Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| Liebowitz, Michael R., M.D. | INDIV |
| Pfizer | INDUSTRY |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the antidepressant effectiveness of Geodon for the treatment of patients diagnosed with Bipolar II disorder who are currently experiencing a major depressive episode.
Bipolar II disorder is largely unstudied, with much less known about its treatment in comparison to Bipolar I disorder. While established mood stabilizers treat and prevent subsequent episodes of hypomania, chronic or recurrent depressions are harder to treat or prevent. In general the treatment of depression in Bipolar II patients is often complicated and there is no clinical unanimity on what approaches to follow. Administration of proven antidepressants would seem most appropriate and are most often used, but their use often involves a number of difficulties. Among these are:
This study will also assess the tolerability of Geodon in the treatment of patients diagnosed with Bipolar II disorder who currently meet criteria for a Major Depressive Episode by examining the incidence of adverse events and the withdrawal rate due to adverse events.
This will be an open-label study. Subjects will be treated for 8 weeks with Geodon, starting at a dose of 20 mg twice per day. The maximum dose will be 60 mg twice per day. Subjects will have a physical exam, electrocardiogram (ECG), standard laboratory tests and a urine drug screen at the screen visit.
Efficacy evaluations will include 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale, Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-D), Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale, and the Young Mania Rating Scale. Social outcome will be measured with a quality-of-life scale (the Q-LES-Q). Overall efficacy will be rated using the Clinical Global Severity and Improvement Scales.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ziprasidone | Experimental | Ziprasidone monotherapy, 20-60 mg BID. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ziprasidone | Drug | Ziprasidone 20-60 mg BID, taken orally. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| The Primary Efficacy Endpoint is the Comparison of Baseline and Week 8 Endpoint in the 17-item HAM-D Total Scores | Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, measuring depression symptoms; possible total scores ranging from 0-54, with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms. | Week 8 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, measuring anxiety symptoms; possible total scores ranging from 0-30, with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety. | Week 8 |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Michael R Liebowitz, MD | Medical Research Network, L.L.C. | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Medical Research Network, L.L.C. | New York | New York | 10024 | United States | ||
| The Mech Center |
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Study Site Information | View source |
Not provided
The planned and actual study population was 30 patients, 18 years of age or older, who met DSM-IV criteria for bipolar II disorder with a history of at least one hypomanic episode.
The trial was conducted at three research centers, located in: New York, NY; Plano, TX; and Seattle, WA. Subjects were recruited over a 37 month period.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Ziprasidone | Patients will receive 8 weeks of active treatment with ziprasidone, initiated at 20mg BID. Depending on tolerability and clinical response, the dosage can be titrated up to a maximum of 60mg BID per day. Dosage can be lowered or temporarily stopped if necessary because of adverse events. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Ziprasidone |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | The Primary Efficacy Endpoint is the Comparison of Baseline and Week 8 Endpoint in the 17-item HAM-D Total Scores | Hamilton Depression Rating Scale, measuring depression symptoms; possible total scores ranging from 0-54, with higher scores indicating greater severity of symptoms. | Per protocol, the number of participants for analysis was 30 randomized subjects; data analyzed at Week 8 or Last Observation Carried Forward for the 6 subjects who dropped out before completion. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Scores on a scale | Week 8 |
|
|
10 weeks
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Ziprasidone |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| White Blood Cell Count Decreased | Immune system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Headache | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Michael Liebowitz | The Medical Research Network, LLC | (212) 595-5012 | MLiebowitz@MedicalResearchNetwork.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001714 | Bipolar Disorder |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000068105 | Bipolar and Related Disorders |
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C092292 | ziprasidone |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, measuring depression symptoms; possible total scores ranging from 0-60, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depression. |
| Week 8 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Global Inventory (CGI) Global Improvement Score of 1 or 2 | Clinical Global Impression of Improvement scale: one item, measuring overall improvement of illness; possible scores range from 1-7, with lower scores representing greater improvement. 18 subjects (60%) were responders (defined as having a CGI-I scores of 1 or 2 at Week 8/study endpoint) by the end of the trial. | Week 8 |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the CGI-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score at Study Endpoint | Clinical Global Impression of Severity scale: one item, measuring overall severity of illness; possible scores range from 1-7, with higher scores representing greater severity of illness. | Week 8 |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) | Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) scale consists of 14 items; possible scores range from 14-70 with higher scores indicating greater quality of life and satisfaction. | Week 8 |
| Mean Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) | Beck Depression Inventory, self-rated scale measuring depression symptoms; possible total scores ranging from 0-63, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depression. | Week 8 |
| Plano |
| Texas |
| 75024 |
| United States |
| Participants |
|
| Age Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAM-A) | Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, measuring anxiety symptoms; possible total scores ranging from 0-30, with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety. | Per protocol, the number of participants for analysis was 30 randomized subjects; data analyzed at Week 8 or Last Observation Carried Forward for the 6 subjects who dropped out before completion. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Scores on a scale | Week 8 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale | Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale, measuring depression symptoms; possible total scores ranging from 0-60, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depression. | Per protocol, the number of participants for analysis was 30 randomized subjects; data analyzed at Week 8 or Last Observation Carried Forward for the 6 subjects who dropped out before completion. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Scores on a scale | Week 8 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Clinical Global Inventory (CGI) Global Improvement Score of 1 or 2 | Clinical Global Impression of Improvement scale: one item, measuring overall improvement of illness; possible scores range from 1-7, with lower scores representing greater improvement. 18 subjects (60%) were responders (defined as having a CGI-I scores of 1 or 2 at Week 8/study endpoint) by the end of the trial. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of subjects with CGI-I </=2 | Week 8 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the CGI-Severity of Illness (CGI-S) Score at Study Endpoint | Clinical Global Impression of Severity scale: one item, measuring overall severity of illness; possible scores range from 1-7, with higher scores representing greater severity of illness. | Per protocol, the number of participants for analysis was 30 randomized subjects; data analyzed at Week 8 or Last Observation Carried Forward for the 6 subjects who dropped out before completion. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a scale | Week 8 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) | Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q) scale consists of 14 items; possible scores range from 14-70 with higher scores indicating greater quality of life and satisfaction. | Per protocol, the number of participants for analysis was 30 randomized subjects; data analyzed at Week 8 or Last Observation Carried Forward for the 6 subjects who dropped out before completion. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Scores on a scale | Week 8 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline in the Total Score of the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) | Beck Depression Inventory, self-rated scale measuring depression symptoms; possible total scores ranging from 0-63, with higher scores indicating greater severity of depression. | Per protocol, the number of participants for analysis was 30 randomized subjects; data analyzed at Week 8 or Last Observation Carried Forward for the 6 subjects who dropped out before completion. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Scores on a scale | Week 8 |
|
|
|
| 1 |
| 30 |
| 20 |
| 30 |
| Drowsiness | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Insomnia | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastrointestinal Upset | Gastrointestinal disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dry Mouth | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided