Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to determine if the ACADIA® Facet Replacement System is effective in the treatment of spinal stenosis. The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the overall success rate of the Anatomic Facet Replacement System in patients with spinal stenosis when compared to a posterior spinal fusion control.
Spinal Stenosis continues to be a major cause of back and leg pain. The condition is attributed to narrowing of the space around the nerves in the lumbar spine. This is often caused by the degenerative process in the spine and the facet joints. The current treatment calls for removal of bone around the affected nerve including the facet joints and fusing the posterior of the spine to ensure the segments remain stable.
The ACADIA® Facet Replacement System (AFRS) allows for an anatomic reconstruction of the facet joint after decompression and removal of the degenerated facet. Like the original facet joint, the replacement implant is designed to reproduce facet motion while restoring normal stability and motion.
The ACADIA® Facet Replacement System (AFRS) has been designed on the principals that have allowed other total joint replacement procedures to provide significant patient benefits. These guiding principals include:
The ACADIA® Facet Replacement System allows the surgeon to remove the offending bone while preserving the motion of the facet joint.
This study will evaluate the outcomes of patients using the AFRS™ investigation compared to those receiving instrumented posterior fusion procedure. Patients will be required to complete study visits before the procedure and at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, 24 months post procedure and annually thereafter as required by FDA. Follow up visits consist of administration of questionnaires, radiographs and neurological assessment.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACADIA® | Experimental | Investigational surgical treatment using the ACADIA Facet Replacement system |
|
| Control Instrumented PLF | Active Comparator | Control surgical treatment using an instrumented posterolateral fusion |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Non-randomized ACADIA® Facet Replacement System | Device | Non-randomized investigational ACADIA Facet Replacement System used for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Measure of Pain/Disability Using the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) Physical Function Score | Physical Function is measured on a scale of 1-4 points (lower values are considered a better outcome) | 24 months |
| Measure of Pain/Disability Using the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) Symptom Severity Score | Symptom Severity is measured on a scale of 1-5 points (lower values are considered a better outcome) | 24 months |
| Number of Participants Who Maintained or Improved in Neurological Status. | Neurological status is based on four types of measurement parameters: muscle strength, straight leg raise, sensory function, and reflexes. Each of the four parameters will be coded as Stable or Improved OR Deteriorated. Neurological assessment scores must be stable or improved compared with the preoperative baseline to be considered "Stable or Improved" neurological status. If these scores have deteriorated as compared to the preoperative baseline, then the neurological status is considered "Deteriorated". | 24 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Right Leg Pain | The visual analog scale (VAS) is a questionnaire used to quantify a subjective experience, such as the intensity of pain. The scale is a 100mm line labeled with "no pain" on the left border and "as severe as it could be" on the right border. The subject is instructed to make a mark along the line to represent the intensity of right leg pain currently being experienced; 0mm is equal to no pain and 100mm is pain as severe as it could be. The clinician records the distance of the mark in millimeters from the left end of the scale. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spine Group Beverly Hills | Beverly Hills | California | 90211 | United States | ||
| Cedars-Sinai Spine Center |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Non-randomized ACADIA® | Non-randomized investigational surgical treatment using the ACADIA Facet Replacement system for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis |
| FG001 | Randomized ACADIA® |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prot_SAP | Yes | Yes | No | Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan | Feb 14, 2013 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Randomized ACADIA® Facet Replacement System | Device | Randomized investigational ACADIA Facet Replacement System used for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis |
|
| Randomized Instrumented posterolateral fusion (PLF) | Device | Randomized control treatment using an instrumented posterolateral fusion for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis |
|
| 24 months |
| Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Left Leg Pain | The visual analog scale (VAS) is a questionnaire used to quantify a subjective experience, such as the intensity of pain. The scale is a 100mm line labeled with "no pain" on the left border and "as severe as it could be" on the right border. The subject is instructed to make a mark along the line to represent the intensity of left leg pain currently being experienced; 0mm is equal to no pain and 100mm is pain as severe as it could be. The clinician records the distance of the mark in millimeters from the left end of the scale. | 24 months |
| Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Back Pain | The visual analog scale (VAS) is a questionnaire used to quantify a subjective experience, such as the intensity of pain. The scale is a 100mm line labeled with "no pain" on the left border and "as severe as it could be" on the right border. The subject is instructed to make a mark along the line to represent the intensity of back pain currently being experienced; 0mm is equal to no pain and 100mm is pain as severe as it could be. The clinician records the distance of the mark in millimeters from the left end of the scale. | 24 months |
| Number of Participants With a Change of at Least 15 Points in Pain/Disability Using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Score at 24 Months Compared With the Score at Baseline | The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a commonly used outcome-measure questionnaire for low back pain in a hospital setting. It is a self-administered questionnaire divided into ten sections designed to assess limitations of various activities of daily living. Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, 5 representing the greatest disability. The scores for all questions answered are summed, then multiplied by two to obtain the index (range 0 to 100). Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible. | 24 months |
| Los Angeles |
| California |
| 90048 |
| United States |
| Desert Orthopaedic Center | Rancho Mirage | California | 92270 | United States |
| Boulder Neurosurgical & Spine Associates | Boulder | Colorado | 80303 | United States |
| Spine Colorado | Durango | Colorado | 81301 | United States |
| Rocky Mountain Associates (RMA) in Orthopedic Medicine | Loveland | Colorado | 80538 | United States |
| Florida Spine Institute | Clearwater | Florida | 33765 | United States |
| Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education | Tampa | Florida | 33637 | United States |
| Neurological Institute of Savannah and Center for Spine | Savannah | Georgia | 31405 | United States |
| Indiana Spine Group | Carmel | Indiana | 46032 | United States |
| Fort Wayne Orthopaedics | Fort Wayne | Indiana | 46804 | United States |
| Spine Institute of Louisiana | Shreveport | Louisiana | 71101 | United States |
| Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopaedics | Owings Mills | Maryland | 21117 | United States |
| UMASS Memorial Medical Center | Worcester | Massachusetts | 01605 | United States |
| Spine Midwest, Inc. | Jefferson City | Missouri | 65101 | United States |
| Springfield Neurological & Spine Institute | Springfield | Missouri | 65804 | United States |
| Albany Medical Center | Albany | New York | 12208 | United States |
| Carolina Neurosurgery and Spine Associates, P.C. | Charlotte | North Carolina | 28204 | United States |
| OrthoCarolina Spine Center | Charlotte | North Carolina | 28207 | United States |
| Riverhills Healthcare | Cincinnati | Ohio | 45242 | United States |
| Abington Memorial Hospital | Abington | Pennsylvania | 19001 | United States |
| Allegheny General Hospital | Pittsburgh | Pennsylvania | 15212 | United States |
| Charleston Brain & Spine | Charleston | South Carolina | 29406 | United States |
| Medical University of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina | 29425 | United States |
| Neuro-Spine Solutions | Bristol | Tennessee | 37620 | United States |
| The Center for Sports Medicine & Orthopedics | Chattanooga | Tennessee | 37404 | United States |
| Central Texas Spine Institute | Austin | Texas | 78731 | United States |
| University of Utah | Salt Lake City | Utah | 84108 | United States |
| University of Puerto Rico | San Juan | 00921 | Puerto Rico |
Randomized investigational surgical treatment using the ACADIA Facet Replacement system for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis
| FG002 | Randomized Instrumented PLF | Randomized control surgical treatment using an instrumented posterolateral fusion for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Non-randomized ACADIA® | Non-randomized investigational surgical treatment using the ACADIA Facet Replacement system for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis |
| BG001 | Randomized ACADIA® | Randomized investigational surgical treatment using the ACADIA Facet Replacement system for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis |
| BG002 | Randomized Instrumented PLF | Randomized control surgical treatment using an instrumented posterolateral fusion for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Height | Mean | Standard Deviation | inches |
| |||||||||||||||
| Weight | Mean | Standard Deviation | pounds |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Measure of Pain/Disability Using the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) Physical Function Score | Physical Function is measured on a scale of 1-4 points (lower values are considered a better outcome) | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 24 months |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Measure of Pain/Disability Using the Zurich Claudication Questionnaire (ZCQ) Symptom Severity Score | Symptom Severity is measured on a scale of 1-5 points (lower values are considered a better outcome) | One patient from the Randomized ACADIA group did not have ZCQ Symptom Severity data at 24 months | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 24 months |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Number of Participants Who Maintained or Improved in Neurological Status. | Neurological status is based on four types of measurement parameters: muscle strength, straight leg raise, sensory function, and reflexes. Each of the four parameters will be coded as Stable or Improved OR Deteriorated. Neurological assessment scores must be stable or improved compared with the preoperative baseline to be considered "Stable or Improved" neurological status. If these scores have deteriorated as compared to the preoperative baseline, then the neurological status is considered "Deteriorated". | Only patients with Neurological data at 24 months and treated with ACADIA or the control treatment were analyzed | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 24 months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Right Leg Pain | The visual analog scale (VAS) is a questionnaire used to quantify a subjective experience, such as the intensity of pain. The scale is a 100mm line labeled with "no pain" on the left border and "as severe as it could be" on the right border. The subject is instructed to make a mark along the line to represent the intensity of right leg pain currently being experienced; 0mm is equal to no pain and 100mm is pain as severe as it could be. The clinician records the distance of the mark in millimeters from the left end of the scale. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 24 months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Left Leg Pain | The visual analog scale (VAS) is a questionnaire used to quantify a subjective experience, such as the intensity of pain. The scale is a 100mm line labeled with "no pain" on the left border and "as severe as it could be" on the right border. The subject is instructed to make a mark along the line to represent the intensity of left leg pain currently being experienced; 0mm is equal to no pain and 100mm is pain as severe as it could be. The clinician records the distance of the mark in millimeters from the left end of the scale. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 24 months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Back Pain | The visual analog scale (VAS) is a questionnaire used to quantify a subjective experience, such as the intensity of pain. The scale is a 100mm line labeled with "no pain" on the left border and "as severe as it could be" on the right border. The subject is instructed to make a mark along the line to represent the intensity of back pain currently being experienced; 0mm is equal to no pain and 100mm is pain as severe as it could be. The clinician records the distance of the mark in millimeters from the left end of the scale. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | score on a scale | 24 months |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With a Change of at Least 15 Points in Pain/Disability Using the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) Score at 24 Months Compared With the Score at Baseline | The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) is a commonly used outcome-measure questionnaire for low back pain in a hospital setting. It is a self-administered questionnaire divided into ten sections designed to assess limitations of various activities of daily living. Each section is scored on a 0-5 scale, 5 representing the greatest disability. The scores for all questions answered are summed, then multiplied by two to obtain the index (range 0 to 100). Zero is equated with no disability and 100 is the maximum disability possible. | Six Non-randomized ACADIA®, 37 Randomized ACADIA® and 23 Randomized instrumented PLF did not complete the 24 month visit and thus were not analyzed. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 24 months |
|
24 months
The Total Number of Participants at Risk for the "Randomized ACADIA" Arm/Group is not consistent with numbers provided in the Participant Flow module. The discrepancy is due to one patient being randomized to ACADIA but not receiving the ACADIA treatment. This patient is included in the intent-to-treat population for efficacy analyses. It is not possible to make any changes to data including Adverse Event Terms as the study is closed and all analysis is complete.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Non-randomized ACADIA® | Non-randomized investigational surgical treatment using the ACADIA Facet Replacement system for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis | 2 | 46 | 20 | 46 | 46 | 46 |
| EG001 | Randomized ACADIA® | Randomized investigational surgical treatment using the ACADIA Facet Replacement system for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis | 4 | 226 | 111 | 226 | 213 | 226 |
| EG002 | Randomized Instrumented PLF | Randomized control surgical treatment using an instrumented posterolateral fusion for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis | 3 | 117 | 40 | 117 | 108 | 117 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiovascular | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Death | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Gastrointestinal | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Infection - Deep Wound | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Other | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Psychological | Psychiatric disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Trauma | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urogenital | Renal and urinary disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Infection - Other | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Infection - Superficial Wound | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cerebrovascular | Vascular disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Surgery - Adjacent Level | Surgical and medical procedures | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Wound Issue | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Respiratory | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vertebral Fracture | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain-Neck and/or Upper Extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain - Back | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain-Back and Lower Extremities | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain Lower Extremities | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain - Hip | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Musculoskeletal | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Surgery - Index Level | Surgical and medical procedures | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Surgery - Other (Non-Lumbar) | Surgical and medical procedures | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Surgery - Other Lumbar | Surgical and medical procedures | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dural Tear | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Neurological Focal Lumbar | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Radiographic | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Metal Allergy | Immune system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cardiovascular | Cardiac disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dysesthesia - Upper Extremities | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Gastrointestinal | Gastrointestinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Headache | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Other | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain - Other | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Psychological | Psychiatric disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Trauma | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Urogenital | Renal and urinary disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dysesthesia - Lower Extremities | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Infection - Superficial Wound | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Infection - Other | Infections and infestations | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Cerebrovascular | Vascular disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Surgery - Adjacent Level | Surgical and medical procedures | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Wound Issue | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Respiratory | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Spinous Process Fracture | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Vertebral Fracture | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Muscle Spasms | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain-Neck and/or Upper Extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain - Back | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain-Back and Lower Extremities | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain - Back and Hip | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain Lower Extremities | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain - Hip | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Musculoskeletal | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Neurological Systemic | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dysesthesia - Other | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain-Back and Lower Extremities with Dysesthesia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain-Back with Dysesthesia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pain Lower Extremities with Dysesthesia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Surgery-Index Level | Surgical and medical procedures | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Surgery - Other (Non-Lumbar) | Surgical and medical procedures | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Weakness | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Paresthesia - Upper Extremities | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Paresthesia - Lower Extremities | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Paresthesia - Other | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Pseudoarthrosis | Hepatobiliary disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Surgery - Other Lumbar | Surgical and medical procedures | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Dural Tear | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Neurological Focal Lumbar | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Neurolgical Focal Other | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Peripheral Neuropathy | Nervous system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Radiographic | General disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
| ||
| Metal Allergy | Immune system disorders | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
To prevent premature disclosure of trade secrets or other confidential information, Investigator agrees not to present, publish, or disclose study results or information about the investigational device without the express written consent of the sponsor.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Director of Clinical Affairs | Globus Medical | 610-930-1800 | jmyer@globusmedical.com |
| Aug 24, 2020 |
| Prot_SAP_000.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013130 | Spinal Stenosis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013122 | Spinal Diseases |
| D001847 | Bone Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| Caucasian |
|
| Hispanic |
|
| Other |
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
Randomized control surgical treatment using an instrumented posterolateral fusion for the treatment of lumbar spinal stenosis |
|
|