Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| U1111-1114-0058 | Registry Identifier | WHO |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a study to assess the efficacy and safety of 8 weeks of treatment with Dexlansoprazole modified release (MR)(60 mg daily and 90 mg daily) compared to Lansoprazole (30 mg daily) in healing subjects with endoscopically proven erosive esophagitis.
This is a Phase 3, randomized, double-blind, multi-center, active-controlled, 3-arm study with an 8 week treatment period. This study will compare the efficacy of Dexlansoprazole MR (60 mg and 90 mg) with that of Lansoprazole (30 mg) when administered orally as a single daily dose in the morning, before breakfast. The study is designed to evaluate healing of erosive esophagitis and the effect of the therapy on relieving gastroesophageal reflux disease related symptoms. The study consists of two periods, a screening period (maximum 21 days) and a treatment period, which will last up to 8 weeks.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QD | Experimental |
| |
| Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QD | Experimental |
| |
| Lansoprazole 30 mg QD | Active Comparator |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dexlansoprazole MR | Drug | Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg, capsules, orally, once daily (QD) for up to 8 weeks. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis. | Percentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy. Change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, D to healed was measured. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A (greater than or equal to 1 mucosal break and less than 5 mm). If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed. | 8 Weeks |
| Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method | Percentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy. Change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, D to healed was measured. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed. | 8 Weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis. | Percentage of subjects with baseline EE grade C or D combined who have complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy. Change in LA Classification grades C or D to healed was measured. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Medical Director | Takeda | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anniston | Alabama | United States | ||||
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19183157 | Result | Sharma P, Shaheen NJ, Perez MC, Pilmer BL, Lee M, Atkinson SN, Peura D. Clinical trials: healing of erosive oesophagitis with dexlansoprazole MR, a proton pump inhibitor with a novel dual delayed-release formulation--results from two randomized controlled studies. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Apr 1;29(7):731-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.03933.x. | |
| 19735233 |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| For the Dexilant Package Insert refer to this link | View source |
Not provided
Subjects recorded day and nighttime heartburn symptoms and rescue medications for a screening period of up to 21 days. Subjects with endoscopically-proven erosive esophagitis (EE) at screening were enrolled in Dexlansoprazole Modified Release (MR) or Lansoprazole once daily (QD) treatment group.
Subjects were enrolled at 93 sites in the US and 63 ex-US sites from 16 December 2005 to 22 January 2007.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QD | Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks. |
| FG001 | Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QD | Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Dexlansoprazole MR | Drug | Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks. |
|
|
| Lansoprazole | Drug | Lansoprazole 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks. |
|
|
| Week 8 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method. | Percentage of subjects with baseline EE grade C or D combined who have complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy. Change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades C or D to healed was measured. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed. | 8 Weeks |
| Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis. | Percentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy. Change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, D to healed was measured. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed. | 4 Weeks |
| Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method | Percentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy. Change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, D to healed was measured. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed. | 4 Weeks |
| Hueytown |
| Alabama |
| United States |
| Huntsville | Alabama | United States |
| Tallassee | Alabama | United States |
| Tuscaloosa | Alabama | United States |
| Tucson | Arizona | United States |
| Little Rock | Arkansas | United States |
| North Little Rock | Arkansas | United States |
| Azusa | California | United States |
| Carmichael | California | United States |
| Cypress | California | United States |
| Fresno | California | United States |
| Los Angeles | California | United States |
| Modesto | California | United States |
| Newport Beach | California | United States |
| Oakland | California | United States |
| Orange | California | United States |
| San Diego | California | United States |
| Santa Maria | California | United States |
| Littleton | Colorado | United States |
| Longmont | Colorado | United States |
| Wheat Ridge | Colorado | United States |
| Bristol | Connecticut | United States |
| Newark | Delaware | United States |
| Fort Myers | Florida | United States |
| Miami | Florida | United States |
| Naples | Florida | United States |
| New Smyrna Beach | Florida | United States |
| Ocala | Florida | United States |
| Pembroke Pines | Florida | United States |
| Port Orange | Florida | United States |
| Sarasota | Florida | United States |
| St. Petersburg | Florida | United States |
| Zephyrhills | Florida | United States |
| Atlanta | Georgia | United States |
| Boise | Idaho | United States |
| Moline | Illinois | United States |
| North Chicago | Illinois | United States |
| Oak Forest | Illinois | United States |
| Evansville | Indiana | United States |
| Indianapolis | Indiana | United States |
| Newburgh | Indiana | United States |
| Davenport | Iowa | United States |
| Kansas City | Kansas | United States |
| Wichita | Kansas | United States |
| Lexington | Kentucky | United States |
| Louisville | Kentucky | United States |
| Baton Rouge | Louisiana | United States |
| Chevy Chase | Maryland | United States |
| Prince Frederick | Maryland | United States |
| Jackson | Mississippi | United States |
| Jefferson City | Missouri | United States |
| Kansas City | Missouri | United States |
| St Louis | Missouri | United States |
| Missoula | Montana | United States |
| Egg Harbor | New Jersey | United States |
| Albuquerque | New Mexico | United States |
| Chapel Hill | North Carolina | United States |
| Charlotte | North Carolina | United States |
| Greensboro | North Carolina | United States |
| Harrisburg | North Carolina | United States |
| High Point | North Carolina | United States |
| Raleigh | North Carolina | United States |
| Wilmington | North Carolina | United States |
| Winston-Salem | North Carolina | United States |
| Bismarck | North Dakota | United States |
| Akron | Ohio | United States |
| Columbus | Ohio | United States |
| Dayton | Ohio | United States |
| Mogadore | Ohio | United States |
| Oklahoma City | Oklahoma | United States |
| Medford | Oregon | United States |
| Portland | Oregon | United States |
| Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | United States |
| Warwick | Rhode Island | United States |
| Anderson | South Carolina | United States |
| Mt. Pleasant | South Carolina | United States |
| Sioux Falls | South Dakota | United States |
| Chattanooga | Tennessee | United States |
| Germantown | Tennessee | United States |
| Jackson | Tennessee | United States |
| Johnson City | Tennessee | United States |
| Kingsport | Tennessee | United States |
| Amarillo | Texas | United States |
| Conroe | Texas | United States |
| Dallas | Texas | United States |
| Fort Worth | Texas | United States |
| Houston | Texas | United States |
| Odessa | Texas | United States |
| Pharr | Texas | United States |
| Seguin | Texas | United States |
| Temple | Texas | United States |
| Salt Lake City | Utah | United States |
| Charlottesville | Virginia | United States |
| Norfolk | Virginia | United States |
| Richmond | Virginia | United States |
| Bellevue | Washington | United States |
| Lakewood | Washington | United States |
| Tacoma | Washington | United States |
| Milwaukee | Wisconsin | United States |
| Adelaide | Australia |
| Bedford Park | Australia |
| Kippa-Ring | Australia |
| Sofia | Bulgaria |
| Hamilton | Ontario | Canada |
| Newmarket | Ontario | Canada |
| Montreal | Quebec | Canada |
| Saskatoon | Saskatchewan | Canada |
| Cundinamarca | Bogota D.C. | Colombia |
| Barranquilla - Atlantico | Colombia |
| Hradec Králové | Czechia |
| Ostrava - Hrabuvka | Czechia |
| Stuttgart | Baden-Wurttemberg | Germany |
| Bochum | North Rhine-Westphalia | Germany |
| Berlin | State of Berlin | Germany |
| Bratislava | Germany |
| Hyderabad | Andh Prad | India |
| Bangalore | Kama | India |
| Ludhiana | Punjab | India |
| Hyderabad | India |
| Pune | India |
| Hamburg | HH | Latvia |
| Balvi | Latvia |
| Riga | Latvia |
| Valmiera | Latvia |
| Panevezys | Lithuania |
| Vinius | Lithuania |
| Auckland | New Zealand |
| Lima | Peru |
| Bialystok | Poland |
| Bydgoszcz | Poland |
| Krakow | Poland |
| Mangalore | Poland |
| Warsaw | Poland |
| Moscow | Russia |
| Saint Petersburg | Russia |
| Yaroslavi | Russia |
| Daugavpils | Slovakia |
| Košice | Slovakia |
| Prešov | Slovakia |
| Bloemfontein | Free State | South Africa |
| Cape Town | WC | South Africa |
| Observatory, Cape Town | WC | South Africa |
| Parktown, Gauteng | South Africa |
| Peura DA, Metz DC, Dabholkar AH, Paris MM, Yu P, Atkinson SN. Safety profile of dexlansoprazole MR, a proton pump inhibitor with a novel dual delayed release formulation: global clinical trial experience. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2009 Nov 15;30(10):1010-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04137.x. Epub 2009 Sep 4. |
| 20195905 | Result | Wyrwich KW, Mody R, Larsen LM, Lee M, Harnam N, Revicki DA. Validation of the PAGI-SYM and PAGI-QOL among healing and maintenance of erosive esophagitis clinical trial participants. Qual Life Res. 2010 May;19(4):551-64. doi: 10.1007/s11136-010-9620-x. Epub 2010 Feb 27. |
| 21129076 | Result | Friedlander EA, Pallentino J, Miller SK, VanBeuge SS. The evolution of proton pump inhibitors for the treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2010 Dec;22(12):674-83. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2010.00578.x. Epub 2010 Nov 24. |
| 24118079 | Derived | Peura DA, Pilmer B, Hunt B, Mody R, Perez MC. Distinguishing the impact of dexlansoprazole on heartburn vs. regurgitation in patients with gastro-oesophageal reflux disease. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Nov;38(10):1303-11. doi: 10.1111/apt.12504. Epub 2013 Sep 30. |
| 23451835 | Derived | Peura DA, Pilmer B, Hunt B, Mody R, Perez MC. The effects of increasing body mass index on heartburn severity, frequency and response to treatment with dexlansoprazole or lansoprazole. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013 Apr;37(8):810-8. doi: 10.1111/apt.12270. Epub 2013 Mar 4. |
| FG002 | Lansoprazole 30 mg QD | Lansoprazole 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QD | Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks. |
| BG001 | Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QD | Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks. |
| BG002 | Lansoprazole 30 mg QD | Lansoprazole 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks. |
| BG003 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Customized | Number | participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Age Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||
| LA Classification Grade | Number | participant |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis. | Percentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy. Change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, D to healed was measured. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A (greater than or equal to 1 mucosal break and less than 5 mm). If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed. | Crude rate analysis were performed on the ITT subjects who had at least 1 post-baseline endoscopy assessment that was performed within 7 days of the last day of study drug. | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects | 8 Weeks |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis. | Percentage of subjects with baseline EE grade C or D combined who have complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy. Change in LA Classification grades C or D to healed was measured. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed. | Crude rate analyses were performed on the ITT subjects who had at least 1 post-baseline endoscopy assessment performed within 7 days of the last day of study drug. | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects | Week 8 |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Baseline Erosive Esophagitis Grade C or D Combined Who Have Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method. | Percentage of subjects with baseline EE grade C or D combined who have complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy. Change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades C or D to healed was measured. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed. | In addition to the ITT subjects who had at least 1 post-baseline endoscopy, Life Table Method included the ITT subjects without any post-baseline endoscopy within 7 days of the last day of study drug as censored. | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects | 8 Weeks |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Primary | Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 8 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method | Percentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy. Change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, D to healed was measured. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed. | In addition to the ITT subjects who had at least 1 post-baseline endoscopy, Life Table Method included the ITT subjects without any post-baseline endoscopy within 7 days of the last day of study drug as censored. | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects | 8 Weeks |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Crude Rate Analysis. | Percentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy. Change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, D to healed was measured. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed. | Crude rate analyses were performed on the ITT subjects who had at least 1 post-baseline endoscopy assessment performed within 7 days of the last day of study drug. | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects | 4 Weeks |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Complete Healing of Erosive Esophagitis by Week 4 as Assessed by Endoscopy - Life Table Method | Percentage of subjects with complete healing of EE as assessed by endoscopy. Change in LA Esophagitis Classification grades A, B, C, D to healed was measured. Healed is defined as anything that is less than the criterion for Grade A. If it doesn't meet the A criterion, it's counted as healed. | In addition to the ITT subjects who had at least 1 post-baseline endoscopy, Life Table Method included the ITT subjects without any post-baseline endoscopy within 7 days of the last day of study drug as censored. | Posted | Number | percentage of subjects | 4 Weeks |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg QD | Dexlansoprazole MR 60 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks. | 4 | 694 | 30 | 694 | ||
| EG001 | Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg QD | Dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks. | 4 | 687 | 31 | 687 | ||
| EG002 | Lansoprazole 30 mg QD | Lansoprazole 30 mg, capsules, orally, once daily for up to 8 weeks. | 2 | 673 | 23 | 673 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ischaemic Coronary Artery Disorders | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain and Discomfort not elsewhere classified (NEC) | General disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cholecystitis and Cholelithiasis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abdominal and Gastrointestinal Infections | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-site Specific Injuries NEC | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Site Specific Injuries NEC | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Breast and Nipple Neoplasms Malignant | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Facial Cranial Nerve Disorders | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal Lithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diarrhoea (Excluding Infective) | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Systematic Assessment |
|
No publication related to study results will be published prior to publication of a multi-center report submitted for publication within 18 months after conclusion or termination of a study. Results publications will be submitted to sponsor for review 60 days in advance of publication. Sponsor can require removal of confidential information unrelated to study results. Sponsor can embargo a proposed publication for another 60 days to preserve intellectual property.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sr. VP Clinical Sciences | Takeda Global Research & Development Center, Inc. | 800-778-2860 | clinicaltrialregistry@tpna.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004942 | Esophagitis, Peptic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004941 | Esophagitis |
| D004935 | Esophageal Diseases |
| D005767 | Gastrointestinal Diseases |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D005759 | Gastroenteritis |
| D010437 | Peptic Ulcer |
| D004378 | Duodenal Diseases |
| D007410 | Intestinal Diseases |
| D013272 | Stomach Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D064748 | Dexlansoprazole |
| D064747 | Lansoprazole |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D053799 | 2-Pyridinylmethylsulfinylbenzimidazoles |
| D013454 | Sulfoxides |
| D013457 | Sulfur Compounds |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D011725 | Pyridines |
| D006573 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring |
| D006571 | Heterocyclic Compounds |
| D001562 | Benzimidazoles |
| D006574 | Heterocyclic Compounds, 2-Ring |
| D000072471 | Heterocyclic Compounds, Fused-Ring |
Not provided
Not provided
| 45 Years to < 65 Years |
|
| >= 65 Years |
|
| Male |
|
| Not Hispanic or Latino |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Asian |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| B: ≥1 mucosal break ≥5 mm |
|
| C: ≥1 mucosal break and <75% of the circumference |
|
| D: ≥1 mucosal break and ≥75% of the circumference |
|
| NA |
|
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.019 | Unadjusted p-value is presented. The overall 0.05 level of significance for the multiple comparisons of each dexlansoprazole dose to lansoprazole was controlled using Hochberg's method. | Difference in percentage | 4.85 | 95 | 1.20 | 8.50 | Yes | Non-Inferiority or Equivalence | If the lower bound of the 95% CI was greater than -10%, noninferiority was concluded. Superiority of primary efficacy endpoint was assessed by comparing the crude healing rate of dexlansoprazole MR 90 mg dose to that of lansoprazole 30 mg using a Cochran Mantel Haenszel (CMH) test with baseline LA EE Grade as strata. |
| Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel | 0.220 | Statistical significance was determined at 0.05 level without adjustment for multiple comparisons. | 95 | No | Superiority or Other |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Units | Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|