A Randomised, Controlled, Crossover Study: Treatment With Thyroxin Compared to Thyroxin + Triiodothyronin in Patients With Secondary Hypothyroidism
A Randomised, Controlled, Crossover Study: Treatment With Thyroxin Compared to Thyroxin + Triiodothyronin in Patients With Secondary Hypothyroidism
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a body weight adjusted dose of thyroxin is superior to treatment guided by laboratory results of thyroxin hormones in patients with central hypothyroidism. Moreover beneficial effects of triiodthyronine supplementation are investigated.
Backround: A normal thyroid function is critical for metabolism, well-being and cognitive function. It is now well accepted that primary subclinical hypothyroidism, characterized by normal circulating thyroid hormones (fT3 and fT4) and elevated TSH, should be treated to improve reduced quality of life and abnormalities of lipid metabolism. In central hypothyroidism (CH) the dose of replacement therapy aims to achieve normal thyroxin (T4) concentrations as defined by appropriate reference populations. Adequate thyroxin treatment is especially challenging, as T4 cannot be titrated according to endogenous TSH levels because of the impaired hypothalamic-pituitary unit. The majority of untreated CH patients show normal (40 %) or elevated TSH levels (35 %) while only a minority has reduced concentrations (25 %) {Faglia, 1979 #1}. These findings are explained by the lack of pulsatile secretion and nocturnal TSH surge, which has been attributed to impaired thyrotroph function in CH patients {Caron, 1986 #2}. Moreover, impaired biological activity of TSH itself due to reduced glycosylation has been described in secondary hypothyroidism.
In a cross sectional study performed in patients with central hypothyroidism, we found elevated cholesterol levels and increased ankle reflex time suggesting subtle hypothyroidism, though fT3 and fT4 serum concentrations were within the normal range. The average dose of thyroxin (T4) applied in these patients with central hypothyroidism was 1.1 µg/kg bw, which is below the average dose recommended in primary hypothyroidism (1.6 µg/kg bw). We hypothesized that these results might indicate suboptimal T4 replacement therapy, not detectable by current laboratory testing.
Hypothesis: To investigate the effects of a body weight adjusted T4 or T3T4 dose on metabolism, well-being and cognitive function.
Study design: Placebo controlled trial in patients with central hypothyroidism following a double blind cross-over design.
Intervention: Three different treatment regimes (5 weeks each) were compared: "CON-T4", empirically chosen, current dose of T4 (1 ± 0.05 μg/kg body weight (bw); "OPT-T4", optimized T4 treatment (1.6 μg/kg bw T4); "T3T4", combination of triiodothyronine (T3, 0.16) and T4 (1.44 μg/kg bw). Biochemical parameters, ankle reflex time and neurocognitive functions were assessed.
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria: