Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| R33133PAI3015 | Other Identifier | Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Grünenthal GmbH | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness (level of pain control) and safety of Tapentadol (CG5503) extended release (ER) (base) compared to placebo in patients with moderate to severe pain from diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
The primary objective of this randomized-withdrawal (randomized means study medication assigned to patients by chance and withdrawal means to stop using), multicenter, double-blind (neither patient nor investigator knows the study medication), placebo-controlled, Phase 3 study is to determine the effectiveness and safety of orally administrated Tapentadol (CG5503) extended release (ER) (base) at doses of 100-250 mg twice daily in patients with moderate to severe pain from diabetic peripheral neuropathy. The study is being conducted for registration and approval of CG5503 in the US and outside US. The trial will consist of two phases: Phase I is open-label and Phase 2 is double- blind. In the Open-Label Phase 1 there will be four periods: screening (to assess eligibility), washout (dependent on the pain medication the patient was previously taking), pain intensity perctoris evaluation (over a 3 day period), and open-label titration (study drug will be titrated to an optimal dose starting with 50 mg twice a day and adjusted to an optimal dose for a period of 3 weeks). Patients with at least a 1-point reduction in the average pain intensity score at the end of the open-label titration period, as compared with pre-titration will be eligible for randomization in the double-blind phase. In the double-blind Phase 2, there will be two periods: double-blind maintenance period (take drug for 12 weeks), and follow-up (a visit within 4 days of the intake of the last dose of study drug and a follow-up call approximately 10-14 days after the intake of the last dose of the study drug). The patient will maintain the dose level achieved at the end of the Phase 1 during the double-blind treatment phase. The study hypothesis is that the study drug will be different from placebo in the change in pain intensity. Titrate Tapentadol (CG5503) extended release (ER) 50 mg to patient's optimal dose ranging between 100mg and 250mg twice a day; Placebo (no active ingredients). All doses of trial treatment will be taken orally with or without food, for a maximum timeframe of 15 weeks.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | placebo matching placebo twice daily for 12 weeks |
|
| CG5503 | Experimental | CG5503 100, 150, 200, 250mg twice daily given for up to 15 weeks |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CG5503 | Drug | 100, 150, 200, 250 mg twice daily given for up to 15 weeks |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline (at Randomization) in Average Pain Intensity on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Over the Last Week of the Double-blind Maintenance Period at Week 12 | For this twice daily pain assessment, the subjects were to indicate the level of pain experienced over the previous 12 hours on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine". | Baseline and 12 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The Number of Patients Achieving at Least 30% Improvement in Pain Score at Week 12 of the Double-blind Maintenance Period From the Start of the Open Label Period. | The number of patients achieving at least 30% improvement in pain score at Week 12 of the double-blind maintenance period on an 11-point numerical rating scale compared with the start of the open-label period. | Start of Open Label and at 12 weeks of Double Blind |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L. C. Clinical Trial | Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development, L.L.C. | Study Director |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 23340531 | Derived | Afilalo M, Morlion B. Efficacy of tapentadol ER for managing moderate to severe chronic pain. Pain Physician. 2013 Jan;16(1):27-40. | |
| 21162697 | Derived | Schwartz S, Etropolski M, Shapiro DY, Okamoto A, Lange R, Haeussler J, Rauschkolb C. Safety and efficacy of tapentadol ER in patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: results of a randomized-withdrawal, placebo-controlled trial. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Jan;27(1):151-62. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.537589. |
Not provided
Not provided
The study consisted of a 2-week screening period followed by a 3-week open-label phase where all subjects received tapentadol extended release (ER) and were titrated to an optimal dose, and a 12-week double-blind phase where subjects were randomly assigned to receive tapentadol ER or placebo.
The recruitment period for this out-patient, multicenter study occurred between 15 March 2007 and 20 August 2008.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Tapentadol ER | Tapentadol ER dose of 100 to 250mg twice a day (BID) for 12 weeks during the double blind period. The study medication was provided as tablets taken orally. |
| FG001 | Placebo | Placebo tablets taken orally twice a day (BID) for 12 weeks during the double blind period. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Open Label Tapentadol Extended Release |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Double Blind Tapentadol ER vs Placebo |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Tapentadol ER | Tapentadol ER dose of 100 to 250mg twice a day (BID) for 12 weeks during the double blind period. The study medication was provided as tablets taken orally. |
| BG001 | Placebo |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline (at Randomization) in Average Pain Intensity on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Over the Last Week of the Double-blind Maintenance Period at Week 12 | For this twice daily pain assessment, the subjects were to indicate the level of pain experienced over the previous 12 hours on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine". | Intent to Treat (ITT) analysis set included all randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study medication during the double blind maintenance period with the exception of 3 subjects who were enrolled in the study twice. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Baseline and 12 weeks |
|
All adverse events were reported from the time a signed and dated informed consent was obtained throughout the follow-up phase of the study. Serious adverse events were collected for 30 days after the last dose of study drug.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Tapentadol ER | Tapentadol ER dose of 100 to 250mg twice a day (BID) for 12 weeks during the double blind period. The study medication was provided as tablets taken orally. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Helicobacter gastritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senior Director, Clinical Leader | Johnson & Johnson Pharmaceutical Research & Development | 609-730-4537 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003929 | Diabetic Neuropathies |
| D011115 | Polyneuropathies |
| D010523 | Peripheral Nervous System Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D048909 | Diabetes Complications |
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077432 | Tapentadol |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010636 | Phenols |
| D001555 | Benzene Derivatives |
| D006841 | Hydrocarbons, Aromatic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| placebo |
| Drug |
matching placebo twice daily for 12 weeks |
|
| Percentage of Patients Who Reported Very Much Improved or Much Improved From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12 | Percentage of patients who reported very much improved (1) or much improved (2) based on an ordinal measure indicating change from start of double blind treatment (on a scale of 7 = Very much worse to 1 = Very much improved) | 12 week endpoint |
| Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) Health Status Index to Week 12 | Change from baseline to end point in EuroQol-5 Dimension Questionnaire. A higher score indicates an improvement in health in the Health Status Index. The EuroQol-5 is a five dimensional health state classification. Each dimension is assessed on a 3-point ordinal scale (1=no problems, 2=some problems, 3=extreme problems). The responses to the five EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 to 1, with 1.00 indicating "full health" and 0 representing dead. | 12 week endpoint (change from baseline) |
| Change From Baseline in Sleep Latency Time in Hours Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12. | A Sleep Questionnaire addressed the following question: "How long after bedtime/lights out did you fall asleep last night (hours)?" 12 week endpoint-mean changes from baseline at endpoint for sleep latency. Decrease in time (hours) indicates improvement. | Baseline and 12 week endpoint |
| Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Total Pain Score Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12. | Total pain score where zero equals "no pain" to ten equals "pain as bad as you can imagine" from 12 week endpoint vs baseline. | Baseline and12 week endpoint |
| Adverse Event |
|
| Lack of Efficacy |
|
| Study drug non-compliant |
|
| All other |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Placebo tablets taken orally twice a day (BID) for 12 weeks during the double blind period.
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| OG001 | Placebo | Placebo tablets taken orally twice a day (BID) for 12 weeks during the double blind period. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | The Number of Patients Achieving at Least 30% Improvement in Pain Score at Week 12 of the Double-blind Maintenance Period From the Start of the Open Label Period. | The number of patients achieving at least 30% improvement in pain score at Week 12 of the double-blind maintenance period on an 11-point numerical rating scale compared with the start of the open-label period. | Intent-to-treat analysis set. | Posted | Number | participants | Start of Open Label and at 12 weeks of Double Blind |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients Who Reported Very Much Improved or Much Improved From Baseline in Patient Global Impression of Change Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12 | Percentage of patients who reported very much improved (1) or much improved (2) based on an ordinal measure indicating change from start of double blind treatment (on a scale of 7 = Very much worse to 1 = Very much improved) | Intent to Treat (ITT) analysis set included all randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study medication during the double blind maintenance period with the exception of 3 subjects who were enrolled in the study twice. | Posted | Number | percentage of patients | 12 week endpoint |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in EuroQol-5 (EQ-5D) Health Status Index to Week 12 | Change from baseline to end point in EuroQol-5 Dimension Questionnaire. A higher score indicates an improvement in health in the Health Status Index. The EuroQol-5 is a five dimensional health state classification. Each dimension is assessed on a 3-point ordinal scale (1=no problems, 2=some problems, 3=extreme problems). The responses to the five EQ-5D dimensions were scored using a utility-weighted algorithm to derive an EQ-5D health status index score between 0 to 1, with 1.00 indicating "full health" and 0 representing dead. | Intent to Treat (ITT) analysis set included all randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study medication during the double blind maintenance period with the exception of 3 subjects who were enrolled in the study twice. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | 12 week endpoint (change from baseline) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Sleep Latency Time in Hours Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12. | A Sleep Questionnaire addressed the following question: "How long after bedtime/lights out did you fall asleep last night (hours)?" 12 week endpoint-mean changes from baseline at endpoint for sleep latency. Decrease in time (hours) indicates improvement. | Intent to Treat (ITT) analysis set included all randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study medication during the double blind maintenance period with the exception of 3 subjects who were enrolled in the study twice. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Hours | Baseline and 12 week endpoint |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Total Pain Score Over the Last Week of the Maintenance Period at Week 12. | Total pain score where zero equals "no pain" to ten equals "pain as bad as you can imagine" from 12 week endpoint vs baseline. | Intent to Treat (ITT) analysis set included all randomized subjects who took at least one dose of study medication during the double blind maintenance period with the exception of 3 subjects who were enrolled in the study twice. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Scores on a scale | Baseline and12 week endpoint |
|
|
|
| 10 |
| 196 |
| 87 |
| 196 |
| EG001 | Placebo | Placebo tablets taken orally twice a day (BID) for 12 weeks during the double blind period. | 3 | 193 | 48 | 193 |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Prostate infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Urosepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Diabetes mellitus inadequate control | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypokalemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Angina unstable | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Asthenia | General disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Blood glucose increased | Investigations | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Lung cancer metastatic | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Suicidal ideation | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Venous thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Costochondritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Restlessness | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Myalgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Bone pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (10.1) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
The only disclosure restriction on the PI is that the sponsor can review results communications prior to public release and can embargo communications regarding trial results for a period that is less than or equal to 60 days from the time submitted to the sponsor for review. The sponsor cannot require changes to the communication. The sponsor can embargo for an additional 60 days to allow for the filing of a patent application.
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D006838 |
| Hydrocarbons |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |