Open, Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Trigger vs Substrate vs Hybrid Approaches for AF Ablation
Open, Prospective, Randomized Trial Comparing Trigger vs Substrate vs Hybrid Approaches for AF Ablation
Patient Population: Patients with AF that is symptomatic and refractory to at least one antiarrhythmic medication. Patients must have AF that is paroxysmal (>4 episodes within 6 months, two episodes >6 hours within 1 year) or persistent (sustained episode <6 months terminated by cardioversion or drug).
Purpose: To compare a trigger-based technique (pulmonary vein isolation) to a substrate-based technique (high-frequency, fractionated EGMs) to a combined approach for AF ablation
Interventions: Patients will be randomized to either wide circumferential pulmonary vein isolation ("trigger") or ablation of high-frequency, fractionated electrograms during AF ("substrate"), or a hybrid approach combining trigger and substrate. Both techniques will be performed with NavX mapping system and a standardized ablation catheter. Endpoint of PVI will be isolation of all four PVs documented by circular catheter. Endpoint for substrate-based ablation will be termination and noninducibility of AF. Up to 2 procedures will be allowed within 6 months. A 2 month blanking period will be allowed after each procedure during which early recurrences will not be counted.
Outcomes:
Followup:
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: