Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Heparin and Minocycline-EDTA Flush for the Prevention of Catheter-Related Infections and Occlusions
Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Heparin and Minocycline-EDTA Flush for the Prevention of Catheter-Related Infections and Occlusions
RATIONALE: Heparin or M-EDTA may prevent catheter-related infections and blockages in patients at high risk for a catheter-related infection. It is not yet known whether heparin is more effective than M-EDTA in preventing catheter-related infections and blockages in patients at high risk for a catheter-related infection.
PURPOSE: This randomized clinical trial is studying heparin to see how well it works compared with M-EDTA in preventing catheter-related infections and blockages in patients at high risk for a catheter-related infection.
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
Secondary
OUTLINE: This is a randomized, double-blind, prospective, multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to type of catheter (tunneled central venous catheter [CVC] vs nontunneled percutaneous CVC) and participating center. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 150 patients will be accrued for this study.
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
At high risk of acquiring a catheter infection, as evidenced by any of the following:
New (≤ 10 days old) functioning externalized tunneled or nontunneled central venous catheter (CVC), such as a Hickman/Broviac or Hohn catheter, or peripherally inserted central venous catheter (PICC) utilized for infusion of chemotherapy, blood and blood products, or other intermittent infusions
No occluded CVC
No existing local or systemic catheter infection
No externalized CVC that is projected to remain in place for < 2 weeks
No infusion ports or Groshong catheters
No coated CVC impregnated with an antimicrobial or antiseptic agent
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: