| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| CENA713D1301E1 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Ono Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. | INDUSTRY |
The purpose of this study was to investigate the 5cm^2 and 10cm^2 doses of rivastigmine transdermal patch in terms of efficacy and safety in patients with probable Alzheimer's Disease (MMSE [Mini Mental State Examination] 10-20). A 52-week extension phase evaluated the safety and tolerability of long-term treatment by rivastigmine transdermal patch in patients with probable Alzheimer's Disease (AD).
Patients were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to one of the 3 treatment arms (placebo, rivastigmine 5 cm^2 and rivastigmine 10 cm^2) in a ratio of 1:1:1. During the Double-blind treatment phase, patients entered a 16-week Titration Period followed by an 8-week Maintenance Period. During the open-label extension phase, all patients started treatment with a 2.5 cm^2 patch and the dose was increased to 10 cm^2 over a 16-week titration period, followed by a maintenance period of 36 weeks.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Participants received daily matching placebo patch for the duration of the 24-week double-blind treatment phase of the study. |
|
| rivastigmine 5 cm^2 | Experimental | During the 16-week titration period patients received daily rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 patch for the first 4 weeks and thereafter daily rivastigmine 5 cm^2 patch. For patients who experienced intolerability, the dose was adjusted to rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 daily. Patients then entered the 8-week maintenance period during which time they continued to receive the dose of rivastigmine they were taking at the end of the titration period. |
|
| Rivastigmine 10 cm^2 | Experimental | During the 16-week titration period patients received daily rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 patch for the first 4 weeks, rivastigmine 5 cm^2 patch for the next 4 weeks, rivastigmine 7.5 cm^2 patch for the next 4 weeks and then rivastigmine 10 cm^2 patch for the final 4 weeks. For patients who experienced intolerability, the dose was adjusted downward. Patients then entered the 8-week maintenance period during which time they continued to receive the dose of rivastigmine they were taking at the end of the titration period. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rivastigmine transdermal patch | Drug | Rivastigmine transdermal patch was provided in the following sizes and doses: 2.5 cm^2 (4.5 mg), 5 cm^2 (9 mg), 7.5 cm^2 (13.5 mg), and 10 cm^2 (18 mg). The caregiver applied one patch on the back of a patient, placed alternately from the right to the left side at approximately the same time each day. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Japan Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-J Cog) | The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Japan cognitive subscale (ADAS-J cog) was used to measure change in cognitive function. The ADAS-J cog score ranges from 0-70, with higher total scores indicating more impairment. A negative change score indicates improvement from baseline. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Overall Clinical Rating of Change From Baseline to Week 24 Measured by the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus - Japan (CIBIC Plus-J) | The overall clinical rating of change from baseline to week 24 measured by the 7-point CIBIC plus-J scale. The Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change plus Caregiver Input consists of 3 subscales: Disability Assessment of Dementia Scale, Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale and Mental Function Impairment Scale, as well as the Clinician's Global Impression of Change (CGIC). Participants are scored according to the following:
| Baseline and Week 24 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in CIBIC Plus-J Score Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) | The Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) was used to assess levels of difficulty in activities of daily living (ADL). The DAD is administered through an interview with the caregiver. A total score is obtained by adding the rating for each question and converting this to a total score out of 100 (%). Higher scores represent less disability in ADL while lower scores indicate more dysfunction. A positive change score indicates an improvement from baseline. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria may apply
Extension Phase Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Novartis Pharmaceuticals | Novartis Pharmaceuticals | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Novartis Investigative Site | Hokkaido Region | Hokkaido | Japan |
Participants were randomly assigned in a double-blind manner to one of the 3 treatment arms (placebo, rivastigmine 5 cm^2 and rivastigmine 10 cm^2) in a ratio of 1:1:1. Following the 24-week double-blind treatment phase, participants could enroll in the open-label extension phase, where all participants were titrated up to the 10 cm^2 patch dose.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo | Participants received daily matching placebo patch for the duration of the 24-week double-blind treatment phase of the study. |
| FG001 | Rivastigmine 5 cm^2 | During the 16-week titration period patients received daily rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 patch for the first 4 weeks and then daily rivastigmine 5 cm^2 patch. For patients who experienced intolerability, the dose was adjusted to rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 daily. Patients then entered the 8-week maintenance period during which time they continued to receive the dose of rivastigmine they were taking at the end of the titration period. |
| FG002 | Rivastigmine 10 cm^2 | During the 16-week titration period patients received daily rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 patch for the first 4 weeks, rivastigmine 5 cm^2 for the next 4 weeks, rivastigmine 7.5 cm^2 patch for the next 4 weeks and then rivastigmine 10 cm^2 patch for the final 4 weeks. For patients who experienced intolerability, the dose was adjusted downward. Patients then entered the 8-week maintenance period during which time they continued to receive the dose of rivastigmine they were taking at the end of the titration period. |
| FG003 | Open-label Extension | All participants started treatment with daily rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 patch. The dose was increased to 5, 7.5, and 10 cm^2 after 4 weeks of treatment at each dose level. One patch was applied once daily. The dose level reached by each individual patient at the end of this 16 weeks was maintained for the rest of the study duration (Maintenance Period). A predetermined "allowed adjustment" scheme was followed in patients who required dose adjustment due to low tolerability. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 24-Week Double-Blind Treatment Phase |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||
| 52-Week Open-Label Extension Phase |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | Participants received daily matching placebo patch for the duration of the 24-week double-blind treatment phase of the study. |
| BG001 | Rivastigmine 5 cm^2 | During the 16-week titration period patients received daily rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 patch for the first 4 weeks and then daily rivastigmine 5 cm^2 patch. For patients who experienced intolerability, the dose was adjusted to rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 daily. Patients then entered the 8-week maintenance period during which time they continued to receive the dose of rivastigmine they were taking at the end of the titration period. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Demographic data for the double-blind treatment phase is provided for the safety population. This population consists of all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study medication and had at least one safety assessment after baseline. |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in the Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Japan Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-J Cog) | The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Japan cognitive subscale (ADAS-J cog) was used to measure change in cognitive function. The ADAS-J cog score ranges from 0-70, with higher total scores indicating more impairment. A negative change score indicates improvement from baseline. | The Intent-to-treat population: This population includes all randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least a baseline and any post-baseline assessment on treatment (i.e. not more than 2 days after the last known date of study drug) for one of the primary efficacy variables. LOCF was utilized. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and Week 24 |
|
Adverse event data were collected during the 24-week double-blind treatment phase and during the 52-week open-label extension phase.
Data presented in the Placebo, Rivastigmine 5 cm^2 and Rivastigmine 10 cm^2 columns represent AEs collected during the 24-week double blind treatment phase of the study. Data presented in the Open-Label Extension column are AEs collected during the 52-week open-label extension phase of the study, after completion of the double-blind phase.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo (24 Weeks) | Participants received daily matching placebo patch for the duration of the 24-week double-blind treatment phase of the study. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Acute myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study Director | Novartis Pharmaceuticals | 862-778-8300 |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000544 | Alzheimer Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003704 | Dementia |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Placebo | Drug | Placebo transdermal patch was provided in the following sizes: 2.5 cm^2, 5 cm^2, 7.5 cm^2 and 10 cm^2. The caregiver applied one patch on the back of a patient, placed alternately from the right to the left side at approximately the same time each day. |
|
| Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in CIBIC Plus-J Score Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (Behave-AD) | BEHAVE-AD was used to assess patient behavior and psychiatric symptoms. It covers symptoms in seven categories: paranoid and delusional ideation, hallucinations, activity disturbances, diurnal rhythm disturbances, aggressiveness, affective disorders and anxieties, and phobias. Caregivers rate behavioral symptoms on a 0-3 scale. The total score can range from 0 to 66, with a lower score indicating better function. A negative change score indicates an improvement from baseline. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in CIBIC Plus-J Score Mental Function Impairment Scale (MENFIS) | MENFIS was used to assess patient cognitive and psychiatric function, and evaluates core symptoms of dementia including cognitive, motivational and emotional aspects. The total score ranges from 0 to 78. The higher the score, the greater the functional deficit. A negative change score indicates an improvement from baseline. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) | The MMSE is a screening test for cognitive dysfunction. The test consists of five sections (orientation, registration, attention-calculation, recall, and language); the total score can range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating better function. A positive change score indicates improvement from baseline. | Baseline and Week 24 |
| Extension Phase: Change From Extension Phase Baseline to End of Extension in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) | The MMSE is a screening test for cognitive dysfunction. The test consists of five sections (orientation, registration, attention-calculation, recall, and language); the total score can range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating better function. A positive change score indicates improvement. This outcome measured the change in MMSE from the beginning of the open-label extension phase through to Week 52 of the extension phase. | Extension Phase Baseline and Week 52 of extension phase |
| Extension Phase: Change From Extension Phase Baseline to End of Extension in CIBIC Plus-J Score Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) | The Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) was used to assess levels of difficulty in activities of daily living. The DAD is administered through an interview with the caregiver. A total score is obtained by adding the rating for each question and converting this to a total score out of 100 (%). Higher scores represent less disability in activities of daily living while lower scores indicate more dysfunction. A positive change score indicates an improvement from baseline. | Extension Phase Baseline and Week 52 of extension phase |
| Extension Phase: Change From Extension Phase Baseline to End of Extension in Modified Crichton Scale | The Modified Crichton Scale includes a total of seven items evaluated in eight grades that assess basic activities of daily living, communication functions, psychiatric symptoms and quality of life; the total score can range from 0 to 56, with a lower score indicating better function. A negative change score indicates an improvement from baseline. | Extension Phase Baseline and Week 52 of extension phase |
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Unsatisfactory therapeutic effect |
|
| Protocol Violation |
|
| Death |
|
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| BG002 | Rivastigmine 10 cm^2 | During the 16-week titration period patients received daily rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 patch for the first 4 weeks, rivastigmine 5 cm^2 for the next 4 weeks, rivastigmine 7.5 cm^2 patch for the next 4 weeks and then rivastigmine 10 cm^2 patch for the final 4 weeks. For patients who experienced intolerability, the dose was adjusted downward. Patients then entered the 8-week maintenance period during which time they continued to receive the dose of rivastigmine they were taking at the end of the titration period. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Mean |
| Standard Deviation |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 | Rivastigmine 5 cm^2 | During the 16-week titration period patients received daily rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 patch for the first 4 weeks and then daily rivastigmine 5 cm^2 patch. For patients who experienced intolerability, the dose was adjusted to rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 daily. Patients then entered the 8-week maintenance period during which time they continued to receive the dose of rivastigmine they were taking at the end of the titration period. |
| OG002 | Rivastigmine 10 cm^2 | During the 16-week titration period patients received daily rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 patch for the first 4 weeks, rivastigmine 5 cm^2 for the next 4 weeks, rivastigmine 7.5 cm^2 patch for the next 4 weeks and then rivastigmine 10 cm^2 patch for the final 4 weeks. For patients who experienced intolerability, the dose was adjusted downward. Patients then entered the 8-week maintenance period during which time they continued to receive the dose of rivastigmine they were taking at the end of the titration period. |
|
|
| Primary | Overall Clinical Rating of Change From Baseline to Week 24 Measured by the Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change Plus - Japan (CIBIC Plus-J) | The overall clinical rating of change from baseline to week 24 measured by the 7-point CIBIC plus-J scale. The Clinician's Interview-Based Impression of Change plus Caregiver Input consists of 3 subscales: Disability Assessment of Dementia Scale, Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale and Mental Function Impairment Scale, as well as the Clinician's Global Impression of Change (CGIC). Participants are scored according to the following:
| Intent-to-treat population utilizing LOCF. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline and Week 24 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in CIBIC Plus-J Score Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) | The Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) was used to assess levels of difficulty in activities of daily living (ADL). The DAD is administered through an interview with the caregiver. A total score is obtained by adding the rating for each question and converting this to a total score out of 100 (%). Higher scores represent less disability in ADL while lower scores indicate more dysfunction. A positive change score indicates an improvement from baseline. | Intent-to-treat population. Only patients with a valid baseline and post-baseline score were included. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and Week 24 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in CIBIC Plus-J Score Behavioral Pathology in Alzheimer's Disease Rating Scale (Behave-AD) | BEHAVE-AD was used to assess patient behavior and psychiatric symptoms. It covers symptoms in seven categories: paranoid and delusional ideation, hallucinations, activity disturbances, diurnal rhythm disturbances, aggressiveness, affective disorders and anxieties, and phobias. Caregivers rate behavioral symptoms on a 0-3 scale. The total score can range from 0 to 66, with a lower score indicating better function. A negative change score indicates an improvement from baseline. | Intent-to-treat population. Only patients with a valid baseline and post-baseline score were included. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and Week 24 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in CIBIC Plus-J Score Mental Function Impairment Scale (MENFIS) | MENFIS was used to assess patient cognitive and psychiatric function, and evaluates core symptoms of dementia including cognitive, motivational and emotional aspects. The total score ranges from 0 to 78. The higher the score, the greater the functional deficit. A negative change score indicates an improvement from baseline. | Intent-to-treat population. Only patients with a valid baseline and post-baseline score were included. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and Week 24 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) | The MMSE is a screening test for cognitive dysfunction. The test consists of five sections (orientation, registration, attention-calculation, recall, and language); the total score can range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating better function. A positive change score indicates improvement from baseline. | Intent-to-treat population. Only patients with a valid baseline and post-baseline score were included. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline and Week 24 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Extension Phase: Change From Extension Phase Baseline to End of Extension in Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) | The MMSE is a screening test for cognitive dysfunction. The test consists of five sections (orientation, registration, attention-calculation, recall, and language); the total score can range from 0 to 30, with a higher score indicating better function. A positive change score indicates improvement. This outcome measured the change in MMSE from the beginning of the open-label extension phase through to Week 52 of the extension phase. | Intent-to-treat population utilizing last observation carried forward. This population includes all patients who received at least one dose of open-label study medication and had at least one efficacy assessment on treatment in the open-label extension Phase. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Extension Phase Baseline and Week 52 of extension phase |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Extension Phase: Change From Extension Phase Baseline to End of Extension in CIBIC Plus-J Score Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) | The Disability Assessment for Dementia (DAD) was used to assess levels of difficulty in activities of daily living. The DAD is administered through an interview with the caregiver. A total score is obtained by adding the rating for each question and converting this to a total score out of 100 (%). Higher scores represent less disability in activities of daily living while lower scores indicate more dysfunction. A positive change score indicates an improvement from baseline. | Intent-to-treat population utilizing last observation carried forward. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Extension Phase Baseline and Week 52 of extension phase |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Extension Phase: Change From Extension Phase Baseline to End of Extension in Modified Crichton Scale | The Modified Crichton Scale includes a total of seven items evaluated in eight grades that assess basic activities of daily living, communication functions, psychiatric symptoms and quality of life; the total score can range from 0 to 56, with a lower score indicating better function. A negative change score indicates an improvement from baseline. | Intent-to-treat population utilizing last observation carried forward. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Extension Phase Baseline and Week 52 of extension phase |
|
|
|
| 20 |
| 286 |
| 157 |
| 286 |
| EG001 | Rivastigmine 5 cm^2 (24 Weeks) | During the 16-week titration period patients received daily rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 patch for the first 4 weeks and thereafter daily rivastigmine 5 cm^2 patch. For patients who experienced intolerability, the dose was adjusted to rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 daily. Patients then entered the 8-week maintenance period during which time they continued to receive the dose of rivastigmine they were taking at the end of the titration period. | 14 | 282 | 206 | 282 |
| EG002 | Rivastigmine 10 cm^2 (24 Weeks) | During the 16-week titration period patients received daily rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 patch for the first 4 weeks, rivastigmine 5 cm^2 patch for the next 4 weeks, rivastigmine 7.5 cm^2 patch for the next 4 weeks and then rivastigmine 10 cm^2 patch for the final 4 weeks. For patients who experienced intolerability, the dose was adjusted downward. Patients then entered the 8-week maintenance period during which time they continued to receive the dose of rivastigmine they were taking at the end of the titration period. | 18 | 287 | 214 | 287 |
| EG003 | Open-Label Extension (52 Weeks) | All participants started treatment with daily rivastigmine 2.5 cm^2 patch. The dose was increased to 5, 7.5, and 10 cm^2 after 4 weeks of treatment at each dose level. One patch was applied once daily. The dose level reached by each individual patient at the end of this 16 weeks was maintained for the rest of the study duration (Maintenance Period). A predetermined "allowed adjustment" scheme was followed in patients who required dose adjustment due to low tolerability. | 74 | 637 | 491 | 637 |
| Angina pectoris | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Angina unstable | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bradycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cardiac failure | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vertigo positional | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Food poisoning | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastric polyps | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastric ulcer | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastric ulcer haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ileus | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Inguinal hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Reflux oesophagitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Subileus | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Condition aggravated | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypothermia | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bile duct stone | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cholelithiasis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Appendicitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bacteraemia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bronchiectasis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cholangitis suppurative | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Empyema | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Endocarditis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Herpes zoster | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Contusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Femoral neck fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Femur fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fractured sacrum | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Head injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Heat stroke | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Humerus fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lumbar vertebral fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Near drowning | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pelvic fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Radius fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Scapula fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Skeletal injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Spinal compression fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Subdural haematoma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Tendon rupture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Traumatic brain injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ulna fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper limb fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vertebral injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Alanine aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Aspartate aminotransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Blood pressure increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Electrocardiogram T wave inversion | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gamma-glutamyltransferase increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Decreased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diabetes mellitus | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fracture delayed union | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lumbar spinal stenosis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Muscular weakness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Osteoarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pseudarthrosis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Spinal osteoarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bone cancer metastatic | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Breast cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Colon cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastric cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Inflammatory carcinoma of the breast | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Large intestine carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pancreatic neoplasm | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Prostate cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rectal cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Transitional cell carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Brain stem haemorrhage | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cerebral haemorrhage | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cerebral infarction | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Convulsion | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dementia Alzheimer's type | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Epilepsy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Loss of consciousness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Subarachnoid haemorrhage | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Behavioural and psychiatric symptoms of dementia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Calculus ureteric | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Haematuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Prostatitis | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Asthma | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Interstitial lung disease | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pleural effusion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumonia aspiration | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumothorax | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Embolism | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Varicose vein | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Venous thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Application site erythema | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Application site oedema | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Application site pruritus | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Contusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Weight decreased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Decreased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dermatitis contact | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data (i.e., data from all sites) in the clinical trial.
| D024801 |
| Tauopathies |
| D019636 | Neurodegenerative Diseases |
| D019965 | Neurocognitive Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Minimally improved |
|
| Unchanged |
|
| Minimally worse |
|
| Moderately worse |
|
| Markedly worse |
|
|
| Change from Baseline |
|
|
| Change from Baseline |
|
|
| Change from Baseline |
|
|
| Change from Baseline |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|