Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 07-D-0016 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Pharmacy temporarily suspended by FDA
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Hypoparathyroidism is a rare condition associated with a low level of parathyroid hormone (PTH) in the blood. Hypoparathyroidism can be genetic and show up in childhood, or it can occur later in life. If it occurs later, it is usually due to damage or removal of the parathyroid glands during neck surgery. PTH helps control the amount of calcium in blood, kidneys, and bones. Low levels of calcium in the blood can cause a person to feel sick. It can cause cramping or tingling in the hands, feet, or other parts of the body. A very low blood calcium can cause fainting or seizures.
The standard treatment for hypoparathyroidism is a form of vitamin D (calcitriol) and calcium supplements. Keeping normal blood levels of calcium can be difficult. Sometimes there is too much calcium in the urine even if the calcium levels in the blood are low. High calcium in the kidneys and urine can cause problems such as calcium deposits in the kidney (nephrocalcinosis) or kidney stones. High levels of calcium in the kidney may keep the kidney from functioning normally. Treatment with PTH will replace the hormone you are missing. Your disease may be better controlled on PTH than on calcium and calcitriol.
Researchers at the NIH have conducted prior studies to establish synthetic human parathyroid hormone 1-34 (HPTH) as a treatment for hypoparathyroidism. Other studies have shown that PTH may improve calcium levels in blood and urine. The primary purpose of this research study is to evaluate the effects of synthetic human parathyroid hormone 1-34 (HPTH) replacement therapy on bone in adults and teenagers with hypoparathyroidism.
The study takes 5 (Omega) years to complete and requires 12 inpatient visits to the National Institutes of Health Clinical Center in Bethesda, MD. The first visit will help the study team decide whether you are eligible. This visit will last 2 to 3 days. After taking calcium and calcitriol for 1 - 7 months you will return to the NIH Clinical Center for the baseline visit. The baseline visit is the visit that you will start your PTH; you will also undergo a bone biopsy during the visit. The baseline visit may last 7 to 10 days. You will then take PTH twice a day for 5 years. You will be asked to return to the NIH clinical center every 6 months for 10 follow-up visits. During one of the follow-up visits, you will have a second bone biopsy taken from the other hip. That second biopsy will be done after 1 year, 2 years, or 4 years of taking PTH; the researchers will assign the timing of the second biopsy randomly. You will be asked to go to your local laboratory for blood and urine tests between each follow up visit. At first the blood tests will occur at least once a week. Later, you will need to go to your local laboratory for blood tests at least once a month and urine tests once every 3 months. The local laboratory visits and follow-up visits at the NIH Clinical Center will help the study team determine whether the HPTH treatment is controlling your hypoparathyroidism.
Objectives
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the skeletal effects of hormone replacement therapy with HPTH in hypoparathyroidism.
Study Population
This study will enroll up to 69 subjects with physician-diagnosed hypoparathyroidism.<TAB>
Design
This study will treat hypoparathyroid individuals with synthetic human PTH 1-34 (HPTH) for up to 5 years, periodically assessing skeletal changes through biochemical markers and iliac-crest bone biopsies, which will allow for ultrastructural, cellular, and molecular analyses.
With respect to HPTH treatment, this study is a single group, within-subjects, repeated measures treatment trial. With respect to all bone biopsy analyses, the design is a parallel group design with each subject allocated to one of the 3 biopsy follow-up times: 1, 2 or 4 years after initiation of HPTH therapy. Post-baseline biopsy timing will be randomly assigned (1:1.2:1.4, respectively) to each subject, stratified by gender and by menopausal status, when relevant. Changes from baseline (time 0) to 1, 2 and 4-years will be compared. Subjects who were on conventional therapy in the former version of the protocol will also be randomized into the new study design. In contrast to new subjects, whose biopsy is performed at the end of the conventional care run-in period, the pre-conventional care biopsy will be used as the baseline for the those subjects entering the new design after having been on conventional care in the older protocol. Because it is not known with certainty what effects duration of time on conventional therapy will have on biopsy results, randomization will also be stratified on status of prior study participation. The subjects who were on HPTH therapy at the time of the protocol redesign are followed as a separate group under this protocol.
Outcome Measures
Primary:
Changes in static and dynamic bone histomorphometry after 1 year, 2 years, and 4 years of HPTH therapy. Primary outcome measurements include:
Secondary:
Changes in bone mineralization density distribution at 1, 2 and 4 years of HPTH therapy. The specific outcomes that will be measured include:
Changes from baseline will be assessed in the following outcomes:
Tertiary:
Changes in blood chemistries and FGF23, renal mineral handling, and PTH sensitivity with the initiation of HPTH, which include:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Biopsy | Other | Subjects are randomized to have the second bone biopsy done 1,2, or 4 years after the start of PTH. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PTH 1-34 | Drug | Given twice daily by subcutaneous |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Bone Biopsy Cancellous Bone Volume (Cn.BV/TV) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, so the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.BV/TV is one of 8 primary endpoints measured from the bone biopsy. The changes in Cn.BV/TV outcome between two time-points are being reported. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Total Number of Cortical Pores Per mm^2 (Ct.Po.N) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, so the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ct.Po.N is a bone biopsy measure that assess the amount of holes in the cortical bone within a predetermined area of cortical bone. The changes in Cn.BV/TV outcome between two time-points are being reported. Cortical bone with a higher number of holes may be at greater risk of fracture. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Cancellous Bone Formation Rate Per Unit of Bone Surface (Cn.BFR/BS) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.BFR/BS, measured from the bone biopsy, is the cancellous bone formation rate per unit of bone surface where cancellous refers to the spongy structure of the bone. The changes in Cn.BFR/BS between two time-points are being reported. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Trabecular Thickness (Tb.Th) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Tb.Th is measured from the bone biopsy. Tb.Th is the mean thickness of trabeculae, assessed using direct 3D methods. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. The changes in Tb.Th between two time-points are being reported. |
Not provided
INCLUSION CRITERIA:
Age eligibility at screening:
Physician-diagnosed hypoparathyroidism of at least 1-year duration, confirmed by medical record review. The investigators will confirm the diagnosis during the screening visit at which time the subject must have an intact PTH < 30 pg/mL.
EXCLUSION CRITERIA:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Rachel I Gafni, M.D. | National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research (NIDCR) | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| National Institutes of Health Clinical Center, 9000 Rockville Pike | Bethesda | Maryland | 20892 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6688127 | Background | Chan JC, Young RB, Alon U, Mamunes P. Hypercalcemia in children with disorders of calcium and phosphate metabolism during long-term treatment with 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin-D3. Pediatrics. 1983 Aug;72(2):225-33. No abstract available. | |
| 3838346 | Background | Chan JC, Young RB, Hartenberg MA, Chinchilli VM. Calcium and phosphate metabolism in children with idiopathic hypoparathyroidism or pseudohypoparathyroidism: effects of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3. J Pediatr. 1985 Mar;106(3):421-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3476(85)80668-5. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| NIH Clinical Center Detailed Web Page | View source |
Not provided
All participants were put on conventional care therapy for 2-6 months prior to HPTH therapy. Previously enrolled participants had their baseline bone biopsy prior to the study's conventional care period. Newly enrolled participants had their baseline bone biopsy performed at the started of HPTH therapy.
Individuals with hypoparathyroidism were enrolled at the NIH clinical center, beginning in October 2006. The protocol was redesigned and amended in February 2010. Some of the previously enrolled participants were re-enrolled in the new study. New participants were also enrolled on the new study through October 2014.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Cohort 1: Received HPTH on Original Protocol | Treated with HPTH therapy on original protocol |
| FG001 | Cohort 2: Received Conventional Care on Original Protocol | Treated with conventional care (CC) throughout original protocol |
| FG002 | Cohort 3: Newly Enrolled No Prior Participation | New participants in revised protocol |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Safety Population: The Safety Population will consist of all enrolled subjects (all cohorts) who have started any study treatment including, but not limited to, conventional care. This population will be used for safety data summaries.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Cohort 1 (HPTH on Old Study) and Received HPTH on New Study | Cohort 1 was treated with HPTH therapy on original protocol. Cohort 1 participants who consented to the new protocol and were treated with HPTH on the new protocol were followed for safety outcomes only. The Safety population of Cohort 1 consisted of 7 participants. |
| BG001 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Bone Biopsy Cancellous Bone Volume (Cn.BV/TV) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, so the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.BV/TV is one of 8 primary endpoints measured from the bone biopsy. The changes in Cn.BV/TV outcome between two time-points are being reported. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | z-score | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
From time of the start of HPTH therapy through the date of last dose of HPTH (i.e., the end of the weaning period off HPTH). The last dose occurred up to 64 months after the start of HPTH therapy.
Treatment emergent adverse events are those events that begin on or after the first dose of HPTH through the date last dose of HPTH.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | All Cohorts, Treated With HPTH on the New Study | Participants from Cohorts 1, 2, and 3, who were treated with HPTH on the new study. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Colitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert James | Rho, Inc | (919) 595-6468 | robert_james@rhoworld.com |
Not provided
| Type | Includes Protocol | Includes SAP | Includes ICF | Document Label | Document Date | Document Uploaded Date | Document File Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SAP | No | Yes | No | Statistical Analysis Plan | Jun 6, 2018 | Sep 20, 2018 | SAP_000.pdf |
| Prot_ICF | Yes | No | Yes | Study Protocol and Informed Consent Form | Sep 9, 2015 | Sep 24, 2018 | Prot_ICF_001.pdf |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007011 | Hypoparathyroidism |
| D004062 | DiGeorge Syndrome |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010279 | Parathyroid Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| D058165 | 22q11 Deletion Syndrome |
| D019465 | Craniofacial Abnormalities |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010281 | Parathyroid Hormone |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D036361 | Peptide Hormones |
| D006728 | Hormones |
| D006730 | Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists |
| D010455 | Peptides |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Cancellous Mineralizing Surface (Bone Surface Based)(Cn.MS/BS) | Following their baseline bone biopsy, 5, 5, and 2 participants were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at years 1, 2, and 4 after the start of HPTH therapy, respectively. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced in size due to withdrawal and the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.MS/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the cancellous bone surface that is actively forming bone. The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Cn.MS/BS between two time-points are being reported. | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Endocortical Bone Formation Rate Per Unit of Bone Surface (Ec.BFR/BS) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. However, because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.BFR/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the rate of new bone formation per day on the inner cortical (endocortical) surface in a predefined region of cortical bone. The changes in Ec.BFR/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Endocortical Mineralizing Surface (Bone Surface Based) (Ec.MS/BS) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.MS/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the endocortical bone surface that is actively forming bone. The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Ec.MS/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Intracortical Bone Formation Rate Per Unit of Bone Surface (Ic.BFR/BS) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. However, because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.BFR/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the rate of new bone formation between the two cortical surfaces (intracortical) in a predefined region of cortical bone. The changes in Ic.BFR/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Intracortical Mineralizing Surface (Bone Surface Based) (Ic.MS/BS) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.MS/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the intracortical bone surface that is actively forming bone. The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Ic.MS/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Trabecular Number (Tb.N) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Tb.N is measured from the bone biopsy. Tb.N is the measure of the average number of trabeculae per unit length. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. The changes in Tb.N between two time-points are being reported. | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Trabecular Separation (Tb.Sp) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Tb.Sp is measured from the bone biopsy. Tb.Sp is the mean distance between trabeculae, assessed using direct 3D methods. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. The changes in Tb.Sp between two time-points are being reported. | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Average Thickness of Inner and Outer Cortices (Ct.Th) | Participants (Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ct.Th, measured from the bone biopsy, is the average thickness of the inner and outer cortices. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. The changes in Ct.Th between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Total Area of Inner and Outer Cortices (Ct.Ar) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ct.AR is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure defines the area of the outer cortex and inner cortex within a predefined section of cortical bone. The changes in Ct.Ar between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Total Area of Cortical Porosity (Ct.Po.Ar) | Following their baseline bone biopsy, 5, 5, and 2 participants were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at years 1, 2, and 4 after the start of HPTH therapy, respectively. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced in size due to withdrawal and the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ct.Po.Ar is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure defines the area of the cortical bone with holes within a predefined section of cortical bone. The changes in Tb.Sp between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Cancellous Osteoid Thickness (Cn.O.Th) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.O.Th measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the thickness of the unmineralized bone (osteoid) in a predefined region of cancellous bone. The changes in Cn.O.Th between two time-points are being reported. | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Cancellous Bone Mineral Apposition Rate (Cn.MAR) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.MAR is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the rate mineral is being laid down per day in a predefined region of the cancellous bone. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. The changes in Cn.MAR between two time-points are being reported. | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Cancellous Osteoid Surface / Bone Surface (Cn.OS/BS) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.OS/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the cancellous bone surface that contains unmineralized bone (osteoid). The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Cn.OS/BS between two time-points are being reported. | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Cancellous Eroded Surface / Bone Surface (Cn.ES/BS) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.ES/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the cancellous bone surface that contains unmineralized bone (osteoid). The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Cn.ES/BS between two time-points are being reported. | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Cancellous Adjusted Apposition Rate (Cn.AjAR) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.AjAR is measured from the bone biopsy. Cn.AjAR represents the Cn.MAR averaged over the entire osteoid surface.The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. The changes in Cn.AjAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Endocortical Osteoid Thickness (Ec.O.Th) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.O.Th is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the thickness of the unmineralized bone (osteoid) on the inner side of the cortex(endocortical). The changes in Cn.AjAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Endocortical Bone Mineral Apposition Rate (Ec.MAR) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose.Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.MAR is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the rate mineral is being laid down per day on the inner cortical (endocortical) surface in a predefined region of cortical bone. The changes in Ec.MAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Endocortical Osteoid Surface / Bone Surface (Ec.OS/BS) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.OS/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the rate mineral is being laid down per day on the inner cortical (endocortical) surface in a predefined region of cortical bone. The changes in Ec.OS/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Endocortical Eroded Surface / Bone Surface (Ec.ES/BS) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4- year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.ES/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the endocortical bone surface that is resorbed (eroded). The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Ec.ES/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Endocortical Adjusted Apposition Rate (Ec.AjAR) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.AjAR is measured from the bone biopsy. Ec.AjAR represents the endocortical mineral apposition rate (Ec.MAR) averaged over the entire osteoid surface. This is another histomorphometric way to evaluate the rate at which bone is laid down on the inner cortical surface per day. The changes in Ec.AjAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Intracortical Osteoid Thickness (Ic.O.Th) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.O.Th is one of 21 secondary endpoints measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the thickness of the unmineralized bone (osteoid) within the middle of the cortex (intracortical). The changes in Ic.O.Th between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Intracortical Bone Mineral Apposition Rate (Ic.MAR) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.MAR is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the rate mineral is being laid down per day within the middle of the cortex (intracortical) surface in a predefined region of cortical bone. The changes in Ic.MAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Intracortical Osteoid Surface / Bone Surface (Ic.OS/BS) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.OS/BS measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the intracortical bone surface that is not mineralized (osteoid). The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in OS/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Intracortical Eroded Surface / Bone Surface (Ic.ES/BS) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.ES/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of bone surface within the middle of the cortex that is resorbed (eroded). The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Ic.ES/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Intracortical Adjusted Apposition Rate (Ic.AjAR) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.AjAR is one of 21 secondary endpoints measured from the bone biopsy. Ic.AjAR represents the intracortical mineral apposition rate (Ic.MAR) averaged over the the entire osteoid surface. This is another histomorphometric way to evaluate the rate at which bone is laid down within the middle of the cortex per day. The changes in Ic.AjAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline values) | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Mean From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-Biopsies | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. The Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Mean is a measure of mean bone calcium content of the bone cortex 1 based on the mineralization density distribution (BMDD) from the back-scattered electron imaging scan of the bone biopsies. The changes in Ic.MAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Peak From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-Biopsies | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. The Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Peak is a measure of the most frequent calcium content of the bone cortex 1 based on the bone mineralization density distribution (BMDD) from the back-scattered electron imaging scan of the bone biopsies. The changes in Ic.MAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Width From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-Biopsies | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. The Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Low is a measure of the area of low bone cortex 1 mineralization based on the mineralization density distribution (BMDD) from the back-scattered electron imaging scan of the bone biopsies. The changes in Ic.MAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Low From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-Biopsies | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. The Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Low is a measure of the area of low bone cortex 1 mineralization based on the mineralization density distribution (BMDD) from the back-scattered electron imaging scan of the bone biopsies. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Change in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium High From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-Biopsies | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. The Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium High is a measure of the area of high bone cortex 1 mineralization based on the mineralization density distribution (BMDD) from the back-scattered electron imaging scan of the bone biopsies. The changes in Ic.MAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Raw 1/3 Radius Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA. | The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit The 1/3 Radius BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
| Raw AP Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA | The DXA BMD were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The AP Spine BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
| Raw Femoral Neck Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA | The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Femoral BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
| Raw Lateral Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA | The DXA BMD were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Lateral Spine BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA . | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
| Raw Total Hip Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA | The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Total Hip BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
| Raw Whole Body Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA | The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Whole Body BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
| Perceived Interference (PI) of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI) | Perceived interference is measured using seven separate items that assess the degree to which fatigue in the past week was judged to interfere with general level of activity, ability to bathe and dress, normal work activity, ability to concentrate, relations with others, enjoyment of life, and mood. The interference ratings were summed to yield a total interference score ranging from 0 (no perceived interference due to fatigue) to 70 (maximum possible perceived interference due to fatigue). | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
| Average Severity Score of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI) | Severity is measured using four separate items of the FSI questionnaire that assesses how the participant felt on their most, least, and average fatigue days in the past week as well as current fatigue. Participants score their level of fatigue for each item on an 11-point scale (0=not at all fatigued, 10=as fatigued as I could be). An average is taken of sum of these 4 scores. The average severity score can range from 0 to 10. A higher average severity score indicates that the participant is experiencing more severe fatigue. | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
| Composite Severity Score of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI) | Severity is measured using four separate items of the FSI questionnaire that assesses how the participant felt on their most, least, and average fatigue days in the past week as well as current fatigue. Participants score their level of fatigue for each item on an 11-point scale (0=not at all fatigued, 10=as fatigued as I could be). The composite severity score reflects the sum of these 4 scores. The composite severity scores can range from 0 to 40. A higher composite severity scores indicates that the participant is experiencing more severe fatigue. | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
| Total Distance Walked During a 6-minute Walk | The total distance a participant was able to walk during a 6-minute walk | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
| SF36 Bodily Pain Domain | The Bodily Pain (BP) domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical domains: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental domains: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool derives SF36 domain scores for each of the eight domains. These domain scores are scaled to range from 0 to 100 with a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The BP domain scores indicate to what extent a participant's bodily pain hinders their performance of daily activities. | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
| SF36 Emotional Role Limitations Domain | Emotional Role Limitations (RE) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical domains: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental domains: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool derives SF36 domain scores for each of the eight domains. These domain scores are scaled to range from 0 to 100 with a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The RE Domain score assesses the extent to which the emotional condition of the participant, e.g. feeling depressed or anxious, limits his/her daily functioning and ability to perform roles, such as in cutting down on the amount of time spent on work or other activities and accomplishing less than he/she would like to. | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
| SF36 General Health Domain | General Health (GH) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical domains: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental domains: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool derives SF36 domain scores for each of the eight domains. These domain scores are scaled to range from 0 to 100 with a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The GH domain score assesses a participant's perception of their general health in terms of concepts such as excellent, very good, good, fair or poor, getting ill easier than other people, and just as healthy as anyone he/she knows. | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
| SF36 Mental Health Domain | Mental Health (MH) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical domains: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental domains: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool derives SF36 domain scores for each of the eight domains. These domain scores are scaled to range from 0 to 100 with a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The MH domain assesses the extent to which the participant is, among other things, feeling full of pep, is happy, is feeling calm and peaceful, is very nervous, or is feeling worn out and tired. | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
| SF36 Physical Function Domain | Physical Function (PF) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical domains: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental domains: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool derives SF36 domain scores for each of the eight domains. These domain scores are scaled to range from 0 to 100 with a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The PF domain assesses the extent to which the participant's perceptions of his/her ability to perform vigorous and moderate physical activities are influenced by his/her physical condition. | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
| SF36 Physical Role Limitations Domain | Physical Role Limitations (RP) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical domains: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental domains: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool derives SF36 domain scores for each of the eight domains. These domain scores are scaled to range from 0 to 100 with a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The RP Domain assesses the extent to which a participant's' performance of his/her roles in daily activities is impeded by his/her physical state of health. | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
| SF36 Social Function Domain | Social Function (SF) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical components: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental components: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool is used to calculate each of the eight domain scores. The scoring tool transforms the score into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. SF36 domain scores are scaled to have a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. The SF Domain assesses the level of a participant's social activities and interaction with significant others such as family members, friends, neighbours and other social relations. Lower scores indicate more disability; higher scores indicate less disability with respect to social function. | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
| SF36 Vitality Domain | Vitality (VT) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. SF36 domain scores are scaled to have a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores reflect a better quality of life.The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical components: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental components: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool is used to calculate the eight domain scores. The scoring tool transforms the score into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. SF36 domain scores are scaled to have a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The VT Domain assesses the participant's experience of feeling energetic and full of pep, or worn out and tired. | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
| Serum Alkaline Phosphatase | Serum Alkaline Phosphatase concentration | Baseline, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
| Serum Calcium | Serum Calcium concentration | Baseline, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
| Serum Osteocalcin | Serum Osteocalcin concentration | Baseline, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
| Serum Phosphorus | Serum Phosphorus concentration | Baseline, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
| 24 Hour Urine NTX Telopeptide | Urine was collected over 24 hours and the total NTX Telopeptide measured | Baseline, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
| Number of Participants With Nephrolithiasis/Nephrocalcinosis | Participants had ultrasound and CT imaging of the kidney were performed yearly. The rates of new, stable, and progressing nephrocalcinosis and nephrolithiasis (NCNL) were recorded. | Baseline, 12-Month Visit, 24-Month Visit, 36-Month Visit, 48-Month Visit, and 60-Month Visit |
| Primary Bone Biopsy Measures Adjusted for HPTH Dose | The 8 primary bone biopsy measures were to be adjusted HPTH dose by fitting the primary bone biopsy model with both linear and quadratic dose covariates added to the model. However, the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. To add additional linear and quadratic dose covariates to the statistical model with an already small sample sizes would highly risk over-parameterizing the model. Thus no new analysis was performed. | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Sensitivity Analyses of Female Menopause Status in the Primary Bone Biopsy Efficacy Models | As a sensitivity analysis, the 8 primary bone biopsy measures were to be adjusted for female menopausal status, by fitting the primary bone biopsy model with a menopausal status covariate added to the model. However, the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. Furthermore, 3 males would need to be removed from the model leaving 4, 3, 2 participants with bone biopsies with an additional degree of freedom consumed for the menopausal status covariate. Thus, the planned mixed models analysis was not performed since with such small samples sizes random fluctuations in the data could give misleading erroneous results. | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
| Z-score of 1/3 Radius Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA. | The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit The 1/3 Radius BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
| Z-score of AP Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA | The DXA BMD were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The AP Spine BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH, and post-HPTH follow-up visits |
| Z-score of Femoral Neck Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA | The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Femoral BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH, and post-HPTH follow-up visits |
| Z-score of Lateral Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA | The DXA BMD were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Lateral Spine BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA . The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH, and post-HPTH follow-up visits |
| Z-score of Total Hip Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA | The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Total Hip BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH, and post-HPTH follow-up visits |
| Z-score of Whole Body Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA | The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Whole Body BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH, and post-HPTH follow-up visits |
| 80633 | Background | Christiansen C, Rodbro P, Christensen MS, Hartnack B, Transbol I. Deterioration of renal function during treatment of chronic renal failure with 1,25-dihydroxycholecalciferol. Lancet. 1978 Sep 30;2(8092 Pt 1):700-3. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(78)92702-2. |
| Failed screening |
|
| Switch to Natpara |
|
| Adverse Event |
|
| DXA or QCT z-score or t-score<-2 |
|
| Non-compliance with study protocol |
|
| PTH resistance |
|
| Pregnancy |
|
| Partial recovery of parathyroid function |
|
| Participant elected to discontinue |
|
| Cohort 2 (CC on Old Study) and Treated With HPTH on New Study |
Cohort 2 consists of participants previously treated with conventional care (CC) throughout the original protocol. Cohort 2 participants who received at least one dose of HPTH on the new protocol were included in safety population. Cohort 2 safety population includes 5 participants. |
| BG002 | Cohort 3 (Newly Enrolled) and Treated With HPTH on New Study | Cohort 3 consists of new participants (i.e. not previously enrolled) that consented to the revised protocol. The Cohort 3 safety population includes 19 subjects who received any HPTH on the new study. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Weight | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg |
|
| Height | Baseline height was missing for some participants. | Mean | Standard Deviation | cm |
|
| BMI | Since some participants had missing height measures, the BMI could not be calculated for these participants. | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg/m^2 |
|
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OG000 | Cohorts 2 (CC on Old Study) and 3 (Newly Enrolled) Combined | Cohort 2 consists of participants previously treated with conventional care (CC) throughout the original protocol. Cohort 3 consisted of all new participants. Efficacy outcomes were only analyzed for Cohorts 2 and 3. (Cohort 1 consisted of previously enrolled participants who were on HPTH therapy on the original protocol and continued on HPTH on the new study as a separate group. These participants were not randomized to a bone biopsy year, nor did they have additional biopsies performed. Cohort 1 participants were followed for safety outcomes only. ) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Change in Total Number of Cortical Pores Per mm^2 (Ct.Po.N) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, so the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ct.Po.N is a bone biopsy measure that assess the amount of holes in the cortical bone within a predetermined area of cortical bone. The changes in Cn.BV/TV outcome between two time-points are being reported. Cortical bone with a higher number of holes may be at greater risk of fracture. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | cortical pores/mm^2 | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Change in Cancellous Bone Formation Rate Per Unit of Bone Surface (Cn.BFR/BS) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.BFR/BS, measured from the bone biopsy, is the cancellous bone formation rate per unit of bone surface where cancellous refers to the spongy structure of the bone. The changes in Cn.BFR/BS between two time-points are being reported. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | z-score | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Change in Cancellous Mineralizing Surface (Bone Surface Based)(Cn.MS/BS) | Following their baseline bone biopsy, 5, 5, and 2 participants were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at years 1, 2, and 4 after the start of HPTH therapy, respectively. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced in size due to withdrawal and the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.MS/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the cancellous bone surface that is actively forming bone. The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Cn.MS/BS between two time-points are being reported. | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percentage of predefined area of bone | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Change in Endocortical Bone Formation Rate Per Unit of Bone Surface (Ec.BFR/BS) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. However, because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.BFR/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the rate of new bone formation per day on the inner cortical (endocortical) surface in a predefined region of cortical bone. The changes in Ec.BFR/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | um^2/um/d | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Change in Endocortical Mineralizing Surface (Bone Surface Based) (Ec.MS/BS) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.MS/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the endocortical bone surface that is actively forming bone. The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Ec.MS/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. This will only include participants from cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percentage of regional interest | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Change in Intracortical Bone Formation Rate Per Unit of Bone Surface (Ic.BFR/BS) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. However, because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.BFR/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the rate of new bone formation between the two cortical surfaces (intracortical) in a predefined region of cortical bone. The changes in Ic.BFR/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | um^2/um/d | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Change in Intracortical Mineralizing Surface (Bone Surface Based) (Ic.MS/BS) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.MS/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the intracortical bone surface that is actively forming bone. The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Ic.MS/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percentage of regional interest | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Trabecular Thickness (Tb.Th) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Tb.Th is measured from the bone biopsy. Tb.Th is the mean thickness of trabeculae, assessed using direct 3D methods. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. The changes in Tb.Th between two time-points are being reported. | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | z-score | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Trabecular Number (Tb.N) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Tb.N is measured from the bone biopsy. Tb.N is the measure of the average number of trabeculae per unit length. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. The changes in Tb.N between two time-points are being reported. | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | z-score | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Trabecular Separation (Tb.Sp) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Tb.Sp is measured from the bone biopsy. Tb.Sp is the mean distance between trabeculae, assessed using direct 3D methods. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. The changes in Tb.Sp between two time-points are being reported. | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | z-score | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Average Thickness of Inner and Outer Cortices (Ct.Th) | Participants (Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ct.Th, measured from the bone biopsy, is the average thickness of the inner and outer cortices. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. The changes in Ct.Th between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | z-score | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Total Area of Inner and Outer Cortices (Ct.Ar) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ct.AR is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure defines the area of the outer cortex and inner cortex within a predefined section of cortical bone. The changes in Ct.Ar between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percentage of region of interest | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Total Area of Cortical Porosity (Ct.Po.Ar) | Following their baseline bone biopsy, 5, 5, and 2 participants were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at years 1, 2, and 4 after the start of HPTH therapy, respectively. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced in size due to withdrawal and the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ct.Po.Ar is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure defines the area of the cortical bone with holes within a predefined section of cortical bone. The changes in Tb.Sp between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. This will only include participants from cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percentage of region of interest | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Cancellous Osteoid Thickness (Cn.O.Th) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.O.Th measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the thickness of the unmineralized bone (osteoid) in a predefined region of cancellous bone. The changes in Cn.O.Th between two time-points are being reported. | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | um | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Cancellous Bone Mineral Apposition Rate (Cn.MAR) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.MAR is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the rate mineral is being laid down per day in a predefined region of the cancellous bone. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. The changes in Cn.MAR between two time-points are being reported. | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | z-score | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Cancellous Osteoid Surface / Bone Surface (Cn.OS/BS) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.OS/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the cancellous bone surface that contains unmineralized bone (osteoid). The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Cn.OS/BS between two time-points are being reported. | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percentage of region of interest | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Cancellous Eroded Surface / Bone Surface (Cn.ES/BS) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.ES/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the cancellous bone surface that contains unmineralized bone (osteoid). The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Cn.ES/BS between two time-points are being reported. | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percentage of region of interest | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Cancellous Adjusted Apposition Rate (Cn.AjAR) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Cn.AjAR is measured from the bone biopsy. Cn.AjAR represents the Cn.MAR averaged over the entire osteoid surface.The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. The changes in Cn.AjAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | z-score | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Endocortical Osteoid Thickness (Ec.O.Th) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.O.Th is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the thickness of the unmineralized bone (osteoid) on the inner side of the cortex(endocortical). The changes in Cn.AjAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | um | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Endocortical Bone Mineral Apposition Rate (Ec.MAR) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose.Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.MAR is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the rate mineral is being laid down per day on the inner cortical (endocortical) surface in a predefined region of cortical bone. The changes in Ec.MAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | um/d | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Endocortical Osteoid Surface / Bone Surface (Ec.OS/BS) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.OS/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the rate mineral is being laid down per day on the inner cortical (endocortical) surface in a predefined region of cortical bone. The changes in Ec.OS/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percentage of region of interest | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Endocortical Eroded Surface / Bone Surface (Ec.ES/BS) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4- year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.ES/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the endocortical bone surface that is resorbed (eroded). The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Ec.ES/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percentage of region of interest | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Endocortical Adjusted Apposition Rate (Ec.AjAR) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ec.AjAR is measured from the bone biopsy. Ec.AjAR represents the endocortical mineral apposition rate (Ec.MAR) averaged over the entire osteoid surface. This is another histomorphometric way to evaluate the rate at which bone is laid down on the inner cortical surface per day. The changes in Ec.AjAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | um/d | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Intracortical Osteoid Thickness (Ic.O.Th) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.O.Th is one of 21 secondary endpoints measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the thickness of the unmineralized bone (osteoid) within the middle of the cortex (intracortical). The changes in Ic.O.Th between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | um | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Intracortical Bone Mineral Apposition Rate (Ic.MAR) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.MAR is measured from the bone biopsy. This measures the rate mineral is being laid down per day within the middle of the cortex (intracortical) surface in a predefined region of cortical bone. The changes in Ic.MAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | um/d | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Intracortical Osteoid Surface / Bone Surface (Ic.OS/BS) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.OS/BS measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of the intracortical bone surface that is not mineralized (osteoid). The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in OS/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percentage of region of interest | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Intracortical Eroded Surface / Bone Surface (Ic.ES/BS) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.ES/BS is measured from the bone biopsy. This measure demonstrates the percentage of bone surface within the middle of the cortex that is resorbed (eroded). The region of interest is the predefined area of total bone that is being measured. The changes in Ic.ES/BS between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | percentage of region of interest | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Intracortical Adjusted Apposition Rate (Ic.AjAR) | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. Ic.AjAR is one of 21 secondary endpoints measured from the bone biopsy. Ic.AjAR represents the intracortical mineral apposition rate (Ic.MAR) averaged over the the entire osteoid surface. This is another histomorphometric way to evaluate the rate at which bone is laid down within the middle of the cortex per day. The changes in Ic.AjAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline values) | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | um/d | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Mean From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-Biopsies | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. The Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Mean is a measure of mean bone calcium content of the bone cortex 1 based on the mineralization density distribution (BMDD) from the back-scattered electron imaging scan of the bone biopsies. The changes in Ic.MAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percentage of the region of interest | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Peak From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-Biopsies | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. The Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Peak is a measure of the most frequent calcium content of the bone cortex 1 based on the bone mineralization density distribution (BMDD) from the back-scattered electron imaging scan of the bone biopsies. The changes in Ic.MAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percentage of the region of interest | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Width From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-Biopsies | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. The Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Low is a measure of the area of low bone cortex 1 mineralization based on the mineralization density distribution (BMDD) from the back-scattered electron imaging scan of the bone biopsies. The changes in Ic.MAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percentage of the region of interest | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Low From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-Biopsies | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. The Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Low is a measure of the area of low bone cortex 1 mineralization based on the mineralization density distribution (BMDD) from the back-scattered electron imaging scan of the bone biopsies. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percentage of the region of interest | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium High From the Back-Scattered Electron Imaging of Bone-Biopsies | Participants (in Cohorts 2 and 3) were randomized to receive their second bone biopsy at year 1, 2, or 4 after the start of HPTH therapy. For Cohort 2, the baseline bone biopsy was completed at the start of CC on the original protocol. For Cohort 3, the baseline biopsy was completed immediately prior to the first HPTH dose. Because the sample sizes for the 1-, 2- and 4-year biopsies are reduced due to the early termination of the study, the 2-, and 4-year biopsies were collapsed into one biopsy year group. The Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium High is a measure of the area of high bone cortex 1 mineralization based on the mineralization density distribution (BMDD) from the back-scattered electron imaging scan of the bone biopsies. The changes in Ic.MAR between two time-points are being reported. The n's in the outcome measure table refer to the number of complete records (non-missing baseline and post-baseline measures). | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percentage of the region of interest | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Raw 1/3 Radius Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA. | The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit The 1/3 Radius BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | g/cm^2 | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Raw AP Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA | The DXA BMD were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The AP Spine BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | g/cm^2 | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Raw Femoral Neck Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA | The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Femoral BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | g/cm^2 | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Raw Lateral Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA | The DXA BMD were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Lateral Spine BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA . | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | g/cm^2 | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Raw Total Hip Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA | The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Total Hip BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | g/cm^2 | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Raw Whole Body Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA | The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Whole Body BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | g/cm^2 | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Perceived Interference (PI) of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI) | Perceived interference is measured using seven separate items that assess the degree to which fatigue in the past week was judged to interfere with general level of activity, ability to bathe and dress, normal work activity, ability to concentrate, relations with others, enjoyment of life, and mood. The interference ratings were summed to yield a total interference score ranging from 0 (no perceived interference due to fatigue) to 70 (maximum possible perceived interference due to fatigue). | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Average Severity Score of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI) | Severity is measured using four separate items of the FSI questionnaire that assesses how the participant felt on their most, least, and average fatigue days in the past week as well as current fatigue. Participants score their level of fatigue for each item on an 11-point scale (0=not at all fatigued, 10=as fatigued as I could be). An average is taken of sum of these 4 scores. The average severity score can range from 0 to 10. A higher average severity score indicates that the participant is experiencing more severe fatigue. | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Composite Severity Score of the Fatigue Symptom Inventory (FSI) | Severity is measured using four separate items of the FSI questionnaire that assesses how the participant felt on their most, least, and average fatigue days in the past week as well as current fatigue. Participants score their level of fatigue for each item on an 11-point scale (0=not at all fatigued, 10=as fatigued as I could be). The composite severity score reflects the sum of these 4 scores. The composite severity scores can range from 0 to 40. A higher composite severity scores indicates that the participant is experiencing more severe fatigue. | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | Composite score from the FSI | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Total Distance Walked During a 6-minute Walk | The total distance a participant was able to walk during a 6-minute walk | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | Distance in meters | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | SF36 Bodily Pain Domain | The Bodily Pain (BP) domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical domains: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental domains: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool derives SF36 domain scores for each of the eight domains. These domain scores are scaled to range from 0 to 100 with a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The BP domain scores indicate to what extent a participant's bodily pain hinders their performance of daily activities. | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | SF36 Emotional Role Limitations Domain | Emotional Role Limitations (RE) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical domains: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental domains: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool derives SF36 domain scores for each of the eight domains. These domain scores are scaled to range from 0 to 100 with a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The RE Domain score assesses the extent to which the emotional condition of the participant, e.g. feeling depressed or anxious, limits his/her daily functioning and ability to perform roles, such as in cutting down on the amount of time spent on work or other activities and accomplishing less than he/she would like to. | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | SF36 General Health Domain | General Health (GH) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical domains: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental domains: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool derives SF36 domain scores for each of the eight domains. These domain scores are scaled to range from 0 to 100 with a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The GH domain score assesses a participant's perception of their general health in terms of concepts such as excellent, very good, good, fair or poor, getting ill easier than other people, and just as healthy as anyone he/she knows. | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | SF36 Mental Health Domain | Mental Health (MH) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical domains: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental domains: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool derives SF36 domain scores for each of the eight domains. These domain scores are scaled to range from 0 to 100 with a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The MH domain assesses the extent to which the participant is, among other things, feeling full of pep, is happy, is feeling calm and peaceful, is very nervous, or is feeling worn out and tired. | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | SF36 Physical Function Domain | Physical Function (PF) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical domains: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental domains: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool derives SF36 domain scores for each of the eight domains. These domain scores are scaled to range from 0 to 100 with a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The PF domain assesses the extent to which the participant's perceptions of his/her ability to perform vigorous and moderate physical activities are influenced by his/her physical condition. | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | SF36 Physical Role Limitations Domain | Physical Role Limitations (RP) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical domains: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental domains: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool derives SF36 domain scores for each of the eight domains. These domain scores are scaled to range from 0 to 100 with a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The RP Domain assesses the extent to which a participant's' performance of his/her roles in daily activities is impeded by his/her physical state of health. | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | SF36 Social Function Domain | Social Function (SF) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical components: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental components: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool is used to calculate each of the eight domain scores. The scoring tool transforms the score into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. SF36 domain scores are scaled to have a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. The SF Domain assesses the level of a participant's social activities and interaction with significant others such as family members, friends, neighbours and other social relations. Lower scores indicate more disability; higher scores indicate less disability with respect to social function. | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | SF36 Vitality Domain | Vitality (VT) Domain scores are derived from the SF36 Health Survey taken by the participant. SF36 domain scores are scaled to have a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Higher scores reflect a better quality of life.The SF-36 is a validated questionnaire assessing 4 physical components: physical function, physical role limitations, bodily pain, and general health, and 4 mental components: vitality, emotional role limitations, social function and mental health. From the 36 questions asked, a scoring tool is used to calculate the eight domain scores. The scoring tool transforms the score into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. SF36 domain scores are scaled to have a population mean of 50 and a standard deviation of 10. Lower scores indicate more disability; and, higher scores indicate less disability. The VT Domain assesses the participant's experience of feeling energetic and full of pep, or worn out and tired. | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | score on a scale | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Serum Alkaline Phosphatase | Serum Alkaline Phosphatase concentration | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | ug/L | Baseline, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Serum Calcium | Serum Calcium concentration | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | Mmol/L | Baseline, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Serum Osteocalcin | Serum Osteocalcin concentration | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | ng/mL | Baseline, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Serum Phosphorus | Serum Phosphorus concentration | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | mg/dL | Baseline, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | 24 Hour Urine NTX Telopeptide | Urine was collected over 24 hours and the total NTX Telopeptide measured | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | nmol Bone Collagen Equiv/mmol Creatinine | Baseline, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Nephrolithiasis/Nephrocalcinosis | Participants had ultrasound and CT imaging of the kidney were performed yearly. The rates of new, stable, and progressing nephrocalcinosis and nephrolithiasis (NCNL) were recorded. | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Baseline, 12-Month Visit, 24-Month Visit, 36-Month Visit, 48-Month Visit, and 60-Month Visit |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Primary Bone Biopsy Measures Adjusted for HPTH Dose | The 8 primary bone biopsy measures were to be adjusted HPTH dose by fitting the primary bone biopsy model with both linear and quadratic dose covariates added to the model. However, the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. To add additional linear and quadratic dose covariates to the statistical model with an already small sample sizes would highly risk over-parameterizing the model. Thus no new analysis was performed. | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
| Secondary | Sensitivity Analyses of Female Menopause Status in the Primary Bone Biopsy Efficacy Models | As a sensitivity analysis, the 8 primary bone biopsy measures were to be adjusted for female menopausal status, by fitting the primary bone biopsy model with a menopausal status covariate added to the model. However, the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. Furthermore, 3 males would need to be removed from the model leaving 4, 3, 2 participants with bone biopsies with an additional degree of freedom consumed for the menopausal status covariate. Thus, the planned mixed models analysis was not performed since with such small samples sizes random fluctuations in the data could give misleading erroneous results. | The Bone Biopsy Analysis Population was used for the primary bone biopsy biomarkers. The Bone Biopsy Population consisted of all participants in Cohorts 2 and 3 who completed both their baseline and randomized 1, 2, or 4 year bone biopsies. | Posted | Baseline, 1 year bone biopsy, and combined 2 and 4 year bone biopsies |
|
|
| Secondary | Z-score of 1/3 Radius Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA. | The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit The 1/3 Radius BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | z-score | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH (up to 5 years), and post-HPTH follow-up visit (6 months post last visit on HPTH) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Z-score of AP Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA | The DXA BMD were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The AP Spine BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | z-score | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH, and post-HPTH follow-up visits |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Z-score of Femoral Neck Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA | The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Femoral BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | z-score | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH, and post-HPTH follow-up visits |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Z-score of Lateral Spine Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA | The DXA BMD were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Lateral Spine BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA . The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | z-score | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH, and post-HPTH follow-up visits |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Z-score of Total Hip Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA | The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Total Hip BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | z-score | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH, and post-HPTH follow-up visits |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Z-score of Whole Body Bone Mineralization Density (BMD) Assessed by DXA | The DXA BMD measures were assessed every 6 months over 5 years, and at a follow-up visit post-HPTH therapy. Due to varying lengths of time on each participant was on HPTH, these BMD assessment times were collapsed for purposes of analysis to: baseline, 6-month on HPTH therapy, last visit on HPTH therapy, and the post-HPTH follow-up visit. The Whole Body BMD is one of 6 bone regions measurements of bone mineralization density assessed by DXA. The unit of measure is a z-score. Z-scores are normed to standard populations to a mean of zero and a standard deviation of 1. The normal range for a z-score is from -2 to 2. Values above or below this normal range are considered worse outcomes. | Secondary Efficacy Population: This population consists of all participants who received at least one dose of HPTH and had at least one post-baseline non-biopsy efficacy assessment. This population will only include participants in Cohorts 2 and 3. | Posted | Mean | Standard Error | z-score | Baseline, 6-months after start of HPTH, last visit on HPTH, and post-HPTH follow-up visits |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 31 |
| 8 |
| 31 |
| 28 |
| 31 |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Appendicitis perforated | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Alcohol poisoning | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Medication error | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypercalcaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypocalcaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypocalcaemic seizure | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sciatica | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Iron deficiency anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lymphadenopathy | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Palpitations | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Supraventricular tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Middle ear effusion | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vertigo | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vision blurred | Eye disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Coeliac disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dry mouth | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastrooesophageal reflux disease | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gingival disorder | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Haemorrhoids | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Melaena | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Toothache | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Chronic fatigue syndrome | General disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site dryness | General disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site erythema | General disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Non-cardiac chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain | General disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hepatic cyst | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypersensitivity | Immune system disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ear infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Herpes zoster | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Paronychia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Tooth infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Viral infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Wound infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bone contusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Contrast media reaction | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Contusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Epicondylitis | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fibula fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Forearm fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Incision site pruritus | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Joint injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ligament sprain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Post procedural complication | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Post procedural haematoma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Procedural pain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Stress fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper limb fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Blood creatine phosphokinase increased | Investigations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bone density decreased | Investigations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cardiac murmur | Investigations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Haemoglobin decreased | Investigations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lipase increased | Investigations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Transaminases increased | Investigations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Weight decreased | Investigations | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gout | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypercalcaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hyperuricaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypocalcaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypokalaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vitamin D deficiency | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Arthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bone pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bursitis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Chondrocalcinosis pyrophosphate | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Groin pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Muscular weakness | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Musculoskeletal chest pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Musculoskeletal deformity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Musculoskeletal disorder | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Musculoskeletal pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Patellofemoral pain syndrome | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Temporomandibular joint syndrome | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Tendonitis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Adrenal neoplasm | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Benign neoplasm of skin | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Haemangioma of liver | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Melanocytic naevus | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Uterine leiomyoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Convulsion | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hyperreflexia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypoaesthesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Paraesthesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Thoracic outlet syndrome | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Mood altered | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Flank pain | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypocitraturia | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Micturition urgency | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nephrocalcinosis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nephrolithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pollakiuria | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Renal cyst | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ureteric obstruction | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary hesitation | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary retention | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Breast cyst | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Menstruation irregular | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ovarian cyst | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dyspnoea exertional | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Acne | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dermal cyst | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hyperhidrosis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Neurodermatitis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Photosensitivity reaction | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pruritus allergic | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Flushing | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Varicose vein | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Venous insufficiency | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 17.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D009139 | Musculoskeletal Abnormalities |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D006330 | Heart Defects, Congenital |
| D018376 | Cardiovascular Abnormalities |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D044148 | Lymphatic Abnormalities |
| D008206 | Lymphatic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D000015 | Abnormalities, Multiple |
| D000013 | Congenital Abnormalities |
| D009358 | Congenital, Hereditary, and Neonatal Diseases and Abnormalities |
| D025063 | Chromosome Disorders |
| D030342 | Genetic Diseases, Inborn |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| 20-29 years |
|
| 30-39 years |
|
| 40-49 years |
|
| 50-59 years |
|
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ct.Po.N between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. P-value interpretation is questionable since there were only 4 participants with non-missing Ct.Po.N values for both their baseline and year 1 biopsies. |
| Mixed models analysis was performed with: Ct.Po.N change from baseline at biopsy year 1 or years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year, and baseline Ct.Po.N, as model covariates; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay of 30 to 31 months from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered to stabilize variance) was added as a covariate to the model for Cohort 2 only (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.129 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ct.Po.N between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ct.Po.N at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.538 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Equivalence | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ct.Po.N between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cn.BFR/BS between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Cn.BFR/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | <0.001 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cn.BFR/BS between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Cn.BFR/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.374 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Equivalence | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cn.BFR/BS between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cn.MS/BS between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Cn.MS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | <0.001 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cn.MS/BS between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Cn.MS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.168 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Equivalence | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cn.MS/BS between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ec.BFR/BS between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. P-value interpretation is questionable since there were only 4 participants with non-missing Ec.BFR/BS values for both their baseline and year 1 biopsies. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ec.BFR/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.001 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ec.BFR/BS between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ec.BFR/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.164 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Equivalence | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ec.BFR/BS between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ec.MS/BS between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. P-value interpretation is questionable since there were only 4 participants with non-missing Ec.MS/BS values for both their baseline and year 1 biopsies. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ec.MS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.001 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ec.MS/BS between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ec.MS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.178 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Equivalence | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ec.MS/BS between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ic.BFR/BS between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. P-value interpretation is questionable since there were only 4 participants with non-missing Ic.BFR/BS values for both their baseline and year 1 biopsies. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ic.BFR/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.022 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ic.BFR/BS between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ic.BFR/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.172 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Equivalence | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ic.BFR/BS between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ic.MS/BS between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. P-value interpretation is questionable since there were only 4 participants with non-missing Ic.MS/BS values for both their baseline and year 1 biopsies. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ic.MS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.018 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ic.MS/BS between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ic.MS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.155 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Equivalence | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ic.MS/BS between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Tb.Th between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Tb.Th at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.944 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Tb.Th between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Tb.Th at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.730 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Tb.Th between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Tb.N between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis was performed with: Tb.N change from baseline at biopsy year 1 or years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year, and baseline Tb.N, as model covariates; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay of 30 to 31 months from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered to stabilize variance) was added as a covariate to the model for Cohort 2 only (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.017 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Tb.N between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis was performed with: Tb.N change from baseline at biopsy year 1 or years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year, and baseline Tb.N, as model covariates; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay of 30 to 31 months from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered to stabilize variance) was added as a covariate to the model for Cohort 2 only (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.843 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Tb.N between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Tb.Sp between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Tb.Sp at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.025 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Tb.Sp between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Tb.Sp at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.608 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Tb.Sp between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ct.Th between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. P-value interpretation is questionable since there were only 4 participants with non-missing Ct.Th values for both their baseline and year 1 biopsies. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ct.Th at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.334 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ct.Th between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis was performed with: Ct.Th change from baseline at biopsy year 1 or years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year, and baseline Ct.Th, as model covariates; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay of 30 to 31 months from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered to stabilize variance) was added as a covariate to the model for Cohort 2 only (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.269 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ct.Th between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ct.Ar between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. P-value interpretation is questionable since there were only 4 participants with non-missing Ct.Ar values for both their baseline and year 1 biopsies. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ct.Ar at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.760 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ct.Ar between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ct.Ar at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.570 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ct.Ar between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ct.Po.Ar between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. P-value interpretation is questionable since there were only 4 participants with non-missing Ct.Po.Ar values for both their baseline and year 1 biopsies. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ct.Po.Ar at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.895 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ct.Po.Ar between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ct.Po.Ar at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.282 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ct.Po.Ar between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cn.O.Th between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Cn.O.Th at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | <0.001 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cn.O.Th between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Cn.O.Th at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.680 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cn.O.Th between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cn.MAR between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Cn.MAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.004 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cn.MAR between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Cn.MAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.904 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cn.MAR between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cn.OS/BS between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Cn.OS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | <0.001 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cn.OS/BS between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Cn.OS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.010 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cn.OS/BS between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cn.ES/BS between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Cn.ES/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | <0.001 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cn.ES/BS between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Cn.ES/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.020 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cn.ES/BS between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cn.AjAR between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Cn.AjAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.022 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cn.AjAR between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Cn.AjAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.228 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cn.AjAR between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ec.O.Th between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. P-value interpretation is questionable since there were only 4 participants with non-missing Ec.O.Th values for both their baseline and year 1 biopsies. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ec.O.Th at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.006 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ec.O.Th between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ec.O.Th at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.670 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ec.O.Th between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ec.MAR between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. P-value interpretation is questionable since there were only 4 participants with non-missing Ec.MAR values for both their baseline and year 1 biopsies. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ec.MAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.001 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ec.MAR between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ec.MAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.712 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ec.MAR between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ec.OS/BS between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. P-value interpretation is questionable since there were only 4 participants with non-missing Ec.OS/BS values for both their baseline and year 1 biopsies. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ec.OS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | <0.001 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ec.OS/BS between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ec.OS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.104 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ec.OS/BS between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ec.ES/BS between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. P-value interpretation is questionable since there were only 4 participants with non-missing Ec.ES/BS values for both their baseline and year 1 biopsies. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ec.ES/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.009 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ec.ES/BS between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ec.ES/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.325 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ec.ES/BS between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ec.AjAR between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. P-value interpretation is questionable since there were only 3 participants with non-missing Ec.AjAR values for both their baseline and year 1 biopsies. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ec.AjAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.001 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ec.AjAR between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ec.AjAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.974 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ec.AjAR between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ic.O.Th between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. P-value interpretation is questionable since there were only 4 participants with non-missing Ic.O.Th values for both their baseline and year 1 biopsies. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ic.O.Th at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.023 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ic.O.Th between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ic.O.Th at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.288 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ic.O.Th between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ic.MAR between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. P-value interpretation is questionable since there were only 4 participants with non-missing Ic.MAR values for both their baseline and year 1 biopsies. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ic.MAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.486 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ic.MAR between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ic.MAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.535 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ic.MAR between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 Biopsy |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ic.OS/BS between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. P-value interpretation is questionable since there were only 4 participants with non-missing Ic.OS/BS values for both their baseline and year 1 biopsies. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ic.OS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.003 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ic.OS/BS between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ic.OS/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.328 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ic.OS/BS between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ic.ES/BS between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. P-value interpretation is questionable since there were only 4 participants with non-missing Ic.ES/BS values for both their baseline and year 1 biopsies. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ic.ES/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | <0.001 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ic.ES/BS between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ic.ES/BS at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.789 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Equivalence | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ic.ES/BS between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Biopsy Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 |
|
|
| Other |
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ic.AjAR between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy. P-value interpretation is questionable since there were only 4 participants with non-missing Ic.AjAR values for both their baseline and year 1 biopsies. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ic.AjAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.580 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ic.AjAR between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis: Ic.AjAR at biopsy baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined as the dependent variable; biopsy year as the independent variable, model covariates for Cohort; and a random effect for participant. Since Cohort 2 had a time delay from the baseline biopsy to start of HPTH therapy, this time delay (centered) was added as a covariate for Cohort 2 (using a Cohort 2 indicator variable). No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.338 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Ic.AjAR between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 Biopsy |
|
|
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Mean between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy.
| Mixed models analysis was performed with Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Mean as the dependent variable; biopsy year (baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined) as the independent variable; study cohort as a covariate; and a random effect for participant. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.110 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Mean between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis was performed with Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Mean as the dependent variable; biopsy year (baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined) as the independent variable; study cohort as a covariate; and a random effect for participant. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.764 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Mean between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 Biopsy |
|
|
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Peak between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy.
| Mixed models analysis was performed with Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Peak as the dependent variable; biopsy year (baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined) as the independent variable; study cohort as a covariate; and a random effect for participant. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.194 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Peak between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis was performed with Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Peak as the dependent variable; biopsy year (baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined) as the independent variable; study cohort as a covariate; and a random effect for participant. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.434 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Peak between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 Biopsy |
|
|
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Width between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy.
| Mixed models analysis was performed with Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Width as the dependent variable; biopsy year (baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined) as the independent variable; study cohort as a covariate; and a random effect for participant. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.002 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Width between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis was performed with Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Width as the dependent variable; biopsy year (baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined) as the independent variable; study cohort as a covariate; and a random effect for participant. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.787 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Width between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 Biopsy |
|
|
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Low between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy.
| Mixed models analysis was performed with Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Low as the dependent variable; biopsy year (baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined) as the independent variable; study cohort as a covariate; and a random effect for participant. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.057 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Low between the baseline and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis was performed with Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Low as the dependent variable; biopsy year (baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined) as the independent variable; study cohort as a covariate; and a random effect for participant. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.547 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium Low between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Years 2 and 4 (combined) - Year 1 Biopsy |
|
|
A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium High between the baseline and the year 1 biopsy.
| Mixed models analysis was performed with Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium High as the dependent variable; biopsy year (baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined) as the independent variable; study cohort as a covariate; and a random effect for participant. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.342 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium High between the year 1 and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
| Mixed models analysis was performed with Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium High as the dependent variable; biopsy year (baseline, year 1, and years 2 and 4 combined) as the independent variable; study cohort as a covariate; and a random effect for participant. No bone biopsy baseline covariate included since it would over-parameterize the model. | Mixed Models Analysis | 0.449 | No adjustments were made for multiple comparisons, since the study was terminated early resulting in only 5, 5, and 2 participants having their biopsies at 1, 2, and 4 years respectively. | Other | A contrast statement within the mixed models analysis tested for differences in the Cortex 1 Spectral Calcium High between the year 1 biopsy and the years 2 and 4 (combined) biopsy. |
|
| Raw BMD at last HPTH visit |
|
|
| Raw BMD at Follow-up |
|
|
|
| Raw BMD at last HPTH visit |
|
|
| Raw BMD at Follow-up |
|
|
|
| Raw BMD at last HPTH visit |
|
|
| Raw BMD at Follow-up |
|
|
|
| Raw BMD at last HPTH visit |
|
|
| Raw BMD at Follow-up |
|
|
|
| Raw BMD at last HPTH visit |
|
|
| Raw BMD at Follow-up |
|
|
|
| Raw BMD at last HPTH visit |
|
|
| Raw BMD at Follow-up |
|
|
|
| Last visit on HPTH prior to weaning |
|
|
| Post-HPTH follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| Last visit on HPTH prior to weaning |
|
|
| Post-HPTH follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| Last visit on HPTH prior to weaning |
|
|
| Post-HPTH follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| Last visit on HPTH prior to weaning |
|
|
| Post-HPTH follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| Last visit on HPTH prior to weaning |
|
|
| Post-HPTH follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| Last visit on HPTH prior to weaning |
|
|
| Post-HPTH follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| Last visit on HPTH prior to weaning |
|
|
| Post-HPTH follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| Last visit on HPTH prior to weaning |
|
|
| Post-HPTH follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| Last visit on HPTH prior to weaning |
|
|
| Post-HPTH follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| Last visit on HPTH prior to weaning |
|
|
| Post-HPTH follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| Last visit on HPTH prior to weaning |
|
|
| Post-HPTH follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| Last visit on HPTH prior to weaning |
|
|
| Post-HPTH follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| Post-HPTH follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| Post-HPTH follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| Post-HPTH follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| Post-HPTH follow-up visit |
|
|
|
| Post-HPTH follow-up visit |
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| NCNL that resolved on HPTH therapy |
|
|
| Z-score BMD at last HPTH visit |
|
|
| Z-score BMD at Follow-up |
|
|
|
| Z-score BMD at last HPTH visit |
|
|
| Z-score BMD at Follow-up |
|
|
|
| Z-score BMD at last HPTH visit |
|
|
| Z-score BMD at Follow-up |
|
|
|
| Z-score BMD at last HPTH visit |
|
|
| Z-score BMD at Follow-up |
|
|
|
| Z-score BMD at last HPTH visit |
|
|
| Z-score BMD at Follow-up |
|
|
|
| Z-score BMD at last HPTH visit |
|
|
| Z-score BMD at Follow-up |
|
|