Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
due to low recruitment rate that would have led to a long study duration.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Bayer | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study treats patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma whose disease is in complete remission due to previous treatment with Cyclophosphamide Doxorubicin hydrochloride Vincristine Prednisolone- Rituximab (CHOP-R). Half of the patients received Zevalin and the other half receive no further anti-cancer treatment. The two patient groups compared to determine if Zevalin given after CHOP-R therapy provides greater benefits than receiving no additional anti-cancer therapy after CHOP-R.
The objectives of this study were to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the Zevalin study regimen compared with observation alone in patients with complete remission (CR or CRu) after first-line CHOP-R, the study was to include patients 60-years-of-age or older with histologically confirmed Ann Arbor stage II, III, or IV diffuse large B-cell lymphoma
End Points:
Primary endpoint: Overall survival (OS) Secondary endpoints: Disease-free survival (DFS), health-related quality of life (HRQL) as assessed by the patient using standard questionnaires .
Number of Patients :
A total of 400 patients (200 per arm) were planned to be enrolled.
- In fact, 68 randomized patients (full analysis set; FAS) were analysed; 34 patients per each arm. The per-protocol set (PPS; 65 patients) comprised 33 patients allocated to the Zevalin arm and 32 patients allocated to the observation control arm.
Study Treatment :
The combination regimen with rituximab was designed in 2 steps as follows:
Duration of Patient Participation:
Due to the sequential design, the total duration of this study was not fixed. Originally, the study was planned in a randomized, parallel-group, group sequential design.
Objective :
The primary objective of this study was an inferential comparison between the 2 randomized groups in terms of overall survival using a group sequential triangular test ,since the study was prematurely terminated the pre-planned group-sequential nature of the study design was not applicable statistical analyses. Actually, the prominent efficacy variables for the OS and DFS were analysed in the FAS (identical to the safety analysis set) and PPS using Kaplan Meier estimates by treatment group.
Study Design :
This study was designed as a prospective, multi-center, open label, randomized, two-armed, group-sequential Phase III study. The study was planned to consist of 2 stages: an interventional Stage 1 with Screening/Baseline, treatment, safety, and follow-up periods, and a non-interventional Stage 2 consisting of a long-term follow-up period (until completion of a median observation period of 5 years). This second stage of the study was to be started only if superiority of the Zevalin study regimen could be demonstrated in the preceding Stage 1.
Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamic results: Not applicable
Extent of exposure:
All 34 patients randomized to the Zevalin arm were given 2 rituximab infusions(with a median dose of 425.0 mg at each of the 2 infusion time points).Three patients underwent radioimaging studies/dosimetry and therefore were administered [111In]-ibritumomab tiuxetan at Day 1. All but 1 patient received an infusion with [90Y]-ibritumomab tiuxetan following the second infusion of rituximab. The mean dose ranged from 765.9 -1197.0 MBq.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Zevalin | Experimental | Patients received Zevalin. Zevalin Therapeutic Regimen: Day 1: Initial administration of 250 mg/m^2 rituximab, followed immediately by administration of 185 MBq of [111In]-ibritumomab tiuxetan ,in centers where centers where biodistribution imaging or dosimetry had not been required, the first rituximab infusion was given alone. - Day 7-9: Rituximab 250 mg/m^2, followed immediately by [90Y]-ibritumomab tiuxetan 14.8 MBq/kg given as a slow intravenous push over 10 minutes. Two treatment days one week apart were followed by a 12-week safety period. |
|
| Observational | No Intervention | Patients in this arm did not receive any reference therapy; they remained free of any anti-lymphoma therapy and were observed for relapse. This was non-interventional Stage consisting of a longterm follow-up period (until completion of a median observation period of 5 years). |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Zevalin | Drug | Zevalin study treatment regimen consisted of 2 rituximab i.v. infusions (Day 1 and Day 7-9) and one [90Y]-ibritumomab tiuxetan infusion in connection with the second rituximab infusion. The core treatment regimen in the Zevalin arm was: Day 1: Rituximab i.v. infusion 250 mg/m^2 Day 7-to 9: Rituximab i.v. infusion 250 mg/m^2 immediately followed by [90Y]-ibritumomab tiuxetan 14.8 MBq/kg (0.4 mCi/kg) with a maximum dose of 1184 MBq (32 mCi),administered as slow intravenous push over 10 minutes. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival (OS) | The primary analysis was based on the full analysis set (FAS). Actually, the prominent efficacy variable OS was analysed in the FAS (identical to the safety analysis set) and Per Protocol Set using Kaplan Meier estimates by treatment group. "Overall survival" was defined as the median time interval (in months)from randomization to death from any cause.This time-to-event variable was censored at the date of the last known follow-up visit (provided that the patient was still alive at that time). | 5 years or until patient dies or lost to follow up |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Participants With Disease Free Survival (DFS) | DFS was analysed in the FAS (identical to the safety analysis set) and Per Protocol set using Kaplan Meier estimates by treatment group.Disease-free survival was defined as the median time interval (in months) from randomization to the date of relapse (as assessed by the investigator) or death from any cause. This time-to-event variable was also censored at the date of the last known follow-up visit (provided that the patient was still alive at that time). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Research Site | Mesa | Arizona | United States | |||
| Research Site |
Of the 151 screened patients 68 patients were assigned to treatment (Full analysis set, FAS). Three patients showed major protocol deviations and thus were excluded from the "per protocol set"(PPS). The PPS comprised 65 patients.
Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) Patients at the age of at least 60 years and in complete remission (CR or CRu) after 6 or 8 cycles of a first-line treatment with Cyclophosphamide Doxorubicin hydrochloride Vincristine Prednisolone- Rituximab (CHOP-R) were enrolled in the study.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Zevalin | Zevalin Therapeutic Regimen: Day 1: 250 milligram per meter square (mg/m^2) Rituxan followed by 5 millicurie (mCi) 111In Zevalin. Day 7: 250 mg/m^2 Rituxan followed by 0.4 millicurie/kilogram (mCi/kg) Zevalin. |
| FG001 | Observation |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
|
| 5 years or until patient disease progresses or lost to follow up |
| The Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) | HRQL questionnaire consists of 27 questions each scores ranging from 0 - 4. The minimum score was 0 which is termed as 'worst imaginable health state' and the maximum score for a patient was 100 which is termed as 'best imaginable health state'. The descriptive classification defines health status in terms of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is subdivided into 3 levels: no problem, some or moderate problems, unable or extreme problems. | Up to Month 36 |
| Phoenix |
| Arizona |
| United States |
| Research Site | Scottsdale | Arizona | United States |
| Research site | Bakersfield | California | United States |
| Research Site | Berkeley | California | United States |
| Research Site | Beverly Hills | California | United States |
| Research Site | Burbank | California | United States |
| Research Site | Duarte | California | United States |
| Research site | Los Angeles | California | United States |
| Research site | Newport Beach | California | United States |
| Research Site | San Diego | California | United States |
| Research site | Vallejo | California | United States |
| Research site | Aurora | Colorado | United States |
| Research site | Newark | Delaware | United States |
| Research site | St. Petersburg | Florida | United States |
| Research Site | Coeur d'Alene | Idaho | United States |
| Research site | Chicago | Illinois | United States |
| Research site | Joliet | Illinois | United States |
| Research Site | Morris | Illinois | United States |
| Research site | Overland Park | Kansas | United States |
| Research Site | Shreveport | Louisiana | United States |
| Research site | Baltimore | Maryland | United States |
| Research site | Boston | Massachusetts | United States |
| Research site | Detroit | Michigan | United States |
| Research Site | Rochester | Minnesota | United States |
| Research Site | Saint Louis Park | Minnesota | United States |
| Research Site | Commack | New York | United States |
| Research Site | East Setauket | New York | United States |
| Research Site | Durham | North Carolina | United States |
| Research Site | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Research Site | Aberdeen | South Dakota | United States |
| Research Site | Dallas | Texas | United States |
| Research Site | Houston | Texas | United States |
| Research Site | Norfolk | Virginia | United States |
| Research Site | Graz | Austria |
| Research Site | Innsbruck | Austria |
| Research Site | Bruges | Belgium |
| Research Site | Ghent | Belgium |
| Research Site | Leuven | Belgium |
| Research Site | Edmonton | Alberta | Canada |
| Research Site | Ottawa | Ontario | Canada |
| Research Site | Toronto | Ontario | Canada |
| Research Site | Montreal | Quebec | Canada |
| Research Site | Helsinki | Finland |
| Research Site | Oulu | Finland |
| Research Site | Créteil | France |
| Research Site | Dijon | France |
| Research Site | Lille | France |
| Research Site | Limoges | France |
| Research Site, Cedax | Lyon | France |
| Research Site | Paris | France |
| Research Site | Toulouse | France |
| Research Site | Chemnitz | Germany |
| Research Site | Jena | Germany |
| Research Site | Karlsruhe | Germany |
| Research Site | Mainz | Germany |
| Research Site | Rostock | Germany |
| Research Site | Würzburg | Germany |
| Research Site | Budapest | Hungary |
| Research Site | Debrecen | Hungary |
| Research Site | Szeged | Hungary |
| Research Site | Dublin | Ireland |
| Research Site | Galway | Ireland |
| Research Site | Bologna | Italy |
| Research Site | Milan | Italy |
| Research Site | Perugia | Italy |
| Research Site | Pisa | Italy |
| Research Site | Torino | Italy |
| Research Site | Gdansk | Poland |
| Research Site | Krakow | Poland |
| Research Site | Poznan | Poland |
| Research Site | Warsaw | Poland |
| Research Site | Coimbra | Portugal |
| Research Site | Lisbon | Portugal |
| Research Site | Porto | Portugal |
| Research Site | Singapore | Singapore |
| Research Site, Yonsei | Seoul | South Korea |
| Research Site | Seoul | South Korea |
| Research Site | Madrid | Spain |
| Research Site | Pamplona | Spain |
| Research Site | Salamanca | Spain |
| Research Site | Seville | Spain |
| Research Site | Malmö | Sweden |
| Research Site | Uddevalla | Sweden |
| Research Site | Umeå | Sweden |
| Research Site | Bern | Switzerland |
| Research Site | Sankt Gallen | Switzerland |
| Research Site | Bangkok | Thailand |
| Research Site | Leicester | United Kingdom |
| Research Site | London | United Kingdom |
Patients in this arm were diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and were in complete remission after first-line CHOP-R therapy. Patients in this arm did not receive any reference therapy; they remained free of any anti-lymphoma therapy and were observed for relapse. |
| Per-Protocol Set |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Zevalin | Zevalin Therapeutic Regimen: Day 1: 250 mg/m^2 Rituxan followed by 5 mCi 111In Zevalin. Day 7: 250 mg/m^2 Rituxan followed by 0.4 mCi/kg Zevalin. |
| BG001 | Observation | Patients in this arm were diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and were in complete remission after first-line CHOP-R therapy. Patients in this arm did not receive any reference therapy; they remained free of any anti-lymphoma therapy and were observed for relapse. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Overall Survival (OS) | The primary analysis was based on the full analysis set (FAS). Actually, the prominent efficacy variable OS was analysed in the FAS (identical to the safety analysis set) and Per Protocol Set using Kaplan Meier estimates by treatment group. "Overall survival" was defined as the median time interval (in months)from randomization to death from any cause.This time-to-event variable was censored at the date of the last known follow-up visit (provided that the patient was still alive at that time). | This study was completed in 2008. We have exhausted all efforts and unfortunately, the data cannot be located in our records. Therefore, no data is available to report for this outcome measure. | Posted | 5 years or until patient dies or lost to follow up |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Proportion of Participants With Disease Free Survival (DFS) | DFS was analysed in the FAS (identical to the safety analysis set) and Per Protocol set using Kaplan Meier estimates by treatment group.Disease-free survival was defined as the median time interval (in months) from randomization to the date of relapse (as assessed by the investigator) or death from any cause. This time-to-event variable was also censored at the date of the last known follow-up visit (provided that the patient was still alive at that time). | Posted | Number | proportion of participants | 5 years or until patient disease progresses or lost to follow up |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | The Health-related Quality of Life (HRQL) | HRQL questionnaire consists of 27 questions each scores ranging from 0 - 4. The minimum score was 0 which is termed as 'worst imaginable health state' and the maximum score for a patient was 100 which is termed as 'best imaginable health state'. The descriptive classification defines health status in terms of 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activity, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Each dimension is subdivided into 3 levels: no problem, some or moderate problems, unable or extreme problems. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | scores on a scale | Up to Month 36 |
|
|
Followed up until last anti-lymphoma treatment or 42 months whichever is longer.
Only study drug-related AEs was collected until the end of Stage 1 in case of a relapse.Patients who relapsed before study treatment were to be followed up in the same way as patients in observation arm,if a patient randomized to the observation arm received treatment for a relapse, no further AE reporting was required.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Zevalin | Zevalin Therapeutic Regimen: Day 1: 250 mg/m^2 Rituxan followed by 5 mCi 111In Zevalin. Day 7: 250 mg/m^2 Rituxan followed by 0.4 mCi/kg Zevalin. | 2 | 34 | 5 | 34 | ||
| EG001 | Observation | Patients in this arm were diagnosed with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma and were in complete remission after first-line CHOP-R therapy. Patients in this arm did not receive any reference therapy; they remained free of any anti-lymphoma therapy and were observed for relapse. | 1 | 34 | 1 | 34 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| cytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Infections and manifestations | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
The study was prematurely terminated after 68 patients had been randomized due to a low recruitment rate that would have led to an unacceptably long study duration.No safety concerns or lack of efficacy had led to the decision to cancel the study.
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gajanan Bhat | Spectrum Pharmaceuticals,Inc. | 949-743-9219 | gajanan.bhat@sppirx.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016403 | Lymphoma, Large B-Cell, Diffuse |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D016393 | Lymphoma, B-Cell |
| D008228 | Lymphoma, Non-Hodgkin |
| D008223 | Lymphoma |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D008232 | Lymphoproliferative Disorders |
| D008206 | Lymphatic Diseases |
| D006425 | Hemic and Lymphatic Diseases |
| D007160 | Immunoproliferative Disorders |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C422802 | ibritumomab tiuxetan |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| >=65 years |
|
| Male |
|
|
|
|
|
|