Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| Hx-CD20-406 | Other Identifier | Genmab |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to determine whether HuMax-CD20 (ofatumumab) is effective in the treatment of patients failing both fludarabine and alemtuzumab.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| ofatumumab | Experimental | Anti-CD20 antibody therapy |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ofatumumab | Drug | Intravenous infusion |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants (Par.) Classified as Responders and Non-responders for Objective Response as Assessed by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IRC) in Accordance With the National Cancer Institute Working Group (NCIWG) 1996 Guidelines | Par. with complete remission (CR), nodular partial remission (nPR), and partial remission (PR) were classified as responders, while those with stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) were classified as non-responders. Per the NCIWG guideline (1996): CR; no lymphadenopathy/hepatomegaly/splenomegaly/constitutional symptoms, normal hematology, bone marrow sample as normocellular for age, <30% lymphocytes (LC), no lymphoid nodule; PR: a >=50% decrease in LC/lymphadenopathy; nPR: persistent nodules in bone marrow; PD: new lesion or increase by >=50% from baseline; SD: no CR, PR, or PD. | Start of treatment (Week 0 of Visit 2) until Week 24 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Duration of Response | Duration of response is defined as the time from the initial response (first visit at which response is observed) to progression or death. If the participant had progression between scheduled visits, no progression at the end of the trial, treatment discontinuation for undocumented progression, treatment discontinuation for toxicity or other reason, new anti-cancer treatment, and experienced death or progression after two or more missed visits in a row the endpoint was censored. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| GSK Clinical Trials | GlaxoSmithKline | Study Director |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21856867 | Background | Wierda WG, Padmanabhan S, Chan GW, Gupta IV, Lisby S, Osterborg A; Hx-CD20-406 Study Investigators. Ofatumumab is active in patients with fludarabine-refractory CLL irrespective of prior rituximab: results from the phase 2 international study. Blood. 2011 Nov 10;118(19):5126-9. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-04-348656. Epub 2011 Aug 19. | |
| 20194866 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | 2000 mg Ofatumumab + DR | Ofatumumab intravenous (iv) infusion was initiated at 300 milligrams (mg), followed by seven weekly 2000 mg infusions and then four monthly infusions of 2000 mg for a duration of 24 weeks. The independent endpoint review committee (IRC) classified these participants as double refractory (DR), defined as participants who were enrolled in the study and were refractory to both fludarabine and alemtuzumab. |
| FG001 | 2000 mg Ofatumumab + BFR | Ofatumumab iv infusion was initiated at 300 mg, followed by seven weekly 2000 mg infusions and then four monthly infusions of 2000 mg for a duration of 24 weeks. The IRC classified these participants as bulky fludarabine refractory (BFR), defined as participants who were enrolled in the study and were refractory to fludarabine with bulky lymphadenopathy. |
| FG002 | 2000 mg Ofatumumab + Other | Ofatumumab iv infusion was initiated at 300 mg, followed by seven weekly 2000 mg infusions and then four monthly infusions of 2000 mg for a duration of 24 weeks. The IRC classified these participants as "other," defined as participants who were enrolled in the study but did not meet criteria for DR or BFR. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | 2000 mg Ofatumumab + DR | Ofatumumab iv infusion was initiated at 300 mg, followed by seven weekly 2000 mg infusions and then four monthly infusions of 2000 mg for a duration of 24 weeks. The IRC classified these participants as DR, defined as participants who were enrolled in the study and were refractory to both fludarabine and alemtuzumab. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Number of Participants (Par.) Classified as Responders and Non-responders for Objective Response as Assessed by an Independent Endpoint Review Committee (IRC) in Accordance With the National Cancer Institute Working Group (NCIWG) 1996 Guidelines | Par. with complete remission (CR), nodular partial remission (nPR), and partial remission (PR) were classified as responders, while those with stable disease (SD) and progressive disease (PD) were classified as non-responders. Per the NCIWG guideline (1996): CR; no lymphadenopathy/hepatomegaly/splenomegaly/constitutional symptoms, normal hematology, bone marrow sample as normocellular for age, <30% lymphocytes (LC), no lymphoid nodule; PR: a >=50% decrease in LC/lymphadenopathy; nPR: persistent nodules in bone marrow; PD: new lesion or increase by >=50% from baseline; SD: no CR, PR, or PD. | Full Analysis Set (FAS): all participants who had been exposed to study drug irrespective of their compliance to the planned course of treatment. Participants not evaluable (NE) were due to patient withdraw, refusal, non-trial drug related AEs, and death | Posted | Number | participants | Start of treatment (Week 0 of Visit 2) until Week 24 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | 2000 mg Ofatumumab + DR | Ofatumumab iv infusion was initiated at 300 mg, followed by seven weekly 2000 mg infusions and then four monthly infusions of 2000 mg for a duration of 24 weeks. The IRC classified these participants as DR, defined as participants who were enrolled in the study and were refractory to both fludarabine and alemtuzumab. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Response Center | GlaxoSmithKline | 866-435-7343 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D015448 | Leukemia, B-Cell |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007945 | Leukemia, Lymphoid |
| D007938 | Leukemia |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C527517 | ofatumumab |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Start of treatment (Week 0 of Visit 2) until Week 24 |
| Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | PFS is defined as the time from randomization until progression/death. Per the IRC, if the participant had progression between scheduled visits, died before the first assessment, or died between adequate visits, the endpoint was considered progressed. If there was no progression at the end of the trial, treatment discontinuation for undocumented progression, treatment discontinuation for toxicity/other reason, new anti-cancer treatment, and death/progression after 2 or more missed visits in a row, the endpoint was censored. Clinical progression is not considered as progression endpoint. | Start of treatment (Week 0 of Visit 2) until Week 24 |
| Time to Next Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Treatment | Time to next chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treatment is defined as the time from treatment allocation/randomization (Visit 2) until the time of the first administration of the next CLL treatment other than ofatumumab (or HuMaxCD20, a fully human monoclonal antibody to CD20 that is expressed on the surface of B-cells). | Time from randomization (Week 0 of Visit 2) until the time of first administration of a CLL treatment other than ofatumumab (assessed for a median of 8.7 weeks currently [or up to 13.3 months]) |
| Overall Survival | OS is defined as the time from allocation to death. OS will also be subgrouped for responders and non-responders. | Start of randomization (Week 0 of Visit 2) until death (up to a median of 17.1 weeks) |
| Percent Change From Baseline to Week 7 in Peripheral CD5+CD19+ Cell Counts | The peripheral blood for each participant was collected and analyzed for CD5+CD19+ cell counts. CD is "cluster of differentiation," is a cell surface marker for immunophenotyping, and, in this case, is a surrogate for B cell malignancy (indicates malignant B cells). Percent change from Visit 2 (Week 0, Baseline) = (value at Week 7 minus value at Week 0 divided by value at Week 0) x 100. | Baseline (Visit 2) until Week 7 (Visit 9) |
| Percent Change From Baseline to Week 7 in Peripheral CD5+CD20+ Cell Counts | The peripheral blood for each participant was collected and analyzed for CD5+CD20+ cell counts. CD is "cluster of differentiation," is a cell surface marker for immunophenotyping, and, in this case, is a surrogate for B cell malignancy (indicates malignant B cells). Percent change from Visit 2 (Week 0, Baseline) = (value at Week 7 minus value at Week 0 divided by value at Week 0) x 100. | Baseline (Visit 2) until Week 7 (Visit 9) |
| Median Percent Change of Tumor Size (Sum of Products Dimensions [SPD]) From Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 24 (Visit 14) | Tumor size and change in tumor size will be measured by the absolute value of and the percent change in the sum of products of the diameters of the largest abnormal lymph nodes from Baseline to Week 24 (Visit 14). Percent change from Visit 2 (Baseline, Week 0) = (value at Week 24 minus value at Week 0 divided by value at Week 0) x 100. | Baseline (Visit 2) until Week 24 (Visit 14) |
| Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Constitutional Symptoms at Week 24 | Participants with complete resolution of constitutional symptoms were those in whom no constitutional symptoms, such as night sweats, weight loss, and fever or extreme fatigue, were observed. | Baseline (Visit 2) and Week 24 |
| Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Lymphadenopathy | Participants with complete resolution of lymphadenopathy (disease involving the lymph nodes) were defined as those in whom all observed lymph nodes were of normal size (all nodes <1 centimeters) as determined by physical examination assessed by the investigator. All palpable lymph node sizes were recorded. | Baseline (Visit 2) to end of study (up to Week 24) |
| Number of Participants With Improvement on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Scale at Week 24 | ECOG performance status is a measure of the participant's ability to carry out activities of daily living on 6-point scale (0=fully active, 1=restricted in physically activity, ambulatory, 2=ambulatory [>50% of waking hours], 3=capable of only limited self care, 4=completely disabled, 5=Dead). Improvement in ECOG performance status is defined as a decrease from baseline by at least one score on the ECOG scale. | Baseline (Visit 2) and Week 24 |
| Number of Participants Who Were Positive, Negative, or Had Missing Data for the Indicated Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Prognostic Factors at Screening | The number of participants (par.) who were positive, negative, or had missing data for the following prognostic factors indicative of altered responsiveness to treatment and/or survival was measured: 17p-, 11q-, +12q, 6q-, 13q-. Par. were assessed by FISH for these chromosomal abnormalities known tobe prognostic for time to treatment and survival when detected at diagnosis. Par. were categorized by the chromosomal abnormality detected: 17 p deletion, 11q deletion (but not 17 p deletion), 12 q trisomy (but not 17 p or 111q deletion), 13q deletion only, and no chromosomal abnormalities found. | Screening (Visit 1, <=14 days prior to Visit 2) |
| Number of Participants With Improvement in Hemoglobin | The number of participants (par.) who had improvement in hemoglobin levels >=11 grams (g)/deciliter (dl) (6.8 millimoles/liter) or 50% improvement over baseline was measured. | Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 28 |
| Number of Participants With Improvement in Thrombocytopenia (Thromb.) | Improvement in thromb. is defined as a decrease from Visit 2 by >=1 National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI CTC) grade. Thromb. is defined as low platelet counts resulting from refractory CLL, damage from prior treatment, advanced age, or reduced bone marrow function and can be considered as an adverse condition. Adverse events (AEs) such as thromb. in a cancer indication are graded on a scale determined by the NCI called the NCI CTC: lowest, grade 1; highest, grade 5 (death). Changes in this grading can assess improvements or declines in the severity of the AE. | Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 28 |
| Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Hepatomegaly | Participants with complete resolution of enlarged liver (hepatomegaly) were defined as those with an enlarged palpable liver at baseline followed by the absence of hepatomegaly post- baseline (i.e., the liver was of normal size). Liver size was assessed by physical examination and documented as "centimeters" under the costal margin with relative changes in spleen size in 1 dimension calculated based on palpated numeric measurements (as per the 1996 NCIWG guidelines). | Baseline (Visit 2) until Week 24 |
| Number of Participants With Improvement in Neutropenia | Low levels of neutrophils (neutropenia) may increase the risk of developing serious infections and may be considered an adverse condition and evaluated on the NCI CTC with a grade. Improvement in neutropenia is defined as a decrease from Visit 2 (baseline) by at least one NCI CTC grade. Improvement is defined as a decrease from Visit 2 by at least one NCI CTC grade. | Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 28 |
| Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Splenomegaly | Participants with complete resolution of enlarged spleen (splenomegaly) were defined as those with an enlarged palpable spleen at baseline followed by the absence of splenomegaly post-baseline (i.e., the spleen was of normal size). Spleen size was assessed by physical examination and documented as "centimeters" under the costal margin with relative changes in spleen size in 1 dimension calculated based on palpated numeric measurements (as per the 1996 NCIWG guidelines). | Baseline (Visit 2) until Week 24 |
| Number of Participants Who Experienced Any Adverse Event | An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. A list of AEs experienced in the study with a frequency threshold of 5% can be found in the AE section of this results record. | From first infusion (Visit 2/Week 0) to Visit 21 (Month 24 of follow-up [up to Month 48]) or time of withdrawal (treatment and follow-up) |
| Cmax and Ctrough at Dose 1 (Visit 2, Week 0), Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7), and Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24) | Cmax is defined as the maximum concentration of drug in serum samples. Ctrough is defined as the trough serum concentration (measured concentration at the end of a dosing interval [taken directly before the next administration]). No drug was present before the first infusion; therefore, there are no Ctrough results for Dose 1 | Visit 2 (Week 0), Visit 9 (Week 7), and Visit 14 (Week 24) |
| AUC (0-inf) and AUC(0-tau) at Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7) and Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24) | AUC is defined as the area under the ofatumumab concentration-time curve as a measure of drug exposure. AUC(0-inf) is AUC from the start of infusion extrapolated to infinity. AUC(0-tau) is AUC from the start of infusion over the dosing interval. | Visit 9 (Week 7) and Visit 14 (Week 24) |
| Half-life (t1/2) at Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7) and at Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24) | Half-life ( t1/2) is defined as the terminal half-life and is the time required for the amount of drug in the body to decrease by half. | Visit 9 (Week 7) and Visit14 (Week 24) |
| Clearance (CL) After Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7) and Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24) | CL is the clearance of drug from serum, which is defined as the volume of serum from which the drug is cleared per unit time. | Visit 9 (Week 7) and Visit 14 (Week 24) |
| Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) at Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7) and at Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24) | Vss is defined as the volume of distribution at steady state of ofatumumab. | Visit 9 (Week 7) and Visit 14 (Week 24) |
| Wierda WG, Kipps TJ, Mayer J, Stilgenbauer S, Williams CD, Hellmann A, Robak T, Furman RR, Hillmen P, Trneny M, Dyer MJ, Padmanabhan S, Piotrowska M, Kozak T, Chan G, Davis R, Losic N, Wilms J, Russell CA, Osterborg A; Hx-CD20-406 Study Investigators. Ofatumumab as single-agent CD20 immunotherapy in fludarabine-refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Apr 1;28(10):1749-55. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.25.3187. Epub 2010 Mar 1. |
| 24443277 | Derived | Struemper H, Sale M, Patel BR, Ostergaard M, Osterborg A, Wierda WG, Hagenbeek A, Coiffier B, Jewell RC. Population pharmacokinetics of ofatumumab in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, follicular lymphoma, and rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Pharmacol. 2014 Jul;54(7):818-27. doi: 10.1002/jcph.268. Epub 2014 Jan 28. |
| Withdrawn due to Disease Progression |
|
| Death |
|
| Other Treatment Selected |
|
| Participant Reduced General Condition |
|
| Physician Decision |
|
| No Response |
|
| New Malignancy (Bladder Cancer) |
|
| BG001 |
| 2000 mg Ofatumumab + BFR |
Ofatumumab iv infusion was initiated at 300 mg, followed by seven weekly 2000 mg infusions and then four monthly infusions of 2000 mg for a duration of 24 weeks. The IRC classified these participants as BFR, defined as participants who were enrolled in the study and were refractory to fludarabine with bulky lymphadenopathy. |
| BG002 | 2000 mg Ofatumumab + Other | Ofatumumab iv infusion was initiated at 300 mg, followed by seven weekly 2000 mg infusions and then four monthly infusions of 2000 mg for a duration of 24 weeks. The IRC classified these participants as "other,"defined as participants who were enrolled in the study but did not meet criteria for DR or BFR. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | participants |
|
| ID |
|---|
| Title |
|---|
| Description |
|---|
| OG000 | 2000 mg Ofatumumab + DR | Ofatumumab iv infusion was initiated at 300 mg, followed by seven weekly 2000 mg infusions and then four monthly infusions of 2000 mg for a duration of 24 weeks. The IRC classified these participants as DR, defined as participants who were enrolled in the study and were refractory to both fludarabine and alemtuzumab. |
| OG001 | 2000 mg Ofatumumab + BFR | Ofatumumab iv infusion was initiated at 300 mg, followed by seven weekly 2000 mg infusions and then four monthly infusions of 2000 mg for a duration of 24 weeks. The IRC classified these participants as BFR, defined as participants who were enrolled in the study and were refractory to fludarabine with bulky lymphadenopathy. |
| OG002 | 2000 mg Ofatumumab + Other | Ofatumumab iv infusion was initiated at 300 mg, followed by seven weekly 2000 mg infusions and then four monthly infusions of 2000 mg for a duration of 24 weeks. The IRC classified these participants as "other,"defined as participants who were enrolled in the study but did not meet criteria for DR or BFR. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Duration of Response | Duration of response is defined as the time from the initial response (first visit at which response is observed) to progression or death. If the participant had progression between scheduled visits, no progression at the end of the trial, treatment discontinuation for undocumented progression, treatment discontinuation for toxicity or other reason, new anti-cancer treatment, and experienced death or progression after two or more missed visits in a row the endpoint was censored. | FAS | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | Start of treatment (Week 0 of Visit 2) until Week 24 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Progression-Free Survival (PFS) | PFS is defined as the time from randomization until progression/death. Per the IRC, if the participant had progression between scheduled visits, died before the first assessment, or died between adequate visits, the endpoint was considered progressed. If there was no progression at the end of the trial, treatment discontinuation for undocumented progression, treatment discontinuation for toxicity/other reason, new anti-cancer treatment, and death/progression after 2 or more missed visits in a row, the endpoint was censored. Clinical progression is not considered as progression endpoint. | FAS | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | Start of treatment (Week 0 of Visit 2) until Week 24 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Time to Next Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) Treatment | Time to next chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) treatment is defined as the time from treatment allocation/randomization (Visit 2) until the time of the first administration of the next CLL treatment other than ofatumumab (or HuMaxCD20, a fully human monoclonal antibody to CD20 that is expressed on the surface of B-cells). | FAS | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | Time from randomization (Week 0 of Visit 2) until the time of first administration of a CLL treatment other than ofatumumab (assessed for a median of 8.7 weeks currently [or up to 13.3 months]) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Overall Survival | OS is defined as the time from allocation to death. OS will also be subgrouped for responders and non-responders. | FAS | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | months | Start of randomization (Week 0 of Visit 2) until death (up to a median of 17.1 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 7 in Peripheral CD5+CD19+ Cell Counts | The peripheral blood for each participant was collected and analyzed for CD5+CD19+ cell counts. CD is "cluster of differentiation," is a cell surface marker for immunophenotyping, and, in this case, is a surrogate for B cell malignancy (indicates malignant B cells). Percent change from Visit 2 (Week 0, Baseline) = (value at Week 7 minus value at Week 0 divided by value at Week 0) x 100. | FAS | Posted | Median | Full Range | percent change in cell counts | Baseline (Visit 2) until Week 7 (Visit 9) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percent Change From Baseline to Week 7 in Peripheral CD5+CD20+ Cell Counts | The peripheral blood for each participant was collected and analyzed for CD5+CD20+ cell counts. CD is "cluster of differentiation," is a cell surface marker for immunophenotyping, and, in this case, is a surrogate for B cell malignancy (indicates malignant B cells). Percent change from Visit 2 (Week 0, Baseline) = (value at Week 7 minus value at Week 0 divided by value at Week 0) x 100. | FAS | Posted | Median | Full Range | percent change in cell counts | Baseline (Visit 2) until Week 7 (Visit 9) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Median Percent Change of Tumor Size (Sum of Products Dimensions [SPD]) From Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 24 (Visit 14) | Tumor size and change in tumor size will be measured by the absolute value of and the percent change in the sum of products of the diameters of the largest abnormal lymph nodes from Baseline to Week 24 (Visit 14). Percent change from Visit 2 (Baseline, Week 0) = (value at Week 24 minus value at Week 0 divided by value at Week 0) x 100. | FAS | Posted | Median | Full Range | percent change in tumor size | Baseline (Visit 2) until Week 24 (Visit 14) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Constitutional Symptoms at Week 24 | Participants with complete resolution of constitutional symptoms were those in whom no constitutional symptoms, such as night sweats, weight loss, and fever or extreme fatigue, were observed. | FAS. Data were provided for the number of participants with constitutional symptoms at baseline attending each visit. Participants withdrawn during the study were not analyzed. (Participants without baseline constitutional symptoms did not experience new constitutional symptoms during the trial period.) | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline (Visit 2) and Week 24 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Lymphadenopathy | Participants with complete resolution of lymphadenopathy (disease involving the lymph nodes) were defined as those in whom all observed lymph nodes were of normal size (all nodes <1 centimeters) as determined by physical examination assessed by the investigator. All palpable lymph node sizes were recorded. | FAS. Data were provided for the number of participants with lymphadenopathy at baseline attending each visit. Participants withdrawn during the study were not analyzed. (Participants without baseline lymphadenopathy remained free of lymphadenopathy during the trial.) | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline (Visit 2) to end of study (up to Week 24) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Improvement on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status Scale at Week 24 | ECOG performance status is a measure of the participant's ability to carry out activities of daily living on 6-point scale (0=fully active, 1=restricted in physically activity, ambulatory, 2=ambulatory [>50% of waking hours], 3=capable of only limited self care, 4=completely disabled, 5=Dead). Improvement in ECOG performance status is defined as a decrease from baseline by at least one score on the ECOG scale. | FAS. Data were provided for participants (par.) with an ECOG score >0 at baseline attending each visit. Par. withdrawn from the study were not analyzed. (55 par. had an ECOG performance status of 0 at baseline and therefore did not have the opportunity to improve. No par. with an ECOG score of 0 at baseline worsened during the trial.) | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline (Visit 2) and Week 24 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants Who Were Positive, Negative, or Had Missing Data for the Indicated Fluorescence in Situ Hybridization (FISH) Prognostic Factors at Screening | The number of participants (par.) who were positive, negative, or had missing data for the following prognostic factors indicative of altered responsiveness to treatment and/or survival was measured: 17p-, 11q-, +12q, 6q-, 13q-. Par. were assessed by FISH for these chromosomal abnormalities known tobe prognostic for time to treatment and survival when detected at diagnosis. Par. were categorized by the chromosomal abnormality detected: 17 p deletion, 11q deletion (but not 17 p deletion), 12 q trisomy (but not 17 p or 111q deletion), 13q deletion only, and no chromosomal abnormalities found. | FAS. Par. were categorized hierarchically (by severity of abnormality): par. with a 17 p deletion (D); par. with an 11q D, but not a 17 p D; par. with 12q trisomy, but not a 17p or 11q D; par. with no aberrations found; par. with a 13q D as the sole aberration; and par. with 6q D (and not any of the above categories). Some par. had missing data. | Posted | Number | participants | Screening (Visit 1, <=14 days prior to Visit 2) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Improvement in Hemoglobin | The number of participants (par.) who had improvement in hemoglobin levels >=11 grams (g)/deciliter (dl) (6.8 millimoles/liter) or 50% improvement over baseline was measured. | FAS. Par. were excluded from analysis if they received treatment of red blood cells (RBCs), received transfusions or a RBC growth factor (erythropoietin), died, withdrew from the trial, or began next CLL treatment. Only those par. remaining in the study at Week 28 were analyzed. No par. in the "Other" treatment arm met the criteria for analysis. | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 28 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Improvement in Thrombocytopenia (Thromb.) | Improvement in thromb. is defined as a decrease from Visit 2 by >=1 National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria (NCI CTC) grade. Thromb. is defined as low platelet counts resulting from refractory CLL, damage from prior treatment, advanced age, or reduced bone marrow function and can be considered as an adverse condition. Adverse events (AEs) such as thromb. in a cancer indication are graded on a scale determined by the NCI called the NCI CTC: lowest, grade 1; highest, grade 5 (death). Changes in this grading can assess improvements or declines in the severity of the AE. | FAS. Only those participants remaining in the study at Week 28 were analyzed. No par. in the "Other" treatment arm met the criteria for analysis. | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 28 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Hepatomegaly | Participants with complete resolution of enlarged liver (hepatomegaly) were defined as those with an enlarged palpable liver at baseline followed by the absence of hepatomegaly post- baseline (i.e., the liver was of normal size). Liver size was assessed by physical examination and documented as "centimeters" under the costal margin with relative changes in spleen size in 1 dimension calculated based on palpated numeric measurements (as per the 1996 NCIWG guidelines). | FAS. Data were provided for the number of participants with hepatomegaly from baseline attending each visit. Participants withdrawn during the study were not analyzed. Only participants with baseline hepatomegaly and a post-baseline assessment are included. | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline (Visit 2) until Week 24 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Improvement in Neutropenia | Low levels of neutrophils (neutropenia) may increase the risk of developing serious infections and may be considered an adverse condition and evaluated on the NCI CTC with a grade. Improvement in neutropenia is defined as a decrease from Visit 2 (baseline) by at least one NCI CTC grade. Improvement is defined as a decrease from Visit 2 by at least one NCI CTC grade. | FAS. Only those par. remaining in the study at Week 28 were analyzed. No par. in the "Other" treatment arm met the criteria for analysis. | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline (Visit 2) to Week 28 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Complete Resolution of Splenomegaly | Participants with complete resolution of enlarged spleen (splenomegaly) were defined as those with an enlarged palpable spleen at baseline followed by the absence of splenomegaly post-baseline (i.e., the spleen was of normal size). Spleen size was assessed by physical examination and documented as "centimeters" under the costal margin with relative changes in spleen size in 1 dimension calculated based on palpated numeric measurements (as per the 1996 NCIWG guidelines). | FAS. Data were provided for the number of participants with splenomegaly at baseline attending each visit. Participants withdrawn during the study were not analyzed. Only participants with baseline splenomegaly and a post-baseline assessment are included. | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline (Visit 2) until Week 24 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants Who Experienced Any Adverse Event | An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which did not necessarily have a causal relationship with the treatment. A list of AEs experienced in the study with a frequency threshold of 5% can be found in the AE section of this results record. | FAS | Posted | Number | participants | From first infusion (Visit 2/Week 0) to Visit 21 (Month 24 of follow-up [up to Month 48]) or time of withdrawal (treatment and follow-up) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Cmax and Ctrough at Dose 1 (Visit 2, Week 0), Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7), and Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24) | Cmax is defined as the maximum concentration of drug in serum samples. Ctrough is defined as the trough serum concentration (measured concentration at the end of a dosing interval [taken directly before the next administration]). No drug was present before the first infusion; therefore, there are no Ctrough results for Dose 1 | FAS. Data were provided for the number of participants attending each visit. Participants withdrawn during the study were not analyzed. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | Milligrams per liter (mg/L) | Visit 2 (Week 0), Visit 9 (Week 7), and Visit 14 (Week 24) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | AUC (0-inf) and AUC(0-tau) at Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7) and Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24) | AUC is defined as the area under the ofatumumab concentration-time curve as a measure of drug exposure. AUC(0-inf) is AUC from the start of infusion extrapolated to infinity. AUC(0-tau) is AUC from the start of infusion over the dosing interval. | FAS. Data were provided for the number of participants attending each visit for whom the parameter could be calculated. Participants withdrawn during the study were not analyzed. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | Milligrams x hour per liter (mg.h/L) | Visit 9 (Week 7) and Visit 14 (Week 24) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Half-life (t1/2) at Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7) and at Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24) | Half-life ( t1/2) is defined as the terminal half-life and is the time required for the amount of drug in the body to decrease by half. | FAS. Data were provided for the number of participants attending each visit for whom the parameter could be calculated. Participants withdrawn during the study were not analyzed. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | hours | Visit 9 (Week 7) and Visit14 (Week 24) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Clearance (CL) After Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7) and Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24) | CL is the clearance of drug from serum, which is defined as the volume of serum from which the drug is cleared per unit time. | FAS. Data were provided for the number of participants attending each visit for whom the parameter could be calculated. Participants withdrawn during the study were not analyzed. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | Milliliters per hour (mL/h) | Visit 9 (Week 7) and Visit 14 (Week 24) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Volume of Distribution at Steady State (Vss) at Dose 8 (Visit 9, Week 7) and at Dose 12 (Visit 14, Week 24) | Vss is defined as the volume of distribution at steady state of ofatumumab. | FAS. Data were provided for the number of participants attending each visit for whom the parameter could be calculated. Participants withdrawn during the study were not analyzed. | Posted | Geometric Mean | Geometric Coefficient of Variation | Liters (L) | Visit 9 (Week 7) and Visit 14 (Week 24) |
|
|
|
| 60 |
| 95 |
| 90 |
| 95 |
| EG001 | 2000 mg Ofatumumab + BFR | Ofatumumab iv infusion was initiated at 300 mg, followed by seven weekly 2000 mg infusions and then four monthly infusions of 2000 mg for a duration of 24 weeks. The IRC classified these participants as BFR, defined as participants who were enrolled in the study and were refractory to fludarabine with bulky lymphadenopathy. | 59 | 112 | 107 | 112 |
| EG002 | 2000 mg Ofatumumab + Other | Ofatumumab iv infusion was initiated at 300 mg, followed by seven weekly 2000 mg infusions and then four monthly infusions of 2000 mg for a duration of 24 weeks. The IRC classified these participants as "other,"defined as participants who were enrolled in the study but did not meet criteria for DR or BFR. | 12 | 16 | 16 | 16 |
| Sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bronchopneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Herpes zoster | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Neutropenic sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Septic shock | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lobar pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Appendicitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Aspergilloma | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Enterocolitis infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Folliculitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fusarium infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lung infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Peritoneal infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumocystis jiroveci pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumonia fungal | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Progessive multifocal | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pseudomonas infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Febrile neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hemolytic anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Agranulocytosis | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Anemia haemolytic autoimmune | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lymphocytic infiltration | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Thrombocytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Disease progression | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Myocardial ischaemia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cardic failure | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Myopericarditis | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Breast cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Chronic lympocytic leukaemia | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hodgkins disease | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Mantle cell lymphoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Haemoptysis | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypoxia | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pleural effusion | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pulmonary edema | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Accidental overdose | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Postoperative fever | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Transfusion reaction | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Facial paresis | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hemiparesis | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ischaemic stroke | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Transient ischaemic attack | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Small intestinal obstruction | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Enteritis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Deep vein thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Haematoma | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cytokine release syndrome | Immune system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypersensitivity | Immune system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diplopia | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Neutrophil count decreased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diabetes mellitus inadequate control | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypercalcaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Confusional state | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vertigo | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lower respiration infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ear infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Eczema infected | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Erysipelas | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Enterocolitis infections | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Escherichia sepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Eye infection staphylococcal | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nocardiosis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pseuromonas infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hyperthermia | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Infusion related reaction | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cardiac arrest | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia transformation | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bladder cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bowen's disease | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Colon cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Neoplasm | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Squamous cell carcinoma of the skin | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Tumor lysis syndrome | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Acute repiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bronchospasm | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dyspnea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lung disorder | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lung infiltration | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Respiratory failure | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lower limb fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Spinal compression fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cerebral ischemia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Epilepsy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Ascites | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastrointestinal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Contrast media allergy | Immune system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Immunodeficiency | Immune system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Blood uric acid increased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diabetes | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypokalemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary retention | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyroderma gangrenosum | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bone pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Chills | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Herpes zoster | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dyspnoea | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Urticaria | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hyperhidrosis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Muscle spasms | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypotension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Lower respiratory tract infections | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal pain | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Decreased appetite | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Parasthesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
| D006402 |
| Hematologic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D008232 | Lymphoproliferative Disorders |
| D008206 | Lymphatic Diseases |
| D007160 | Immunoproliferative Disorders |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
|
| FISH 17p-, missing |
|
| FISH 11q-, negative |
|
| FISH 11q-, positive |
|
| FISH 11q-, missing |
|
| FISH +12q, negative |
|
| FISH +12q, positive |
|
| FISH +12q, missing |
|
| FISH 6q-, negative |
|
| FISH 6q-, positive |
|
| FISH 6q-, missing |
|
| FISH 13q-, negative |
|
| FISH 13q-, positive |
|
| FISH 13q-, missing |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Ctrough at Dose 12, n=106 |
|
| Cmax at Dose 12, n=106 |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| AUC(0-tau) at Dose 12, n=84 |
|