Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Stryker Trauma and Extremities | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This study compares outcomes and metal ion levels between patients who receive the Conserve® Plus Hip System compared to those who have received a standard hip replacement in a recent study.
Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is currently the standard of care for end-stage degenerative joint disease of the hip. In this surgery, the entire joint is replaced by inserting an acetabular component into the pelvis, a femoral stem down the thigh bone (which has a ball on it to articulate in the acetabulum). However for the younger patient, long-term fixation and the prospect of multiple revisions remain a notable concern. Long-term results of THA in this patient population have been disappointing. Studies cite failure rates of 21% to 33% at less than 10 years follow up. The Conserve Plus Hip System differs from total hip arthroplasty as it uses less bone stock from the femoral bone. The prosthesis is designed so that the head of the femoral bone is resurfaced rather than replaced. Consequently, bone stock of the femur is conserved. The bone conserving nature of this implant allows the surgeon to convert to a total hip arthroplasty with ease should a time arise when the patient requires revision arthroplasty. The Conserve Plus Hip System is also different from the THA as the bearing surface is metal on metal, rather than the conventional metal on polyethylene. This metal on metal bearing surface provides lower wear. Theoretically, this type of hip replacement may be a viable alternative to THA for the younger patient.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conserve Plus Hip Resurfacing | Active Comparator | Conserve Plus Hip Resurfacing group. Complication rate will be compared between groups. |
|
| Total Hip Replacement | Other | Historical Total Hip Replacement control group of recently published conventional total hip replacement results (Williams, 2002). Complication rate will be compared between groups. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Complication rate | Other | All patients in the active comparator group received the Conserve Plus Hip Resurfacing System, manufactured by Wright Medical Technology. The complication rate and clinical efficacy will be recorded and compared to the Total Hip Replacement historical control group. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rate of complications | Any complications pertaining specifically to the implant | 2 years |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Survivorship rate Clinical efficacy (Pain, Function, Radiographic outcome and Patient Satisfaction) Blood and Urine Ion Levels | Clincial efficiency pertaining to the implant directly | 2 years |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are undergoing primary hip surgery for noninflammatory degenerative joint disease (NIDJD). Composite diagnoses for NIDJD include osteo/degenerative arthritis, traumatic arthritis, congenital hip dysplasia, and avascular necrosis.2. Patients who are skeletally mature or at least 18 years of age.3. Patients for whom there is a reasonable expectation that they will be available for each examination scheduled over a two year post-operative follow up period and for annual exams until the last patient entered into the study has achieved two years of follow-up.4. Patients who agree to participate and sign the informed consent form.5. Patients who do not meet any of the exclusion criteria.6. Patients who are already enrolled in the study and present with a need for revision of the metal femoral or acetabular resurfacing components. These patients may have the failed component(s) revised with an investigational component.
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Paul Kim, MD, FRCS(C) | OHRI | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QEII Health Sciences Centre | Halifax | Nova Scotia | B3H 3A7 | Canada | ||
| The Ottawa Hospital |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 18722302 | Result | Kim PR, Beaule PE, Laflamme GY, Dunbar M. Causes of early failure in a multicenter clinical trial of hip resurfacing. J Arthroplasty. 2008 Sep;23(6 Suppl 1):44-9. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2008.05.022. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010003 | Osteoarthritis |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001168 | Arthritis |
| D007592 | Joint Diseases |
| D009140 | Musculoskeletal Diseases |
| D012216 | Rheumatic Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Ottawa |
| Ontario |
| K1H 8L6 |
| Canada |
| Hopital du Sacre-Coeur de Montreal | Montreal | Quebec | H4J 1C5 | Canada |