Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2002-2763 | Other Identifier | University of California, Irvine | |
| NCI-2010-00217 | Other Identifier | NCI Clinical Trials Reporting Program (CTRP) |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Bayer | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a Phase II Evaluation of Docetaxel and Vinorelbine Plus Sargramostim in subjects who have metastatic melanoma which has advanced beyond the point at which local therapies such as surgery or radiation therapy would be helpful. Without effective treatment, metastatic melanoma is usually a severe and fatal disease. Chemotherapy agents or combinations of chemotherapy agents have produced tumor shrinkage in some patients, which has occasionally persisted. This research involves treatment with a combination of chemotherapy drugs known to be active against melanoma alone. The investigational purpose of this study is to determine if the combination of docetaxel, vinorelbine and sargramostim will produce a response (complete or partial) in metastasis melanoma. The researchers also wants to find out what side effects are associated with this combination of drugs.
Annually in the U.S. there is an estimated 40,000 new cases of malignant melanoma and 7000 deaths. This disease is becoming more common with its incidence increasing at a more rapid rate in the past decade than that of any other cancer except lung cancer in women. Metastatic disease responds poorly to the usual treatments with only 2 out of 30 drugs tested, DTIC and nitrosoureas, showing response rates greater than 10%. Complete responses are rare.
Metastatic melanoma is a disease with few therapeutic options. Multi-agent chemotherapy with cisplatin (CDDP), Dacarbazine (DTIC), Carmustine (BCNU), with or without Tamoxifen, offers a 20% response rate but has failed to consistently demonstrate a significant improvement in overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) when compared to a single agent DTIC.
Recently, investigators, in an effort to combine the activity of biologic response modifiers with chemotherapy, have developed combination biochemotherapy for metastatic melanoma. Legha et al reported an overall objective response rate of 64% with a 5-day biochemotherapy regimen. O'Day et al reported similar results (overall response rate of 57%) using a modified 5-day biochemotherapy regimen.
The above regimens all have significant toxicities and modest response rates. Clearly, more effective less toxic regimens are needed.
Vinorelbine tartrate (Navelbine) and Docetaxel (Taxotere) have both shown activity against melanoma. Additionally, the combination of both drugs has shown enhanced activity against melanoma.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Docetaxel & Vinorelbine + Sargramostim | Experimental | Docetaxel, Vinorelbine, and Sargramostim |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vinorelbine | Drug | 30 mg/m2 IV over 6-10 min every 14 days |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Progression-free Survival (PFS) in Patients With AJCC Stage IV Metastatic Melanoma Treated With Docetaxel and Vinorelbine as First-line or Post-first Line (Salvage) Systemic Therapy | The primary endpoint is to evaluate the six-month progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with AJCC stage IV metastatic melanoma treated with docetaxel and vinorelbine as first-line or post-first line (salvage) systemic therapy. Progressive disease is defined as any new lesion or a greater than or equal to 20% increase in the largest perpendicular diameter of the sum of the T-lesions identified on contrast enhanced CT or MRI scan. | Six months from initial treatment |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Patients Alive at One Year | 1 year |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Age greater than or equal to 18
Karnofsky Performance Status (KFS) of greater than or equal to 70
Laboratory values (performed in 14 days, inclusive prior to study drug administration):
Life expectancy of greater than 12 weeks
Written informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| John P. Fruehauf, MD, PhD | Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chao Family Comprehensive Cancer Center | Orange | California | 92868 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21769667 | Background | Eroglu Z, Kong KM, Jakowatz JG, Samlowski W, Fruehauf JP. Phase II clinical trial evaluating docetaxel, vinorelbine and GM-CSF in stage IV melanoma. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2011 Oct;68(4):1081-7. doi: 10.1007/s00280-011-1703-z. Epub 2011 Jul 19. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Docetaxel and Vinorelbine Plus Sargramostim | Docetaxel (40 mg.m2 IV), Vinorelbine (30 mg/m2 IV), and Sargramostim 250 mcg/m2 subcutaneous (SQ) Vinorelbine: 30 mg/m2 IV over 6-10 min every 14 days Docetaxel: 40mg/m2 IV over 1 hour every 14 days Sargramostim: 250 mcg/m2 subcutaneous (SQ) daily (QD) x 10 days |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Docetaxel and Vinorelbine Plus Sargramostim | The DVS regimen consisted of docetaxel 40 mg/m2 IV over 1 hour, vinorelbine 30 mg/m2 IV over 6 to 10 minutes on day 1, every 14 days, and GM-CSF, 250 mg/m2 SC on days 2 to 12. Patients received a cycle of this regimen every two weeks. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Progression-free Survival (PFS) in Patients With AJCC Stage IV Metastatic Melanoma Treated With Docetaxel and Vinorelbine as First-line or Post-first Line (Salvage) Systemic Therapy | The primary endpoint is to evaluate the six-month progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with AJCC stage IV metastatic melanoma treated with docetaxel and vinorelbine as first-line or post-first line (salvage) systemic therapy. Progressive disease is defined as any new lesion or a greater than or equal to 20% increase in the largest perpendicular diameter of the sum of the T-lesions identified on contrast enhanced CT or MRI scan. | Posted | Median | 95% Confidence Interval | days | Six months from initial treatment |
|
6 years, 6 months
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Docetaxel and Vinorelbine Plus Sargramostim | Docetaxel (40 mg.m2 IV), Vinorelbine (30 mg/m2 IV), and Sargramostim 250 mcg/m2 subcutaneous (SQ) Vinorelbine: 30 mg/m2 IV over 6-10 min every 14 days Docetaxel: 40mg/m2 IV over 1 hour every 14 days Sargramostim: 250 mcg/m2 subcutaneous (SQ) daily (QD) x 10 days |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| febrile neutropenia | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| anemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. John P. Fruehauf | University of California, Irvine | 714-456-5153 | jfruehau@uci.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008545 | Melanoma |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D018358 | Neuroendocrine Tumors |
| D017599 | Neuroectodermal Tumors |
| D009373 | Neoplasms, Germ Cell and Embryonal |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000077235 | Vinorelbine |
| D000077143 | Docetaxel |
| C081222 | sargramostim |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D014748 | Vinca Alkaloids |
| D046948 | Secologanin Tryptamine Alkaloids |
| D026121 | Indole Alkaloids |
| D000470 | Alkaloids |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Docetaxel | Drug | 40mg/m2 IV over 1 hour every 14 days |
|
|
| Sargramostim | Drug | 250 mcg/m2 subcutaneous (SQ) daily (QD) x 10 days |
|
|
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Median | Full Range | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients Alive at One Year | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 1 year |
|
|
|
| 15 |
| 52 |
| 6 |
| 52 |
| 42 |
| 52 |
| neutropenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| thrombocytopenia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| neuropathy | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| alopecia | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Injection site reaction | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D009380 | Neoplasms, Nerve Tissue |
| D018326 | Nevi and Melanomas |
| D012878 | Skin Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
| D017437 | Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D006571 |
| Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D007211 | Indoles |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
| D054836 | Indolizidines |
| D007212 | Indolizines |
| D043823 | Taxoids |
| D043822 | Cyclodecanes |
| D003516 | Cycloparaffins |
| D006840 | Hydrocarbons, Alicyclic |
| D006844 | Hydrocarbons, Cyclic |
| D006838 | Hydrocarbons |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D004224 | Diterpenes |
| D013729 | Terpenes |