Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Cycloset, a new quick-release oral formulation of bromocriptine mesylate, effectively reduces blood sugar by the proposed mechanism of reversing many of the metabolic alterations associated with insulin resistance and obesity by resetting central (hypothalamic) circadian organization of monoamine neuronal activities.
The primary analysis of this study will test the hypothesis that the rate of all-cause severe adverse events for those receiving usual drug therapy for diabetes management plus Cycloset is not greater than that for usual drug therapy plus placebo by more than an acceptable margin. While the primary purpose of this study is to establish the safety profile of Cycloset in type 2 diabetes, any potential positive cardiovascular benefits will be evaluated as well.
Bromocriptine mesylate, an ergot derivative, is a sympatholytic dopamine D2 receptor agonist that can exert inhibitory effects on serotonin turnover in the central nervous system. It has been proposed that bromocriptine can reverse many of the metabolic alterations associated with insulin resistance and obesity by resetting central (hypothalamic) circadian organization of monoamine neuronal activities.
While Cycloset has demonstrated efficacy by reducing HbA1c, fasting and post-prandial glucose and fasting and post-prandial triglycerides, the relatively small numbers of individuals treated for type 2 diabetes during the controlled Phase III clinical trials of Cycloset did not allow for a full evaluation of the safety profile. Since persons with diabetes are already at higher risk for cardiovascular disease, it is important to examine more fully the spectrum of potential adverse or positive effects from Cycloset in a large sample of persons with diabetes. Accordingly, the present study is designed to investigate the clinical safety of treatment with Cycloset in a broad population of persons with type 2 diabetes.
To determine in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus receiving Usual Diabetes Therapy (UDT) consisting of either diet, oral hypoglycemic agents (OHA) (no more than 2), or insulin (with or without no more than 1 OHA) plus either Placebo or Cycloset:
Whether add-on therapy with Cycloset results in all-cause rate of serious adverse events, which are not higher than add-on therapy with Placebo.
Whether add-on therapy with Cycloset results in disease-specific rate of serious cardiovascular adverse events, which are not higher than add-on therapy with Placebo.
While the primary purpose of this study is to establish the safety profile of Cycloset in type 2 diabetes, any potential positive cardiovascular benefits will be evaluated as well.
Other clinical measures:
The impact (either positive or negative) of Cycloset on HbA1c, fasting plasma glucose, weight, triglycerides lipids, blood pressure and patient tolerability after 12 months of therapy.
Furthermore, Hba1c changes from baseline to 24 weeks between Cycloset and Placebo among subjects with a baseline Hba1c of >= 7.5% among the following subgroups:
A. Treated at baseline with any Oral hypoglycemic agent (OHA) including injectable insulin secretagogues B. Metformin plus or minus one OHA or injectable insulin secretagogue C. Sulphonylurea plus or minus one OHA or injectable insulin secretagogue D. Treated at baseline with Metformin and one sulphonylurea
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Usual Diabetes Therapy plus placebo | Experimental | Usual diabetes therapy plus placebo |
|
| Drug Cycloset | Experimental |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cycloset | Drug | Usual diabetes therapy plus Cycloset |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Subjects Experiencing Serious Adverse Events | Number of subjects reporting all-cause Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) for usual drug therapy plus Cycloset vs. that for usual drug therapy (UDT) plus placebo from baseline to week 52. | From baseline to week 52. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Subjects Experiencing Serious Cardiovascular Adverse Events | The secondary safety endpoint is number subjects with occurrences of first cardiovascular SAE (myocardial infarction, stroke, in-patient hospitalization for heart failure, angina or revascularization surgery). | Baseline to week 52. |
| Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 24 in Subjects Failing Treatment With Metformin Plus a Sulfonylurea |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Subject who had taken prescription sympathomimetic drugs within seven (7) days prior to the first screening visit. Prescription sympathomimetic drugs were not allowed for any period greater than ten (10) consecutive days during the course of the study. Other ergot alkaloid derivatives or anti-migraine medications such as zolmitriptan (Zomig) and sumatriptan (Imitrex) were not permitted during the study.
Subject who had a history of alcoholism or drug abuse in the three (3) years prior to the first screening visit.
Subject who had a known hypersensitivity to any of the formulation components of the study drug.
Subject who had received any experimental drug or used an experimental device in the 30 days prior to the first screening visit or would do so during the study.
Subject who was pregnant or lactating women or women planning to become pregnant during the study. Women of childbearing potential had to have a negative pregnancy test at screening. Women who became pregnant were discontinued from the study.
Subject who had given donations of blood during the 30 days prior to the screening visit. Donation of blood also was prohibited during the study and for 30 days after completion of the study.
Subjects with clinically significant major organ system disease, such as
Working rotating, varying or night shifts
Patients taking unapproved herbal supplements that may be associated with a risk of cardiovascular events (such as ephedra, yohimbe etc)
Patients who had started therapy with an erectile dysfunction drug within 2 weeks prior to screening; patients could not begin treatment with an erectile dysfunction drug during the study period; patients previously taking erectile dysfunction drugs could do so only under medical supervision.
Subjects with circumstances or abnormalities (e.g., blindness or a history of non-compliance) that would interfere with the interpretation of safety or efficacy data or completion of the study.
Clinically significant abnormalities (values outside the normal range) on screening central laboratory evaluation unless discussed with and approved by the study principal investigator or Sponsor medical monitor.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michael Gaziano | MAVERIC | Principal Investigator |
| Richard E Scranton, MD MPH | VeroScience | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17592632 | Background | Scranton RE, Gaziano JM, Rutty D, Ezrokhi M, Cincotta A. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial to assess safety and tolerability during treatment of type 2 diabetes with usual diabetes therapy and either Cycloset or placebo. BMC Endocr Disord. 2007 Jun 25;7:3. doi: 10.1186/1472-6823-7-3. | |
| 20332352 | Result |
Not provided
Not provided
4,074 subjects were screened, 3,095 randomized 2:1 to Cycloset or placebo. 3,095 were analyzed for safety and 3,070 for all other analyses.The most common reason given for screen failure due to protocol ineligibility was an elevated creatinine (24.7% of all screen failures).
Patients were recruited from 74 centers across the United States and Puerto Rico, including 19 Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals. First patient enrolled: 23 August 2004 Last patient completed: 25 January 2007
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Cycloset | During the first week of the dose titration period, subjects were instructed to take 1 tablet of study drug daily (0.8 mg Cycloset). If the dose was tolerated, subjects were to have their dose of study drug increased to 2 tablets of study drug per day. The daily dose of study drug was to be increased at a rate of 1 tablet per week, up to a target dose level of 6 tablets per day at Week 6. |
| FG001 | Placebo | During the first week of the dose titration period, subjects were instructed to take 1 tablet of study drug daily (1 placebo tablet). If the dose was tolerated, subjects were to have their dose of study drug increased to 2 tablets of study drug per day. The daily dose of study drug was to be increased at a rate of 1 tablet per week, up to a target dose level of 6 tablets per day at Week 6. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Cycloset | During the first week of the dose titration period, subjects were instructed to take 1 tablet of study drug daily (0.8 mg Cycloset). If the dose was tolerated, subjects were to have their dose of study drug increased to 2 tablets of study drug per day. The daily dose of study drug was to be increased at a rate of 1 tablet per week, up to a target dose level of 6 tablets per day at Week 6. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Subjects Experiencing Serious Adverse Events | Number of subjects reporting all-cause Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) for usual drug therapy plus Cycloset vs. that for usual drug therapy (UDT) plus placebo from baseline to week 52. | Posted | Number | participants | From baseline to week 52. |
|
Expected study duration was 52 weeks. Adverse event data were collected from the day of first treatment dose to within 30 days of the last course of treatment or the date of the last contact (whichever was earlier).
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Cycloset | During the first week of the dose titration period, subjects were instructed to take 1 tablet of study drug daily (0.8 mg Cycloset). If the dose was tolerated, subjects were to have their dose of study drug increased to 2 tablets of study drug per day. The daily dose of study drug was to be increased at a rate of 1 tablet per week, up to a target dose level of 6 tablets per day at Week 6. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cardiac Disorders | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA (8.0) | Systematic Assessment | Cardiac Disorders include: Coronary Artery Disease, Chest Pain, Cardiac failure congestive, Myocardial Infarction, Angina Unstable, Atrial Fibrillation, Syncope, Acute Myocardial Infarction |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (8.0) | Systematic Assessment |
Thus HbA1c was only performed on a subset of patients defined as failing (HbA1c >= 7.5) and who were on oral diabetes medications. Forced titration of study drug may have lead to a greater number of discontinuations.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Richard Scranton | VeroScience | 401 816-0525 | richard_scranton@veroscience.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003924 | Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2 |
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001971 | Bromocriptine |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004879 | Ergotamines |
| D004876 | Ergot Alkaloids |
| D000470 | Alkaloids |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Usual Diabetes Therapy plus placebo | Drug | Placebo tablet taken orally once in the morning, beginning with one tablet daily, titrated up by 1 tablet each week to a maximum of 6 tablets daily |
|
|
Change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24 in subjects failing treatment with metformin plus a sulfonylurea with failure defined as having a baseline HbA1c value of ≥ 7.5%. Change was measured at week 24 after randomization in subjects having no major protocol violations. Change is reported as the absolute difference in % HbA1c. |
| Baseline to week 24 |
| Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 24 for Subjects With a Baseline HbA1c of ≥ 7.5% Who Were Taking at Least One Oral Hypoglycemia Agent (OHA) at Baseline. | The difference between Cycloset and placebo in the change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 24 was analyzed for subjects with a baseline HbA1c of ≥ 7.5% who were taking at least one oral hypoglycemia agent (OHA) at baseline. The primary analysis was based on subjects from the evaluable per protocol efficacy (EPPE) analysis set with a secondary analysis using subjects from the intent to treat efficacy (ITTE) analysis set for subjects completing 24 weeks of treatment. Change is reported as the absolute difference in % HbA1c. | Baseline to week 24 |
| Gaziano JM, Cincotta AH, O'Connor CM, Ezrokhi M, Rutty D, Ma ZJ, Scranton RE. Randomized clinical trial of quick-release bromocriptine among patients with type 2 diabetes on overall safety and cardiovascular outcomes. Diabetes Care. 2010 Jul;33(7):1503-8. doi: 10.2337/dc09-2009. Epub 2010 Mar 23. |
| 28374645 | Derived | Chamarthi B, Cincotta AH. Effect of bromocriptine-QR therapy on glycemic control in subjects with type 2 diabetes mellitus whose dysglycemia is inadequately controlled on insulin. Postgrad Med. 2017 May;129(4):446-455. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2017.1315290. Epub 2017 Apr 12. |
| 27687032 | Derived | Chamarthi B, Ezrokhi M, Rutty D, Cincotta AH. Impact of bromocriptine-QR therapy on cardiovascular outcomes in type 2 diabetes mellitus subjects on metformin. Postgrad Med. 2016 Nov;128(8):761-769. doi: 10.1080/00325481.2016.1243003. Epub 2016 Oct 11. |
| 26060823 | Derived | Chamarthi B, Gaziano JM, Blonde L, Vinik A, Scranton RE, Ezrokhi M, Rutty D, Cincotta AH. Timed Bromocriptine-QR Therapy Reduces Progression of Cardiovascular Disease and Dysglycemia in Subjects with Well-Controlled Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus. J Diabetes Res. 2015;2015:157698. doi: 10.1155/2015/157698. Epub 2015 Apr 28. |
| 23316290 | Derived | Gaziano JM, Cincotta AH, Vinik A, Blonde L, Bohannon N, Scranton R. Effect of bromocriptine-QR (a quick-release formulation of bromocriptine mesylate) on major adverse cardiovascular events in type 2 diabetes subjects. J Am Heart Assoc. 2012 Oct;1(5):e002279. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.112.002279. Epub 2012 Oct 25. |
| Death |
|
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Other |
|
| BG001 | Placebo | During the first week of the dose titration period, subjects were instructed to take 1 tablet of study drug daily (1 placebo tablet). If the dose was tolerated, subjects were to have their dose of study drug increased to 2 tablets of study drug per day. The daily dose of study drug was to be increased at a rate of 1 tablet per week, up to a target dose level of 6 tablets per day at Week 6. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
During the first week of the dose titration period, subjects were instructed to take 1 tablet of study drug daily (1 placebo tablet). If the dose was tolerated, subjects were to have their dose of study drug increased to 2 tablets of study drug per day. The daily dose of study drug was to be increased at a rate of 1 tablet per week, up to a target dose level of 6 tablets per day at Week 6.
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Subjects Experiencing Serious Cardiovascular Adverse Events | The secondary safety endpoint is number subjects with occurrences of first cardiovascular SAE (myocardial infarction, stroke, in-patient hospitalization for heart failure, angina or revascularization surgery). | intent to treat | Posted | Number | Subjects | Baseline to week 52. |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 24 in Subjects Failing Treatment With Metformin Plus a Sulfonylurea | Change in HbA1c from baseline to week 24 in subjects failing treatment with metformin plus a sulfonylurea with failure defined as having a baseline HbA1c value of ≥ 7.5%. Change was measured at week 24 after randomization in subjects having no major protocol violations. Change is reported as the absolute difference in % HbA1c. | subjects with baseline HbA1c of >= 7.5 and taking both metformin/sulfonylurea but not insulin. Analysis was conducted for those completing 24 weeks of treatment and on the ITT using the LOCF for those not completing 24 weeks of treatment. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Deviation | percent | Baseline to week 24 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in HbA1c From Baseline to Week 24 for Subjects With a Baseline HbA1c of ≥ 7.5% Who Were Taking at Least One Oral Hypoglycemia Agent (OHA) at Baseline. | The difference between Cycloset and placebo in the change in HbA1c from baseline to Week 24 was analyzed for subjects with a baseline HbA1c of ≥ 7.5% who were taking at least one oral hypoglycemia agent (OHA) at baseline. The primary analysis was based on subjects from the evaluable per protocol efficacy (EPPE) analysis set with a secondary analysis using subjects from the intent to treat efficacy (ITTE) analysis set for subjects completing 24 weeks of treatment. Change is reported as the absolute difference in % HbA1c. | randomized subjects with a baseline HbA1c of >= 7.5 taking one or two oral diabetes agents (not insulin) | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Deviation | percent | Baseline to week 24 |
|
|
|
|
| 176 |
| 2,054 |
| 1,611 |
| 2,054 |
| EG001 | Placebo | During the first week of the dose titration period, subjects were instructed to take 1 tablet of study drug daily (1 placebo tablet). If the dose was tolerated, subjects were to have their dose of study drug increased to 2 tablets of study drug per day. The daily dose of study drug was to be increased at a rate of 1 tablet per week, up to a target dose level of 6 tablets per day at Week 6. | 98 | 1,016 | 430 | 1,016 |
|
| Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA (8.0) | Systematic Assessment | Infection includes: Pneumonia, Cellulitis, Diverticulitis |
|
| Nervous | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (8.0) | Systematic Assessment | Nervous system disorders include: Syncope, Cerebrovascular accident, Transient ischemic attack |
|
| General disorders and adminstrative site conditions | General disorders | MedDRA (8.0) | Systematic Assessment | General disorders and administrative site conditions include: Chest pain, non-cardiac chest pain |
|
| Gastrointestinal | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (8.0) | Systematic Assessment | Gastrointestinal disorders include: Gastrointestinal hemorrhage |
|
| Vascular disorders | Vascular disorders | MedDRA (8.0) | Systematic Assessment | Vascular disorders include: Carotid artery stenosis |
|
| Respiratory | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA (8.0) | Systematic Assessment | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders include: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease |
|
| Injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA (8.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Musculoskeletal and connective tissue | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA (8.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Neoplasm | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA (8.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Endocrine disorders | Endocrine disorders | MedDRA (8.0) | Systematic Assessment | Endocrine disorders include: hypoglycemia |
|
| Metabolism | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA (8.0) | Systematic Assessment | Metabolism and nutrition disorders include: Dehydration |
|
| Renal | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA (8.0) | Systematic Assessment | Renal and urinary disorders include: acute renal failure |
|
| Hepatobiliary | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA (8.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyschiatric | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA (8.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Reproductive | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA (8.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Eye | Eye disorders | MedDRA (8.0) | Systematic Assessment | Eye disorders include: retinal detachment |
|
| vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (8.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (8.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA (8.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA (8.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA (8.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| hypoglycemia | Endocrine disorders | MedDRA (8.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
After FDA filing, Principal Liaison shall be free to publish the results of the Study subject only to the provisions of Section 7 regarding Veroscience Proprietary Information. The Principal Liaison shall furnish Veroscience with a copy of any proposed publication for review and comment prior to submission for publication, at least thirty (30) days prior to submission for manuscripts and at least fifteen (15) days prior to submission for abstracts.
| D004873 |
| Ergolines |
| D006576 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 4 or More Rings |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |