Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| P50HL073994 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is a severe lung condition that causes respiratory failure. Individuals with ARDS often require the use of an artificial breathing machine, known as a mechanical ventilator. High frequency oscillatory ventilation (HFOV) is a form of mechanical ventilation that pumps small amounts of air into the lungs at a constant high rate. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of two HFOV methods in individuals with ARDS.
ARDS is a serious condition that involves lung inflammation and fluid accumulation in the air sacs, leading to low blood oxygen levels and respiratory failure. It is often fatal and affects approximately 160,000 individuals each year in the United States. The main form of treatment for ARDS is delivery of oxygen and a continuous level of pressure to the damaged lungs through mechanical ventilation. However, some methods of mechanical ventilation may cause ventilator-associated lung injury (VALI), a condition that can result from overdistension of the lungs during inspiration or from excessive mechanical forces. VALI can delay or prevent healing from respiratory failure.
HFOV is a mechanical ventilation method that pumps small amounts of air into the lungs at a constant high rate. Because the increments of air are small the likelihood of experiencing overdistension and developing VALI may be reduced. While HFOV is an effective, commonly used ventilation method, there have been no studies that demonstrate the efficacy of HFOV in comparison to the efficacy of conventional mechanical ventilation methods. This study will compare two different HFOV techniques: the HFOV-Hi method, which uses higher airway pressure, and the HFOV-Lo method, which uses lower airway pressure. The purpose of this study is to compare the safety and efficacy of HFOV-Hi, HFOV-Lo, and standard mechanical ventilation methods in individuals with ARDS.
This study will enroll individuals with ARDS at four Baltimore hospitals. Participants will be randomly assigned to receive either HFOV-Hi or HFOV-Lo. All participants will receive their assigned HFOV method for 7 days, until spontaneous breathing occurs, or until death, whichever occurs first. Blood collected at baseline and Days 1 and 3 will be analyzed for markers of inflammation and lung injury. Participants' clinical status will be monitored until they no longer need ventilation and return home, or for up to 60 days while in the hospital. Individuals being treated for ARDS at the participating hospitals who decline to enroll in the study will be asked for permission to monitor their medical progress. These individuals will not take part in any study procedures, but their clinical information will be used for comparison purposes. Additionally, clinical information on other ARDS patients admitted to the hospital over the previous 2 years will be analyzed.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| HFOV-Lo | Experimental | High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation using lower mean airway pressures and higher FiO2s. |
|
| HFOV-Hi | Experimental | High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation using higher mean airway pressures |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation-Hi | Procedure | HFOV will be conducted with recruitment maneuvers and with a table of mPaw and FiO2s that include higher mPaw's. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of ventilator free days | Measured at 28 days | |
| Changes in plasma concentration of IL-6 | Measured at 3 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of intensive care unit free days | Measured at 28 days | |
| Mortality | Measured at 60 days | |
| Number of hospital free days |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Acute onset of all of the following criteria within a 24-hour period:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Roy G. Brower, MD | Johns Hopkins University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johns Hopkins Bayview Medical Center | Baltimore | Maryland | 21224 | United States | ||
| Johns Hopkins Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 16236739 | Background | Rubenfeld GD, Caldwell E, Peabody E, Weaver J, Martin DP, Neff M, Stern EJ, Hudson LD. Incidence and outcomes of acute lung injury. N Engl J Med. 2005 Oct 20;353(16):1685-93. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050333. | |
| 10793162 | Background | Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Network; Brower RG, Matthay MA, Morris A, Schoenfeld D, Thompson BT, Wheeler A. Ventilation with lower tidal volumes as compared with traditional tidal volumes for acute lung injury and the acute respiratory distress syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2000 May 4;342(18):1301-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM200005043421801. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| High Frequency Oscillatory Ventilation-Lo | Procedure | HFOV will be conducted without routine recruitment maneuvers and with a table of mPaw and FiO2s that include relatively low mPaw's. |
|
| Measured at 60 days |
| Changes in plasma IL1ra | Measured at 3 days |
| Changes in plasma IL-1 | Measured at 3 days |
| Changes in plasma IL-10 | Measured at 3 days |
| Changes in plasma surfactant protein D | Measured at 3 days |
| Changes in plasma von Willebrand factor | Measured at 3 days |
| Baltimore |
| Maryland |
| 21287 |
| United States |
| University of Maryland Medical Center | Baltimore | Maryland | United States |
| Ohio State University Medical Center | Columbus | Ohio | United States |
| Wilford Hall Medical Center | San Antonio | Texas | United States |
| 10988205 | Background | Krishnan JA, Brower RG. High-frequency ventilation for acute lung injury and ARDS. Chest. 2000 Sep;118(3):795-807. doi: 10.1378/chest.118.3.795. |
| 12231488 | Background | Derdak S, Mehta S, Stewart TE, Smith T, Rogers M, Buchman TG, Carlin B, Lowson S, Granton J; Multicenter Oscillatory Ventilation For Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Trial (MOAT) Study Investigators. High-frequency oscillatory ventilation for acute respiratory distress syndrome in adults: a randomized, controlled trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2002 Sep 15;166(6):801-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.2108052. |
| 8463913 | Background | Randomized study of high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in infants with severe respiratory distress syndrome. HiFO Study Group. J Pediatr. 1993 Apr;122(4):609-19. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(05)83548-6. |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D012128 | Respiratory Distress Syndrome |
| D055371 | Acute Lung Injury |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008171 | Lung Diseases |
| D012140 | Respiratory Tract Diseases |
| D012120 | Respiration Disorders |
| D055370 | Lung Injury |
Not provided
Not provided