Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
PI left Health System
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to compare patients who underwent decompression/discectomy with pedicle screw fusion to patients who received decompression/discectomy without fusion.
Lumbar disc herniations are quite common and typically improve after surgical correction. However, some patients develop recurrent herniations at the same level. Controversy exists as to why reherniated discs occur. Moreover, existing research does not settle the issue of whether a second decompression/discectomy or a repeat decompression/discectomy with pedicle screw fusion is the more successful treatment. This study is designed to compare differences in patient-reported pain, physical function, and satisfaction between the two types of surgery patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Adult patients with recurrent lumbar disc herniation.
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Alan M. Scarrow, MD, JD | St. John's Health System, Missouri | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D017116 | Low Back Pain |
| D007405 | Intervertebral Disc Displacement |
| D006547 | Hernia |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001416 | Back Pain |
| D010146 | Pain |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D013568 |
| Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
| D013122 | Spinal Diseases |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D020763 | Pathological Conditions, Anatomical |