Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| WA20494 |
Not provided
Not provided
Based on analysis of results and consideration of available treatments, the overall benefit to risk profile of ocrelizumab was not favorable in RA.
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Roche Pharma AG | INDUSTRY |
This study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of ocrelizumab, compared with placebo, in combination with methotrexate in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who have had an inadequate response to methotrexate. Patients will be randomized to receive placebo, 200mg of intravenous ocrelizumab or 500mg of i.v. ocrelizumab on Days 1 and 15. A repeat course of i.v. treatment will be administered at Weeks 24 and 26. All patients will receive 7.5mg - 25mg/week concomitant methotrexate at a stable dose. The anticipated time on study treatment is 1-2 years. Target sample size is 1000.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Placebo × 2 IV + MTX | Placebo Comparator | Participants received two intravenous (IV) infusion matching placebo to ocrelizumab on Day 1 and Day 15. A repeat course was administered at Weeks 24 and 26. Methotrexate 7.5-25 milligram (mg) was administered weekly. |
|
| Ocrelizumab 200 mg × 2 IV + MTX | Experimental | Participants received two IV infusion of ocrelizumab 200 mg on Day 1 and Day 15. A repeat course was administered at Weeks 24 and 26. Methotrexate 7.5-25 mg was administered weekly. |
|
| Ocrelizumab 500 mg × 2 IV + MTX | Placebo Comparator | Participants received two IV infusion of ocrelizumab 500 mg on Day 1 and Day 15. A repeat course was administered at Weeks 24 and 26. Methotrexate 7.5-25 mg was administered weekly. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Methotrexate | Drug | Methotrexate tablet was administered orally at a dose 7.5-25 mg |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24 | ACR20 is defined as 20 percent improvement respectively in: a) swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) and b) Three of the following 5 assessments: Subject's global assessment of pain by VAS Subject's global assessment of disease activity (VAS) Investigator/Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS) Subject's assessment of disability measured by HAQ-DI Acute phase reactant (ESR or CRP). | Week 24 |
| Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 48 | ACR20 is defined as 20 percent improvement respectively in: a) swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) and b) Three of the following 5 assessments: Subject's global assessment of pain by VAS Subject's global assessment of disease activity (VAS) Investigator/Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS) Subject's assessment of disability measured by HAQ-DI Acute phase reactant (ESR or CRP). | Week 48 |
| Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) | An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Pre-existing conditions which worsened during the study were also reported as AEs. | From baseline up to 8.5 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Participants With a Major Clinical Response (ACR70 for ≥ 6 Months) at Week 48 | ACR70 is defined as 70 percent improvement respectively in: a) swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) and b) Three of the following 5 assessments: Subject's global assessment of pain by VAS Subject's global assessment of disease activity (VAS) Investigator/Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS) Subject's assessment of disability measured by HAQ-DI Acute phase reactant (ESR or CRP). |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria:
Exclusion criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Wolfgang Dummer, M.D. | Genentech, Inc. | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Trial Information Support Line | South San Francisco | California | 94080 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 24498318 | Derived | Emery P, Rigby W, Tak PP, Dorner T, Olech E, Martin C, Millar L, Travers H, Fisheleva E. Safety with ocrelizumab in rheumatoid arthritis: results from the ocrelizumab phase III program. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 3;9(2):e87379. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0087379. eCollection 2014. | |
| 21905001 | Derived | Rigby W, Tony HP, Oelke K, Combe B, Laster A, von Muhlen CA, Fisheleva E, Martin C, Travers H, Dummer W. Safety and efficacy of ocrelizumab in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate: results of a forty-eight-week randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase III trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2012 Feb;64(2):350-9. doi: 10.1002/art.33317. |
Not provided
Not provided
Qualified researchers may request access to individual patient level data through the clinical study data request platform (www.vivli.org). Further details on Roche's criteria for eligible studies are available here (https://vivli.org/members/ourmembers/). For further details on Roche's Global Policy on the Sharing of Clinical Information and how to request access to related clinical study documents, see here (https://www.roche.com/research\_and\_development/who\_we\_are\_how\_we\_work/clinical\_trials/our\_commitment\_to\_data\_sharing.htm).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo × 2 IV + MTX | Participants received two intravenous (IV) infusion matching placebo to ocrelizumab on Day 1 and Day 15. A repeat course was administered at Weeks 24 and 26. Methotrexate 7.5-25 milligram (mg) was administered weekly. |
| FG001 | Ocrelizumab 200 mg × 2 IV + MTX | Participants received two IV infusion of ocrelizumab 200 mg on Day 1 and Day 15. A repeat course was administered at Weeks 24 and 26. Methotrexate 7.5-25 mg was administered weekly. |
| FG002 | Ocrelizumab 500 mg × 2 IV + MTX | Participants received two IV infusion of ocrelizumab 500 mg on Day 1 and Day 15. A repeat course was administered at Weeks 24 and 26. Methotrexate 7.5-25 mg was administered weekly. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo × 2 IV + MTX | Participants received two intravenous (IV) infusion matching placebo to ocrelizumab on Day 1 and Day 15. A repeat course was administered at Weeks 24 and 26. Methotrexate 7.5-25 milligram (mg) was administered weekly. |
| BG001 | Ocrelizumab 200 mg × 2 IV + MTX |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 24 | ACR20 is defined as 20 percent improvement respectively in: a) swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) and b) Three of the following 5 assessments: Subject's global assessment of pain by VAS Subject's global assessment of disease activity (VAS) Investigator/Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS) Subject's assessment of disability measured by HAQ-DI Acute phase reactant (ESR or CRP). | ITT population included all randomised participants who had received any part of an infusion of study medication. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of participants | Week 24 |
|
Baseline up to 33 months.
All patients that received any part of an infusion of study drug and provided at least one assessment of safety were included in the safety population. In patients who had received the incorrect therapy from that intended were summarized in the group according to the highest dose of double-blind therapy they actually received.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo × 2 IV + MTX | Participants received two intravenous (IV) infusion matching placebo to ocrelizumab on Day 1 and Day 15. A repeat course was administered at Weeks 24 and 26. Methotrexate 7.5-25 milligram (mg) was administered weekly. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Deep vein thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical Communications | F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd | +41 616878333 | global.trial_information@roche.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001172 | Arthritis, Rheumatoid |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008727 | Methotrexate |
| C533411 | ocrelizumab |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000630 | Aminopterin |
| D011622 | Pterins |
| D011621 | Pteridines |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ocrelizumab | Drug | Ocrelizumab was administered via IV infusion at a dose specified in arm description |
|
| Placebo | Drug | Matching placebo to ocrelizumab was administered via IV infusion |
|
| Week 48 |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Remission (DAS28 < 2.6) at Weeks 24 and 48 | The Disease Activity Score (DAS28) score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR). DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. | Weeks 24 and 48 |
| Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Weeks 24 and 48 | The Disease Activity Score (DAS28) score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR). DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. | Weeks 24 and 48 |
| European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Rates (Categorical DAS Responders) at Weeks 24 and 48 | DAS 28 score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity and ESR. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. EULAR Good response: DAS28 ≤ 3.2 and a change from Baseline < -1.2. EULAR Moderate response: DAS28 >3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or a change from Baseline < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2. | Weeks 24 and 48 |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response at Weeks 24 and 48 | ACR50 is defined as 50 percent improvement respectively in: a) swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) and b) Three of the following 5 assessments: Subject's global assessment of pain by VAS Subject's global assessment of disease activity (VAS) Investigator/Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS) Subject's assessment of disability measured by HAQ-DI Acute phase reactant (ESR or CRP). | Weeks 24 and 48 |
| Percentage of Participants Achieving an ACR70 Response at Weeks 24 and 48 | ACR70 is defined as 70 percent improvement respectively in: a) swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) and b) Three of the following 5 assessments: Subject's global assessment of pain by VAS Subject's global assessment of disease activity (VAS) Investigator/Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS) Subject's assessment of disability measured by HAQ-DI Acute phase reactant (ESR or CRP). | Weeks 24 and 48 |
| Percent Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 24 and 48 | 66 joints were assessed for swelling and joints are classified as swollen/not swollen giving a total possible swollen joint count score of 0 to 66. | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
| Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 24 and 48 | 68 joints were assessed for tenderness and joints were classified as tender/not tender giving a total possible tender joint count score of 0 to 68. | Baseline, Weeks 24, 48 |
| Change From Baseline in Patient's Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Weeks 24 and 48 | The patient assessed their pain on a 0 to 100 millimeters (mm) horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "unbearable pain". A negative change indicated improvement. | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
| Change From Baseline in Physician's Global VAS at Weeks 24 and 48 | The physician's global assessment of disease activity is assessed on a 0 to 100 millimetres (mm) horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the physician. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
| Change From Baseline in Patient's Global VAS at Weeks 24 and 48 | The patient's global assessment of disease activity is assessed on a 0 to 100 millimeters (mm) horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the patient. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
| Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 24 and 48 | The serum concentration of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) is measured in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). A reduction in the level is considered an improvement. | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
| Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Weeks 24 and 48 | HAQ-DI is a self-completed patient questionnaire specific for Rheumatoid Arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities. Each domain has at least 2 component questions. There are 4 possible responses for each component 0=without any difficulty 1=with some difficulty 2=with much difficulty 3=unable to do. Calculate HAQ-DI the patient must have a domain score for at least 6 of 8 domains. The HAQ-DI is the sum of the scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score (in range 6-8) for a total possible score minimum/maximum 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
| Change From Baseline in the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 24 and 48 | HAQ-DI is a self-completed patient questionnaire specific for Rheumatoid Arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities. Each domain has at least 2 component questions. There are 4 possible responses for each component 0=without any difficulty 1=with some difficulty 2=with much difficulty 3=unable to do. Calculate HAQ-DI the patient must have a domain score for at least 6 of 8 domains. The HAQ-DI is the sum of the scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score (in range 6-8) for a total possible score minimum/maximum 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
| Change From Baseline in the Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Weeks 24 and 48 | mTSS: measure of joint damage that combines scores for bone erosion and joint space narrowing (JNS). Erosion score: total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=normal to 3.5=very severe erosion. JNS score: total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint). mTSS scores ranged from 0 (normal) to 292 (worst possible total score). Change= mTSS score at Week 24 minus score at baseline. An increase in mTSS from baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement. | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
| Change From Baseline in Modified Erosion Score at Weeks 24 and 48 | The erosion score is a summary of erosion severity in 32 joints of the hands (16 joints per hand) and 12 joints in the feet (6 joints per foot). Each joint is scored, according to the surface area involved, from 0 to 5, with 5 indicating extensive loss of bone from more than one-half of the articulating bone (0 indicates no erosion). Because each side of a foot joint is graded separately on this scale, the maximum erosion score for a foot joint is 10. The maximal erosion score is 280. | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
| Change From Baseline in Modified Joint Space Narrowing Score at Weeks 24 and 48 | The joint space narrowing score summarizes the severity of joint space narrowing in 30 joints of the hands and 12 joints of the feet. Assessment of joint space narrowing for each hand (15 joints per hand) and foot (6 joints per foot), including subluxation, is scored from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating no/normal joint space narrowing and 4 indicating complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation. The maximum joint space narrowing score is 168. | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
| Percentage of Participants Without Radiographic Progression Defined as Change in mTSS ≤ 0 at Weeks 24 and 48 | Radiographic progression was defined as a change of ≤ 0 in the total Genant-modified Sharp score. The Genant-modified Sharp scoring system assesses structural damage due to rheumatoid arthritis in radiographs. A score for erosions of 0-3.5 (8 gradations) is assigned for 14 joints in each hand and wrist, and 6 joints in each foot. Joint space narrowing scores of 0-4 (9 gradations) are assigned to 13 joints in each hand and 6 joints in each foot. The maximum erosion score is 40 x 3.5 = 140. The maximum joint space narrowing score is 38 x 4.0 = 152. Both the erosion and joint space narrowing scores are normalized to 145 and are added together for a maximum total Genant-modified Sharp score of 290; the minimum score is 0. A higher score indicates more damage. | Weeks 24, 48 |
| Percentage of Participants With a Reduction in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) From Baseline at Week 48 | mTSS: measure of joint damage that combines scores for bone erosion and joint space narrowing (JNS). Erosion score: total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=normal to 3.5=very severe erosion. JNS score: total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint). mTSS scores ranged from 0 (normal) to 292 (worst possible total score). Change= mTSS score at Week 24 minus score at baseline. An increase in mTSS from baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement. | Baseline, Week 48 |
| Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of Greater Than or Equal to 0.25 Units in the HAQ-DI Score at Weeks 24 and | HAQ-DI is a self-completed patient questionnaire specific for Rheumatoid Arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities. Each domain has at least 2 component questions. There are 4 possible responses for each component 0=without any difficulty 1=with some difficulty 2=with much difficulty 3=unable to do. Calculate HAQ-DI the patient must have a domain score for at least 6 of 8 domains. The HAQ-DI is the sum of the scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score (in range 6-8) for a total possible score minimum/maximum 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. | Week 24, 48 |
| Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Subscale and Summary Scores at Weeks 24 and 48 | The SF-36 is a questionnaire used to assess physical functioning and is made up of eight domains: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional and Mental Health. Transforming and standardizing these domains leads to the calculation of the Physical and Mental Component Summary measures. Scores ranging from 0 to 100, with 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
| Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Fatigue Assessment at Weeks 24 and 48 | The FACIT-Fatigue score was calculated according to a 13-item questionnaire that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the participants fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). Clinically relevant improvement is defined as a greater than or equal to (≥)5-point change from Baseline. | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
| Change From Baseline in Pain Quality and Impact of Pain on Daily Function Measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Short Form at Weeks 24 and 48 | The modified BPI (short-form) is a short questionnaire to assess the severity of pain and the impact of pain on daily functions. The first two questions relate to average and current pain respectively and are assessed on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain, and 10 represents pain as bad as one can imagine. The degree to which pain has interfered with 7 different aspects is also rated on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents that pain does not interfere and 10 that pain completely interferes. | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
| Study Terminated by Sponsor |
|
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Lack of Efficacy |
|
| Non-Compliance with Study Drug |
|
| Adverse Event |
|
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
Participants received two IV infusion of ocrelizumab 200 mg on Day 1 and Day 15. A repeat course was administered at Weeks 24 and 26. Methotrexate 7.5-25 mg was administered weekly. |
| BG002 | Ocrelizumab 500 mg × 2 IV + MTX | Participants received two IV infusion of ocrelizumab 500 mg on Day 1 and Day 15. A repeat course was administered at Weeks 24 and 26. Methotrexate 7.5-25 mg was administered weekly. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG001 | Ocrelizumab 200 mg × 2 IV + MTX | Participants received two IV infusion of ocrelizumab 200 mg on Day 1 and Day 15. A repeat course was administered at Weeks 24 and 26. Methotrexate 7.5-25 mg was administered weekly. |
| OG002 | Ocrelizumab 500 mg × 2 IV + MTX | Participants received two IV infusion of ocrelizumab 500 mg on Day 1 and Day 15. A repeat course was administered at Weeks 24 and 26. Methotrexate 7.5-25 mg was administered weekly. |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20 Response at Week 48 | ACR20 is defined as 20 percent improvement respectively in: a) swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) and b) Three of the following 5 assessments: Subject's global assessment of pain by VAS Subject's global assessment of disease activity (VAS) Investigator/Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS) Subject's assessment of disability measured by HAQ-DI Acute phase reactant (ESR or CRP). | ITT population included all randomised participants who had received any part of an infusion of study medication. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of participants | Week 48 |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) | An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a subject administered a pharmaceutical product which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. Pre-existing conditions which worsened during the study were also reported as AEs. | The safety population included all participants who were randomized and received any part of an infusion of study drug and provided at least one assessment of safety. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | From baseline up to 8.5 years |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a Major Clinical Response (ACR70 for ≥ 6 Months) at Week 48 | ACR70 is defined as 70 percent improvement respectively in: a) swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) and b) Three of the following 5 assessments: Subject's global assessment of pain by VAS Subject's global assessment of disease activity (VAS) Investigator/Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS) Subject's assessment of disability measured by HAQ-DI Acute phase reactant (ESR or CRP). | ITT population included all randomised participants who had received any part of an infusion of study medication. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of participants | Week 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving Disease Activity Score 28 (DAS28) Remission (DAS28 < 2.6) at Weeks 24 and 48 | The Disease Activity Score (DAS28) score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR). DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. | ITT population included all randomised participants who had received any part of an infusion of study medication. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of participants | Weeks 24 and 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in DAS28 at Weeks 24 and 48 | The Disease Activity Score (DAS28) score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity and Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR). DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. | ITT population included all randomised participants who had received any part of an infusion of study medication. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a Scale | Weeks 24 and 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response Rates (Categorical DAS Responders) at Weeks 24 and 48 | DAS 28 score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity and ESR. DAS28 total scores range from 0 to approximately 10. Scores below 2.6 indicate best disease control and scores above 5.1 indicate worse disease control. A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. EULAR Good response: DAS28 ≤ 3.2 and a change from Baseline < -1.2. EULAR Moderate response: DAS28 >3.2 to ≤ 5.1 or a change from Baseline < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2. | ITT population included all randomised participants who had received any part of an infusion of study medication. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Weeks 24 and 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving an ACR50 Response at Weeks 24 and 48 | ACR50 is defined as 50 percent improvement respectively in: a) swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) and b) Three of the following 5 assessments: Subject's global assessment of pain by VAS Subject's global assessment of disease activity (VAS) Investigator/Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS) Subject's assessment of disability measured by HAQ-DI Acute phase reactant (ESR or CRP). | ITT population included all randomised participants who had received any part of an infusion of study medication. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of participants | Weeks 24 and 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Achieving an ACR70 Response at Weeks 24 and 48 | ACR70 is defined as 70 percent improvement respectively in: a) swollen joint count (SJC) and tender joint count (TJC) and b) Three of the following 5 assessments: Subject's global assessment of pain by VAS Subject's global assessment of disease activity (VAS) Investigator/Physician's global assessment of disease activity (VAS) Subject's assessment of disability measured by HAQ-DI Acute phase reactant (ESR or CRP). | ITT population included all randomised participants who had received any part of an infusion of study medication. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of participants | Weeks 24 and 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline in Swollen Joint Count (SJC) at Weeks 24 and 48 | 66 joints were assessed for swelling and joints are classified as swollen/not swollen giving a total possible swollen joint count score of 0 to 66. | ITT population included all randomised participants who had received any part of an infusion of study medication. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percentage of Change | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Tender Joint Count (TJC) at Weeks 24 and 48 | 68 joints were assessed for tenderness and joints were classified as tender/not tender giving a total possible tender joint count score of 0 to 68. | ITT population included all randomised participants who had received any part of an infusion of study medication. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Tendor joins | Baseline, Weeks 24, 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Patient's Pain Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Weeks 24 and 48 | The patient assessed their pain on a 0 to 100 millimeters (mm) horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS). The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no pain" and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "unbearable pain". A negative change indicated improvement. | ITT population included all randomised participants who had received any part of an infusion of study medication. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on scale | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Physician's Global VAS at Weeks 24 and 48 | The physician's global assessment of disease activity is assessed on a 0 to 100 millimetres (mm) horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the physician. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). | ITT population included all randomised participants who had received any part of an infusion of study medication. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on scale | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Patient's Global VAS at Weeks 24 and 48 | The patient's global assessment of disease activity is assessed on a 0 to 100 millimeters (mm) horizontal visual analogue scale (VAS) by the patient. The left-hand extreme of the line equals 0 mm, and is described as "no disease activity" (symptom-free and no arthritis symptoms) and the right-hand extreme equals 100 mm, as "maximum disease activity" (maximum arthritis disease activity). A negative change from Baseline indicated improvement. | ITT population included all randomised participants who had received any part of an infusion of study medication. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on scale | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in C-Reactive Protein (CRP) at Weeks 24 and 48 | The serum concentration of C-Reactive Protein (CRP) is measured in milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL). A reduction in the level is considered an improvement. | ITT population included all randomised participants who had received any part of an infusion of study medication. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Milligrams per deciliter (mg/dL) | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Weeks 24 and 48 | HAQ-DI is a self-completed patient questionnaire specific for Rheumatoid Arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities. Each domain has at least 2 component questions. There are 4 possible responses for each component 0=without any difficulty 1=with some difficulty 2=with much difficulty 3=unable to do. Calculate HAQ-DI the patient must have a domain score for at least 6 of 8 domains. The HAQ-DI is the sum of the scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score (in range 6-8) for a total possible score minimum/maximum 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. | ITT population included all randomised participants who had received any part of an infusion of study medication. Here, 'n' signifies the number of partcipants evaluated at a specified time point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percentage Change from Baseline | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR) at Weeks 24 and 48 | HAQ-DI is a self-completed patient questionnaire specific for Rheumatoid Arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities. Each domain has at least 2 component questions. There are 4 possible responses for each component 0=without any difficulty 1=with some difficulty 2=with much difficulty 3=unable to do. Calculate HAQ-DI the patient must have a domain score for at least 6 of 8 domains. The HAQ-DI is the sum of the scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score (in range 6-8) for a total possible score minimum/maximum 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. | ITT population included all randomised participants who had received any part of an infusion of study medication. Here, 'n' signifies the number of participants evaluated at a specified time point. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percentage Change from Baseline | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) at Weeks 24 and 48 | mTSS: measure of joint damage that combines scores for bone erosion and joint space narrowing (JNS). Erosion score: total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=normal to 3.5=very severe erosion. JNS score: total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint). mTSS scores ranged from 0 (normal) to 292 (worst possible total score). Change= mTSS score at Week 24 minus score at baseline. An increase in mTSS from baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement. | mITT population. Number of participants analysed signifies participants who were evaluated for the endpoint. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on scale | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Modified Erosion Score at Weeks 24 and 48 | The erosion score is a summary of erosion severity in 32 joints of the hands (16 joints per hand) and 12 joints in the feet (6 joints per foot). Each joint is scored, according to the surface area involved, from 0 to 5, with 5 indicating extensive loss of bone from more than one-half of the articulating bone (0 indicates no erosion). Because each side of a foot joint is graded separately on this scale, the maximum erosion score for a foot joint is 10. The maximal erosion score is 280. | mITT population included all participants who were in the ITT analysis set and had both baseline radiograph and at least one post-baseline radiograph for campaign 1. Here, the number of participants analysed signifies participants who were evaluated for the endpoint. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on scale | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Modified Joint Space Narrowing Score at Weeks 24 and 48 | The joint space narrowing score summarizes the severity of joint space narrowing in 30 joints of the hands and 12 joints of the feet. Assessment of joint space narrowing for each hand (15 joints per hand) and foot (6 joints per foot), including subluxation, is scored from 0 to 4, with 0 indicating no/normal joint space narrowing and 4 indicating complete loss of joint space, bony ankylosis, or luxation. The maximum joint space narrowing score is 168. | mITT population included all participants who were in the ITT analysis set and had both baseline radiograph and at least one post-baseline radiograph for campaign 1. Here, the number of participants analysed signifies participants who were evaluated for the endpoint. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on scale | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Without Radiographic Progression Defined as Change in mTSS ≤ 0 at Weeks 24 and 48 | Radiographic progression was defined as a change of ≤ 0 in the total Genant-modified Sharp score. The Genant-modified Sharp scoring system assesses structural damage due to rheumatoid arthritis in radiographs. A score for erosions of 0-3.5 (8 gradations) is assigned for 14 joints in each hand and wrist, and 6 joints in each foot. Joint space narrowing scores of 0-4 (9 gradations) are assigned to 13 joints in each hand and 6 joints in each foot. The maximum erosion score is 40 x 3.5 = 140. The maximum joint space narrowing score is 38 x 4.0 = 152. Both the erosion and joint space narrowing scores are normalized to 145 and are added together for a maximum total Genant-modified Sharp score of 290; the minimum score is 0. A higher score indicates more damage. | The modified Intent-to-Treat (mITT) population included all participants who were in the ITT analysis set and had both baseline radiograph and at least one post-baseline radiograph for campaign 1. Here, the number of participants analysed signifies subjects who were evaluated for the endpoint. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of Participants | Weeks 24, 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a Reduction in Modified Total Sharp Score (mTSS) From Baseline at Week 48 | mTSS: measure of joint damage that combines scores for bone erosion and joint space narrowing (JNS). Erosion score: total of 14 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for erosion using an 8-point scale where 0=normal to 3.5=very severe erosion. JNS score: total of 13 locations in each hand and wrist and 6 joints in the foot were evaluated for joint narrowing score using a 9-point scale where 0=normal to 4.0=definite ankylosis (stiffness or fixation of a joint). mTSS scores ranged from 0 (normal) to 292 (worst possible total score). Change= mTSS score at Week 24 minus score at baseline. An increase in mTSS from baseline represents disease progression and/or joint worsening, no change represents halting of disease progression, and a decrease represents improvement. | mITT population. Number of participants analysed signifies participants who were evaluated for the endpoint. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of Participants | Baseline, Week 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants With a Reduction of Greater Than or Equal to 0.25 Units in the HAQ-DI Score at Weeks 24 and | HAQ-DI is a self-completed patient questionnaire specific for Rheumatoid Arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip; common daily activities. Each domain has at least 2 component questions. There are 4 possible responses for each component 0=without any difficulty 1=with some difficulty 2=with much difficulty 3=unable to do. Calculate HAQ-DI the patient must have a domain score for at least 6 of 8 domains. The HAQ-DI is the sum of the scores, divided by the number of domains that have a score (in range 6-8) for a total possible score minimum/maximum 0 (best) to 3 (worst). A negative change from baseline indicated improvement. | ITT population included all randomised participants who had received any part of an infusion of study medication. Here, the number of participants analysed signifies participants evaluated for this endpoint. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of Participants | Week 24, 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) Subscale and Summary Scores at Weeks 24 and 48 | The SF-36 is a questionnaire used to assess physical functioning and is made up of eight domains: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional and Mental Health. Transforming and standardizing these domains leads to the calculation of the Physical and Mental Component Summary measures. Scores ranging from 0 to 100, with 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. | ITT population included all randomised participants who had received any part of an infusion of study medication. Here, the number of participants analysed signifies participants evaluated for this endpoint. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on scale | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue Scale (FACIT-F) Fatigue Assessment at Weeks 24 and 48 | The FACIT-Fatigue score was calculated according to a 13-item questionnaire that assesses self-reported fatigue and its impact upon daily activities and function. FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Participants scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the participant's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the participants fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the participant's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). Clinically relevant improvement is defined as a greater than or equal to (≥)5-point change from Baseline. | ITT population included all randomised participants who had received any part of an infusion of study medication. Here, the number of participants analysed signifies participants evaluated for this endpoint. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on scale | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Pain Quality and Impact of Pain on Daily Function Measured by the Brief Pain Inventory (BPI) Short Form at Weeks 24 and 48 | The modified BPI (short-form) is a short questionnaire to assess the severity of pain and the impact of pain on daily functions. The first two questions relate to average and current pain respectively and are assessed on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents no pain, and 10 represents pain as bad as one can imagine. The degree to which pain has interfered with 7 different aspects is also rated on a scale from 0 to 10, where 0 represents that pain does not interfere and 10 that pain completely interferes. | ITT population included all randomised participants who had received any part of an infusion of study medication. Here, the number of participants analysed signifies participants evaluated for this endpoint. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on scale | Baseline, Week 24, 48 |
|
|
|
| 5 |
| 318 |
| 73 |
| 318 |
| 228 |
| 318 |
| EG001 | Ocrelizumab 200 mg × 2 IV + MTX | Participants received two IV infusion of ocrelizumab 200 mg on Day 1 and Day 15. A repeat course was administered at Weeks 24 and 26. Methotrexate 7.5-25 mg was administered weekly. | 2 | 343 | 61 | 343 | 272 | 343 |
| EG002 | Ocrelizumab 500 mg × 2 IV + MTX | Participants received two IV infusion of ocrelizumab 500 mg on Day 1 and Day 15. A repeat course was administered at Weeks 24 and 26. Methotrexate 7.5-25 mg was administered weekly. | 8 | 345 | 78 | 345 | 273 | 345 |
| Aortic aneurysm | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Aortic dissection | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rheumatoid vasculitis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vasculitis necrotising | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| B-cell lymphoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Basal cell carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Breast cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Intraductal proliferative breast lesion | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Non-Hodgkin's lymphoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Prostate cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Uterine leiomyoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Adenocarcinoma of colon | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bladder transitional cell carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bronchial carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cervix carcinoma stage 0 | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Chronic myeloid leukaemia | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastric cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Inflammatory carcinoma of the breast | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lymphoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Malignant melanoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Metastatic renal cell carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Myxoid liposarcoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ovarian cancer metastatic | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ovarian epithelial cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Renal cell carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Squamous cell carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Squamous cell carcinoma of lung | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Squamous cell carcinoma of skin | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| T-cell lymphoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Thyroid neoplasm | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypersensitivity | Immune system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abortion missed | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abortion spontaneous | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Non-cardiac chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Drug dependence | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypomania | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Mental status changes | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ovarian cyst | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ovarian cyst | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cervical dysplasia | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Endometrial hyperplasia | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Endometriosis | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ovarian cyst ruptured | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Uterine polyp | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Uterine prolapse | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Humerus fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Infusion related reaction | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Femur fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Femur fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Toxicity to various agents | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hip fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Multiple fractures | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Multiple injuries | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper limb fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Accidental overdose | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ankle fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Carbon monoxide poisoning | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Clavicle fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Comminuted fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Femoral neck fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Joint dislocation | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Laceration | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lower limb fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lumbar vertebral fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Overdose | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Tendon rupture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Haemoglobin abnormal | Investigations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Acute myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Coronary artery disease | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cardiac failure congestive | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pericardial effusion | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pericarditis | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Supraventricular tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Arteriosclerosis coronary artery | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Atrial flutter | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diastolic dysfunction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Mitral valve incompetence | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Palpitations | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumonitis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Alveolitis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Asthma | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bronchiectasis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Interstitial lung disease | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pulmonary oedema | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sinus disorder | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Anaemia of chronic disease | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Febrile neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pancytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Transient ischaemic attack | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cerebrovascular accident | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Brain oedema | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cerebral ischaemia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Convulsion | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dementia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Grand mal convulsion | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ischaemic stroke | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lacunar infarction | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nerve compression | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Subarachnoid haemorrhage | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cataract | Eye disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Inner ear disorder | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Otosalpingitis | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vertigo | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Umbilical hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diverticular perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diverticulum | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Haemorrhoidal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pancreatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Renal failure acute | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Calculus ureteric | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hydronephrosis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nephrolithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Renal colic | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Stag horn calculus | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Urogenital fistula | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cholecystitis acute | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cholecystitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cholelithiasis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rheumatoid arthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Intervertebral disc protrusion | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Foot deformity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Muscular weakness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Osteochondrosis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Osteonecrosis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rotator cuff syndrome | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Basedow's disease | Endocrine disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diabetes mellitus | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Electrolyte imbalance | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Type 2 diabetes mellitus | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyelonephritis acute | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Appendicitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Herpes zoster | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Postoperative wound infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abscess soft tissue | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Acute hepatitis B | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Acute sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Appendicitis perforated | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Borrelia infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bronchopneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cellulitis gangrenous | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Clostridium difficile colitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dengue fever | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhoea infectious | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diverticulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Extradural abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fungal oesophagitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastroenteritis viral | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Histoplasmosis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lower respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Meningitis aseptic | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Mycobacterium kansasii infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Osteomyelitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Paronychia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumonia staphylococcal | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumonia viral | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Purulent synovitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyelonephritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyelonephritis chronic | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Soft tissue infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Staphylococcal bacteraemia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Wound infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Infusion related reaction | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dyspepsia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Herpes zoster | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 16.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
The Study being conducted under this Agreement is part of the Overall Study. Investigator is free to publish in reputable journals or to present at professional conferences the results of the Study, but only after the first publication or presentation that involves the Overall Study. The Sponsor may request that Confidential Information be deleted and/or the publication be postponed in order to protect the Sponsor's intellectual property rights.
| D003240 |
| Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| D000072471 |
| Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| Weighted difference |
| 34.5 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 27.4 |
| 41.5 |
| Superiority |
|
| Change at Week |
|
|
| Change at Week 48 |
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
|
|
| Change at Week 48 |
|
|
| Change at Week 48 |
|
|
| Change at Week 48 |
|
|
|
| Change at Week 48 |
|
|
| Change at Week 48 |
|
|
|
| Change at Week 48 |
|
|
| Change at Week 24 |
|
|
| Change at Week 48 |
|
|
| Change at Week 24 |
|
|
| Change at week 48 |
|
|
| Change at Week 24 |
|
|
| Change at Week 48 |
|
|
|
|
| Change at Week 24: Mental Component Summary |
|
|
| Change at Week 48: Mental Component Summary |
|
|
| Baseline: Physical Component Summary |
|
|
| Change at Week 24: Physical Component Summary |
|
|
| Change at Week 48: Physical Component Summary |
|
|
| Change at Week 24 |
|
|
| Change at Week 48 |
|
|
| Baseline: pain right now |
|
|
| Change at Week 24: average pain |
|
|
| Change at Week 24: pain right now |
|
|
| Change at Week 48: average pain |
|
|
| Change at Week 48: pain right now |
|
|