Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| P2DP06002 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Enrollement target could not be achieved, study will not resume
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Tree MATAMPL has been developed to provide pre-seasonal specific immunotherapy for patients with hypersensitivity to Tree (birch, alder, hazel) pollen (hay fever). This novel formulation is designed to provide a vaccine that will be efficacious with only four escalating dose injections administered before the start of the pollen season. In this Study the Efficacy will be assessed by exposing allergic subjects to birch pollen in an environmental exposure chamber EEC. Patient symptomatic response to birch pollen and patient quality of life in the EEC will be determined.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | modified Tree pollen allergen absorbed to Tyrosine and containing MPL adjuvant |
|
| 2 | Experimental | modified Tree pollen allergen absorbed to Tyrosine |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | 4 injections of placebo 0.5 ml (2% tyrosine) |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tree MATA MPL or Tree MATA | Biological | 4 injections of increasing dose strength for Tree MATA MPL or Tree MATA:
4 injections of 0.5 mL of 2% w/v L-tyrosine for Placebo |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Assess the clinical efficacy as measured by Total Symptom Scores (TSS) of TreeMATAMPL versus placebo in reducing Allergic Rhinitis (AR) symptoms caused by birch tree pollen in an Environmental Exposure Chamber (EEC) Model. | about 10 weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Assess the clinical efficacy of TreeMATAMPL versus placebo and TreeMATA in reducing AR symptoms caused by birch and oak tree pollen in an EEC model | about 10 weeks | |
| Assess the responder/non-responder rate in TSS, NSS and NNSS of TreeMATAMPL versus placebo and TreeMATAMPL versus TreeMATA |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
A patient will not be included in this study if one or more of the following criteria apply:
Rhinitis medicamentosa; Large obstructive nasal polyps; Documented evidence of acute or significant chronic sinusitis, or upper respiratory tract infection as determined by the individual Investigator; Asthma, with the exception of mild intermittent asthma, to lessen confounding by asthma medications; History of hospitalization for asthma; History or presence of acute or subacute atopic dermatitis, chronic dermatitis, urticaria factitia, or urticaria due to physical/chemical influence.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Deepen Patel, MD, CCFP | Allied Research International Inc, Mississauga, Canada | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Allied Research International Inc. | Mississauga | Ontario | L4W 1N2 | Canada |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006969 | Hypersensitivity, Immediate |
| D006967 | Hypersensitivity |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| about 10 weeks |
| Evaluate the correlation between TSS obtained during the baseline birch EEC session compared to baseline oak EEC session | about 10 weeks |
| Evaluate the correlation between the TSS change observed (baseline to post treatment) during the birch EEC sessions compared to oak EEC sessions | about 10 weeks |
| Assess the correlation between the percentage of positive skin prick test results between birch pollen and the following tree pollen: Oak, ash, red maple, poplar, black walnut, beech, sycamore and American elm | during screening period (normally 1 day) |
| Assess the immunological response to TreeMATAMPL versus placebo and for TreeMATAMPL versus TreeMATA immunotherapy in patients with SAR. | IgG (IgG/IgG4) levels will be assessed after V1, 14, 21 |
| Evaluate the impact of TreeMATAMPL versus placebo and for TreeMATAMPL versus TreeMATA on quality-of-life in patients with SAR using the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire for use in the EEC. | about 10 weeks |
| Assess the safety and tolerability of TreeMATAMPL versus placebo and TreeMATAMPL versus TreeMATA in patients with SAR. | about 10 weeks |