To Compare the Effect of Liraglutide When Given Together... | NCT00318461 | Trialant
NCT00318461
Sponsor
Novo Nordisk A/S
Status
Completed
Last Update Posted
Mar 7, 2017Actual
Enrollment
1,091Actual
Phase
Phase 3
Conditions
Diabetes
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Interventions
liraglutide
metformin
glimepiride
placebo
placebo
liraglutide
liraglutide
Countries
Argentina
Australia
Belgium
Bulgaria
Croatia
Denmark
Germany
Hungary
India
Ireland
Italy
Netherlands
Norway
Romania
Russia
Slovakia
South Africa
Spain
Sweden
United Kingdom
Protocol Section
Identification Module
NCT ID
NCT00318461
Obsolete or Duplicate NCT IDs
Not provided
Organization Study
NN2211-1572
Secondary IDs
Not provided
Brief Title
To Compare the Effect of Liraglutide When Given Together With Metformin With the Effect of Metformin Given Alone and With the Effect of Glimepiride and Metformin Given Together
Official Title
Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (LEAD-2): Effect on Glycaemic Control After Once Daily Administration of Liraglutide in Combination With Metformin Versus Metformin Monotherapy Versus Metformin and Glimepiride Combination Therapy in Subjects With Type 2 Diabetes
Acronym
LEAD-2
Organization
Novo Nordisk A/SINDUSTRY
Status Module
Record Verification Date
Jan 2017
Overall Recruitment Status or Expanded Access Status
Completed
Last Known Status
Not provided
Delayed Posting
Not provided
Why Stopped
Not provided
Expanded Access Info
No
Start Date
May 2006
Primary Completion Date
May 2007Actual
Completion Date
Nov 2008Actual
First Submitted Date
Apr 25, 2006
First Submission Date that Met QC Criteria
Apr 25, 2006
First Posted Date
Apr 26, 2006Estimated
Results Waived
Not provided
Results First Submitted Date
Feb 23, 2010
Results First Submitted that Met QC Criteria
Feb 23, 2010
Results First Posted Date
Mar 12, 2010Estimated
Certification/Extension (aka Delayed Results) First Submitted Date
Nov 9, 2009
Certification/Extension First Submitted that Passed QC Review
Nov 9, 2009
Certification/Extension First Posted Date
Nov 11, 2009Estimated
Last Update Submitted Date
Jan 24, 2017
Last Update Posted Date
Mar 7, 2017Actual
Sponsor/Collaborators Module
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Lead Sponsor
Novo Nordisk A/SINDUSTRY
Collaborators
Not provided
Oversight Module
Has Data Monitoring Committee (DMC)
No
Is FDA Regulated Drug
Not provided
Is FDA Regulated Device
Not provided
Is Unapproved Device
Not provided
Pediatric Postmarket Surveillance of a Device Product
Not provided
Product Exported from US
Not provided
FDAAA801 Violation
Not provided
Description Module
Brief Summary
This trial is conducted in Europe, Oceania, Africa, Asia and South America. This trial is designed to show the effect of treatment with liraglutide when adding to existing metformin therapy and to compare it with the effects of metformin monotherapy and combination therapy of metformin and glimepiride. Two trial periods: A 6 month (26 weeks) randomised, double-blinded period followed by an 18 months open-label extension, in total 2 years (104 weeks).
Percentage point change in Glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation)
week 0, week 26
Change in Glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) at Week 104
Change in glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of randomisation)
week 0, week 104
Secondary Outcomes
Measure
Description
Time Frame
Change in Body Weight at Week 26
Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation)
week 0, week 26
Change in Body Weight at Week 104
Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of treatment)
Other Outcomes
Not provided
Eligibility Module
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects diagnosed with type 2 diabetes and treated with oral anti-diabetic drugs (OADs) for at least 3 months
HbA1c: 7.0-11.0 % (both incl.) in subjects on OAD monotherapy. 7.0-10.0 % (both incl.) in subjects on OAD combination therapy
Body Mass Index (BMI) less than or equal 40 kg/m2
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects treated with insulin within the last three months
Subjects with any serious medical condition
Females of child bearing potential who are pregnant, breast-feeding or have the intention of becoming pregnant or not using adequate contraceptive methods
Subjects using any drug (except for OADs), which in the Investigator's opinion could interfere with the glucose level (e.g. systemic corticosteroids)
Nauck M, Frid A, Hermansen K, Shah NS, Tankova T, Mitha IH, Zdravkovic M, During M, Matthews DR; LEAD-2 Study Group. Efficacy and safety comparison of liraglutide, glimepiride, and placebo, all in combination with metformin, in type 2 diabetes: the LEAD (liraglutide effect and action in diabetes)-2 study. Diabetes Care. 2009 Jan;32(1):84-90. doi: 10.2337/dc08-1355. Epub 2008 Oct 17.
Eligible subjects discontinued their oral anti-diabetic drug treatment and commenced a 3-week period of forced titration of metformin followed by a 3-week maintenance period. Subjects on current metformin therapy could go through a modified titration period or advance directly to the 3-week maintenance period at the discretion of the investigator.
Recruitment Details
A total of 170 centres in 21 countries: Argentina (4), Australia (19), Belgium (6), Bulgaria (1), Germany (33), Denmark (9), Spain (14), United Kingdom (11), Croatia (2), Hungary (5), Ireland (4), India (5), Italy (10), The Netherlands (5), New Zealand (3), Norway (8), Romania (3), Russia (6), Sweden (8), Slovakia (7) and South Africa (7)
Type of Units Analyzed
Not provided
Arm/Group Information
ID
Title
Description
FG000
Lira 0.6 + Met
Liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
FG001
Lira 1.2 + Met
Periods
Title
Milestones
Reasons Not Completed
Double-Blind, 6 Months
Type
Comment
Milestone Data
STARTED
Baseline Characteristics Module
Baseline Analysis Population Description
Not provided
Outcome Measures Module
Outcome Measures
Adverse Events Module
Frequency Threshold
5
More Info Module
Limitations and Caveats
Not provided
Annotation Section
No data available
No data is available for this block.
Document Section
No data available
No data is available for this block.
Derived Section
Miscellaneous Info Module
Version Holder
Jul 10, 2026
Removed Countries
New Zealand
Submission Tracking
No data available
No data is available for this block.
Condition Browse Module
MeSH Terms
Intervention Browse Module
MeSH Terms
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel Assignment
Intervention Model Description
Not provided
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Observational Model
Not provided
Time Perspective
Not provided
Masking Info
Masking
Double
Masking Description
Not provided
Who Masked
ParticipantInvestigator
metformin
Drug
1.5-2.0 g tablets
Lira 0.6 + Met
Lira 1.2 + Met
Lira 1.8 + Met
Met + Glim
Met Mono
glimepiride
Drug
4 mg tablets
Met + Glim
placebo
Drug
Glimepiride placebo 1 mg and 2 mg tablets
Lira 0.6 + Met
Lira 1.2 + Met
Lira 1.8 + Met
Met Mono
placebo
Drug
Liraglutide placebo 1-3 mL for s.c. (under the skin) injection
Met + Glim
Met Mono
liraglutide
Drug
1.2 mg for s.c. (under the skin) injection
Lira 1.2 + Met
liraglutide
Drug
1.8 mg for s.c. (under the skin) injection
Lira 1.8 + Met
week 0, week 104
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 26
Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation)
week 0, week 26
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 104
Change in Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of treatment)
week 0, week 104
Change in Mean Prandial Increments of Plasma Glucose Based on Self-measured 7-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 26
Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose based on self-measured 7-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation). The 7 time points for self-measurements were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime.
Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between values measured before and after a meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three.
week 0, week 26
Change in Mean Prandial Increments of Plasma Glucose Based on Self-measured 7-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 104
Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose based on self-measured 7-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of treatment). The 7 time points for self-measurements were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime.
Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between values measured before and after a meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three.
week 0, week 104
Change in Mean Post Prandial Plasma Glucose Based on Self-measured 7-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 26
Change in mean post prandial plasma glucose from baseline (Week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation). The 7 time points for self-measurements were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime. Mean post prandial plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the post pradial plasma glucose values divided by three.
week 0, week 26
Change in Mean Post Prandial Plasma Glucose Based on Self-measured 7-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 104
Change in mean post prandial plasma glucose from baseline (Week 0) to 104 weeks (end of treatment) The 7 time points for self-measurements were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime. Mean post prandial plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the post pradial plasma glucose values divided by three.
week 0, week 104
Change in Beta-cell Function at Week 26
Change in beta cell function from baseline (week 0) to 16 weeks (end of treatment). Beta-cell function was derived from fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting insulin concentrations using the homeostasic model assessment (HOMA) method which uses the assumption that normal-weight normal subjects aged under 35 years have a 100% beta-cell function (HOMA-B).
Change in beta cell function from baseline (week 0) to 16 weeks (end of treatment). Beta-cell function was derived from fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting insulin concentrations using the homeostasic model assessment (HOMA) method which uses the assumption that normal-weight normal subjects aged under 35 years have a 100% beta-cell function (HOMA-B).
Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occuring after baseline (week 0) until week 26 (end of randomisation). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 3.1 mmol/L. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 3.1 mmol/L.
weeks 0-26
Hypoglycaemic Episodes at Week 104
Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occuring after baseline (week 0) until 104 weeks (end of treatment). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 3.1 mmol/L. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 3.1 mmol/L.
weeks 0-104
Ciudad Autónoma de Bs As
C1426ABP
Argentina
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Ciudad Autónoma de BsAs
C1406FWY
Argentina
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Junín
6000
Argentina
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Broadmeadow
New South Wales
2292
Australia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Penrith
New South Wales
2751
Australia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
St Leonards
New South Wales
2065
Australia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Daw Park
South Australia
5041
Australia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
East Ringwood
Victoria
3135
Australia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Fremantle
Western Australia
6160
Australia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Adelaide
5000
Australia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Adelaide
SA 5035
Australia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Auckland
Australia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bankstown
2200
Australia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Box Hill
3128
Australia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Cairns
4870
Australia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Camperdown
2050
Australia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Christchurch
8011
Australia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Clayton
3168
Australia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Fitzroy
3065
Australia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Garran
2605
Australia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Hornsby
2077
Australia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Malvern
3144
Australia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Perth
6000
Australia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Westmead
2145
Australia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Woodville
5011
Australia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Arlon
6700
Belgium
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bonheiden
2820
Belgium
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Ghent
9000
Belgium
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Huy
4500
Belgium
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
La Louvière
7100
Belgium
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Leuven
3000
Belgium
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Sofia
1431
Bulgaria
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Zagreb
10 000
Croatia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Aalborg
9000
Denmark
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Århus C
8000
Denmark
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Copenhagen
2400
Denmark
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Frederiksberg
2000
Denmark
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Herlev
2730
Denmark
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Hjørring
9800
Denmark
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Hvidovre
2650
Denmark
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
København S
2300
Denmark
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Odense
5000
Denmark
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Viborg
Denmark
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Aschaffenburg
63739
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bad Heilbrunn
83670
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bad Kreuznach
55545
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bad Lauterberg im Harz
37431
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bad Mergentheim
97980
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bad Neuenahr-Ahrweiler
53474
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Beckum
59269
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bensheim
64625
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Berlin
10115
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Berlin
12203
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Berlin
12687
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Cologne
50858
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Darmstadt
64283
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Diez
65582
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Dormagen
41539
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Dresden
01219
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Dresden
01307
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Flensburg
24939
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Großheirath
96269
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Halle
06114
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Hamburg
21073
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Hamburg
22607
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kutenholz-Mulsum
27449
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Ludwigshafen
67059
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Marburg
35037
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Münster
48145
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Neuwied
56564
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Oberhausen
46145
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Pirna
01796
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Pohlheim
35415
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Regensburg
93059
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Rehlingen-Siersburg
66780
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Saaldorf
83416
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Saarbrücken
66121
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Saint Ingbert
66386
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Speyer
67346
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Stuttgart
70184
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Sulzbach-Rosenberg
92237
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tübingen
72072
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Viersen
41751
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Völklingen
66333
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Würzburg
97072
Germany
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Budapest
1041
Hungary
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Debrecen
4043
Hungary
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Gyula
5700
Hungary
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Nyíregyháza
4400
Hungary
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Pécs
7631
Hungary
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Szekszárd
7100
Hungary
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Zalaegerszeg
8900
Hungary
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Hyderabad
Andhra Pradesh
500082
India
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kochi
Kerala
682041
India
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Mumbai
Maharashtra
400012
India
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Chennai
Tamil Nadu
600086
India
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bangalore
560034
India
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Dublin
DUBLIN 15
Ireland
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Dublin
DUBLIN 7
Ireland
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Dublin
DUBLIN 8
Ireland
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Waterford
Ireland
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bari
70124
Italy
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Catania
95126
Italy
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Florence
50141
Italy
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Milan
20122
Italy
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Milan
20132
Italy
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Monza
20052
Italy
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Orbassano
10043
Italy
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Padova
35128
Italy
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Palermo
90127
Italy
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Rimini
47900
Italy
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Roma
00161
Italy
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Sassari
07100
Italy
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Torino
10154
Italy
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Verona
37126
Italy
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Apeldoorn
7334 DZ
Netherlands
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Groningen
9728 NT
Netherlands
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Rotterdam
3045 PM
Netherlands
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Sliedrecht
3361 XV
Netherlands
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bekkestua
1357
Norway
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bergen
NO-5012
Norway
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Elverum
2408
Norway
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Gjøvik
NO-2819
Norway
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Hamar
2317
Norway
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kongsberg
NO-3602
Norway
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Kongsvinger
2212
Norway
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Stavanger
4011
Norway
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Tromsø
9038
Norway
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Trondheim
NO-7030
Norway
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Cluj-Napoca
Cluj
400006
Romania
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Constanța
900591
Romania
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Iași
700111
Romania
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Moscow
117036
Russia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Moscow
119435
Russia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Moscow
127486
Russia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Moscow
129090
Russia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg
194354
Russia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Saint Petersburg
198013
Russia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bratislava
83 299
Slovakia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bratislava
831 01
Slovakia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bratislava
833 05
Slovakia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Košice
04-001
Slovakia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Moldava nad Bodvou
045 01
Slovakia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Prešov
080 01
Slovakia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Trenčín
91 101
Slovakia
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Johannesburg
Gauteng
1829
South Africa
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Johannesburg
Gauteng
27 11
South Africa
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Durban
KwaZulu-Natal
4001
South Africa
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Durban
KwaZulu-Natal
4091
South Africa
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Durban
KwaZulu-Natal
4092
South Africa
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Cape Town
Western Cape
7130
South Africa
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Benoni
1500
South Africa
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
A Coruña
15006
Spain
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Alcázar de San Juan
13600
Spain
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Almería
04001
Spain
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Barcelona
08017
Spain
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bilbao
48013
Spain
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Cadiz
11009
Spain
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Girona
17007
Spain
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Granada
18012
Spain
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Málaga
29010
Spain
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Mérida
06800
Spain
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
San Cristóbal de La Laguna
38320
Spain
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
San Juan
03550
Spain
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Santa Cruz de Tenerife
38010
Spain
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Santander
39008
Spain
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Seville
41009
Spain
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Falun
791 82
Sweden
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Karlstad
651 85
Sweden
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Linköping
581 85
Sweden
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Lund
221 85
Sweden
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Malmö
205 02
Sweden
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Stockholm
118 83
Sweden
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Stockholm
171 76
Sweden
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Umeå
901 85
Sweden
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Abergavenny
NP7 7EG
United Kingdom
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bath
BA1 2SR
United Kingdom
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Bath
BA2 1NH
United Kingdom
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Berkshire
RG7 3SQ
United Kingdom
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Cardiff
CF23 8SQ
United Kingdom
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Coventry
CV2 2DX
United Kingdom
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Dundee
DD1 9SY
United Kingdom
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
East Horsley
KT24 6QT
United Kingdom
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Frome
BA11 1EZ
United Kingdom
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Llanelli
SA14 8QF
United Kingdom
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Oxford
OX3 7LE
United Kingdom
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Plymouth
PL6 8BQ
United Kingdom
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Sheffield
S3 9DA
United Kingdom
Novo Nordisk Investigational Site
Sunbury-on-Thames
TW16 6RH
United Kingdom
Result
Sullivan SD, Alfonso-Cristancho R, Conner C, Hammer M, Blonde L. Long-term outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes receiving glimepiride combined with liraglutide or rosiglitazone. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2009 Feb 26;8:12. doi: 10.1186/1475-2840-8-12.
Nauck M, Marre M. Adding liraglutide to oral antidiabetic drug monotherapy: efficacy and weight benefits. Postgrad Med. 2009 May;121(3):5-15. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2009.05.1997.
McGill JB. Insights from the Liraglutide Clinical Development Program--the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (LEAD) studies. Postgrad Med. 2009 May;121(3):16-25. doi: 10.3810/pgm.2009.05.1998.
Blonde L, Russell-Jones D. The safety and efficacy of liraglutide with or without oral antidiabetic drug therapy in type 2 diabetes: an overview of the LEAD 1-5 studies. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009 Dec;11 Suppl 3:26-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01075.x.
Jendle J, Nauck MA, Matthews DR, Frid A, Hermansen K, During M, Zdravkovic M, Strauss BJ, Garber AJ; LEAD-2 and LEAD-3 Study Groups. Weight loss with liraglutide, a once-daily human glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue for type 2 diabetes treatment as monotherapy or added to metformin, is primarily as a result of a reduction in fat tissue. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2009 Dec;11(12):1163-72. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2009.01158.x.
Buse JB, Garber A, Rosenstock J, Schmidt WE, Brett JH, Videbaek N, Holst J, Nauck M. Liraglutide treatment is associated with a low frequency and magnitude of antibody formation with no apparent impact on glycemic response or increased frequency of adverse events: results from the Liraglutide Effect and Action in Diabetes (LEAD) trials. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Jun;96(6):1695-702. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-2822. Epub 2011 Mar 30.
Bode BW, Brett J, Falahati A, Pratley RE. Comparison of the efficacy and tolerability profile of liraglutide, a once-daily human GLP-1 analog, in patients with type 2 diabetes >/=65 and <65 years of age: a pooled analysis from phase III studies. Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2011 Dec;9(6):423-33. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2011.09.007. Epub 2011 Nov 4.
Henry RR, Buse JB, Sesti G, Davies MJ, Jensen KH, Brett J, Pratley RE. Efficacy of antihyperglycemic therapies and the influence of baseline hemoglobin A(1C): a meta-analysis of the liraglutide development program. Endocr Pract. 2011 Nov-Dec;17(6):906-13. doi: 10.4158/ep.17.6.906.
Zinman B, Schmidt WE, Moses A, Lund N, Gough S. Achieving a clinically relevant composite outcome of an HbA1c of <7% without weight gain or hypoglycaemia in type 2 diabetes: a meta-analysis of the liraglutide clinical trial programme. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012 Jan;14(1):77-82. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2011.01493.x. Epub 2011 Oct 30.
Davies MJ, Chubb BD, Smith IC, Valentine WJ. Cost-utility analysis of liraglutide compared with sulphonylurea or sitagliptin, all as add-on to metformin monotherapy in Type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2012 Mar;29(3):313-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03429.x.
Nauck M, Frid A, Hermansen K, Thomsen AB, During M, Shah N, Tankova T, Mitha I, Matthews DR. Long-term efficacy and safety comparison of liraglutide, glimepiride and placebo, all in combination with metformin in type 2 diabetes: 2-year results from the LEAD-2 study. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2013 Mar;15(3):204-12. doi: 10.1111/dom.12012. Epub 2012 Oct 11.
King AB, Montanya E, Pratley RE, Blonde L, Svendsen CB, Donsmark M, Sesti G. Liraglutide achieves A1C targets more often than sitagliptin or exenatide when added to metformin in patients with type 2 diabetes and a baseline A1C <8.0%. Endocr Pract. 2013 Jan-Feb;19(1):64-72. doi: 10.4158/EP12232.OR.
Jensen TM, Saha K, Steinberg WM. Is there a link between liraglutide and pancreatitis? A post hoc review of pooled and patient-level data from completed liraglutide type 2 diabetes clinical trials. Diabetes Care. 2015 Jun;38(6):1058-66. doi: 10.2337/dc13-1210. Epub 2014 Dec 12.
Fonseca VA, Devries JH, Henry RR, Donsmark M, Thomsen HF, Plutzky J. Reductions in systolic blood pressure with liraglutide in patients with type 2 diabetes: insights from a patient-level pooled analysis of six randomized clinical trials. J Diabetes Complications. 2014 May-Jun;28(3):399-405. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Jan 21.
Hegedus L, Moses AC, Zdravkovic M, Le Thi T, Daniels GH. GLP-1 and calcitonin concentration in humans: lack of evidence of calcitonin release from sequential screening in over 5000 subjects with type 2 diabetes or nondiabetic obese subjects treated with the human GLP-1 analog, liraglutide. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2011 Mar;96(3):853-60. doi: 10.1210/jc.2010-2318. Epub 2011 Jan 5.
Liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
FG002
Lira 1.8 + Met
Liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
FG003
Met Mono
Metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo + glimepiride placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
FG004
Met + Glim
Glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
FG000242 subjectsRandomised
FG001241 subjectsRandomised
FG002242 subjectsRandomised
FG003122 subjectsRandomised
FG004244 subjectsRandomised
Exposed to Study Drug
FG000242 subjects
FG001240 subjectsSubject withdrew before exposure to drug, and thus not included in the safety and ITT analysis sets
FG002242 subjects
FG003121 subjectsSubject withdrew before exposure to drug, and thus not included in the safety and ITT analysis sets
FG004242 subjectsSubjects withdrew before exposure to drug, and thus not included in the safety and ITT analysis sets
COMPLETED
FG000208 subjects
FG001197 subjects
FG002191 subjects
FG00374 subjects
FG004210 subjects
NOT COMPLETED
FG00034 subjects
FG00144 subjects
FG00251 subjects
FG00348 subjects
FG00434 subjects
Type
Comment
Reasons
Adverse Event
FG00011 subjects
FG00123 subjects
FG00229 subjects
FG0032 subjects
FG0048 subjects
Lack of Efficacy
FG00019 subjects
FG0018 subjects
FG00213 subjects
FG00329 subjects
FG004
Protocol Violation
FG0002 subjects
FG0014 subjects
FG0024 subjects
FG0034 subjects
FG004
Lost to follow up
FG0000 subjects
FG0011 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG004
Poor compliance/Non-compliance
FG0000 subjects
FG0011 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG004
Consent withdrawn
FG0000 subjects
FG0013 subjects
FG0024 subjects
FG00310 subjects
FG004
Subject decision/No wish to continue
FG0000 subjects
FG0012 subjects
FG0021 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG004
Move
FG0000 subjects
FG0011 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG004
Tendency to low blood glucose levels
FG0000 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG004
FPG exceeds limits/too high
FG0001 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0032 subjects
FG004
Work commitment
FG0000 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG004
Investigator decision
FG0000 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG004
Lack of time
FG0001 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG004
Hypoglycaemia/Hypoglycemia
FG0000 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG004
Hyperglicaemia
FG0000 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0031 subjects
FG004
metformin titrated <1500 mg or >2000 mg
FG0000 subjects
FG0010 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG004
Fear of experiencing AE again
FG0000 subjects
FG0011 subjects
FG0020 subjects
FG0030 subjects
FG004
Open-Label Extension, 18 Months
Type
Comment
Milestone Data
STARTED
FG000208 subjects
FG001197 subjects
FG002191 subjects
FG00374 subjects
FG004210 subjects
COMPLETED
FG000130 subjects
FG001137 subjects
FG002118 subjects
FG00331 subjects
FG004
NOT COMPLETED
FG00078 subjects
FG00160 subjects
FG00273 subjects
FG00343 subjects
FG004
Type
Comment
Reasons
Withdrawals between 6 and 24 months
FG00019 subjects
FG00114 subjects
FG00227 subjects
FG003
Type of Units Analyzed
Not provided
Arm/Group Information
ID
Title
Description
BG000
Lira 0.6 + Met
Liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
BG001
Lira 1.2 + Met
Liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
BG002
Lira 1.8 + Met
Liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
BG003
Met Mono
Metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo + glimepiride placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
BG004
Met + Glim
Glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
BG005
Total
Total of all reporting groups
Denominators
Units
Counts
Participants
BG000242
BG001240
BG002242
BG003121
BG004242
BG0051087
Baseline Measures
Title
Description
Population Description
Parameter Type
Dispersion Type
Unit of Measure
Calculate Percentage
Denominator Units Selected
Denominators
Classes
Age, Continuous
Mean
Standard Deviation
years
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
BG00056.0± 10.5
BG00157.2± 9.2
BG00256.8± 9.4
BG003
Sex: Female, Male
Count of Participants
Participants
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
Female
BG00091
BG001111
BG002
Race (NIH/OMB)
Count of Participants
Participants
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
American Indian or Alaska Native
BG0000
BG0010
BG002
Previous anti-diabetic treatment
Number
participants
Title
Denominators
Categories
Mono-therapy
Title
Measurements
BG00081
BG00190
BG002
BMI
Body Mass Index
Mean
Standard Deviation
kg/m2
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
BG00030.5± 4.8
BG00131.1± 4.8
BG002
Duration of diabetes
Number of years since diagnosis of diabetes
Mean
Standard Deviation
years
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
BG0007.0± 4.8
BG0016.8± 4.9
BG002
HbA1c
Glycosylated Haemoglobin at screening
Mean
Standard Deviation
percentage of total haemoglobin
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
BG0008.4± 0.9
BG0018.3± 0.9
BG002
Height
Mean
Standard Deviation
m
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
BG0001.69± 0.10
BG0011.68± 0.11
BG002
Type
Title
Description
Population Description
Reporting Status
Anticipated Posting Date
Parameter Type
Dispersion Type
Unit of Measure
Calculate Percentage
Time Frame
Units Analyzed
Denominator Units Selected
Arm/Group Information
Denominators
Classes
Analyses
Primary
Change in Glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) at Week 26
Percentage point change in Glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation)
Intention to treat (ITT) analysis set using LOCF (Last Observation Carried Forward) is all randomised subjects who had been exposed to at least one dose of the study products.
Posted
Least Squares Mean
Standard Error
Percentage point of total HbA1c
week 0, week 26
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Lira 0.6 + Met
Liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG001
Lira 1.2 + Met
Liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG002
Lira 1.8 + Met
Liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG003
Met Mono
Metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo + glimepiride placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG004
Met + Glim
Glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000239
OG001232
OG002236
OG003
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG000-0.69± 0.07
OG001-0.97± 0.07
OG002-1.00± 0.07
OG003
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG002
OG003
Change in HbA1c from baseline to end of treatment at 26 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-1.09
95
-1.30
-0.88
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
Hypothesis testing was done in a hierarchical manner. First, it was tested whether liraglutide 1.8 mg+metformin was superior to placebo + metformin.
Superiority was always concluded if the upper limit of the 2-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference was below 0%.
Secondary
Change in Body Weight at Week 26
Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation)
Intention to treat (ITT) analysis set using LOCF (Last Observation Carried Forward) is all randomised subjects who had been exposed to at least one dose of the study products.
Posted
Least Squares Mean
Standard Error
kg
week 0, week 26
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Lira 0.6 + Met
Liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG001
Lira 1.2 + Met
Liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG002
Lira 1.8 + Met
Liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG003
Secondary
Change in Body Weight at Week 104
Change in body weight from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of treatment)
Intention to treat (ITT) analysis set using LOCF (Last Observation Carried Forward) is all randomised subjects who had been exposed to at least one dose of the study products.
Posted
Least Squares Mean
Standard Error
kg
week 0, week 104
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Lira 0.6 + Met
Liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG001
Lira 1.2 + Met
Liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG002
Lira 1.8 + Met
Liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG003
Secondary
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 26
Change in fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation)
Intention to treat (ITT) analysis set using LOCF (Last Observation Carried Forward) is all randomised subjects who had been exposed to at least one dose of the study products.
Posted
Least Squares Mean
Standard Error
mmol/L
week 0, week 26
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Lira 0.6 + Met
Liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG001
Lira 1.2 + Met
Liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG002
Lira 1.8 + Met
Liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
Secondary
Change in Fasting Plasma Glucose (FPG) at Week 104
Change in Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of treatment)
Intention to treat (ITT) analysis set using LOCF (Last Observation Carried Forward) is all randomised subjects who had been exposed to at least one dose of the study products.
Posted
Least Squares Mean
Standard Error
mmol/L
week 0, week 104
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Lira 0.6 + Met
Liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG001
Lira 1.2 + Met
Liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG002
Lira 1.8 + Met
Liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
Secondary
Change in Mean Prandial Increments of Plasma Glucose Based on Self-measured 7-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 26
Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose based on self-measured 7-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation). The 7 time points for self-measurements were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime.
Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between values measured before and after a meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three.
Intention to treat (ITT) analysis set using LOCF (Last Observation Carried Forward) is all randomised subjects who had been exposed to at least one dose of the study products.
Posted
Least Squares Mean
Standard Error
mmol/l
week 0, week 26
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Lira 0.6 + Met
Liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG001
Lira 1.2 + Met
Liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
Primary
Change in Glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) at Week 104
Change in glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of randomisation)
Intention to treat (ITT) analysis set using LOCF (Last Observation Carried Forward) is all randomised subjects who had been exposed to at least one dose of the study products.
Posted
Least Squares Mean
Standard Error
percentage of total haemoglobin
week 0, week 104
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Lira 0.6 + Met
Liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG001
Lira 1.2 + Met
Liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG002
Lira 1.8 + Met
Liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
Secondary
Change in Mean Prandial Increments of Plasma Glucose Based on Self-measured 7-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 104
Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose based on self-measured 7-point plasma glucose profiles from baseline (week 0) to 104 weeks (end of treatment). The 7 time points for self-measurements were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime.
Mean prandial increments of plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the plasma glucose differences between values measured before and after a meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) divided by three.
Intention to treat (ITT) analysis set using LOCF (Last Observation Carried Forward) is all randomised subjects who had been exposed to at least one dose of the study products.
Posted
Least Squares Mean
Standard Error
mmol/L
week 0, week 104
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Lira 0.6 + Met
Liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG001
Lira 1.2 + Met
Liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
Secondary
Change in Mean Post Prandial Plasma Glucose Based on Self-measured 7-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 26
Change in mean post prandial plasma glucose from baseline (Week 0) to 26 weeks (end of randomisation). The 7 time points for self-measurements were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime. Mean post prandial plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the post pradial plasma glucose values divided by three.
Intention to treat (ITT) analysis set using LOCF (Last Observation Carried Forward) is all randomised subjects who had been exposed to at least one dose of the study products.
Posted
Least Squares Mean
Standard Error
mmol/L
week 0, week 26
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Lira 0.6 + Met
Liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG001
Lira 1.2 + Met
Liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG002
Lira 1.8 + Met
Secondary
Change in Mean Post Prandial Plasma Glucose Based on Self-measured 7-point Plasma Glucose Profiles at Week 104
Change in mean post prandial plasma glucose from baseline (Week 0) to 104 weeks (end of treatment) The 7 time points for self-measurements were: before each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner), at 90 min after start of each meal (breakfast, lunch and dinner) and at bedtime. Mean post prandial plasma glucose were calculated as the sum of the post pradial plasma glucose values divided by three.
Intention to treat (ITT) analysis set using LOCF (Last Observation Carried Forward) is all randomised subjects who had been exposed to at least one dose of the study products.
Posted
Least Squares Mean
Standard Error
mmol/L
week 0, week 104
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Lira 0.6 + Met
Liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG001
Lira 1.2 + Met
Liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG002
Lira 1.8 + Met
Secondary
Change in Beta-cell Function at Week 26
Change in beta cell function from baseline (week 0) to 16 weeks (end of treatment). Beta-cell function was derived from fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting insulin concentrations using the homeostasic model assessment (HOMA) method which uses the assumption that normal-weight normal subjects aged under 35 years have a 100% beta-cell function (HOMA-B).
Intention to treat (ITT) analysis set using LOCF (Last Observation Carried Forward) is all randomised subjects who had been exposed to at least one dose of the study products.
Posted
Least Squares Mean
Standard Error
percentage point (%point)
week 0, week 26
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Lira 0.6 + Met
Liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG001
Lira 1.2 + Met
Liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG002
Lira 1.8 + Met
Secondary
Change in Beta-cell Function at Week 104
Change in beta cell function from baseline (week 0) to 16 weeks (end of treatment). Beta-cell function was derived from fasting plasma glucose (FPG) and fasting insulin concentrations using the homeostasic model assessment (HOMA) method which uses the assumption that normal-weight normal subjects aged under 35 years have a 100% beta-cell function (HOMA-B).
Intention to treat (ITT) analysis set using LOCF (Last Observation Carried Forward) is all randomised subjects who had been exposed to at least one dose of the study products.
Posted
Least Squares Mean
Standard Error
percentage point (%point)
week 0, week 104
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Lira 0.6 + Met
Liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG001
Lira 1.2 + Met
Liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG002
Lira 1.8 + Met
Secondary
Hypoglycaemic Episodes at Week 26
Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occuring after baseline (week 0) until week 26 (end of randomisation). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 3.1 mmol/L. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 3.1 mmol/L.
Safety analysis set is all randomised subjects who were exposed to at least one dose of study product.
Posted
Number
episodes
weeks 0-26
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Lira 0.6 + Met
Liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG001
Lira 1.2 + Met
Liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG002
Lira 1.8 + Met
Liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
Secondary
Hypoglycaemic Episodes at Week 104
Total number of hypoglycaemic episodes occuring after baseline (week 0) until 104 weeks (end of treatment). Hypoglycaemic episodes were defined as major, minor, or symptoms only. Major if the subject was unable to treat her/himself. Minor if subject was able to treat her/himself and plasma glucose was below 3.1 mmol/L. Symptoms only if subject was able to treat her/himself and with no plasma glucose measurement or plasma glucose higher than or equal to 3.1 mmol/L.
Safety analysis set is all randomised subjects who were exposed to at least one dose of study product.
Posted
Number
episodes
weeks 0-104
ID
Title
Description
OG000
Lira 0.6 + Met
Liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG001
Lira 1.2 + Met
Liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG002
Lira 1.8 + Met
Liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
Time Frame
Adverse events were collected over 24 months of treatment
Description
The safety analysis set is all randomised subjects who were exposed to at least one dose of study product.
All-Cause Mortality Comment
Not provided
Arm/Groups
ID
Title
Description
Deaths (Affected)
Deaths (At Risk)
Serious Events (Affected)
Serious Events (At Risk)
Other Events (Affected)
Other Events (At Risk)
EG000
Lira 0.6 + Met
Liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 0.6 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
36
242
132
242
EG001
Lira 1.2 + Met
Liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.2 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
25
240
144
240
EG002
Lira 1.8 + Met
Liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
16
242
158
242
EG003
Met Mono
Metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo + glimepiride placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
9
121
44
121
EG004
Met + Glim
Glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
24
242
128
242
Serious Adverse Events
Term
Organ System
Source Vocabulary
Assessment Type
Notes
Statistical Information
Angina pectoris
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 events2 affected242 at risk
EG0012 events2 affected240 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0030 events0 affected121 at risk
EG0040 events0 affected242 at risk
Acute myocardial infarction
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 events2 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Myocardial infarction
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Atrial fibrillation
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0022 events2 affected242 at risk
EG003
Coronary artery disease
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Acute coronary syndrome
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Atrial flutter
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Cardiac arrest
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Cardiac failure
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Congestive cardiomyopathy
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Coronary artery occlusion
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Myocardial ischaemia
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Right ventricular failure
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected242 at risk
EG003
Tachycardia paroxysmal
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Ventricular tachycardia
Cardiac disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Fall
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 events2 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Ankle fracture
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Concussion
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0002 events2 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Humerus fracture
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Road traffic accident
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Brain contusion
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Femur fracture
Infections and infestations
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Hip fracture
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Joint dislocation
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Joint injury
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Sympathetic nerve injury
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected242 at risk
EG003
Wound
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Inguinal hernia
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0022 events2 affected242 at risk
EG003
Duodenal ulcer
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected242 at risk
EG003
Duodenal ulcer haemorrhage
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Femoral hernia, obstructive
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Gastric ulcer
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Gastritis
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Hiatus hernia
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Mallory-Weiss syndrome
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Pancreatitis
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Pancreatitis acute
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Umbilical hernia
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected242 at risk
EG003
Osteoarthritis
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Musculoskeletal pain
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0012 events2 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Back pain
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Intervertebral disc disorder
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Intervertebral disc protrusion
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected242 at risk
EG003
Muscle disorder
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Osteolysis
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Spinal column stenosis
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Tendon disorder
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Pyelonephritis
Infections and infestations
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0022 events2 affected242 at risk
EG003
Abscess sweat gland
Infections and infestations
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Erysipelas
Infections and infestations
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Infected skin ulcer
Infections and infestations
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Infection
Infections and infestations
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Osteomyelitis
Infections and infestations
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Tuberculosis
Infections and infestations
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Upper respiratory tract infection
Infections and infestations
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Wound sepsis
Infections and infestations
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Colon adenoma
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Colon cancer
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Hepatic neoplasm malignant
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Lung carcinoma cell type unspecified recurrent
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected242 at risk
EG003
Malignant lymphoma unclassifiable high grade
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Prostate cancer
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Rectal cancer
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Renal cell carcinoma
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Thyroid cancer
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Thyroid neoplasm
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Uterine leiomyoma
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Carotid artery stenosis
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Cerebral hypoperfusion
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Cerebrovascular accident
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Diabetic neuropathy
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected242 at risk
EG003
Haemorrhage intracranial
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Headache
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Subarachnoid haemorrhage
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Goitre
Endocrine disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0022 events2 affected242 at risk
EG003
Autoimmune thyroiditis
Endocrine disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Nephrolithiasis
Renal and urinary disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Renal failure acute
Renal and urinary disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Calculus ureteric
Renal and urinary disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Obstructive airways disorder
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Pulmonary embolism
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Pulmonary oedema
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Sleep apnoea syndrome
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Snoring
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Hernia
General disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Chest pain
General disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Pyrexia
General disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Cataract
Eye disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Uveitis
Eye disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected242 at risk
EG003
Blood calcitonin increased
Investigations
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Electrocardiogram abnormal
Investigations
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Heart rate increased
Investigations
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Benign prostatic hyperplasia
Reproductive system and breast disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Menorrhagia
Reproductive system and breast disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Testicular pain
Reproductive system and breast disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Angioedema
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Penile ulceration
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Skin ulcer
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Arterial stenosis limb
Vascular disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Arteriosclerosis
Vascular disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected242 at risk
EG003
Circulatory collapse
Vascular disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0021 events1 affected242 at risk
EG003
Vertigo
Ear and labyrinth disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Vestibular disorder
Ear and labyrinth disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Hyperglycaemia
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Hypoglycaemia
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0001 events1 affected242 at risk
EG0010 events0 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Hepatic cirrhosis
Hepatobiliary disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0000 events0 affected242 at risk
EG0011 events1 affected240 at risk
EG0020 events0 affected242 at risk
EG003
Other Adverse Events
Term
Organ System
Source Vocabulary
Assessment Type
Notes
Statistical Information
Nasopharyngitis
Infections and infestations
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG00069 events43 affected242 at risk
EG00170 events36 affected240 at risk
EG00243 events36 affected242 at risk
EG00321 events12 affected121 at risk
EG00480 events49 affected242 at risk
Influenza
Infections and infestations
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG00017 events14 affected242 at risk
EG00118 events15 affected240 at risk
EG00227 events17 affected242 at risk
EG003
Upper respiratory tract infection
Infections and infestations
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG00016 events11 affected242 at risk
EG00119 events14 affected240 at risk
EG00219 events15 affected242 at risk
EG003
Bronchitis
Infections and infestations
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG00010 events10 affected242 at risk
EG00116 events13 affected240 at risk
EG00213 events12 affected242 at risk
EG003
Nausea
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG00033 events30 affected242 at risk
EG00150 events42 affected240 at risk
EG00270 events52 affected242 at risk
EG003
Diarrhoea
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG00040 events31 affected242 at risk
EG00143 events27 affected240 at risk
EG00250 events40 affected242 at risk
EG003
Vomiting
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG00021 events19 affected242 at risk
EG00122 events18 affected240 at risk
EG00226 events24 affected242 at risk
EG003
Dyspepsia
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG00013 events12 affected242 at risk
EG0016 events6 affected240 at risk
EG00227 events22 affected242 at risk
EG003
Gastritis
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG00011 events10 affected242 at risk
EG00111 events8 affected240 at risk
EG00213 events13 affected242 at risk
EG003
Toothache
Gastrointestinal disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0006 events6 affected242 at risk
EG00114 events13 affected240 at risk
EG0028 events7 affected242 at risk
EG003
Back pain
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG00021 events16 affected242 at risk
EG00117 events15 affected240 at risk
EG00220 events17 affected242 at risk
EG003
Arthralgia
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG00015 events14 affected242 at risk
EG0015 events5 affected240 at risk
EG00212 events9 affected242 at risk
EG003
Headache
Nervous system disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG00041 events26 affected242 at risk
EG00140 events34 affected240 at risk
EG00251 events35 affected242 at risk
EG003
Anorexia
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0006 events6 affected242 at risk
EG00110 events10 affected240 at risk
EG00217 events15 affected242 at risk
EG003
Decreased appetite
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0004 events4 affected242 at risk
EG00115 events14 affected240 at risk
EG00210 events10 affected242 at risk
EG003
Hypertension
Vascular disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG00011 events11 affected242 at risk
EG00115 events13 affected240 at risk
EG00211 events11 affected242 at risk
EG003
Cough
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
MedDRA (11.1)
Systematic Assessment
EG0009 events8 affected242 at risk
EG0016 events6 affected240 at risk
EG0023 events2 affected242 at risk
EG003
Certain Agreements
Are all PI(s) employees of the sponsor?
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Results Disclosure Restriction on PI(s)?
Yes
Other Details
Novo Nordisk acknowledges the Investigator's right to publish the entire results of the trial. Any such scientific paper, presentation, communication or other information concerning the investigation described in this protocol, must be submitted in writing to Novo Nordisk Trial Manager prior to submission for publication/presentation for comments. Comments will be given within four weeks from receipt of the manuscript.
Point of Contact
Title
Organization
Phone
Extension
Email
Public Access to Clinical Trials
Novo Nordisk A/S
clinicaltrials@novonordisk.com
ID
Term
D003920
Diabetes Mellitus
D003924
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Ancestor Terms
ID
Term
D044882
Glucose Metabolism Disorders
D008659
Metabolic Diseases
D009750
Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases
D004700
Endocrine System Diseases
Browse Leaves
Not provided
Browse Branches
Not provided
ID
Term
D000069450
Liraglutide
D008687
Metformin
C057619
glimepiride
Ancestor Terms
ID
Term
D052216
Glucagon-Like Peptide 1
D004763
Glucagon-Like Peptides
D052336
Proglucagon
D005768
Gastrointestinal Hormones
D006728
Hormones
D006730
Hormones, Hormone Substitutes, and Hormone Antagonists
D001645
Biguanides
D006146
Guanidines
D000578
Amidines
D009930
Organic Chemicals
Browse Leaves
Not provided
Browse Branches
Not provided
9 subjects
5 subjects
0 subjects
0 subjects
4 subjects
2 subjects
0 subjects
1 subjects
0 subjects
1 subjects
1 subjects
0 subjects
2 subjects
0 subjects
1 subjects
0 subjects
113 subjects
97 subjects
11 subjects
FG00422 subjects
Adverse Event
FG00011 subjects
FG0018 subjects
FG0026 subjects
FG0031 subjects
FG0046 subjects
Lack of Efficacy
FG00041 subjects
FG00133 subjects
FG00237 subjects
FG00327 subjects
FG00463 subjects
Protocol Violation
FG0007 subjects
FG0015 subjects
FG0023 subjects
FG0034 subjects
FG0046 subjects
56.0
± 9.4
BG00457.3± 8.8
BG00556.7± 9.5
100
BG00349
BG004103
BG005454
Male
BG000151
BG001129
BG002142
BG00372
BG004139
BG005633
0
BG0030
BG0040
BG0050
Asian
BG00031
BG00119
BG00218
BG0039
BG00421
BG00598
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
BG0000
BG0010
BG0020
BG0030
BG0040
BG0050
Black or African American
BG0004
BG0019
BG0025
BG0033
BG0045
BG00526
White
BG000202
BG001210
BG002214
BG003106
BG004214
BG005946
More than one race
BG0000
BG0010
BG0020
BG0030
BG0040
BG0050
Unknown or Not Reported
BG0005
BG0012
BG0025
BG0033
BG0042
BG00517
82
BG00341
BG00490
BG005384
Combination therapy
Title
Measurements
BG000161
BG001150
BG002160
BG00380
BG004152
BG005703
30.9
± 4.6
BG00331.6± 4.4
BG00431.2± 4.6
BG00531.0± 4.7
7.8
± 5.2
BG0037.9± 6.0
BG0047.7± 5.3
BG0057.4± 5.2
8.3
± 0.9
BG0038.4± 1.0
BG0048.4± 0.9
BG0058.4± 0.9
1.69
± 0.10
BG0031.69± 0.10
BG0041.69± 0.11
BG0051.69± 0.10
120
OG004234
0.09
± 0.09
OG004-0.98± 0.07
OG002
OG004
Change in HbA1c from baseline to end of treatment at 26 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-0.02
95
-0.19
0.15
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
Hypothesis testing was done in a hierarchical manner. As superiority of liraglutide 1.8 mg + metformin to metformin monotherapy was established, it was investigated whether liraglutide 1.8 mg + metformin was non-inferior to glimepiride + metformin. Non-inferiority was concluded if the upper limit of the 2-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference was below 0.4%.
OG001
OG003
Change in HbA1c from baseline to end of treatment at 26 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-1.06
95
-1.27
-0.85
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
Hypothesis testing was done in a hierarchical manner. First, it was tested whether liraglutide 1.2 mg+metformin was superior to placebo + metformin. Superiority was always concluded if the upper limit of the 2-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference was below 0%.
OG001
OG004
Change in HbA1c from baseline to end of treatment at 26 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
0.01
95
-0.16
0.18
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
Hypothesis testing was done in a hierarchical manner. As superiority of liraglutide 1.2 mg + metformin to metformin monotherapy was established, it was investigated whether liraglutide 1.2 mg + metformin was non-inferior to glimepiride + metformin. Non-inferiority was concluded if the upper limit of the 2-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference was below 0.4%.
OG000
OG003
Change in HbA1c from baseline to end of treatment at 26 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-0.78
95
-0.99
-0.57
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
Hypothesis testing was done in a hierarchical manner. First, it was tested whether liraglutide 0.6 mg+metformin was superior to placebo + metformin. Superiority was always concluded if the upper limit of the 2-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference was below 0%.
OG000
OG004
Change in HbA1c from baseline to end of treatment at 26 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.1026
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
0.29
95
0.12
0.46
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
Hypothesis testing was done in a hierarchical manner. As superiority of liraglutide 0.6 mg + metformin to metformin monotherapy was established, it was investigated whether liraglutide 0.6 mg + metformin was non-inferior to glimepiride + metformin. Non-inferiority was concluded if the upper limit of the 2-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference was below 0.4%.
OG003
OG004
Change in HbA1c from baseline to end of treatment at 26 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-1.07
95
-1.28
-0.86
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A test for superiority of glimepiride+metformin to metformin was performed to verify assay sensitivity. Superiority was always concluded if the upper limit of the 2-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference was below 0%.
Met Mono
Metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo + glimepiride placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG004
Met + Glim
Glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000242
OG001236
OG002241
OG003121
OG004237
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG000-1.78± 0.23
OG001-2.58± 0.24
OG002-2.79± 0.23
OG003-1.51± 0.31
OG0040.95± 0.23
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG002
OG003
Change in body weight from baseline to end of treatment at 26 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline body weight as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.0016
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-1.29
95
-2.16
-0.41
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.8 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG002
OG004
Change in body weight from baseline to end of treatment at 26 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline body weight as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-3.75
95
-4.48
-3.01
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.8 mg + metformin and glimepiride + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG001
OG003
Change in body weight from baseline to end of treatment at 26 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline body weight as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.0117
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-1.07
95
-1.94
-0.19
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.2 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG001
OG004
Change in body weight from baseline to end of treatment at 26 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline body weight as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-3.53
95
-4.27
-2.79
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.2 mg + metformin and glimepirde + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG000
OG003
Change in body weight from baseline to end of treatment at 26 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline body weight as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.8198
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-0.28
95
-1.15
0.60
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 0.6 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG000
OG004
Change in body weight from baseline to end of treatment at 26 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline body weight as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-2.73
95
-3.47
-2.00
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 0.6 mg + metformin and glimepirde + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
Met Mono
Metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo + glimepiride placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG004
Met + Glim
Glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000242
OG001236
OG002241
OG003121
OG004237
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG000-2.07± 0.28
OG001-3.03± 0.29
OG002-2.91± 0.28
OG003-1.80± 0.38
OG0040.70± 0.29
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG002
OG003
Change in body weight from baseline to end of treatment at 104 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline body weight as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.0378
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-1.11
95
-2.18
-0.05
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.8 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG002
OG004
Change in body weight from baseline to end of treatment at 104 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline body weight as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-3.61
95
-4.51
-2.72
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.8 mg + metformin and glimepiride + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG001
OG003
Change in body weight from baseline to end of treatment at 104 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline body weight as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.0185
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-1.23
95
-2.30
-0.16
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.2 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG001
OG004
Change in body weight from baseline to end of treatment at 104 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline body weight as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-3.73
95
-4.64
-2.83
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.2 mg + metformin and glimepirde + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG000
OG003
Change in body weight from baseline to end of treatment at 104 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline body weight as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.9069
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-0.27
95
-1.33
0.80
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 0.6 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG000
OG004
Change in body weight from baseline to end of treatment at 104 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline body weight as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-2.77
95
-3.67
-1.87
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 0.6 mg + metformin and glimepirde + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG003
Met Mono
Metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo + glimepiride placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG004
Met + Glim
Glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000238
OG001234
OG002235
OG003116
OG004234
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG000-1.13± 0.15
OG001-1.63± 0.16
OG002-1.68± 0.15
OG0030.40± 0.21
OG004-1.31± 0.16
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG002
OG003
Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to end of treatment at 26 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline fasting plasma glucose as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-2.09
95
-2.68
-1.50
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.8 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG002
OG004
Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to end of treatment at 26 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline fasting plasma glucose as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.1845
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-0.38
95
-0.87
0.11
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.8 mg + metformin and glimepiride + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG001
OG003
Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to end of treatment at 26 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline fasting plasma glucose as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-2.04
95
-2.63
-1.44
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.2 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG001
OG004
Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to end of treatment at 26 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline fasting plasma glucose t as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.3047
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-0.33
95
-0.82
0.17
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.2 mg + metformin and glimepirde + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG000
OG003
Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to end of treatment at 26 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline fasting plasma glucose as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-1.53
95
-2.12
-0.94
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 0.6 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG000
OG004
Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to end of treatment at 26 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline fasting plasma glucose as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.8079
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
0.18
95
-0.32
0.67
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 0.6 mg + metformin and glimepirde + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG003
Met Mono
Metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo + glimepiride placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG004
Met + Glim
Glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000238
OG001233
OG002234
OG003116
OG004234
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG000-0.80± 0.17
OG001-1.20± 0.18
OG002-1.18± 0.17
OG0030.75± 0.23
OG004-0.64± 0.17
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG002
OG003
Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to end of treatment at 104 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline fasting plasma glucose as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-1.93
95
-2.58
-1.28
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.8 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG002
OG004
Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to end of treatment at 104 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline fasting plasma glucose as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.0542
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-0.53
95
-1.08
0.01
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.8 mg + metformin and glimepiride + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG001
OG003
Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to end of treatment at 104 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline fasting plasma glucose as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-1.95
95
-2.60
-1.30
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.2 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG001
OG004
Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to end of treatment at 104 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline fasting plasma glucose t as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.0451
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-0.55
95
-1.10
-0.01
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.2 mg + metformin and glimepirde + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG000
OG003
Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to end of treatment at 104 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline fasting plasma glucose as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-1.55
95
-2.20
-0.90
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 0.6 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG000
OG004
Change in fasting plasma glucose from baseline to end of treatment at 104 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline fasting plasma glucose as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.9006
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-0.15
95
-0.70
0.39
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 0.6 mg + metformin and glimepirde + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG002
Lira 1.8 + Met
Liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG003
Met Mono
Metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo + glimepiride placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG004
Met + Glim
Glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000214
OG001207
OG002205
OG00390
OG004213
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG000-0.23± 0.12
OG001-0.40± 0.13
OG002-0.56± 0.12
OG003-0.44± 0.18
OG004-0.44± 0.12
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG002
OG003
Change in prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline to 26 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.8871
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-0.13
95
-0.62
0.36
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.8 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG002
OG004
Change in prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline to 26 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.8695
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-0.12
95
-0.51
0.27
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.8 mg + metformin and glimepiride + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG001
OG003
Change in prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline to 26 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.9994
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
0.03
95
-0.46
0.52
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.2 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG001
OG004
Change in prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline to 26 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.9984
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
0.04
95
-0.35
0.43
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.2 mg + metformin and glimepirde + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG000
OG003
Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline to 26 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.6201
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
0.21
95
-0.28
0.70
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 0.6 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG000
OG004
Change in mean prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline to 26 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.4831
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
0.21
95
-0.18
0.60
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 0.6 mg + metformin and glimepirde + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG003
Met Mono
Metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo + glimepiride placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG004
Met + Glim
Glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000239
OG001231
OG002235
OG003120
OG004234
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG000-0.36± 0.08
OG001-0.56± 0.08
OG002-0.58± 0.08
OG0030.25± 0.10
OG004-0.50± 0.08
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG002
OG003
Change in HbA1c from baseline to end of treatment at 104 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-0.83
95
-1.07
-0.59
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
Hypothesis testing was done in a hierarchical manner. First, it was tested whether liraglutide 1.8 mg+metformin was superior to placebo + metformin. Superiority was always concluded if the upper limit of the 2-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference was below 0%.
OG002
OG004
Change in HbA1c from baseline to end of treatment at 104 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-0.08
95
-0.28
0.12
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
Hypothesis testing was done in a hierarchical manner. As superiority of liraglutide 1.8 mg + metformin to metformin monotherapy was established, it was investigated whether liraglutide 1.8 mg + metformin was non-inferior to glimepiride + metformin. Non-inferiority was concluded if the upper limit of the 2-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference was below 0.4%.
OG001
OG003
Change in HbA1c from baseline to end of treatment was at 104 weeks analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-0.81
95
-1.05
-0.57
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
Hypothesis testing was done in a hierarchical manner. First, it was tested whether liraglutide 1.2 mg+metformin was superior to placebo + metformin. Superiority was always concluded if the upper limit of the 2-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference was below 0%.
OG001
OG004
Change in HbA1c from baseline to end of treatment at 104 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-0.07
95
-0.27
0.13
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
Hypothesis testing was done in a hierarchical manner. As superiority of liraglutide 1.2 mg + metformin to metformin monotherapy was established, it was investigated whether liraglutide 1.2 mg + metformin was non-inferior to glimepiride + metformin. Non-inferiority was concluded if the upper limit of the 2-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference was below 0.4%.
OG000
OG003
Change in HbA1c from baseline to end of treatment at 104 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-0.61
95
-0.85
-0.37
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
Hypothesis testing was done in a hierarchical manner. First, it was tested whether liraglutide 0.6 mg+metformin was superior to placebo + metformin.
Superiority was always concluded if the upper limit of the 2-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference was below 0%.
OG000
OG004
Change in HbA1c from baseline to end of treatment at 104 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.0052
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
0.14
95
-0.06
0.34
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
Hypothesis testing was done in a hierarchical manner. As superiority of liraglutide 0.6 mg + metformin to metformin monotherapy was established, it was investigated whether liraglutide 0.6 mg + metformin was non-inferior to glimepiride + metformin. Non-inferiority was concluded if the upper limit of the 2-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference was below 0.4%.
OG003
OG004
Change in HbA1c from baseline to end of treatment at 104 weeks was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline glycosylated A1c (HbA1c) as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-0.75
95
-0.99
-0.51
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A test for superiority of glimepiride+metformin to placebo metformin was performed to verify assay sensitivity. Superiority was always concluded if the upper limit of the 2-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference was below 0%.
OG002
Lira 1.8 + Met
Liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG003
Met Mono
Metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo + glimepiride placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG004
Met + Glim
Glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000218
OG001208
OG002206
OG00390
OG004215
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG000-0.27± 0.12
OG001-0.56± 0.13
OG002-0.44± 0.13
OG003-0.20± 0.18
OG004-0.29± 0.13
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG002
OG003
Change in prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline to 104 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.5282
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-0.24
95
-0.74
0.26
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.8 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG002
OG004
Change in prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline to 104 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.7644
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-0.15
95
-0.55
0.25
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.8 mg + metformin and glimepiride + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG001
OG003
Change in prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline to 104 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.2063
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-0.36
95
-0.86
0.14
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.2 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG001
OG004
Change in prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline to 104 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.2678
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-0.28
95
-0.68
0.12
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.2 mg + metformin and glimepirde + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG000
OG003
Change in prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline to 104 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.9887
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-0.07
95
-0.57
0.43
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 0.6 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG000
OG004
Change in prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline to 104 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.9998
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
0.02
95
-0.38
0.42
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 0.6 mg + metformin and glimepirde + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
Liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG003
Met Mono
Metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo + glimepiride placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG004
Met + Glim
Glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000214
OG001207
OG002205
OG00390
OG004214
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG000-1.68± 0.16
OG001-2.33± 0.17
OG002-2.57± 0.16
OG003-0.62± 0.24
OG004-2.46± 0.16
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG002
OG003
Change in post prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline to 26 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-1.95
95
-2.60
-1.30
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.8 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG002
OG004
Change in post prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline to 26 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.9670
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-0.11
95
-0.62
0.41
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.8 mg + metformin and glimepiride + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG001
OG003
Change in post prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline to 26 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-1.72
95
-2.36
-1.07
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.2 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG001
OG004
Change in post prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline to 26 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.9368
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
0.13
95
-0.39
0.64
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.2 mg + metformin and glimepirde + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG000
OG003
Change in post prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline to 26 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.0003
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-1.06
95
-1.71
-0.42
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 0.6 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG000
OG004
Change in post prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline to 26 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.0008
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
0.78
95
0.27
1.29
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 0.6 mg + metformin and glimepirde + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
Liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG003
Met Mono
Metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo + glimepiride placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG004
Met + Glim
Glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000218
OG001208
OG002206
OG00390
OG004216
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG000-1.59± 0.18
OG001-2.22± 0.18
OG002-2.10± 0.18
OG003-0.43± 0.26
OG004-1.80± 0.18
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG002
OG003
Change in post prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline to 104 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-1.66
95
-2.37
-0.96
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.8 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG002
OG004
Change in post prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline to 104 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.5048
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-0.30
95
-0.86
0.26
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.8 mg + metformin and glimepiride + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG001
OG003
Change in post prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline to 104 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
<0.0001
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-1.79
95
-2.49
-1.08
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.2 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG001
OG004
Change in post prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline to 104 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.2005
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-0.42
95
-0.98
0.14
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.2 mg + metformin and glimepirde + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG000
OG003
Change in post prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline to 104 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.0003
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-1.16
95
-1.86
-0.46
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 0.6 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG000
OG004
Change in post prandial increments of plasma glucose from baseline to 104 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.7871
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
0.21
95
-0.35
0.76
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 0.6 mg + metformin and glimepirde + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
Liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG003
Met Mono
Metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo + glimepiride placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG004
Met + Glim
Glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000229
OG001224
OG002224
OG003109
OG004226
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00020.45± 5.19
OG00120.33± 5.34
OG00226.12± 5.20
OG003-1.63± 7.19
OG00424.68± 5.25
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG002
OG003
Change in HOMA-B from baseline to 26 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.0031
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
27.75
95
7.83
47.67
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.8 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG002
OG004
Change in HOMA-B from baseline to 26 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.9987
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
1.44
95
-15.03
17.90
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.8 mg + metformin and glimepiride + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG001
OG003
Change in HOMA-B from baseline to 26 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.0263
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
21.96
95
2.04
41.87
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.2 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG001
OG004
Change in HOMA-B from baseline to 26 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.9227
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-4.36
95
-20.94
12.22
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.2 mg + metformin and glimepirde + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG000
OG003
Change in HOMA-B from baseline to 26 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.0253
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
22.08
95
2.15
42.01
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 0.6 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG000
OG004
Change in HOMA-B from baseline to 26 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.9293
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
-4.23
95
-20.78
12.31
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 0.6 mg + metformin and glimepirde + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
Liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + glimepiride placebo + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label liraglutide 1.8 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG003
Met Mono
Metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo + glimepiride placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG004
Met + Glim
Glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000230
OG001224
OG002224
OG003110
OG004226
Title
Denominators
Categories
Title
Measurements
OG00064.48± 24.93
OG00127.30± 25.70
OG00217.81± 25.03
OG003-7.89± 34.47
OG00411.25± 25.27
Group IDs
Group Description
Statistical Method
Statistical Comment
P-Value
P-Value Comment
Parameter Type
Parameter Value
Dispersion Type
Dispersion Value
Confidence Interval Sides
Confidence Interval %
CI Lower Limit
CI Upper Limit
CI Lower Limit Comment
CI Upper Limit Comment
Estimate Comment
Tested Non-Inferiority
Non-Inferiority Type
Non-Inferiority Comment
Other Analysis Description
OG002
OG003
Change in HOMA-B from baseline to 104 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.8821
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
25.71
95
-69.84
121.26
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.8 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG002
OG004
Change in HOMA-B from baseline to 104 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.9989
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
6.56
95
-72.66
85.79
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.8 mg + metformin and glimepiride + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG001
OG003
Change in HOMA-B from baseline to 104 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.7292
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
35.20
95
-60.33
130.72
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.2 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG001
OG004
Change in HOMA-B from baseline to 104 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.9689
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
16.05
95
-63.69
95.79
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 1.2 mg + metformin and glimepirde + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG000
OG003
Change in HOMA-B from baseline to 104 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.1818
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
72.38
95
-23.15
167.90
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 0.6 mg + metformin and placebo + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG000
OG004
Change in HOMA-B from baseline to 104 weeks of treatment was analyzed using an analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) model with treatment, country and previous anti-diabetic treatment as fixed effects and baseline value as covariate.
ANCOVA
0.2978
Estimated treatment difference, LS Mean
53.23
95
-26.30
132.76
Non-Inferiority or Equivalence
A two-sided 95% CI for the treatment difference between liraglutide 0.6 mg + metformin and glimepirde + metfomine was calculated. If the upper limit of the 95% CI was below 0%, it was concluded that the given dose of liraglutide in combination with metformin was better than the comparator therapy.
OG003
Met Mono
Metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo + glimepiride placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG004
Met + Glim
Glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
Units
Counts
Participants
OG000242
OG001240
OG002242
OG003121
OG004242
Title
Denominators
Categories
Major
Title
Measurements
OG0000
OG0010
OG0020
OG0030
OG0040
Minor
Title
Measurements
OG00015
OG0013
OG0029
OG003
Symptoms only
Title
Measurements
OG00017
OG0017
OG00222
OG003
OG003
Met Mono
Metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo + glimepiride placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)
OG004
Met + Glim
Glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day + liraglutide placebo, weeks 0-26 (double-blinded period) and open-label glimepiride 4 mg/day + metformin 1.5-2.0 g/day in the extension period (weeks 26-104)