A percutaneous liver biopsy was obtained at the screening visit and at Week 52. A new liver biopsy at the screening visit was not taken in the event that a previous liver biopsy taken within 120 days of the Baseline /Day 1 visit (day of first dose), and the tissue block was available. The immunohistochemical marker assessed was smooth muscle alpha-actin (aSMA). Sections of the liver biopsies were stained by standard immunocytochemical techniques using a monoclonal antibody to smooth muscle actin with 'very intense purple' as the detection chromogen. This gives a reddish-purple color to the activated stellate cells, which strongly contrasts with the rest of the tissue. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post Baseline assessment minus the Baseline assessment for a given parameter. If either the Baseline or on-treatment value was missing, the change from Baseline value was also set to missing. The values are presented as proportion of positive area over total area.

Modified Intent to Treat (MITT) Population consisted of all participants with chronic hepatitis C randomized, regardless of whether or not the study drug was actually taken or if the participant completed the planned duration of the study. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

A percutaneous liver biopsy was obtained at the screening visit and at Week 52. A new liver biopsy at the screening visit was not taken in the event that a previous liver biopsy taken within 120 days of the Baseline /Day 1 visit (day of first dose), and the tissue block was available. Morphometric analysis was performed using specimens stained with Sirius red and computerized image analysis. Sirius red was used to stain extracellular collagen in liver sections. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post Baseline assessment minus the Baseline assessment for a given parameter. If either the Baseline or on-treatment value was missing, the change from Baseline value was also set to missing. The values are presented as proportion of positive area over total area.

MITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time point were analyzed.

In ranked assessment (fibrosis and necroinflammation), available slides from each participant were evaluated as to whether one slide presents a globally more benign histopathology or whether the matched slides comprise globally equivalent histologic patterns. Subsequent data analysis revealed whether slides scored (within matched pairs of slides) as more benign occurred in different proportions of the Week 52 liver biopsies, according to treatment group. The number of participants with paired biopsies was based on the number with a Rank Assessment.

MITT Population. Only those participants with paired biopsies at the indicated time point were analyzed.

AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. SAE is any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment.

As Treated Population consisted of all participants for whom no clear evidence was available of failure to take study medication.

A standardized 12-lead ECGs were recorded at pre-screening, and pre-dose, at Baseline/Day 1, Weeks 16, 34, and 52 or withdrawal and at the 4 week follow-up visit. Any conditions such as bundle branch block, repolarization, depolarization, abnormal sinus rhythms, atrial fibrillation etc. are considered to be clinically abnormal findings.

As Treated Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

Clinical laboratory parameters: Alkaline phosphatase, Alanine aminotransferase (ALT), Aspartate aminotransferase (AST), Total bilirubin, Cholesterol, Carbon dioxide content/Bicarbonate (CO2/HCO3), Creatinine, Glucose, Hemoglobin, Potassium, Low density lipid (LDL) cholesterol, Lymphocytes, Sodium, Segmented neutrophils, Platelet count, White blood cell (WBC) count were assessed for change in grade toxicities. Toxicities were graded as grade 1 to grade 4 in increasing order of severity of toxicity. Thus grade 4 indicating severe toxicity. Only those parameters with grade 3 and 4 toxicities are presented.

As Treated Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points for particular parameter were analyzed.

SBP and DBP readings were taken at pre-screening, pre-dose after 10 minutes of rest, at Baseline/Day 1, weeks 2, 4, 10, 16, 22, 28, 34, 40, 46, and 52 or WD and at the 4 week follow-up visit. Day 1 (before dosing) value was considered to be as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post Baseline assessment minus the Baseline assessment for a given parameter. If either the Baseline or on-treatment value was missing, the change from Baseline value was also set to missing.

As Treated Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

Heart rate assessment were done at pre-screening, pre-dose after 10 minutes of rest, at Baseline/Day 1, weeks 2, 4, 10, 16, 22, 28, 34, 40, 46, and 52 or WD and at the 4 week follow-up visit. Day 1 (before dosing) value was considered to be as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post Baseline assessment minus the Baseline assessment for a given parameter. If either the Baseline or on-treatment value was missing, the change from Baseline value was also set to be missing.

As treated population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

Fluid retention event was one of the AEs reported. AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.

As Treated Population.

Progression was defined as an increase by at least one point in the fibrosis score. Score ranged from 0 to 6 (higher score indicates greater fibrosis). 0: No fibrosis, 1: Fibrous expansion of some portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa, 2: Fibrous expansion of most portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa, 3: Fibrous expansion of most portal areas with portal to portal bridging, 4: Fibrous expansion of portal areas with marked bridging, 5: Marked bridging with occasional nodules (incomplete cirrhosis), 6: Cirrhosis, probable or definite. The number of participants with paired biopsies is based on the number with an Ishak Fibrosis score.

MITT Population.

Regression was defined as a decrease by at least one point in the fibrosis score. Score ranged from 0 to 6 (higher score indicates greater fibrosis). 0: No fibrosis, 1: Fibrous expansion of some portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa, 2: Fibrous expansion of most portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa, 3: Fibrous expansion of most portal areas with portal to portal bridging, 4: Fibrous expansion of portal areas with marked bridging, 5: Marked bridging with occasional nodules (incomplete cirrhosis), 6: Cirrhosis, probable or definite. The number of participants with paired biopsies is based on the number with an Ishak Fibrosis score.

MITT Population.

No change was defined as having the same score at both Baseline and at Week 52. Score ranged from 0 to 6 (higher score indicates greater fibrosis). 0: No fibrosis, 1: Fibrous expansion of some portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa, 2: Fibrous expansion of most portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa, 3: Fibrous expansion of most portal areas with portal to portal bridging, 4: Fibrous expansion of portal areas with marked bridging, 5: Marked bridging with occasional nodules (incomplete cirrhosis), 6: Cirrhosis, probable or definite. The number of participants with paired biopsies is based on the number with an Ishak Fibrosis score.

MITT Population.

Ishak score ranged from 0 to 6 (higher score indicates greater fibrosis). 0: No fibrosis, 1: Fibrous expansion of some portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa, 2: Fibrous expansion of most portal areas, with or without short fibrous septa, 3: Fibrous expansion of most portal areas with portal to portal bridging, 4: Fibrous expansion of portal areas with marked bridging, 5: Marked bridging with occasional nodules (incomplete cirrhosis), 6: Cirrhosis, probable or definite. The necroinflammatory score is the combined score for necrosis and inflammation domains and ranged from 0 (best) to 14 (worst). Change from screening was calculated as the post screening assessment minus the screening assessment for a given parameter.

MITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time point were analyzed

Metavir activity score ranged from 0 to 3 (higher score indicates severe symptoms of necrosis). 0: Piecemeal necrosis (PMN) absent and lobular necrosis (LN) absent or slight, 1: PMN slight and LN moderate, 2: PMN moderate and LN severe, 3: PMN severe. Metavir fibrosis score ranged from 0 to 4 (higher score indicates severe symptoms of necrosis). 0: No fibrosis, 1: Portal fibrosis without septa, 2: Portal fibrosis with septa, 3: Septal fibrosis without cirrhosis, 4: Cirrhosis. Change from screening was calculated as the post screening assessment minus the screening assessment for a given parameter.

MITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time point were analyzed.

FibroTest was for the assessment of fibrosis. Fibro test was calculated using an original combination of five highly concentrated serum biochemical markers; alpha-2-macroglobulin, haptoglobin, apolipoprotein A1, total bilirubin and gammaglutamyltransferase. FibroTest scores range from 0.00 to 1.00 where 0.0-0.21 is no fibrosis and >= 0.59 is cirrhosis. Acti-test was calculated using 6 serum biochemical markers; alpha2macroglobulin, haptoglobin, apolipoprotein A1, total bilirubin, GGT and alanine aminotransferase. ActiTest was used for the assessment of necroinflammatory activity. Test score ranges from 0.00 to 1.00, where 0.00-0.17 indicates no necrosis and >= 0.61 indicates severe necrosis. Day 1 value was considered to be as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post Baseline assessment minus the Baseline assessment for a given parameter. If either the Baseline or on-treatment value was missing, the change from Baseline value was also set to missing.

MITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time point were analyzed.

ALT was assessed as per upper limit of normal where the normal range was 0-48 international units per liter. Day 1 (before dosing) value was considered to be as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post Baseline assessment minus the Baseline assessment for a given parameter. If either the Baseline or on-treatment value was missing, the change from Baseline value was also set to missing.

MITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time points were analyzed.

Insulin resistance was measured using Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR), Belfiore Insulin Sensitivity Index (ISI) and Quantitative Insulin Sensitivity Check Index (QUICKI). HOMA-IR = fasting plasma insulin*fasting plasma glucose / 22.5 and ISI = 2 / [(fasting plasma glucose from the participant / fasting plasma glucose normal reference range)*( fasting plasma insulin from the participant / fasting plasma insulin normal reference range) + 1] and QUICKI = 1/(log[fasting plasma Insulin] + log[fasting plasma glucose]). Day 1 (before dosing) value was considered to be as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post Baseline assessment minus the Baseline assessment for a given parameter. If either the Baseline or on-treatment value was missing, the change from Baseline value was also set to missing.

As Treated Population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time point were analyzed.

ALT was assessed as per upper limit of normal where the normal range was 0-48 international units per liter. Day 1 (before dosing) value was considered to be as Baseline value. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post Baseline assessment minus the Baseline assessment for a given parameter. If either the Baseline or on-treatment value was missing, the change from Baseline value was also set to missing.

MITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

Value at Day 1 visit (day of first dose) was considered as Baseline. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post Baseline assessment minus the Baseline assessment for a given parameter. If either the Baseline or on-treatment value was missing, the change from Baseline value was also set to missing.

MITT Population. Only those participants with data available at the indicated time point were analyzed.

Serum for HCV RNA levels were collected at pre-screen, Baseline, Week 28, Week 52, and at the 4 week follow up visit. Value at Day 1 visit (day of first dose) was considered as Baseline. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post Baseline assessment minus the Baseline assessment for a given parameter. If either the Baseline or on-treatment value was missing, the change from Baseline value was also set to missing.

MITT Population. Only those participants available at the specified time points were analyzed.

Samples for Week 2 serial group were collected at 0 (pre-morning dose)1, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 hour post-morning dose. Initially the doses selected for the study were 0.5 mg twice daily and 1.0 mg twice daily. However, because of implementation of Amendment 4, the dose regimen was reduced to half the original dosing resulting in dose once daily.

The Pharmacokinetic (PK) Parameter Population included all participants in the subset having the serial PK profiles performed at Week 2 and having sufficient data for the calculation of the PK parameters. Initially the doses selected were twice daily, but after implementation of Amendment 4 the dose regimen was reduced to half the original dosing.

Sample s for Week 2 serial group were collected at 0 (pre-morning dose )1, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 hour post-morning dose. Initially the doses selected for the study were 0.5 mg twice daily and 1.0 mg twice daily. However, because of implementation of Amendment 4, the dose regimen was reduced to half the original dosing resulting in dose once daily.

PK parameter Population. Initially the doses selected were twice daily, but after implementation of Amendment 4 the dose regimen was reduced to half the original dosing.

Samples for Week 2 serial group were collected at 0 (pre-morning dose)1, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 hour post-morning dose. Initially the doses selected for the study were 0.5 mg twice daily and 1.0 mg twice daily. However, because of implementation of Amendment 4, the dose regimen was reduced to half the original dosing resulting in dose once daily.

PK parameter Population. Initially the doses selected were twice daily, but after implementation of Amendment 4 the dose regimen was reduced to half the original dosing.

Samples for Week 2 serial group were collected at 0 (pre-morning dose)1, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 hour post-morning dose. Initially the doses selected for the study were 0.5 mg twice daily and 1.0 mg twice daily. However, because of implementation of Amendment 4, the dose regimen was reduced to half the original dosing resulting in dose once daily.

PK parameter Population. Initially the doses selected were twice daily, but after implementation of Amendment 4 the dose regimen was reduced to half the original dosing.

Samples for Week 2 serial group were collected at 0 (pre-morning dose) 1, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 hour post-morning dose. Initially the doses selected for the study were 0.5 mg twice daily and 1.0 mg twice daily. However, because of implementation of Amendment 4, the dose regimen was reduced to half the original dosing resulting in dose once daily.

PK parameter Population. Initially the doses selected were twice daily, but after implementation of Amendment 4 the dose regimen was reduced to half the original dosing.

Samples for Week 2 serial group were collected at 0 (pre-morning dose)1, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 hour post-morning dose. Initially the doses selected for the study were 0.5 mg twice daily and 1.0 mg twice daily. However, because of implementation of Amendment 4, the dose regimen was reduced to half the original dosing resulting in dose once daily.

PK parameter Population. Initially the doses selected were twice daily, but after implementation of Amendment 4 the dose regimen was reduced to half the original dosing.

Samples for Week 2 serial group were collected at 0 (pre-morning dose)1, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 hour post-morning dose. Initially the doses selected for the study were 0.5 mg twice daily and 1.0 mg twice daily. However, because of implementation of Amendment 4, the dose regimen was reduced to half the original dosing resulting in dose once daily.

PK parameter Population. Initially the doses selected were twice daily, but after implementation of Amendment 4 the dose regimen was reduced to half the original dosing.

Samples for Week 2 serial group were planned to be collected at 0 (pre-morning dose)1, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 2.5, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12 hour post-morning dose. For Weeks 16 and 40 samples were planned to be collected at 0 (pre-morning dose)1 and between 1.5-6 hour post-morning dose 2. For Weeks 28 and 52 samples were planned to be collected at 0 (pre-morning dose)1 and between 6-10 hour post-morning dose 2.

PK parameter Population. Initially the doses selected were twice daily, but after implementation of Amendment 4 the dose regimen was reduced to half the original dosing. Data was not collected for this endpoint.