Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
We hypothesize that the use of absorbable staples to close cesarean skin incisions will cause less pain, have better long-term cosmetic results, and result in improved patient satisfaction over standard metal staples. We expect to see no difference in wound complication rates with these two cesarean skin closure techniques.
Type: Randomized controlled trial
Selection of Patients: All pregnant women, undergoing a primary (their first) cesarean delivery at Thomas Jefferson University Hospital will be offered randomization regardless of indication for cesarean delivery. Patients will be excluded from the study if they have a history of a previous cesarean delivery, history of a previous Pfannensteil skin incision for an indication other than for a cesarean delivery (i.e. myomectomy, laparotomy), or a planned vertical skin incision prior to randomization.
Randomization:
Patients will be randomized to skin closure with either the standard staples or the Insorbâ„¢ absorbable staple using a computer-generated random number sequence in blocks of six and ten. Allocation will be concealed in opaque, sealed study envelopes that are held on labor and delivery until after consent is obtained. Patients will not be masked as to the type of stapler used however, the investigator obtaining outcome data at six months will be masked.
Procedure:
The cesarean delivery should be performed in the usual fashion according to the surgeon's preference.
We recommend:
Skin incisions will be closed with the assigned stapling device. Addison tissue forceps will be used to evert the skin edges. The recommended distance between staples is 8 to 10mm; however this can be altered at the discretion of the operating physician.
Follow Up:
The subject's age, race, gravidity, parity, reported weight, indication for cesarean delivery, medical co-morbidity, delivery associated complications and findings, charted pain medication and clinic status will be assessed by chart review. Pain, time of placement, patient satisfaction, and cosmetic outcome will be assessed by data sheets filled out by the OR staff, physicians, and patients.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Insorb absorbable skin staple | Device |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Post operative pain |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Length of time of skin closure | ||
| Costs | ||
| Cosmetic outcome |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Jason K. Baxter, MD, MSCP | Thomas Jefferson University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thomas Jefferson University Hospital | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19107 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 9350017 | Background | Frishman GN, Schwartz T, Hogan JW. Closure of Pfannenstiel skin incisions. Staples vs. subcuticular suture. J Reprod Med. 1997 Oct;42(10):627-30. | |
| 1467895 | Background | Ranaboldo CJ, Rowe-Jones DC. Closure of laparotomy wounds: skin staples versus sutures. Br J Surg. 1992 Nov;79(11):1172-3. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800791122. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Wound disruption rate |
| Infection rate |
| Patient Satisfaction |
| 12804476 | Background | Alderdice F, McKenna D, Dornan J. Techniques and materials for skin closure in caesarean section. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(2):CD003577. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003577. |
| 16334959 | Background | Fick JL, Novo RE, Kirchhof N. Comparison of gross and histologic tissue responses of skin incisions closed by use of absorbable subcuticular staples, cutaneous metal staples, and polyglactin 910 suture in pigs. Am J Vet Res. 2005 Nov;66(11):1975-84. doi: 10.2460/ajvr.2005.66.1975. |
| 6338996 | Background | Pickford IR, Brennan SS, Evans M, Pollock AV. Two methods of skin closure in abdominal operations: a controlled clinical trial. Br J Surg. 1983 Apr;70(4):226-8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800700414. |
| 2501713 | Background | Zwart HJ, de Ruiter P. Subcuticular, continuous and mechanical skin closure: cosmetic results of a prospective randomized trial. Neth J Surg. 1989 Jun;41(3):57-60. No abstract available. |