Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a Phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter study evaluating the efficacy of retreatment with rituximab in subjects with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are receiving Methotrexate (MTX).
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm A: Rituximab Retreatment | Experimental | 1000 mg rituximab intravenous initial treatment on day 1 and day 15 plus 10-25 mg/week methotrexate followed by re-treatment during weeks 24 -40 consisting of two additional doses of 1000 mg rituximab 14 days apart plus 10-25 mg/week methotrexate. |
|
| Arm B: Placebo Retreatment | Placebo Comparator | 1000 mg rituximab intravenous initial treatment on day 1 and day 15 plus 10-25 mg/week methotrexate followed by retreatment during weeks 24 -40 consisting of two doses of placebo 14 days apart plus 10-25 mg/week methotrexate. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| placebo | Drug | Intravenous repeating dose |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Retreated Subjects With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 48 Relative to Baseline | ACR20 response was defined as a ≥ 20% improvement compared with baseline in both tender joint count (TJC) [68 joints] and swollen joint count (SJC) [66 joints] as well as a ≥ 20% improvement in three of five additional measurements: 1) Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity]; 2) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity]; 3) Patient's Assessment of Pain [visual analog scale: 0=no pain to 100=unbearable pain]; 4) Health Assessment Questionnaire [20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do] and 5) erythrocyte sedimentation rate. | 48 Weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Retreated Subjects With American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response and American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 48 Relative to Baseline | ACR50 or ACR70 response was defined as a ≥ 50% or 70% improvement compared with baseline in both tender joint count (TJC) [68 joints] and swollen joint count (SJC) [66 joints] as well as a ≥ 50% or 70% improvement in three of five additional measurements: 1) Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity]; 2) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity]; 3) Patient's Assessment of Pain [visual analog scale: 0=no pain to 100=unbearable pain]; 4) Health Assessment Questionnaire [20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do] and 5) erythrocyte sedimentation rate. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Anshu Vashishtha, MD PhD | Genentech, Inc. | Study Director |
Not provided
559 participants received initial treatment open label rituximab. 84 of these participants were not randomized to Retreatment.
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Arm A: Rituximab Retreatment | 1000 mg rituximab intravenous initial treatment on day 1 and day 15 plus 10-25 mg/week methotrexate followed by re-treatment during weeks 24 -40 consisting of two additional doses of 1000 mg rituximab 14 days apart plus 10-25 mg/week methotrexate. |
| FG001 | Arm B: Placebo Retreatment | 1000 mg rituximab intravenous initial treatment on day 1 and day 15 plus 10-25 mg/week methotrexate followed by retreatment during weeks 24 -40 consisting of two doses of placebo 14 days apart plus 10-25 mg/week methotrexate. |
| FG002 | Rituximab-Not Randomized to Retreatment | 1000 mg rituximab intravenous initial treatment on day 1 and day 15 plus 10-25 mg/week methotrexate. Participants were not randomized to Retreatment. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Initial Treatment |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Retreatment: Up to Week 48 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Retreatment: Week 48 to Week 72 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Arm A: Rituximab Retreatment | 1000 mg rituximab intravenous initial treatment on day 1 and day 15 plus 10-25 mg/week methotrexate followed by re-treatment during weeks 24 -40 consisting of two additional doses of 1000 mg rituximab 14 days apart plus 10-25 mg/week methotrexate. |
| BG001 | Arm B: Placebo Retreatment |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Baseline measures are based on the Intent-to-treat population that includes all participants randomized to Retreatment. |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Retreated Subjects With an American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) Response at Week 48 Relative to Baseline | ACR20 response was defined as a ≥ 20% improvement compared with baseline in both tender joint count (TJC) [68 joints] and swollen joint count (SJC) [66 joints] as well as a ≥ 20% improvement in three of five additional measurements: 1) Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity]; 2) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity]; 3) Patient's Assessment of Pain [visual analog scale: 0=no pain to 100=unbearable pain]; 4) Health Assessment Questionnaire [20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do] and 5) erythrocyte sedimentation rate. | Intent-to-treat population includes all participants randomized to Retreatment. | Posted | Number | Participants | 48 Weeks |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Arm A: Rituximab Retreatment | 1000 mg rituximab intravenous initial treatment on day 1 and day 15 plus 10-25 mg/week methotrexate followed by re-treatment during weeks 24 -40 consisting of two additional doses of 1000 mg rituximab 14 days apart plus 10-25 mg/week methotrexate. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical Communications Specialist | Genentech, Inc. | 800-821-8590 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001172 | Arthritis, Rheumatoid |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000069283 | Rituximab |
| D008727 | Methotrexate |
| D005492 | Folic Acid |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D058846 | Antibodies, Monoclonal, Murine-Derived |
| D000911 | Antibodies, Monoclonal |
| D000906 | Antibodies |
| D007136 | Immunoglobulins |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| rituximab |
| Drug |
Intravenous repeating dose |
|
| methotrexate | Drug | Oral or parenteral repeating dose |
|
| folate | Drug | Intravenous repeating dose |
|
| Baseline, Week 48 |
| Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score Using 28 Joint Counts (DAS28-ESR) at Week 48 | The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 2 to 10. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | 48 weeks |
| Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28-CRP) at Week 48 | The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) for a total possible score of 2 to 10. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Baseline, Week 48 |
| Percentage of Retreated Subjects With a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 48 | Change of the Disease Activity Score 28 score from baseline was used to determine EULAR responses of good, moderate, or no response. For a post-baseline score ≤ 3.2, a change from baseline of < -1.2 was a good response, < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2 was a moderate response, and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score > 3.2 to ≤ 5.1, a change from baseline of < -0.6 was a moderate response and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score > 5.1, a change from baseline < -1.2 was a moderate response and ≥ -1.2 was no response. A good response could not be achieved for post-baseline scores > 3.2. | Baseline, Week 48 |
| Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set Component: Swollen Joint Count at Week 48 | A Rheumatologist or an skilled arthritis assessor evaluated 66 joints at baseline and at Week 48. A negative change from baseline in Swollen Joint Count indicates improvement. | Baseline, Week 48 |
| Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set Component: Tender Joint Count at Week 48 | A Rheumatologist or an skilled arthritis assessor evaluated 68 joints at baseline and at Week 48. A negative change from baseline in the Tender Joint Count indicates improvement. | Baseline, Week 48 |
| Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 48 | The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) is a patient completed questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip,and common daily activities. Each domain has at least two component questions. There are four possible responses for each component ranging from 0(without any difficulty) to 4 (unable to do).HAQ-DI=sum of worst scores in each domain divided by the number of domains answered. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Baseline, Week 48 |
| Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set Component: Subject's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 48 | Participants rated their disease activity at baseline and Week 48 using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on a scale of 0 (best) to 100 (worse). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Baseline, Week 48 |
| Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 48 | A Rheumatologist or a skilled Arthritis assessor rated the patient's disease activity at baseline and Week 48 using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on a scale of 0 (best) to 100 (worse). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Baseline, Week 48 |
| Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set Component: Subject's Assessment of Pain at Week 48 | Patients rated their pain at baseline and Week 48 using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on a scale of 0 (none) to 100 (unbearable pain). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Baseline, Week 48 |
| Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set Component: C-Reactive Protein at Week 48 | Blood was collected for C-Reactive Protein, an inflammatory marker, at Baseline and Week 48. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Baseline, Week 48 |
| Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set Component: Erythrocyte Sedimentation (ESR) at Week 48 | Blood was collected for Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, an inflammatory marker, at Baseline and Week 48. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Baseline, Week 48 |
| Percentage of Retreated Subjects With a Change ≥ 0.22 From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 48 | The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) is a patient completed questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Each domain has at least two component questions. There are four possible responses for each component ranging from 0(without any difficulty) to 4 (unable to do). HAQ-DI=sum of worst scores in each domain divided by the number of domains answered. | Baseline, Week 48 |
| Percentage of Retreated Subjects With a Change ≥ 0.3 From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 48 | The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) is a patient completed questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Each domain has at least two component questions. There are four possible responses for each component ranging from 0(without any difficulty) to 4 (unable to do).HAQ-DI=sum of worst scores in each domain divided by the number of domains answered. | Baseline, Week 48 |
| ACRn in Retreated Subjects at Week 48 | The ACRn is calculated for each participant by taking the lowest percentage improvement in (1) swollen joint count or (2) tender joint count or (3) the median of the remaining 5 components of the ACR response (participant's assessment of disease activity; participant's global assessment of pain; physician's assessment of disease activity; participant's assessment of physical function; an acute phase reactant value - CRP). A positive ACRn Score indicates an improvement. | Baseline, Week 48 |
| Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Summary Scores at Week 48 in Retreated Subjects | The SF-36 is a questionnaire used to assess physical functioning and is made up of eight domains: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional and Mental Health. Transforming and standardizing these domains leads to the calculation of the Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component Summary measures. Scores ranging from 0 to 100, with 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. | Baseline, Week 48 |
| Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) at Week 48 in Retreated Subjects | FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Patients scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the patient's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the patient's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the patient's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the patient's health status. | Baseline, Week 48 |
| Percentage of Retreated Subjects Achieving DAS28-ESR Remission at Week 48 | DAS28-ESR remission was defined as a DAS28-ESR < 2.6 | Week 48 |
| Percentage of Retreated Subjects Achieving DAS28-ESR Low Disease at Week 48 | The DAS28-ESR score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity (mm), and ESR. DAS28-ESR scores range from 0 - 10. Low disease activity is defined as achieving a DAS28-ESR score of less than or equal to 3.2. | Week 48 |
| Subject/Guardian decision to withdraw |
|
| Physician decision to withdraw |
|
| Pregnancy |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
1000 mg rituximab initial treatment on day 1 and day 15 plus 10-25 mg/wk methotrexate followed by re-treatment during weeks 24 -40 consisting of two doses of placebo 14 days apart plus 10-25 mg/wk methotrexate. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Count of Participants |
| Participants |
|
| Age Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| OG000 |
| Arm A: Rituximab Retreatment |
1000 mg rituximab intravenous initial treatment on day 1 and day 15 plus 10-25 mg/week methotrexate followed by re-treatment during weeks 24 -40 consisting of two additional doses of 1000 mg rituximab 14 days apart plus 10-25 mg/week methotrexate. |
| OG001 | Arm B: Placebo Retreatment | 1000 mg rituximab initial treatment on day 1 and day 15 plus 10-25 mg/wk methotrexate followed by re-treatment during weeks 24 -40 consisting of two doses of placebo 14 days apart plus 10-25 mg/wk methotrexate. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Retreated Subjects With American College of Rheumatology 50% (ACR50) Response and American College of Rheumatology 70% (ACR70) Response at Week 48 Relative to Baseline | ACR50 or ACR70 response was defined as a ≥ 50% or 70% improvement compared with baseline in both tender joint count (TJC) [68 joints] and swollen joint count (SJC) [66 joints] as well as a ≥ 50% or 70% improvement in three of five additional measurements: 1) Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity]; 2) Patient's Global Assessment of Disease Activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity]; 3) Patient's Assessment of Pain [visual analog scale: 0=no pain to 100=unbearable pain]; 4) Health Assessment Questionnaire [20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip, and activities, 0=without difficulty to 3=unable to do] and 5) erythrocyte sedimentation rate. | Intent-to-treat population includes all participants randomized to Retreatment. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Week 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in the Disease Activity Score Using 28 Joint Counts (DAS28-ESR) at Week 48 | The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and the erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) for a total possible score of 2 to 10. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, that includes all participants randomized to Retreatment, with data available for analyses. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | 48 weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Disease Activity Score (DAS28-CRP) at Week 48 | The DAS28 score is a measure of the patient's disease activity calculated using the tender joint count (TJC) [28 joints], swollen joint count (SJC) [28 joints], patient's global assessment of disease activity [visual analog scale: 0=no disease activity to 100=maximum disease activity] and C-Reactive Protein (CRP) for a total possible score of 2 to 10. Higher values indicate higher disease activity. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Participants from the Intent-to-treat population that includes all participants randomized to Retreatment with data available for analyses. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Units on a scale | Baseline, Week 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Retreated Subjects With a European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) Response at Week 48 | Change of the Disease Activity Score 28 score from baseline was used to determine EULAR responses of good, moderate, or no response. For a post-baseline score ≤ 3.2, a change from baseline of < -1.2 was a good response, < -0.6 to ≥ -1.2 was a moderate response, and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score > 3.2 to ≤ 5.1, a change from baseline of < -0.6 was a moderate response and ≥ -0.6 was no response. For a post-baseline score > 5.1, a change from baseline < -1.2 was a moderate response and ≥ -1.2 was no response. A good response could not be achieved for post-baseline scores > 3.2. | Intent-to-treat population includes all participants randomized to Retreatment. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Baseline, Week 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set Component: Swollen Joint Count at Week 48 | A Rheumatologist or an skilled arthritis assessor evaluated 66 joints at baseline and at Week 48. A negative change from baseline in Swollen Joint Count indicates improvement. | Intent-to-treat population includes all participants randomized to Retreatment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Joint Count | Baseline, Week 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set Component: Tender Joint Count at Week 48 | A Rheumatologist or an skilled arthritis assessor evaluated 68 joints at baseline and at Week 48. A negative change from baseline in the Tender Joint Count indicates improvement. | Intent-to-treat population includes all participants randomized to Retreatment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Joint Count | Baseline, Week 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set Component: Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ-DI) at Week 48 | The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) is a patient completed questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip,and common daily activities. Each domain has at least two component questions. There are four possible responses for each component ranging from 0(without any difficulty) to 4 (unable to do).HAQ-DI=sum of worst scores in each domain divided by the number of domains answered. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, that includes all participants randomized to Retreatment, with data available for analyses. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Baseline, Week 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set Component: Subject's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 48 | Participants rated their disease activity at baseline and Week 48 using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on a scale of 0 (best) to 100 (worse). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, that includes all participants randomized to Retreatment, with data available for analyses. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | millimeter (mm) | Baseline, Week 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set Component: Physician's Global Assessment of Disease Activity at Week 48 | A Rheumatologist or a skilled Arthritis assessor rated the patient's disease activity at baseline and Week 48 using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on a scale of 0 (best) to 100 (worse). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Intent-to-treat population includes all participants randomized to Retreatment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | millimeter (mm) | Baseline, Week 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set Component: Subject's Assessment of Pain at Week 48 | Patients rated their pain at baseline and Week 48 using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) on a scale of 0 (none) to 100 (unbearable pain). A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, that includes all participants randomized to Retreatment with data available for analyses. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | millimeter (mm) | Baseline, Week 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set Component: C-Reactive Protein at Week 48 | Blood was collected for C-Reactive Protein, an inflammatory marker, at Baseline and Week 48. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Intent-to-treat Population includes all participants randomized to Retreatment. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mg/dL | Baseline, Week 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) Core Set Component: Erythrocyte Sedimentation (ESR) at Week 48 | Blood was collected for Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate, an inflammatory marker, at Baseline and Week 48. A negative change from baseline indicates improvement. | Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, that includes all participants randomized to Retreatment, with data available for analyses. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | millimeter/hour (mm/hr) | Baseline, Week 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Retreated Subjects With a Change ≥ 0.22 From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 48 | The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) is a patient completed questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Each domain has at least two component questions. There are four possible responses for each component ranging from 0(without any difficulty) to 4 (unable to do). HAQ-DI=sum of worst scores in each domain divided by the number of domains answered. | Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, that includes all participants randomized to Retreatment, with data available for analyses. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Baseline, Week 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Retreated Subjects With a Change ≥ 0.3 From Baseline in HAQ-DI at Week 48 | The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ-DI) is a patient completed questionnaire specific for rheumatoid arthritis. It consists of 20 questions referring to 8 domains: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and common daily activities. Each domain has at least two component questions. There are four possible responses for each component ranging from 0(without any difficulty) to 4 (unable to do).HAQ-DI=sum of worst scores in each domain divided by the number of domains answered. | Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, that includes all participants randomized to Retreatment, with data available for analyses. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Baseline, Week 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | ACRn in Retreated Subjects at Week 48 | The ACRn is calculated for each participant by taking the lowest percentage improvement in (1) swollen joint count or (2) tender joint count or (3) the median of the remaining 5 components of the ACR response (participant's assessment of disease activity; participant's global assessment of pain; physician's assessment of disease activity; participant's assessment of physical function; an acute phase reactant value - CRP). A positive ACRn Score indicates an improvement. | Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, that includes all participants randomized to Retreatment, with data available for analyses. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Baseline, Week 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in SF-36 Health Summary Scores at Week 48 in Retreated Subjects | The SF-36 is a questionnaire used to assess physical functioning and is made up of eight domains: Physical Functioning, Role Physical, Bodily Pain, General Health, Vitality, Social Functioning, Role-Emotional and Mental Health. Transforming and standardizing these domains leads to the calculation of the Physical (PCS) and Mental (MCS) Component Summary measures. Scores ranging from 0 to 100, with 0=worst score (or quality of life) and 100=best score. A positive change from baseline indicates improvement. | Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, that includes all participants randomized to Retreatment, with data available for analyses. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Baseline, Week 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy Fatigue (FACIT-F) at Week 48 in Retreated Subjects | FACIT-F is a 13-item questionnaire. Patients scored each item on a 5-point scale: 0 (Not at all) to 4 (Very much). The larger the patient's response to the questions (with the exception of 2 negatively stated), the greater the patient's fatigue. For all questions, except for the 2 negatively stated ones, the code was reversed and a new score was calculated as (4 minus the patient's response). The sum of all responses resulted in the FACIT-Fatigue score for a total possible score of 0 (worse score) to 52 (better score). A higher score reflects an improvement in the patient's health status. | Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, that includes all randomized participants, with data available for analyses. | Posted | Median | Full Range | Score on a scale | Baseline, Week 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Retreated Subjects Achieving DAS28-ESR Remission at Week 48 | DAS28-ESR remission was defined as a DAS28-ESR < 2.6 | Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, that includes all participants randomized to Retreatment, with data available for analyses. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Week 48 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Retreated Subjects Achieving DAS28-ESR Low Disease at Week 48 | The DAS28-ESR score is a measure of the subject's disease activity. It is based on the tender joint count (28 joints), swollen joint count (28 joints), patient's global assessment of disease activity (mm), and ESR. DAS28-ESR scores range from 0 - 10. Low disease activity is defined as achieving a DAS28-ESR score of less than or equal to 3.2. | Participants from the Intent-to-treat population, that includes all participants randomized to Retreatment, with data available for analyses. | Posted | Number | Percentage of participants | Week 48 |
|
|
|
| 42 |
| 320 |
| 291 |
| 320 |
| EG001 | Arm B: Placebo Retreatment | 1000 mg rituximab intravenous initial treatment on day 1 and day 15 plus 10-25 mg/week methotrexate followed by retreatment during weeks 24 -40 consisting of two doses of placebo 14 days apart plus 10-25 mg/week methotrexate. | 19 | 155 | 148 | 155 |
| EG002 | Rituximab-Not Randomized to Retreatment | 1000 mg rituximab intravenous initial treatment on day 1 and day 15 plus 10-25 mg/week methotrexate. Participants were not randomized to Retreatment. | 9 | 84 | 71 | 84 |
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Acute coronary syndrome | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Acute myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Coronary artery disease | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Coronary artery occlusion | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Supraventricular tachycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cardiac failure congestive | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pericarditis | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cardio-respiratory arrest | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Colitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Enterocolitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Oesophagitis ulcerative | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Death | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hernia obstructive | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cholecystitis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Biliary dyskinesia | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal wall abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diverticulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Perirectal abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Arthritis bacterial | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Osteomyelitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Clostridium difficile colitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Human ehrlichiosis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Urosepsis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyelonephritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Viral infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Road traffic accident | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Device failure | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diabetes mellitus inadequate control | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Musculoskeletal pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Osteoarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Spinal osteoarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Intervertebral disc degeneration | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Intervertebral disc protrusion | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rheumatiod arthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Osteonecrosis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bursitis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Costochondritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Joint destruction | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Spinal column stenosis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cerebral ischaemia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cerebrovascular accident | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cauda equina syndrome | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Transient ischaemic attack | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Abortion spontaneous | Pregnancy, puerperium and perinatal conditions | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rectocele | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Uterine prolapse | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Benign prostatic hyperplasia | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Acute respiratory distress syndrome | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Interstitial lung disease | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Deep vein thrombosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Iliac artery occlusion | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pulmonary embolism | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cholelithiasis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypotension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Colon cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pyrexia | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Upper respiratory tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sinusitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rheumatoid arthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Arthralgia | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Cough | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Pruritus | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Rash | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Flushing | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| D003240 |
| Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D001327 | Autoimmune Diseases |
| D007154 | Immune System Diseases |
| D007162 | Immunoproteins |
| D001798 | Blood Proteins |
| D011506 | Proteins |
| D000602 | Amino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins |
| D012712 | Serum Globulins |
| D005916 | Globulins |
| D000630 | Aminopterin |
| D011622 | Pterins |
| D011621 | Pteridines |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |