan 16. |
| BG002 |
| Total |
Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
|
|
|
| Other Pre-specified | Contraceptive Failure | Intrauterine contraceptive methods have low Pearl Indices. Nevertheless, there is a lack of comparative data between LNG IUS users and copper IUD users. Women with unintended pregnancies were explicitly aked whether the pregnancy occured despite IUD use. The 29 pregnancies that occured after unrecognized IUD expulsion were considered to have resulted from a failure of the contraceptive method and were therefore included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | participants | Within 12 months |
|
|
|
|
| 21 |
| 43,078 |
| 0 |
| 43,078 |
| EG001 | Copper IUD | New users of Copper IUD | 7 | 18,370 | 0 | 18,370 |
| Cerebrovascular Events | Cardiac disorders | ICD10 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | ICD10 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Other arterial thromboembolic event | Cardiac disorders | ICD10 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D005261 |
| Female Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy Complications |
| D000091642 | Urogenital Diseases |
| D000091662 | Genital Diseases |
| D012421 | Rupture |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| 0.52 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 0.42 |
| 0.64 |
| No |
| Superiority or Other |
| Hazard Ratio (HR) | 0.16 | 2-Sided | 95 | 0.10 | 0.25 | Hazard ratio was adjusted for the following prognostic factors: age, BMI, and parity. | No | Superiority or Other |