Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Dexmedetomidine (Precedex, Hospira) is a "super" selective alpha2-agonist - 8-10x more avid binding to alpha2 receptors than clonidine - and may have particularly favorable characteristics as a continuous i.v. infusion sedative for critically ill neuroscience patients. Its combination of anxiolysis, analgesia, without undue lethargy may make it an ideal agent where frequent neurological examinations are important. Unclear, however, is whether Precedex is superior to current common i.v. sedation protocols, and if there are any undue concerns of this agent on cerebral physiology and cortical stimulation.
Dexmedetomidine has shown promise in small case series to be an efficacious sedative agent in the intensive care unit (ICU) setting, in both post-surgical and medical patients. A recent publication reported on the efficacy in a small series of medical patients (n=12), but as part of the exclusion criteria were any serious nervous system trauma or direct central nervous system (CNS) pathology.
A potential advantage of dexmedetomidine as a sedative agent compared to current popular classes of drugs, particularly propofol, benzodiazepines, and narcotics, is the nominal effect on reduction of level of arousal. Experience suggests that this agent may induce effective degrees of sedation without concomitant loss of attentive behavior and cognition following low levels of auditory or tactile stimulation. Thus, neurological assessment may be preserved while achieving the goal of a non-agitated or anxious patient. Additionally, the combination of both sedative/anxiolytic and analgesic action of dexmedetomidine may permit single drug use for both sedation and pain control during the post-operative and medical ICU period.
The cerebral effects of alpha2-agonists have been modestly studied in the clinical environment, and only in normal volunteers. As expected, cerebral blood flow decreased following initiation of the sedative, coincident with the expected diminishment of global cerebral metabolism. No studies have evaluated dexmedetomidine in patients suffering from neurological injury, the very population that may most benefit from the agent's sedative characteristics. Thus, it is imperative that a safety & efficacy study be carried out in a population of both medical and post-operative neuroscience patients. From an intraoperative perspective, dexmedetomidine has been effectively used as a sedative for both awake and sedation cases. Some evidence suggests prolonged cognitive deficits may persist beyond the sedative action of the drug.
One concern in the neuroscience patient population is laboratory evidence that alpha2-agonists may lower the seizure threshold. Such data has been shown for both clonidine and dexmedetomidine.
Therefore, to provide a comprehensive evaluation leading to successful safety and efficacy data for this sedative, it will be important to perform the following three studies. All three studies will be done concurrently but enrollment between the three studies will be mutually exclusive.
Objective 1: Evaluation of Quality of Sedation: Does dexmedetomidine provide superior sedative characteristics relative to current standard agents in patients with neurological dysfunction? The metrics for such a study will include -
Objective 2: Alteration of Cerebral Physiology: Does Dexmedetomidine alter intracranial physiology either in a favorable or unfavorable manner? The metrics for such a study will include -
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fentanyl/Propofol sedation first | Active Comparator | Patient given fentanyl only first, then sedated with fentanyl/propofol as needed to have Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) Score 0 to -1. After washout with fentanyl only, patient sedated with fentanyl/dexmedetomidine to have RASS Score 0 to -1. |
|
| Fentanyl/Dexmedetomidine sedation first | Active Comparator | Patient given fentanyl only first, then sedated with fentanyl/dexmedetomidine as needed to have RASS Score 0 to -1. After washout with fentanyl only, patient sedated with fentanyl/propofol to have RASS Score 0 to -1. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fentanyl/Dexmedetomidine | Drug |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Johns Hopkins Adapted Cognitive Exam | Cognitive assessment tool | day of study |
| Confusion Assessment Method (CAM) for the Intensive Care Unit | CAM-ICU delirium assessment tool | day of study |
| Time from initiation of study drug to calm, non-anxious state | From control state to RASS Score or 0 to -1 (average=137 min) | day of study |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Therapy Intensity Level Scale (TIL) | Bedside assessment tool to quantify nursing effort | day of study |
| Requirement for fluids, pressors | Documenting need for adjunctive treatment with vasoactive agents |
Not provided
Objective 1: Inclusion Criteria:
Neuroscience patients in the Neuro Critical Care Unit (NCCU) who are:
Objective 1: Exclusion Criteria:
Objective 2: Inclusion Criteria:
Critically ill neuroscience patients who are:
Objective 2: Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Marek Mirski, MD, PhD | Johns Hopkins University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Johns Hopkins University | Baltimore | Maryland | 21287 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21926576 | Result | Lewin JJ 3rd, LeDroux SN, Shermock KM, Thompson CB, Goodwin HE, Mirski EA, Gill RS, Mirski MA. Validity and reliability of The Johns Hopkins Adapted Cognitive Exam for critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2012 Jan;40(1):139-44. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e31822ef9fc. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005283 | Fentanyl |
| D020927 | Dexmedetomidine |
| D015742 | Propofol |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010880 | Piperidines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D007093 | Imidazoles |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Fentanyl/Propofol | Drug |
|
|
| Fentanyl | Drug |
|
| day of study |
| Toxicity/side effects | documenting drug toxicity - rash, angioedema, nausea, fever, etc. | day of study |
| Numerical Pain Rating Scale | behavioral and numerical pain rating | day of study |
| Need for less or more fentanyl during the infusion drug phase | assessment of fentanyl dosing required to maintain behavioral pain score at < 3 | day of study |
| D001393 |
| Azoles |
| D010636 | Phenols |
| D001555 | Benzene Derivatives |
| D006841 | Hydrocarbons, Aromatic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |