Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Rosiglitazone (RSG) has been tested in clinical studies and is approved by the FDA as a treatment for type II diabetes mellitus, a disease that occurs when the body is unable to effectively use glucose. RSG XR, the investigational drug used in this study, is an extended-release form of RSG.
This study tests whether RSG XR safely provides clinical benefit to people with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (AD) when combined with the currently approved AD medication, Aricept (donepezil). RSG XR is a new approach to AD therapy and this study tests a new way to treat AD by testing whether one's genetic makeup affects their response to the study drug. Clinical data suggesting that RSG may benefit AD patients was first seen in a small study performed at the University of Washington and then from a larger GSK study conducted in Europe and New Zealand. In the first study, subjects receiving RSG once daily for 6 months scored significantly better on 3 tests of memory and thought than those who did not receive RSG. In the GSK study, those that appeared to benefit most from treatment with RSG XR had a specific genetic pattern. They did not have the gene that caused them to produce the protein apolipoprotein E e4 (APOE e4). Subjects who have the APOE e4 gene may have two copies, one from each parent, or they may have only one APOE e4 gene meaning that they inherited either the APOE e2 or APOE e3 version of the gene, instead of APOE e4, from one of their parents. Subjects with one copy of the APOE e4 gene remained at their same level of thinking ability while those with two copies of the APOE e4 gene, continued to worsen during the 6-month treatment. The current study will more directly test the effectiveness or RSG XR on people who either have or lack the APOE e4 gene.
A 54-week, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study to investigate the effects of rosiglitazone (extended release tablets) as adjunctive therapy to donepezil on cognition and overall clinical response in APOE e4-stratified subjects with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease (REFLECT-2)
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 | Experimental | Rosiglitazone Extended Release 2mg OD |
|
| Arm 2 | Experimental | Rosiglitazone Extended Release 8mg OD |
|
| Arm 3 | Placebo Comparator | Placebo |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rosiglitazone Extended Release 2mg | Drug | Rosiglitazone Extended Release 2mg OD |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Total Score at Week 48 | ADAS is a performance-based test that measures specific cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions in participants with Alzheimer's Disease. The cognitive subscale of the ADAS (ADAS-Cog) comprises 11 items that are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 70, with lower scores indicating less severe impairment. Change from baseline is calculated as Week 48 value minus the baseline value. APOE4 negative, All except E4/E4's: comprised of APOE4 negative and E4 heterozygote and full population was analyzed for this outcome measure. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for the two rosiglitazone dose groups and the genetic subgroups. Least square mean is entered for adjusted mean. | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 48 |
| Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) at Week 48 for APOE E4 | CDR-SB is a semi-structured interview of participants and their caregivers. Participant's cognitive status is rated across 6 domains of functioning, including memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving, community affairs, home/hobbies, and personal care. Severity score assigned for each of 6 domains; Total score (SB) ranges from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. Change from baseline is calculated as Week 48 value minus the baseline value. APOE4 negative, All except E4/E4's: comprised of APOE4 negative and E4 heterozygote and full population was analyzed for this outcome measure. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for the two rosiglitazone dose groups and the genetic subgroups. | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 48 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score | The DAD measures instrumental and basic activities of daily living in participants with Alzheimer's Disease (AD). This scale assesses a participants' ability to initiate, plan, and perform activities related to hygiene, dressing, continence, eating, meal preparation, telephoning, going on an outing, finance and correspondence, medications, leisure, and housework. The scale includes 23 items relating to instrumental activities of daily living and 17 items relating to basic self-care. Each item can be scored as 1 = yes, 0 = no, non applicable = NA. Total score was obtained by adding the rating for each question and converting this total score out of 100. The total score ranged from 0 to 100, where higher score indicated better function and lower score indicated greater severity of symptoms; a positive change from baseline indicated an improvement. Change from baseline is calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value. |
Not provided
Inclusion criteria:
(Note: National Institute of Neurological and Communicative Disorders and Stroke (NINCDS) and Alzheimer's Disease and Related Disorders Association (ADRDA).)
(Note: Questionable CT or MRI scans should be discussed with the medical monitor, using central imaging guidelines.)
Note: A non-cohabiting caregiver must spend sufficient time with the subject so that, in the opinion of the Investigator, the caregiver can reliably assess cognitive function, activities and behavior, and report on the subject's compliance and health. As caregiver time spent with a potential subject is anticipated to be highly variable across countries and cultures, GSK will consider a variety of different measures by which this stipulation may be met, and GSK should be consulted if adequacy of a caregiver situation is in doubt. However, as guidance, the ability for a caregiver to meet his/her expected responsibilities for this study would normally be possible when the caregiver spends no less than 10 hours per week with the subject, divided over multiple days.)
(Note: Consent by legally acceptable representative is allowed where this is in accordance with local laws, regulations and ethics committee policy.)
Exclusion criteria:
(Note: National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) and Association Internationale pour la Recherche et l'Enseignement en Neurosciences (AIREN).)
(Note: Testing is required for each parameter only when no result is available from previous 12 months.)
(Note: If not currently treated, but active depression is suspected, the Cornell Scale for Depression in Dementia (CSDD) can be used by the Investigator as a guide for deciding whether a prospective subject requires treatment. If the subject has a CSDD score >7, the Investigator should decide if the subject has depression in need of prescribed medication, and a CSDD >12 is considered a strong indicator that treatment is needed. Subjects will be allowed to re-screen after their depression has been adequately managed for >3 months.)
(Note: For subjects with a diagnosis of Gilberts Syndrome and an isolated increase in total bilirubin >1.5 ULN, fractionation should be performed. If all of the following conditions are met, the patient may enter or remain in the study, even if total bilirubin >1.5 ULN:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| GSK Clinical Trials | GlaxoSmithKline | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Investigational Site | Litchfield Park | Arizona | 85340 | United States | ||
| GSK Investigational Site |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21592048 | Background | Harrington C, Sawchak S, Chiang C, Davies J, Donovan C, Saunders AM, Irizarry M, Jeter B, Zvartau-Hind M, van Dyck CH, Gold M. Rosiglitazone does not improve cognition or global function when used as adjunctive therapy to AChE inhibitors in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease: two phase 3 studies. Curr Alzheimer Res. 2011 Aug;8(5):592-606. doi: 10.2174/156720511796391935. |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Researchers can use this site to request access to anonymised patient level data and/or supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct further research. | View source |
| ID | Type | URL | Comment |
|---|---|---|---|
| AVA102672 | Clinical Study Report | View IPD |
Patient-level data for this study will be made available through www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com following the timelines and process described on this site.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
A total of 1496 participants were randomized for the study, out of which seventeen participants did not receive study medication. A total of 1479 were included in the Safety population.
The study was conducted on participants with mild to moderate Alzheimer's disease(AD), who received donepezil for at least 6 months and who received a stable dose of donepezil for at least 2 months immediately before study entry from 06 July 2006 to 28 January 2009 across 228 centers of 19 countries.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo | Participants received rosiglitazone extended release matching placebo tablet orally, once daily until Week 54. |
| FG001 | 2mg Rosiglitazone Extended Release | Participants received rosiglitazone extended release 2 milligram (mg) tablet orally, once daily until Week 48 followed by placebo tablet orally once daily until Week 54. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Rosiglitazone Extended Release 8mg |
| Drug |
Rosiglitazone Extended Release 8mg OD |
|
| Placebo | Other | Placebo |
|
| Donepezil | Other | Donepezil (At least 6 months of ongoing donepezil therapy for Alzheimer's disease, with stable dosing for at least the last 2 months (and with no intent to change for the duration of the study). |
|
|
| Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, 16, 24 and 48 |
| Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score | The NPI is a questionnaire that quantifies behavioral changes in dementia. For each of 12 behavioral domains there are 4 scores: Frequency (scale:1=occasionally to 4=very frequently), Severity (scale:1=Mild to 3=Severe), Total (frequency x severity), Caregiver distress (scale: 0=not at all distressing to 5=extremely distressing).The NPI Psychosis Subscale consists of the two domains of Delusions and Hallucinations, calculated by adding the Individual Item Scores, to yield a possible total score of 0 to 24. Lower score=less severity. Change from baseline is calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value. | Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, 16, 24 and 48 |
| Change From Screening in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score | The MMSE consists of 11 tests of orientation, memory (recent and immediate), concentration, language and praxis. The scale was completed by the investigator, based on the performance of the participant, and took approximately 5 to 10 minutes to administer. The scores from 11 tests were combined to obtain the total score. The total scores range from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment and higher score indicating better outcome; a positive change from screening indicated an improvement. The total MMSE score for participants at screening was between 10 and 26, inclusive, in order to be eligible to participate in the trial. Change from screening is calculated as endpoint value minus the screening value. | Screening (Week -4) and Week 48 |
| Change From Baseline in the Domains of the Resource Utilization in Dementia Scale (RUD) | The RUD instrument was developed as a comprehensive tool to assess the amount of resource use among demented patients. RUD assessd both formal and informal resource use of the patient and the primary caregiver, making it possible to calculate costs from a societal perspective. Q1 corresponds to the number of hours during the last month the caregiver spent assisting the patient with toilet visits, eating, dressing, grooming, walking and bathing and Q2 corresponds to the number of hours during the last month the caregiver spent assisting the patient with shopping, food preparation, housekeeping, laundry, transportation, taking medication and managing financial matters. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. | Baseline (Week 0), Week 12, 24, 36 and 48 |
| Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Proxy Version (EQ-5D Proxy) Scale Total Score Assessed by Thermometer (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) and Utility | The EQ-5D Proxy is a two part scale that evaluated the participant's health status via Thermometer and Utility scores. The Thermometer score was the caregiver's rating of the participant's overall health status on a VAS (0 ["worst possible status"] to 100 ["best imaginable status"]). The Utility score was a caregiver rating of health status on dimensions of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression] where '1' indicated better health state (no problems); '3' indicated worst health state ("confined to bed"). Total possible score was the sum of individual items, ranged from 5 to 15; lower score indicated a better health state and higher score indicated greater severity of symptoms. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement in the Thermometer score and a negative change from baseline indicated improvement in the Utility score. Change from baseline is calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value. | Baseline (Week 0), Week 12, 36 and 48 |
| Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score for Observed Cases at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 48 | ADAS is a performance-based test that measures specific cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions in patients with Alzheimer's Disease. The cognitive subscale of the ADAS (ADAS-Cog) comprises 11 items that are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 70, with lower scores indicating less severe impairment. Change from baseline is calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value. | Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, 16, 24, 36 and 48 |
| Change From Baseline in CDR-SB Score for Observed Cases at Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48 | CDR-SB is a semi-structured interview of participants and their caregivers. Participant's cognitive status is rated across 6 domains of functioning, including memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving, community affairs, home/hobbies, and personal care. Severity score assigned for each of 6 domains; Total score (SB) ranges from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. Change from baseline is calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value. | Baseline (Week 0), Week 12, 24, 36 and 48 |
| Change in ADAS-Cog Total Score for Observed Cases at Week 54 Compared to Week 48 | ADAS is a performance-based test that measures specific cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions in patients with Alzheimer's Disease. The cognitive subscale of the ADAS (ADAS-Cog) comprises 11 items that are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 70, with lower scores indicating less severe impairment. Change was calculated as endpoint value (Week 54) minus Week 48 value. | Week 48 and 54 |
| Change in CDR-SB Total Score at Week 54 Compared to Week 48 | CDR-SB is a semi-structured interview of participants and their caregivers. Participant's cognitive status is rated across 6 domains of functioning, including memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving, community affairs, home/hobbies, and personal care. Severity score assigned for each of 6 domains; Total score (SB) ranges from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. Change was calculated as endpoint value (Week 54) minus Week 48 value. | Week 48 and 54 |
| Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 48 | Blood samples of participants were collected for HbA1c assessment. HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the value at Week 48 minus the value at Baseline. | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 48 |
| Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that occurred during the course of the trial after study treatment had started. An adverse event was therefore any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, are life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or results in disability/incapacity, and congenital anomaly/birth defect. The data was reported for prospective period. | Up to Week 54 |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) | The plethysmographic method was used to measure BP throughout the study. Change in Systolic and Diastolic BP was calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value. | Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 56 |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Mean Change From Baseline in heart rate was calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value. | Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 56 |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Weight | Body weight was measured at all visits, without shoes and wearing light clothing. Mean Change From Baseline in Weight was calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value. | Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 56 |
| Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Values | Blood samples of participants were collected for Hemoglobin. Change from baseline in Hemoglobin was calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value. | Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, 16, 36 and 48 |
| Change From Baseline in Hematocrit Values | Blood samples of participants were collected for Hematocrit . Change from baseline in Hematocrit was calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value. | Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 36 and 48 |
| Mean Change From Baseline in Short Term Memory Assessment Score | Short term memory assessment score was based on ADAS-Cog questionnaire (Question 1 and 7). ADAS is a performance-based test that measures specific cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions in participants with AD. Question 1 (Word Recall) and Question 7 (Word Recognition) of the ADAS-Cog questionnaire were summed to get a short term memory assessment score. Word recall task consist of the participants score was the mean number of words not recalled on three trials (maximum score 10) and word recognition task, to score this item the number of incorrect responses was counted (maximum error score was 12). The total score ranged from 0 to 22 with 0 indicating absence of symptoms and higher scores indicating greater dysfunction; a negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Change from Baseline in short term memory assessment was calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value. | Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 56 |
| Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 36 | Blood samples of participants were collected for HbA1c assessment. HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the value at time point minus the value at Baseline. | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12, 24 and 36 |
| Number of Participants With Laboratory Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) Values | Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern (CC Low [relative to the lower limit of normal], CC High [relative to the upper limit of normal]) are: Hematocrit 0.8, 1.2; hemoglobin 10-11, 16.5-18; Red blood corpuscles(RBC) 0.8, 1.2; mean corpuscular volume (MCV) 0.8, 1.2; mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) 0.8, 1.2; White blood corpuscles (WBC) 3- absolute value, 15-absolute value, Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW) 0.8, 1.2; Lymphocytes 0.75, 1.5; Monocytes NA, 2; Eosinophil NA, 2; platelet count 100-absolute, 500-absoulte; segmented neutrophil (SN) 0.75, 1.5 and Total Neutrophil (TN) 0.75, 1.5. | Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 56 |
| Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Carer Quality of Life Instrument (ACQLI) Total Score | The ACQLI was an assessment of caregiver quality of life. This instrument consists of 30 questions exploring various aspects of carer's quality of life. Each of the questions had a two point response and the 30 questions were summed to provide a total score. Items are assumed to be unidimensional (i.e., represent a single variable) and are scored 0/1 (false/true) before summation into a total score with a 0-30 range. The total score ranged from 0 to 30, where 0 indicated absence of symptoms and higher score indicated worse outcomes; a negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Change from baseline was calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value. | Baseline (Week 0), Week 12, 36 and 48 |
| Phoenix |
| Arizona |
| 85004 |
| United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Phoenix | Arizona | 85006 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Phoenix | Arizona | 85050 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Little Rock | Arkansas | 72205 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Fresno | California | 93720 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Rancho Mirage | California | 92270 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Sacramento | California | 95816 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Sherman Oaks | California | 91403 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Denver | Colorado | 80212 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | New Haven | Connecticut | 06510 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Delray Beach | Florida | 33445 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hallandale | Florida | 33009 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Miami | Florida | 33143 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Sarasota | Florida | 34233 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | St. Petersburg | Florida | 33701 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | West Palm Beach | Florida | 33407 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hoffman Estates | Illinois | 60194 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Fort Wayne | Indiana | 46805 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Indianapolis | Indiana | 46202 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Baltimore | Maryland | 21224 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Glen Burnie | Maryland | 21061 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Rockville | Maryland | 20852 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Saint Paul | Minnesota | 55101 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Lebanon | New Hampshire | 03756 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Morristown | New Jersey | 07960 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Nutley | New Jersey | 07110 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Princeton | New Jersey | 08540 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Stratford | New Jersey | 08084 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Albany | New York | 12205 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Brooklyn | New York | 11235 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | New York | New York | 10021 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Durham | North Carolina | 27705 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Raleigh | North Carolina | 27607 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Portland | Oregon | 97239 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Providence | Rhode Island | 02906 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Nashville | Tennessee | 37203 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Austin | Texas | 78757 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | South Ogden | Utah | 84403 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bennington | Vermont | 05201 | United States |
| GSK Investigational Site | Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires | Buenos Aires | C1192AAW | Argentina |
| GSK Investigational Site | Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires | Buenos Aires | C1419HDN | Argentina |
| GSK Investigational Site | Ciudad de Buenos Aires | Buenos Aires | C1431FWO | Argentina |
| GSK Investigational Site | Córdoba | Córdoba Province | 5000 | Argentina |
| GSK Investigational Site | Córdoba | Córdoba Province | X5004AOA | Argentina |
| GSK Investigational Site | Córdoba | Córdoba Province | x5009bin | Argentina |
| GSK Investigational Site | Godoy Cruz | Mendoza Province | M5504FMI | Argentina |
| GSK Investigational Site | Buenos Aires | C1425CDC | Argentina |
| GSK Investigational Site | Mendoza | CPM5500HIF | Argentina |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hall in Tirol | A-6060 | Austria |
| GSK Investigational Site | Innsbruck | A-6020 | Austria |
| GSK Investigational Site | Vienna | 1010 | Austria |
| GSK Investigational Site | Vienna | 1030 | Austria |
| GSK Investigational Site | Vienna | A-1130 | Austria |
| GSK Investigational Site | Vienna | A-1220 | Austria |
| GSK Investigational Site | Belo Horizonte | 30130-110 | Brazil |
| GSK Investigational Site | Ribeirão Preto | 14048-900 | Brazil |
| GSK Investigational Site | São Paulo | 040023-900 | Brazil |
| GSK Investigational Site | Calgary | Alberta | T2N 4N1 | Canada |
| GSK Investigational Site | Medicine Hat | Alberta | T1A 4C2 | Canada |
| GSK Investigational Site | Victoria | British Columbia | V8T 5G1 | Canada |
| GSK Investigational Site | Moncton | New Brunswick | E1C 4B7 | Canada |
| GSK Investigational Site | Barrie | Ontario | L4M 4S5 | Canada |
| GSK Investigational Site | Kingston | Ontario | K7L 4X3 | Canada |
| GSK Investigational Site | Peterborough | Ontario | K9H 2P4 | Canada |
| GSK Investigational Site | Toronto | Ontario | M5T 2S8 | Canada |
| GSK Investigational Site | Toronto | Ontario | M6M 3Z5 | Canada |
| GSK Investigational Site | Whitby | Ontario | L1N 5S9 | Canada |
| GSK Investigational Site | Charlottetown | Prince Edward Island | C1A 5Y8 | Canada |
| GSK Investigational Site | Greenfield Park | Quebec | J4V 2J2 | Canada |
| GSK Investigational Site | Montreal | Quebec | H1T 2M4 | Canada |
| GSK Investigational Site | Montreal | Quebec | H4H 1R3 | Canada |
| GSK Investigational Site | Sherbrooke | Quebec | J1H 1Z1 | Canada |
| GSK Investigational Site | Regina | Saskatchewan | S4T 1A5 | Canada |
| GSK Investigational Site | Québec | G1R 3X5 | Canada |
| GSK Investigational Site | Providencia / Santiago | Región Metro de Santiago | 7500710 | Chile |
| GSK Investigational Site | Puente Alto - Santiago | Región Metro de Santiago | 8207257 | Chile |
| GSK Investigational Site | Santiago | Región Metro de Santiago | 7560356 | Chile |
| GSK Investigational Site | Viña del Mar | Valparaiso | 252-0997 | Chile |
| GSK Investigational Site | Ostrava | 702 00 | Czechia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Prague | 10000 | Czechia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Prague | 120 00 | Czechia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Prague | 150 18 | Czechia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Prague | 170 00 | Czechia |
| GSK Investigational Site | Angoulême | 16000 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Arcachon | 33120 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Avignon | 84000 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bourg-en-Bresse | 01012 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Caen | 14033 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Dijon | 21000 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Issy-les-Moulineaux | 92130 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Ivry | 94206 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Luynes | 37230 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Lyon | 69006 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Marseille | 13008 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Marseille | 13009 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Metz | 57038 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Montpellier | 34080 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Nantes | 44000 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Nantes | 44093 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Nantes | 44200 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Nice | 06002 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Paris | 75012 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Paris | 75013 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Paris | 75018 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Pau | 64000 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Pessac | 33604 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Reims | 51100 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Rennes | 35000 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Rodez | 12000 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Saint-Etienne | 42100 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Saint-Jean-de-Luz | 64500 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Saint-Nicolas-de-Port | 54210 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Saint-Ouen-la-Rouërie | 35460 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Tinténiac | 35190 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Tours | 37100 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Verny | 57420 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Vichy | 03200 | France |
| GSK Investigational Site | Böblingen | Baden-Wurttemberg | 71034 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Ostfildern | Baden-Wurttemberg | 73760 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Stuttgart | Baden-Wurttemberg | 70178 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Ulm | Baden-Wurttemberg | 89073 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Munich | Bavaria | 80331 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Munich | Bavaria | 80333 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Munich | Bavaria | 80336 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Munich | Bavaria | 81377 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Munich | Bavaria | 81667 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Neuburg an der Donau | Bavaria | 86633 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Nuremberg | Bavaria | 90402 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Nuremberg | Bavaria | 90403 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Regensburg | Bavaria | 93053 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Würzburg | Bavaria | 97070 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hüttenberg | Hesse | 35625 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Achim | Lower Saxony | 28832 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bockhorn | Lower Saxony | 26345 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Ganderkesee | Lower Saxony | 27777 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Göttingen | Lower Saxony | 37075 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hanover | Lower Saxony | 30559 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hildesheim | Lower Saxony | 31134 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Lüneburg | Lower Saxony | 21335 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Westerstede | Lower Saxony | 26655 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Schwerin | Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | 19053 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Schwerin | Mecklenburg-Vorpommern | 19055 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bad Honnef | North Rhine-Westphalia | 53604 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Baesweiler | North Rhine-Westphalia | 52499 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bergisch Gladbach | North Rhine-Westphalia | 51465 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bochum | North Rhine-Westphalia | 44791 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bochum | North Rhine-Westphalia | 44805 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bochum | North Rhine-Westphalia | 44809 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bochum | North Rhine-Westphalia | 44869 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bochum | North Rhine-Westphalia | 44892 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Cologne | North Rhine-Westphalia | 50767 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Cologne | North Rhine-Westphalia | 51069 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Duisburg | North Rhine-Westphalia | 47051 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Düren | North Rhine-Westphalia | 52349 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Essen | North Rhine-Westphalia | 45138 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hattingen | North Rhine-Westphalia | 45525 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Jülich | North Rhine-Westphalia | 52428 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Krefeld | North Rhine-Westphalia | 47800 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Remscheid | North Rhine-Westphalia | 42853 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Siegen | North Rhine-Westphalia | 57072 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hamburg | 20249 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hamburg | 21149 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hamburg | 22083 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hamburg | 22143 | Germany |
| GSK Investigational Site | Athens | 115 21 | Greece |
| GSK Investigational Site | Athens | 151 23 | Greece |
| GSK Investigational Site | Melíssia | 151 27 | Greece |
| GSK Investigational Site | Thessaloniki | 57010 | Greece |
| GSK Investigational Site | Debrecen | 4043 | Hungary |
| GSK Investigational Site | Győr | 9024 | Hungary |
| GSK Investigational Site | Szeged | 6725 | Hungary |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bangalore | 560 054 | India |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bangalore | 560034 | India |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hyderabad | 500 034 | India |
| GSK Investigational Site | Mumbai | 400010 | India |
| GSK Investigational Site | Nagpur | 440010 | India |
| GSK Investigational Site | New Delhi | 110002 | India |
| GSK Investigational Site | Pune | 411004 | India |
| GSK Investigational Site | Varanasi | 221005 | India |
| GSK Investigational Site | Chieti Scalo | Abruzzo | 66013 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bari | Apulia | 70124 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Naples | Campania | 80131 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | San Felice A Cancello Caserta | Campania | 81027 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bologna | Emilia-Romagna | 40138 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Rome | Lazio | 00148 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Rome | Lazio | 00163 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Rome | Lazio | 00186 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Brescia | Lombardy | 25123 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Brescia | Lombardy | 25125 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Milan | Lombardy | 20122 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Milan | Lombardy | 20127 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Pavia | Lombardy | 27100 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Rho | Lombardy | 20017 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Ancona | The Marches | 60020 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Arezzo | Tuscany | 52100 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Florence | Tuscany | 50134 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Pisa | Tuscany | 56126 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Verona | Veneto | 37100 | Italy |
| GSK Investigational Site | Aichi | 451-0052 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Aichi | 455-8530 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Fukuoka | 813-8588 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Fukuoka | 819-0165 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Gunma | 375-0017 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hiroshima | 733-0864 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hokkaido | 005-0853 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hokkaido | 080-2470 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Hyōgo | 672-8043 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Ibaraki | 300-0053 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Kagawa | 761-8024 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Kanagawa | 231-0023 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Kanagawa | 238-0042 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Kochi | 780-0842 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Kumamoto | 861-8002 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Kyoto | 607-8062 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Nagano | 399-8695 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Osaka | 567-0011 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Osaka | 569-1041 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Tokyo | 193-0998 | Japan |
| GSK Investigational Site | Saltillo | Coahuila | 25000 | Mexico |
| GSK Investigational Site | Monterrey | Nuevo León | 64660 | Mexico |
| GSK Investigational Site | Monterrey | Nuevo León | 64710 | Mexico |
| GSK Investigational Site | México | 14000 | Mexico |
| GSK Investigational Site | Bydgoszcz | 85-096 | Poland |
| GSK Investigational Site | Katowice | 40-752 | Poland |
| GSK Investigational Site | Lodz | 91-348 | Poland |
| GSK Investigational Site | Mosina | 62-050 | Poland |
| GSK Investigational Site | Poznan | 61-298 | Poland |
| GSK Investigational Site | Sopot | 81-824 | Poland |
| GSK Investigational Site | Warsaw | 02-507 | Poland |
| GSK Investigational Site | Coimbra | 3000-548 | Portugal |
| GSK Investigational Site | Lisbon | 1649-035 | Portugal |
| GSK Investigational Site | A Coruña | 15006 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Burgos | 09006 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Castellon | 12004 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Elche (Alicante) | 03202 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Galdakano | 48960 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Girona | 17190 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Granada | 18013 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Madrid | 28006 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Madrid | 28040 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Madrid | 28046 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Málaga | 29071 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Murcia | 30120 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Pamplona | 31008 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | San Sebastián | 20014 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Valencia | 46010 | Spain |
| GSK Investigational Site | Zurich | 8032 | Switzerland |
For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| AVA102672 | Dataset Specification | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| AVA102672 | Study Protocol | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| AVA102672 | Annotated Case Report Form | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| AVA102672 | Statistical Analysis Plan | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| AVA102672 | Informed Consent Form | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| AVA102672 | Individual Participant Data Set | View IPD | For additional information about this study please refer to the GSK Clinical Study Register |
| FG002 | 8mg Rosiglitazone Extended Release | Participants received rosiglitazone extended release 4 mg tablet orally, once daily until Week 4 followed by 8 mg tablet orally once daily from Week 4 until Week 48 followed by placebo tablet orally once daily until Week 54. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | Participants received rosiglitazone extended release matching placebo tablet orally, once daily until Week 54. |
| BG001 | 2mg Rosiglitazone Extended Release | Participants received rosiglitazone extended release 2 milligram (mg) tablet orally, once daily until Week 48 followed by placebo tablet orally once daily until Week 54. |
| BG002 | 8mg Rosiglitazone Extended Release | Participants received rosiglitazone extended release 4 mg tablet orally, once daily until Week 4 followed by 8 mg tablet orally once daily from Week 4 until Week 48 followed by placebo tablet orally once daily until Week 54. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race/Ethnicity, Customized | Number | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale - Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-Cog) Total Score at Week 48 | ADAS is a performance-based test that measures specific cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions in participants with Alzheimer's Disease. The cognitive subscale of the ADAS (ADAS-Cog) comprises 11 items that are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 70, with lower scores indicating less severe impairment. Change from baseline is calculated as Week 48 value minus the baseline value. APOE4 negative, All except E4/E4's: comprised of APOE4 negative and E4 heterozygote and full population was analyzed for this outcome measure. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for the two rosiglitazone dose groups and the genetic subgroups. Least square mean is entered for adjusted mean. | ITT population included all the participants who were randomized to treatment, who had received at least one dose of study medication and who had at least one post baseline efficacy assessment. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a scale | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 48 |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Change From Baseline in Clinical Dementia Rating Scale - Sum of Boxes (CDR-SB) at Week 48 for APOE E4 | CDR-SB is a semi-structured interview of participants and their caregivers. Participant's cognitive status is rated across 6 domains of functioning, including memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving, community affairs, home/hobbies, and personal care. Severity score assigned for each of 6 domains; Total score (SB) ranges from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. Change from baseline is calculated as Week 48 value minus the baseline value. APOE4 negative, All except E4/E4's: comprised of APOE4 negative and E4 heterozygote and full population was analyzed for this outcome measure. A hierarchical testing procedure was used to control for the two rosiglitazone dose groups and the genetic subgroups. | ITT population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a scale | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 48 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Disability Assessment for Dementia Scale (DAD) Total Score | The DAD measures instrumental and basic activities of daily living in participants with Alzheimer's Disease (AD). This scale assesses a participants' ability to initiate, plan, and perform activities related to hygiene, dressing, continence, eating, meal preparation, telephoning, going on an outing, finance and correspondence, medications, leisure, and housework. The scale includes 23 items relating to instrumental activities of daily living and 17 items relating to basic self-care. Each item can be scored as 1 = yes, 0 = no, non applicable = NA. Total score was obtained by adding the rating for each question and converting this total score out of 100. The total score ranged from 0 to 100, where higher score indicated better function and lower score indicated greater severity of symptoms; a positive change from baseline indicated an improvement. Change from baseline is calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value. | ITT population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Scores on a scale | Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, 16, 24 and 48 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Neuropsychiatric Inventory (NPI) Total Score | The NPI is a questionnaire that quantifies behavioral changes in dementia. For each of 12 behavioral domains there are 4 scores: Frequency (scale:1=occasionally to 4=very frequently), Severity (scale:1=Mild to 3=Severe), Total (frequency x severity), Caregiver distress (scale: 0=not at all distressing to 5=extremely distressing).The NPI Psychosis Subscale consists of the two domains of Delusions and Hallucinations, calculated by adding the Individual Item Scores, to yield a possible total score of 0 to 24. Lower score=less severity. Change from baseline is calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value. | ITT population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a scale | Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, 16, 24 and 48 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Screening in Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE) Total Score | The MMSE consists of 11 tests of orientation, memory (recent and immediate), concentration, language and praxis. The scale was completed by the investigator, based on the performance of the participant, and took approximately 5 to 10 minutes to administer. The scores from 11 tests were combined to obtain the total score. The total scores range from 0 to 30, with lower scores indicating greater cognitive impairment and higher score indicating better outcome; a positive change from screening indicated an improvement. The total MMSE score for participants at screening was between 10 and 26, inclusive, in order to be eligible to participate in the trial. Change from screening is calculated as endpoint value minus the screening value. | ITT population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a scale | Screening (Week -4) and Week 48 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Domains of the Resource Utilization in Dementia Scale (RUD) | The RUD instrument was developed as a comprehensive tool to assess the amount of resource use among demented patients. RUD assessd both formal and informal resource use of the patient and the primary caregiver, making it possible to calculate costs from a societal perspective. Q1 corresponds to the number of hours during the last month the caregiver spent assisting the patient with toilet visits, eating, dressing, grooming, walking and bathing and Q2 corresponds to the number of hours during the last month the caregiver spent assisting the patient with shopping, food preparation, housekeeping, laundry, transportation, taking medication and managing financial matters. Change from Baseline was calculated as value at scheduled time point minus Baseline value. Baseline was defined as value at Week 0. Estimated value was calculated by Active treatment minus Placebo. The adjusted means were presented. | ITT population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | hours | Baseline (Week 0), Week 12, 24, 36 and 48 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in European Quality of Life-5 Dimensions Proxy Version (EQ-5D Proxy) Scale Total Score Assessed by Thermometer (Visual Analog Scale [VAS]) and Utility | The EQ-5D Proxy is a two part scale that evaluated the participant's health status via Thermometer and Utility scores. The Thermometer score was the caregiver's rating of the participant's overall health status on a VAS (0 ["worst possible status"] to 100 ["best imaginable status"]). The Utility score was a caregiver rating of health status on dimensions of mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression] where '1' indicated better health state (no problems); '3' indicated worst health state ("confined to bed"). Total possible score was the sum of individual items, ranged from 5 to 15; lower score indicated a better health state and higher score indicated greater severity of symptoms. A positive change from baseline indicated improvement in the Thermometer score and a negative change from baseline indicated improvement in the Utility score. Change from baseline is calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value. | ITT population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a scale | Baseline (Week 0), Week 12, 36 and 48 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in ADAS-Cog Total Score for Observed Cases at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 36 and 48 | ADAS is a performance-based test that measures specific cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions in patients with Alzheimer's Disease. The cognitive subscale of the ADAS (ADAS-Cog) comprises 11 items that are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 70, with lower scores indicating less severe impairment. Change from baseline is calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value. | ITT population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, 16, 24, 36 and 48 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in CDR-SB Score for Observed Cases at Weeks 12, 24, 36 and 48 | CDR-SB is a semi-structured interview of participants and their caregivers. Participant's cognitive status is rated across 6 domains of functioning, including memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving, community affairs, home/hobbies, and personal care. Severity score assigned for each of 6 domains; Total score (SB) ranges from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. Change from baseline is calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value. | ITT population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Baseline (Week 0), Week 12, 24, 36 and 48 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in ADAS-Cog Total Score for Observed Cases at Week 54 Compared to Week 48 | ADAS is a performance-based test that measures specific cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions in patients with Alzheimer's Disease. The cognitive subscale of the ADAS (ADAS-Cog) comprises 11 items that are summed to a total score ranging from 0 to 70, with lower scores indicating less severe impairment. Change was calculated as endpoint value (Week 54) minus Week 48 value. | ITT population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a scale | Week 48 and 54 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in CDR-SB Total Score at Week 54 Compared to Week 48 | CDR-SB is a semi-structured interview of participants and their caregivers. Participant's cognitive status is rated across 6 domains of functioning, including memory, orientation, judgment/problem solving, community affairs, home/hobbies, and personal care. Severity score assigned for each of 6 domains; Total score (SB) ranges from 0 to 18. Higher scores indicate greater disease severity. Change was calculated as endpoint value (Week 54) minus Week 48 value. | ITT population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a scale | Week 48 and 54 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Glycosylated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at Week 48 | Blood samples of participants were collected for HbA1c assessment. HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the value at Week 48 minus the value at Baseline. | ITT population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Percentage of total hemoglobin | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 48 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that occurred during the course of the trial after study treatment had started. An adverse event was therefore any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. A Serious Adverse Event (SAE) is any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose results in death, are life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization or results in disability/incapacity, and congenital anomaly/birth defect. The data was reported for prospective period. | The safety population included all participants randomized to treatment and received at least one dose of study medication. | Posted | Number | Participants | Up to Week 54 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure (BP) | The plethysmographic method was used to measure BP throughout the study. Change in Systolic and Diastolic BP was calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value. | Safety population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. Data for Site 040449 was not included in analysis due to audit finding. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Millimeter of mercury (mmHg) | Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 56 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in Heart Rate | Mean Change From Baseline in heart rate was calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value. | Safety population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. Data for Site 040449 was not included in analysis due to audit finding. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | beats per min (bpm) | Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 56 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in Weight | Body weight was measured at all visits, without shoes and wearing light clothing. Mean Change From Baseline in Weight was calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value. | Safety population. Here, n=number of participants with observed data contributing to the analysis. Data for Site 040449 was not included in analysis due to audit finding. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | kilogram (kg) | Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 56 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Hemoglobin Values | Blood samples of participants were collected for Hemoglobin. Change from baseline in Hemoglobin was calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value. | Safety population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | grams per litre (g/L) | Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, 16, 36 and 48 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Hematocrit Values | Blood samples of participants were collected for Hematocrit . Change from baseline in Hematocrit was calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value. | Safety population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | litre | Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 36 and 48 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in Short Term Memory Assessment Score | Short term memory assessment score was based on ADAS-Cog questionnaire (Question 1 and 7). ADAS is a performance-based test that measures specific cognitive and behavioral dysfunctions in participants with AD. Question 1 (Word Recall) and Question 7 (Word Recognition) of the ADAS-Cog questionnaire were summed to get a short term memory assessment score. Word recall task consist of the participants score was the mean number of words not recalled on three trials (maximum score 10) and word recognition task, to score this item the number of incorrect responses was counted (maximum error score was 12). The total score ranged from 0 to 22 with 0 indicating absence of symptoms and higher scores indicating greater dysfunction; a negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Change from Baseline in short term memory assessment was calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value. | ITT population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Baseline (Week 0), Week 8, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 56 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in HbA1c at Week 12, Week 24 and Week 36 | Blood samples of participants were collected for HbA1c assessment. HbA1c is a form of hemoglobin that is measured primarily to identify the average plasma glucose concentration over a 2- to 3-month period. Change from Baseline in HbA1c was calculated as the value at time point minus the value at Baseline. | Safety population. Week 12, Week 24 and Week 36 assessments of HbA1c were only needed in participants whose HbA1c was >= 6.5% at screening or who had known Type 2 diabetes. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Percent of total hemoglobin | Baseline (Week 0) and Week 12, 24 and 36 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Laboratory Potential Clinical Concern (PCC) Values | Only those parameters for which at least one value of clinical concern (CC) was reported are summarized. Pre-defined limits of potential clinical concern (CC Low [relative to the lower limit of normal], CC High [relative to the upper limit of normal]) are: Hematocrit 0.8, 1.2; hemoglobin 10-11, 16.5-18; Red blood corpuscles(RBC) 0.8, 1.2; mean corpuscular volume (MCV) 0.8, 1.2; mean corpuscular hemoglobin (MCH) 0.8, 1.2; White blood corpuscles (WBC) 3- absolute value, 15-absolute value, Red Cell Distribution Width (RDW) 0.8, 1.2; Lymphocytes 0.75, 1.5; Monocytes NA, 2; Eosinophil NA, 2; platelet count 100-absolute, 500-absoulte; segmented neutrophil (SN) 0.75, 1.5 and Total Neutrophil (TN) 0.75, 1.5. | Safety population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. | Posted | Number | participants | Baseline (Week 0), Week 4, 8, 12, 16, 24, 36, 48 and 56 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Alzheimer's Carer Quality of Life Instrument (ACQLI) Total Score | The ACQLI was an assessment of caregiver quality of life. This instrument consists of 30 questions exploring various aspects of carer's quality of life. Each of the questions had a two point response and the 30 questions were summed to provide a total score. Items are assumed to be unidimensional (i.e., represent a single variable) and are scored 0/1 (false/true) before summation into a total score with a 0-30 range. The total score ranged from 0 to 30, where 0 indicated absence of symptoms and higher score indicated worse outcomes; a negative change from baseline indicated improvement. Change from baseline was calculated as endpoint value minus the baseline value. | ITT population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a scale | Baseline (Week 0), Week 12, 36 and 48 |
|
Up to Week 48
An AE is defined as any unfavourable and unintended sign, symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug .The data was reported for prospective period. Participants with available data in the prospective period were analysed.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo | Participants received rosiglitazone extended release matching placebo tablet orally, once daily until Week 54. | 12 | 496 | 62 | 496 | 11 | 496 |
| EG001 | 2mg Rosiglitazone Extended Release | Participants received rosiglitazone extended release 2 mg tablet orally, once daily until Week 48 followed by placebo tablet orally once daily until Week 54. | 6 | 494 | 45 | 494 | 29 | 494 |
| EG002 | 8mg Rosiglitazone Extended Release | Participants received rosiglitazone extended release 4 mg tablet orally, once daily until Week 4 followed by 8 mg tablet orally once daily from Week 4 until Week 48 followed by placebo tablet orally once daily until Week 54. | 8 | 489 | 50 | 489 | 69 | 489 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hip fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Femoral neck fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Humerus fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Femur fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Concussion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Contusion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dislocation of joint | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Face injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ligament rupture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lower limb fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Meniscus lesion | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Overdose | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pelvic fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Radius fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rib fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Spinal compression fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tibia fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Appendicitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchopneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diverticulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis norovirus | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastroenteritis rotavirus | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Gastrointestinal infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Herpes zoster | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lung infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pneumonia primary atypical | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pyelonephritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Viral infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac arrest | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Angina pectoris | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bradycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac failure congestive | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Coronary artery stenosis | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myocardial ischaemia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Acute myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac failure | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardio-respiratory arrest | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Coronary artery disease | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sick sinus syndrome | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tachyarrhythmia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebrovascular accident | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebral haemorrhage | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Convulsion | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dementia Alzheimer's type | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Epilepsy | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haemorrhagic stroke | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Loss of consciousness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Transient ischaemic attack | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vertebrobasilar insufficiency | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Confusional state | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aggression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Agitation | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anxiety | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Delirium | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Delusion | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hallucination | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Panic attack | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Psychotic disorder due to a general medical condition | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Suicidal ideation | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Suicide attempt | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Inguinal hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Colonic polyp | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diverticulum intestinal | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Duodenal ulcer haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haemorrhoids | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Large intestine perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Peptic ulcer perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rectal haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Rectal polyp | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lymphoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Basal cell carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bile duct cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bile duct cancer recurrent | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Breast cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatic neoplasm malignant | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intraductal papilloma of breast | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Prostate cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sarcoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Uterine neoplasm | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aortic aneurysm | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Aortic dissection | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Deep vein thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Haematoma | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypertensive crisis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Venous thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Arthropathy | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lateral patellar compression syndrome | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Muscle spasms | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Lung disorder | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchospasm | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Interstitial lung disease | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bile duct stone | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholecystitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholelithiasis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hepatitis toxic | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Jaundice | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Iron deficiency anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Normochromic normocytic anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Malaise | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Death | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Benign prostatic hyperplasia | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Metrorrhagia | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Angle closure glaucoma | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cataract | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Platelet count decreased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Weight decreased | Investigations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin fissures | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Skin ulcer | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vertigo | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal failure acute | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
GSK agreements may vary with individual investigators, but will not prohibit any investigator from publishing. GSK supports the publication of results from all centers of a multi-center trial but requests that reports based on single-site data not precede the primary publication of the entire clinical trial.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSK Response Center | GlaxoSmithKline | 866-435-7343 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000544 | Alzheimer Disease |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003704 | Dementia |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D024801 | Tauopathies |
| D019636 | Neurodegenerative Diseases |
| D019965 | Neurocognitive Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077265 | Donepezil |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D007189 | Indans |
| D007192 | Indenes |
| D011084 | Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons |
| D006841 | Hydrocarbons, Aromatic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D010880 | Piperidines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D011083 | Polycyclic Compounds |
Not provided
Not provided
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| All except E4/E4s |
|
|
| Full populations |
|
|
| 0.808 |
APOE4 negatives |
| Mean Difference (Final Values) |
| -0.2 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| -1.7 |
| 1.3 |
| Superiority or Other |
| Mixed Models Analysis | 0.035 | All except E4/E4s | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -1.0 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.9 | -0.1 | Superiority or Other |
| Mixed Models Analysis | 0.999 | All except E4/E4s | Mean Difference (Final Values) | 0.0 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.0 | 1.0 | Superiority or Other |
| Mixed Models Analysis | 0.020 | Full population | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -1.0 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.9 | -0.2 | Superiority or Other |
| Mixed Models Analysis | 0.661 | Full population | Mean Difference (Final Values) | -0.2 | 2-Sided | 95 | -1.2 | 0.7 | Superiority or Other |
| OG002 |
| 8mg Rosiglitazone Extended Release |
Participants received rosiglitazone extended release 4 mg tablet orally, once daily until Week 4 followed by 8 mg tablet orally once daily from Week 4 until Week 48 followed by placebo tablet orally once daily until Week 54. |
|
|
|
| OG002 | 8mg Rosiglitazone Extended Release | Participants received rosiglitazone extended release 4 mg tablet orally, once daily until Week 4 followed by 8 mg tablet orally once daily from Week 4 until Week 48 followed by placebo tablet orally once daily until Week 54. |
|
|
|
Participants received rosiglitazone extended release 4 mg tablet orally, once daily until Week 4 followed by 8 mg tablet orally once daily from Week 4 until Week 48 followed by placebo tablet orally once daily until Week 54. |
|
|
|
| 8mg Rosiglitazone Extended Release |
Participants received rosiglitazone extended release 4 mg tablet orally, once daily until Week 4 followed by 8 mg tablet orally once daily from Week 4 until Week 48 followed by placebo tablet orally once daily until Week 54. |
|
|
|
| OG002 | 8mg Rosiglitazone Extended Release | Participants received rosiglitazone extended release 4 mg tablet orally, once daily until Week 4 followed by 8 mg tablet orally once daily from Week 4 until Week 48 followed by placebo tablet orally once daily until Week 54. |
|
|
|
Participants received rosiglitazone extended release 2 mg tablet orally, once daily until Week 48 followed by placebo tablet orally once daily until Week 54. |
| OG002 | 8mg Rosiglitazone Extended Release | Participants received rosiglitazone extended release 4 mg tablet orally, once daily until Week 4 followed by 8 mg tablet orally once daily from Week 4 until Week 48 followed by placebo tablet orally once daily until Week 54. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Participants received rosiglitazone extended release 4 mg tablet orally, once daily until Week 4 followed by 8 mg tablet orally once daily from Week 4 until Week 48 followed by placebo tablet orally once daily until Week 54. |
|
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
| OG002 | 8mg Rosiglitazone Extended Release | Participants received rosiglitazone extended release 4 mg tablet orally, once daily until Week 4 followed by 8 mg tablet orally once daily from Week 4 until Week 48 followed by placebo tablet orally once daily until Week 54. |
|
|
|
|
| 8mg Rosiglitazone Extended Release |
Participants received rosiglitazone extended release 4 mg tablet orally, once daily until Week 4 followed by 8 mg tablet orally once daily from Week 4 until Week 48 followed by placebo tablet orally once daily until Week 54. |
|
|
| 8mg Rosiglitazone Extended Release |
Participants received rosiglitazone extended release 4 mg tablet orally, once daily until Week 4 followed by 8 mg tablet orally once daily from Week 4 until Week 48 followed by placebo tablet orally once daily until Week 54. |
|
|
|