Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a study to confirm the superior efficacy of a single treatment of GSK1358820 over placebo in patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity of both the wrist and finger flexors using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) wrist score.
This is a study to confirm the superior efficacy of a single treatment of GSK1358820 over placebo in patients with post-stroke upper limb spasticity of both the wrist and finger flexors using the Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) wrist score.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| High-Dose BTX | Active Comparator |
| |
| High-Dose Placebo | Placebo Comparator |
| |
| Low-Dose BTX | Active Comparator |
| |
| Low-Dose Placebo | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK1358820 | Drug | botulinum toxin type A |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Change From Baseline in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Wrist Score to the End of the DB Phase (Week 12) in the High-dose Groups | Change from baseline in MAS wrist score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+ [regarded as 1.5], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion/extension) to each time point in the DB phase was calculated. In the graph plotting time points on the horizontal axis and changes from baseline on the vertical axis, the area surrounded by the MAS wrist score change curve and the horizontal axis was calculated and used as a summary index (AUC) for assessment of the MAS wrist score. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement, and the AUC has a negative sign. | Baseline, Week 12 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Change From Baseline in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Wrist Score to the End of the DB Phase (Week 12) in the Low-dose Groups | Change from baseline in MAS wrist score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+ [regarded as 1.5], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion/extension) to each time point in the DB phase was calculated. In the graph plotting time points on the horizontal axis (HA) and changes from baseline on the vertical axis, the area surrounded by the MAS wrist score change curve and the HA was calculated and used as a summary index (AUC) for assessment of the MAS wrist score. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement, and the area under the AUC has a negative sign. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects eligible for enrollment in the study must meet all of the following criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| GSK Clinical Trials | GlaxoSmithKline | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Investigational Site | Fukuoka | 811-0213 | Japan | |||
| GSK Investigational Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20569068 | Derived | Kaji R, Osako Y, Suyama K, Maeda T, Uechi Y, Iwasaki M; GSK1358820 Spasticity Study Group. Botulinum toxin type A in post-stroke upper limb spasticity. Curr Med Res Opin. 2010 Aug;26(8):1983-92. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.497103. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | High-Dose BTX | BTX (GSK1358820) 200U (4 mL) was injected into the wrist and finger muscles, and 40U (0.8 mL) into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0) |
| FG001 | High-Dose Placebo | Placebo 4 mL was injected into the wrist and finger muscles, and 0.8 mL into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0) |
| FG002 | Low-Dose BTX | BTX (GSK1358820) 120U (2.4 mL) was injected into the wrist and finger muscles, and 30U (0.6 mL) into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present in double-blind phase in the 12-week (DB) (once at Week 0) |
| FG003 | Low-Dose Placebo | Placebo 2.4 mL was injected into the wrist and finger muscles, and 0.6 mL into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0) |
| FG004 | DB High-Dose BTX + OL High-Dose BTX | BTX (GSK1358820) 200U (4 mL) was injected into the wrist and finger muscles, and 40U (0.8 mL) into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0) plus the 36-week open-label phase (OL) following the DB phase (up to 3 times, from Week 12 to Week 36 if participant met re-injection criteria [Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of wrist >=2 and at least 12 weeks (84 days) since the last injection]) |
| FG005 | DB High-Dose Placebo + OL High-Dose BTX | Placebo 4 mL was injected into the wrist and finger muscles, and 0.8 mL into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0) plus high-dose BTX in open-label phase (OL) following the DB phase (up to 3 times, from Week 12 to Week 36 if participant met re-injection criteria [Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of wrist >=2 and at least 12 weeks (84 days) since the last injection]) |
| FG006 | DB Low-Dose BTX + OL High-Dose BTX | BTX (GSK1358820) 120U (2.4 mL) was injected into the wrist and finger muscles, and 30U (0.6 mL) into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present in double-blind phase in the 12-week (DB) (once at Week 0) plus high-dose BTX in open-label phase (OL) following the DB phase (up to 3 times, from Week 12 to Week 36 if participant met re-injection criteria [Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of wrist >=2 and at least 12 weeks (84 days) since the last injection]) |
| FG007 | DB Low-Dose Placebo + OL High-Dose BTX | Placebo 2.4 mL was injected into the wrist and finger muscles, and 0.6 mL into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0) plus high-dose BTX in open-label phase (OL) following the DB phase (up to 3 times, from Week 12 to Week 36 if participant met re-injection criteria [Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of wrist >=2 and at least 12 weeks (84 days) since the last injection]) |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Double-Blind Phase (12 Weeks) |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Open-Label Phase (36 Weeks) |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | High-Dose BTX | BTX (GSK1358820) 200U (4 mL) was injected into the wrist and finger muscles, and 40U (0.8 mL) into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0) |
| BG001 | High-Dose Placebo |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Change From Baseline in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Wrist Score to the End of the DB Phase (Week 12) in the High-dose Groups | Change from baseline in MAS wrist score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+ [regarded as 1.5], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion/extension) to each time point in the DB phase was calculated. In the graph plotting time points on the horizontal axis and changes from baseline on the vertical axis, the area surrounded by the MAS wrist score change curve and the horizontal axis was calculated and used as a summary index (AUC) for assessment of the MAS wrist score. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement, and the AUC has a negative sign. | Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS wrist score | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score*week | Baseline, Week 12 |
|
Adverse Events (AEs) were classified by onset time because the study consists of the double-blind (DB) and open-label (OL) phases.
AEs in the double-blind (DB) phase (Arms 1-4), AEs occurring after the start (injection) of the DB phase (Week 0), but before the first injection day in the open-label (OL) phase; AEs in the OL phase (Arms 5-8), AEs occurring after the first injection day in the OL phase. SAEs and AEs were analyzed in the Full Analysis Set.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | High-Dose BTX | BTX (GSK1358820) 200U (4 mL) was injected into the wrist and finger muscles, and 40U (0.8 mL) into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0) |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Facial bones fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
The frequency threshold (5%) for reporting other adverse events is based on the result of the double-blind phase for the first four arms listed in the table and on the open-label phase for the last four arms listed in the table.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Response Center | GlaxoSmithKline | 866-435-7343 |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020521 | Stroke |
| D009128 | Muscle Spasticity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo |
| Drug |
Placebo |
|
| Baseline, Week 12 |
| Mean Change From Baseline in MAS Wrist Score From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase | The investigator assessed MAS wrist score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part[s] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point in the double-blind phase. The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder [less than half] of ROM [range of motion]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5. | Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
| Mean Change From Baseline in MAS Finger Score From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase | The investigator assessed MAS finger score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part[s] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point in the double-blind phase. The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder [less than half] of ROM [range of motion]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5. | Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Principal Measure From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase | DAS scores of Hygiene, Pain, Dressing, and Limb posture were assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability). Prior to the first injection, the investigator, in consultation with the participant, selected one functional disability item and assessed it as a principal measure at each time point in the double-blind phase. | Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Hygiene From Baseline to week12 of the Double-blind Phase | DAS score of Hygiene was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point in double-blind phase. | Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Pain From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase | DAS score of pain was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point in the double-blind phase. | Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Dressing From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase | DAS score of Dressing was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point in the double-blind phase. | Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Limb Posture From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase | DAS score of Limb Posture was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point in the double-blind phase. | Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase | The CGI score of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase. | Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase | The CGI score of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase. | Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase | The CGI score of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase. | Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
| Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Wrist Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase | The investigator assessed the MAS wrist score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone to 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to week 48. The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder ([less than half] of ROM [range of motion]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5. | Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36) |
| Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Finger Score From at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase | The investigator assessed the MAS finger score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part[s] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to week 48. The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder [less than half] of ROM [range of motion]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5. | Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36) |
| Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Principal Measure at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase | DAS scores of Hygiene, Pain, Dressing, and Limb posture were assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability). Prior to the first injection, the investigator, in consultation with the participant, selected one functional disability item and assessed it as a principal measure at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48. | Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36) |
| Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Hygiene at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase | The DAS score of Hygiene was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability; 3=Severe disability) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48. BTX was injected in participants up to 3 times from Week 12 to Week 36 when participants met re-injection criteria. Measurements were taken at each point until Week 48 and summarized by the number of weeks after the re-injection in individuals (4, 8, and 12 weeks after each injection) in open-label phase; thus, measurements could have been taken up to Week 48 (12 weeks after the Week 36 injection). | Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36) |
| Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Pain at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase | The DAS score of Pain was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48. BTX was injected in participants up to 3 times from Week 12 to Week 36 when participants met re-injection criteria. Measurements were taken at each point until Week 48 and summarized by the number of weeks after the re-injection in individuals (4, 8, and 12 weeks after each injection) in open-label phase; thus, measurements could have been taken up to Week 48 (12 weeks after the Week 36 injection). | Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36) |
| Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Dressing at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase | The DAS score of Dressing was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48. BTX was injected in participants up to 3 times from Week 12 to Week 36 when participants met re-injection criteria. Measurements were taken at each point until Week 48 and summarized by the number of weeks after the re-injection in individuals (4, 8, and 12 weeks after each injection) in open-label phase; thus, measurements could have been taken up to Week 48 (12 weeks after the Week 36 injection). | Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36) |
| Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Limb Posture at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase | The DAS score of Limb Posture was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48. BTX was injected in participants up to 3 times from Weeks 12 to 36 when participants met re-injection criteria. Measurements were taken at each point until Week 48 and summarized by the number of weeks after the re-injection in individuals (4, 8, and 12 weeks after each injection) in open-label phase; thus, measurements could have been taken up to Week 48 (12 weeks after the Week 36 injection). | Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36) |
| Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase | The CGI score of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48. | Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36) |
| Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase | The CGI score of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48. | Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36) |
| Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase | The CGI score of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48. | Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36) |
| Hiroshima |
| 720-0825 |
| Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hiroshima | 728-0001 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hokkaido | 005-0802 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hokkaido | 006-0805 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hokkaido | 053-0803 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Ibaraki | 302-0112 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Kanagawa | 227-8518 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Kanagawa | 247-8533 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Kanagawa | 253-8558 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Kanagawa | 257-0001 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Kumamoto | 860-8518 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Shizuoka | 410-1128 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Shizuoka | 410-2507 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Shizuoka | 410-3293 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Tokyo | 105-8471 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Tokyo | 142-8666 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Yamaguchi | 740-0021 | Japan |
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Placebo 4 mL was injected into the wrist and finger muscles, and 0.8 mL into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0) |
| BG002 | Low-Dose BTX | BTX (GSK1358820) 120U (2.4 mL) was injected into the wrist and finger muscles, and 30U (0.6 mL) into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present in double-blind phase in the 12-week (DB) (once at Week 0) |
| BG003 | Low-Dose Placebo | Placebo 2.4 mL was injected into the wrist and finger muscles, and 0.6 mL into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0) |
| BG004 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | participants |
|
| High-Dose BTX |
BTX (GSK1358820) 200U (4 mL) was injected into the wrist and finger muscles, and 40U (0.8 mL) into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0) |
| OG001 | High-Dose Placebo | Placebo 4 mL was injected into the wrist and finger muscles, and 0.8 mL into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Area Under the Curve (AUC) for the Change From Baseline in Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Wrist Score to the End of the DB Phase (Week 12) in the Low-dose Groups | Change from baseline in MAS wrist score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+ [regarded as 1.5], 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone; 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion/extension) to each time point in the DB phase was calculated. In the graph plotting time points on the horizontal axis (HA) and changes from baseline on the vertical axis, the area surrounded by the MAS wrist score change curve and the HA was calculated and used as a summary index (AUC) for assessment of the MAS wrist score. Negative changes from baseline indicate improvement, and the area under the AUC has a negative sign. | Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS wrist score | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score*week | Baseline, Week 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in MAS Wrist Score From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase | The investigator assessed MAS wrist score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part[s] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point in the double-blind phase. The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder [less than half] of ROM [range of motion]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5. | Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS wrist score | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Points on a scale | Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in MAS Finger Score From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase | The investigator assessed MAS finger score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part[s] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point in the double-blind phase. The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder [less than half] of ROM [range of motion]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5. | Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS wrist score | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Points on a scale | Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Principal Measure From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase | DAS scores of Hygiene, Pain, Dressing, and Limb posture were assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability). Prior to the first injection, the investigator, in consultation with the participant, selected one functional disability item and assessed it as a principal measure at each time point in the double-blind phase. | Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS wrist score | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Points on a scale | Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Hygiene From Baseline to week12 of the Double-blind Phase | DAS score of Hygiene was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point in double-blind phase. | Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS wrist score | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Points on a scale | Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Pain From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase | DAS score of pain was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point in the double-blind phase. | Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS wrist score | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Points on a scale | Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Dressing From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase | DAS score of Dressing was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point in the double-blind phase. | Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS wrist score | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Points on a scale | Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Limb Posture From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase | DAS score of Limb Posture was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point in the double-blind phase. | Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS wrist score | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Points on a scale | Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase | The CGI score of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase. | Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS wrist score | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Points on a scale | Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase | The CGI score of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase. | Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS wrist score | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Points on a scale | Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist From Baseline to Week 12 of the Double-blind Phase | The CGI score of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point in the double-blind phase. | Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS wrist score | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Points on a scale | Baseline; Weeks 1, 4, 6, 8, and 12 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Wrist Score at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase | The investigator assessed the MAS wrist score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=no increase in muscle tone to 4=affected part[s] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to week 48. The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder ([less than half] of ROM [range of motion]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5. | Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS wrist score | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Points on a scale | Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the MAS Finger Score From at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase | The investigator assessed the MAS finger score using a 6-point scale (0, 1, 1+, 2, 3, and 4; 0=No increase in muscle tone to 4=Affected part[s] rigid in flexion or extension) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to week 48. The "+1" (slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder [less than half] of ROM [range of motion]) of MAS score is regarded as score 1.5. | Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS wrist score | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Points on a scale | Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Principal Measure at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase | DAS scores of Hygiene, Pain, Dressing, and Limb posture were assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability). Prior to the first injection, the investigator, in consultation with the participant, selected one functional disability item and assessed it as a principal measure at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48. | Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS wrist score | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Points on a scale | Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Hygiene at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase | The DAS score of Hygiene was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability; 3=Severe disability) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48. BTX was injected in participants up to 3 times from Week 12 to Week 36 when participants met re-injection criteria. Measurements were taken at each point until Week 48 and summarized by the number of weeks after the re-injection in individuals (4, 8, and 12 weeks after each injection) in open-label phase; thus, measurements could have been taken up to Week 48 (12 weeks after the Week 36 injection). | Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS wrist score | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Points on a scale | Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Pain at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase | The DAS score of Pain was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48. BTX was injected in participants up to 3 times from Week 12 to Week 36 when participants met re-injection criteria. Measurements were taken at each point until Week 48 and summarized by the number of weeks after the re-injection in individuals (4, 8, and 12 weeks after each injection) in open-label phase; thus, measurements could have been taken up to Week 48 (12 weeks after the Week 36 injection). | Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS wrist score | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Points on a scale | Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Dressing at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase | The DAS score of Dressing was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48. BTX was injected in participants up to 3 times from Week 12 to Week 36 when participants met re-injection criteria. Measurements were taken at each point until Week 48 and summarized by the number of weeks after the re-injection in individuals (4, 8, and 12 weeks after each injection) in open-label phase; thus, measurements could have been taken up to Week 48 (12 weeks after the Week 36 injection). | Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS wrist score | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Points on a scale | Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) Score of Limb Posture at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase | The DAS score of Limb Posture was assessed using a 4-point scale (0=No functional disability to 3=Severe disability) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48. BTX was injected in participants up to 3 times from Weeks 12 to 36 when participants met re-injection criteria. Measurements were taken at each point until Week 48 and summarized by the number of weeks after the re-injection in individuals (4, 8, and 12 weeks after each injection) in open-label phase; thus, measurements could have been taken up to Week 48 (12 weeks after the Week 36 injection). | Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS wrist score | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Points on a scale | Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Investigator at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase | The CGI score of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48. | Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS wrist score | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Points on a scale | Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the Double-blind Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Participant at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase | The CGI score of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48. | Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS wrist score | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Points on a scale | Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline (at the Start of the DB Phase) in the Clinical Global Impression (CGI) Score of Functional Disability Assessed by the Physiotherapist/Occupational Therapist at 4, 8, and 12 Weeks After Each Injection in the Open-label Phase | The CGI score of functional disability was assessed at each visit using the 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) (-5=Worst Possible to 5=Best Possible) at each time point from baseline (at the start of the double-blind phase) to Week 48. | Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants randomized, with the exception of those who did not receive any investigational product and those with no assessment of post-treatment MAS wrist score | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Points on a scale | Baseline; Weeks 4, 8, and 12 after each injection (up to Week 48; injections given from Week 12 to Week 36) |
|
|
|
| 6 |
| 51 |
| 17 |
| 51 |
| EG001 | High-Dose Placebo | Placebo 4 mL was injected into the wrist and finger muscles, and 0.8 mL into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0) | 3 | 26 | 12 | 26 |
| EG002 | Low-Dose BTX | BTX (GSK1358820) 120U (2.4 mL) was injected into the wrist and finger muscles, and 30U (0.6 mL) into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present in double-blind phase in the 12-week (DB) (once at Week 0) | 1 | 21 | 8 | 21 |
| EG003 | Low-Dose Placebo | Placebo 2.4 mL was injected into the wrist and finger muscles, and 0.6 mL into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0) | 0 | 11 | 6 | 11 |
| EG004 | DB High-Dose BTX + OL High-Dose BTX | BTX (GSK1358820) 200U (4 mL) was injected into the wrist and finger muscles, and 40U (0.8 mL) into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0) plus the 36-week open-label phase (OL) following the DB phase (up to 3 times, from Week 12 to Week 36 if participant met re-injection criteria [Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of wrist >=2 and at least 12 weeks (84 days) since the last injection]) | 4 | 43 | 21 | 43 |
| EG005 | DB High-Dose Placebo + OL High-Dose BTX | Placebo 4 mL was injected into the wrist and finger muscles, and 0.8 mL into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0) plus high-dose BTX in open-label phase (OL) following the DB phase (up to 3 times, from Week 12 to Week 36 if participant met re-injection criteria [Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of wrist >=2 and at least 12 weeks (84 days) since the last injection]) | 3 | 23 | 12 | 23 |
| EG006 | DB Low-Dose BTX + OL High-Dose BTX | BTX (GSK1358820) 120U (2.4 mL) was injected into the wrist and finger muscles, and 30U (0.6 mL) into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present in double-blind phase in the 12-week (DB) (once at Week 0) plus high-dose BTX in open-label phase (OL) following the DB phase (up to 3 times, from Week 12 to Week 36 if participant met re-injection criteria [Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of wrist >=2 and at least 12 weeks (84 days) since the last injection]) | 4 | 20 | 14 | 20 |
| EG007 | DB Low-Dose Placebo + OL High-Dose BTX | Placebo 2.4 mL was injected into the wrist and finger muscles, and 0.6 mL into the thumb muscles if thumb spasticity was present in the 12-week double-blind phase (DB) (once at Week 0) plus high-dose BTX in open-label phase (OL) following the DB phase (up to 3 times, from Week 12 to Week 36 if participant met re-injection criteria [Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) score of wrist >=2 and at least 12 weeks (84 days) since the last injection]) | 0 | 11 | 11 | 11 |
| Humerus fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Tibia fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Traumatic intracranial hemorrhage | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bronchitis chronic | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pleurisy | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Acute myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Colonic polyp | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyothorax | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Blood pressure increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diabetes mellitus | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Musculoskeletal stiffness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Epilepsy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nephrolithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cerebral infarction | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Emphysema | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumonia aspiration | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Herpes zoster | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dislocation of joint prosthesis | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Muscular weakness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Prostate cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Completed suicide | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Herpes zoster | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Contusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Excoriation | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Muscular weakness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper respiratory tract inflammation | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Aspiration | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Blood pressure increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Tinea infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nail tinea | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rhinitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Joint sprain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Radius fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Wound | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ear abrasion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Frostbite | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Humerus fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rib fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Thermal burn | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Musculoskeletal pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Muscle spasms | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Neck pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Eczema | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Asteatosis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Decubitus ulcer | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dermatitis contact | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Eczema asteatotic | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hemorrhage subcutaneous | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Toothache | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Periodontitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypoaesthesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Post herpetic neuralgia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dysphonia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Edema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Grip strength decreased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Blepharospasm | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Conjunctivitis | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Keratoconjunctivitis sicca | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Restlessness | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Exsanguination | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Wound hemorrhage | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Posthitis | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Arrhythmia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diabetes mellitus | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D009135 | Muscular Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D009122 | Muscle Hypertonia |
| D020879 | Neuromuscular Manifestations |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| Week 4 |
|
| Week 6 |
|
| Week 8 |
|
| Week 12 |
|
| Week 4 |
|
| Week 6 |
|
| Week 8 |
|
| Week 12 |
|
| Week 4 |
|
| Week 6 |
|
| Week 8 |
|
| Week 12 |
|
| Week 4 |
|
| Week 6 |
|
| Week 8 |
|
| Week 12 |
|
| Week 4 |
|
| Week 6 |
|
| Week 8 |
|
| Week 12 |
|
| Week 4 |
|
| Week 6 |
|
| Week 8 |
|
| Week 12 |
|
| Week 4 |
|
| Week 6 |
|
| Week 8 |
|
| Week 12 |
|
| Week 4 |
|
| Week 6 |
|
| Week 8 |
|
| Week 12 |
|
| Week 4 |
|
| Week 6 |
|
| Week 8 |
|
| Week 12 |
|
| Week 4 |
|
| Week 6 |
|
| Week 8 |
|
| Week 12 |
|
| Week 8 after first injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after first injection in OL |
|
| Week 4 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 4 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after first injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after first injection in OL |
|
| Week 4 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 4 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after first injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after first injection in OL |
|
| Week 4 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 4 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after first injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after first injection in OL |
|
| Week 4 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 4 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after first injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after first injection in OL |
|
| Week 4 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 4 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after first injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after first injection in OL |
|
| Week 4 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 4 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after first injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after first injection in OL |
|
| Week 4 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 4 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after first injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after first injection in OL |
|
| Week 4 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 4 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after first injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after first injection in OL |
|
| Week 4 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 4 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after first injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after first injection in OL |
|
| Week 4 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after second injection in OL |
|
| Week 4 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 8 after third injection in OL |
|
| Week 12 after third injection in OL |
|