Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2004-000960-28 | EudraCT Number |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| SCHWARZ BIOSCIENCES GmbH - Part of UCB Group | UNKNOWN |
The purpose of this study is to determine if lacosamide (SPM 927) is safe if taken for a longer period of time and whether it continues to work well to treat pain.
Subjects will receive lacosamide at a dose that will be individually determined to be the one that provides most pain relief with the least side effects. The maximum dose will be 600mg/day. Subjects may participate in this trial until October 2007. This time may be extended to allow them to participate until lacosamide is commercially available.
If a subject meet the requirements for the study at Visit 1 and after a two weeks phase without trial medication, s/he enters a Titration Phase to determine the personal optimal dose of lacosamide. When this dose is reached s/he will enter the Maintenance Phase and will be asked to return for visits every 4 weeks for the first 24 weeks and every 12 weeks thereafter.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Lacosamide (LCM) | Experimental | Open label active treatment |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lacosamide | Drug | Lacosamide film-coated tablets; two times per day; up to 400 mg/day for 2.75 years |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Percentage of Subjects With Adverse Events (AE) Reported Spontaneously by the Subject or Observed by the Investigator | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. | From Screening until Safety Follow up Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Percentage of Subjects With Marked Abnormalities in Hematology Parameters After Start of Treatment During the Titration Period | Changes in hematology parameters is reported as incidence of marked abnormalities in - Hematocrit (<=.85x Lower Limit Normal [LLN] or >= 1.15x Upper Limit Normal [ULN] - Hemoglobin (<=.85x LLN or >=1.15x ULN) - White Blood Cell (WBC) Count (<=3.0 or >=16.0 G/l) - Basophils (>=5.0%) - Eosinophils (>=10%) - Monocytes (>=20%) - Platelet Count (<=100 or >=600 G/l) | During the titration period (up to Week 8) |
| Percentage of Subjects With Marked Abnormalities in Hematology Parameters After Start of Treatment During the Maintenance Period | Changes in hematology parameters is reported as incidence of marked abnormalities in - Hematocrit (<=.85x Lower Limit Normal [LLN] or >= 1.15x Upper Limit Normal [ULN] - Hemoglobin (<=.85x LLN or >=1.15x ULN) - White Blood Cell (WBC) Count (<=3.0 or >=16.0 G/l) - Basophils (>=5.0%) - Eosinophils (>=10%) - Monocytes (>=20%) - Platelet Count (<=100 or >=600 G/l) | During the maintenance period (up to 136 weeks) |
| Percentage of Subjects With Marked Abnormalities Clinical Chemistry Parameters After Start of Treatment During the Titration Period | Changes in clinical chemistry parameters is reported as incidence of marked abnormalities in - Alanine aminotransferase ([ALT] 3x ULN) - Alanine aminotransferase ([ALT] 5x ULN) - Alanine aminotransferase [(ALT] 10x ULN) - Aspartate aminotransferase ([AST] 3x ULN) - Aspartate aminotransferase ([AST] 5x ULN) - Aspartate aminotransferase ([AST] 10x ULN) - Alkaline Phosphatase (3x ULN) - Gamma-glutamyltransferase ([GGT] 3x ULN) - Total Bilirubin (2x ULN) - Albumin (<26 g/l) - Blood Urea Nitrogen (>=14.28 mmol/l) - Creatinine (>=2.0 mg/dl) - Calcium (<=7.6 or >=11.0 mg/dl) - Chloride (<=90 or >=112 mmol/l) - Phosphorus (<=2.0 or >=6.0 mg/dl) - Potassium (<=3.0 or >=6.0 mmol/l) - Sodium (<127 or >151 mmol/l) - Glucose (<50 or >=200 mg/dl) - Total Cholesterol (>6.5 mmol/l) - Uric Acid (>565.06 umol/l) |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Average Pain Interference With Sleep From the Baseline Week to the 7 Days Prior to Each Visit | Pain interference scores at each visit (sleep and activity respectively) were defined as the average of the respective daily interference scores during the 7 last available days prior to the corresponding visit. An 11-point Likert scale was used to assess the subject's sleep. The subject rated how the pain had interfered with sleep over the past 12 hours, from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. Subjects rated pain interference over the past 12 hours for 7 days prior to each visit and an average value was calculated for each subject. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| UCB Cares | UCB (+1 844 599 2273) | Study Director |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Monheim | Germany |
Participant Flow refers to the Safety Set.
The study started to enroll patients in December 2004 and concluded in October 2007.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Lacosamide | Subjects received lacosamide 100 mg (milligrams)/day (50 mg twice daily), orally which was up titrated in increments of 100 mg up to a maximum optimal dose of 400 mg/day during Titration Phase (Weeks 1 to 4). Subjects entered Maintenance Phase after the optimal dose was achieved and received it for up to a maximum of 140 weeks. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Baseline Characteristics refer to the Safety Set which consisted of all subjects who received at least 1 dose of study medication.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Lacosamide | Subjects received lacosamide 100 mg/day (50 mg twice daily), orally which was up titrated in increments of 100 mg up to a maximum optimal dose of 400 mg/day during Titration Phase (Weeks 1 to 4). Subjects entered Maintenance Phase after the optimal dose was achieved and received it for up to a maximum of 140 weeks. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Percentage of Subjects With Adverse Events (AE) Reported Spontaneously by the Subject or Observed by the Investigator | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. | The Safety Set (SS) was defined as all subjects who signed the informed consent form and took at least 1 dose of trial medication. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | From Screening until Safety Follow up Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
From Baseline through Safety follow up visit (up to 140 weeks)
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Lacosamide | Subjects received lacosamide 100 mg/day (50 mg twice daily), orally which was up titrated in increments of 100 mg up to a maximum optimal dose of 400 mg/day during Titration Phase (Weeks 1 to 4). Subjects entered Maintenance Phase after the optimal dose was achieved and received it for up to a maximum of 140 weeks. |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lymphadenopathy mediastinal | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nasopharyngitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| UCB | Cares | 001 844 599 2273 | UCBCares@ucb.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003929 | Diabetic Neuropathies |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010523 | Peripheral Nervous System Diseases |
| D009468 | Neuromuscular Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D048909 | Diabetes Complications |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000078334 | Lacosamide |
| C476828 | 2-(acetylamino)-3-methoxy-N-(phenylmethyl)-, (2R)- |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000081 | Acetamides |
| D000577 | Amides |
| D009930 | Organic Chemicals |
| D000085 | Acetates |
| D000144 |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| During the titration period (up to Week 8) |
| Percentage of Subjects With Marked Abnormalities Clinical Chemistry Parameters After Start of Treatment During the Maintenance Period | Changes in clinical chemistry parameters is reported as incidence of marked abnormalities in - Alanine aminotransferase ([ALT] 3x ULN) - Alanine aminotransferase ([ALT] 5x ULN) - Alanine aminotransferase [(ALT] 10x ULN) - Aspartate aminotransferase ([AST] 3x ULN) - Aspartate aminotransferase ([AST] 5x ULN) - Aspartate aminotransferase ([AST] 10x ULN) - Alkaline Phosphatase (3x ULN) - Gamma-glutamyltransferase ([GGT] 3x ULN) - Total Bilirubin (2x ULN) - Albumin (<26 g/l) - Blood Urea Nitrogen (>=14.28 mmol/l) - Creatinine (>=2.0 mg/dl) - Calcium (<=7.6 or >=11.0 mg/dl) - Chloride (<=90 or >=112 mmol/l) - Phosphorus (<=2.0 or >=6.0 mg/dl) - Potassium (<=3.0 or >=6.0 mmol/l) - Sodium (<127 or >151 mmol/l) - Glucose (<50 or >=200 mg/dl) - Total Cholesterol (>6.5 mmol/l) - Uric Acid (>565.06 umol/l) | During the maintenance period (up to 136 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine pH= 5.0 at Baseline, Categorized by Urine pH at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: pH= 5.0, pH= 6.0, pH= 6.5, pH= 7.0, pH= 7.5, pH= 8.0, pH= 8.5, not done (data not available). Baseline value taken at Visit 2 or at screening for parameters not collected at Visit 2. Last visit is the last post-baseline visit observed under exposure of trial medication, including unscheduled visits. | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine pH= 6.0 at Baseline, Categorized by Urine pH at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: pH= 5.0, pH= 6.0, pH= 6.5, pH= 7.0, pH= 7.5, pH= 8.0, pH= 8.5, not done (data not available). Baseline value taken at Visit 2 or at screening for parameters not collected at Visit 2. Last visit is the last post-baseline visit observed under exposure of trial medication, including unscheduled visits. | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine pH= 6.5 at Baseline, Categorized by Urine pH at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: pH= 5.0, pH= 6.0, pH= 6.5, pH= 7.0, pH= 7.5, pH= 8.0, pH= 8.5, not done (data not available). Baseline value taken at Visit 2 or at screening for parameters not collected at Visit 2. Last visit is the last post-baseline visit observed under exposure of trial medication, including unscheduled visits. | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine pH= 7.0 at Baseline, Categorized by Urine pH at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: pH= 5.0, pH= 6.0, pH= 6.5, pH= 7.0, pH= 7.5, pH= 8.0, pH= 8.5, not done (data not available). Baseline value taken at Visit 2 or at screening for parameters not collected at Visit 2. Last visit is the last post-baseline visit observed under exposure of trial medication, including unscheduled visits. | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine pH= 7.5 at Baseline, Categorized by Urine pH at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: pH= 5.0, pH= 6.0, pH= 6.5, pH= 7.0, pH= 7.5, pH= 8.0, pH= 8.5, not done (data not available). Baseline value taken at Visit 2 or at screening for parameters not collected at Visit 2. Last visit is the last post-baseline visit observed under exposure of trial medication, including unscheduled visits. | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine pH= 8.0 at Baseline, Categorized by Urine pH at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: pH= 5.0, pH= 6.0, pH= 6.5, pH= 7.0, pH= 7.5, pH= 8.0, pH= 8.5, not done (data not available). Baseline value taken at Visit 2 or at screening for parameters not collected at Visit 2. Last visit is the last post-baseline visit observed under exposure of trial medication, including unscheduled visits. | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine White Blood Cell Count 'Negative' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine White Blood Cell Count at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace, positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive categories (+,++,+++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine White Blood Cell Count 'Trace' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine White Blood Cell Count at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace, positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive categories (+,++,+++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine White Blood Cell Count 'Positive +' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine White Blood Cell Count at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace, positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive categories (+,++,+++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine White Blood Cell Count 'Positive ++' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine White Blood Cell Count at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace, positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive categories (+,++,+++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Nitrite Status 'Negative' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Nitrite Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, positive, not done (data not available). Positive category indicate worsening from Baseline. | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Nitrite Status 'Positive' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Nitrite Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, positive, not done (data not available). Positive category indicate worsening from Baseline. | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Urobilinogen Value 3 µmol/l at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Urobilinogen Value at Last Visit | Categories are as following: 3 µmol/l, 16 µmol/l, 33 µmol/l, 66 µmol/l, not done (data not available). | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Urobilinogen Value 16 µmol/l at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Urobilinogen Value at Last Visit | Categories are as following: 3 µmol/l, 16 µmol/l, 33 µmol/l, 66 µmol/l, not done (data not available). | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Urobilinogen Value 66 µmol/l at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Urobilinogen Value at Last Visit | Categories are as following: 3 µmol/l, 16 µmol/l, 33 µmol/l, 66 µmol/l, not done (data not available). | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Protein Status 'Negative' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Protein Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace, positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive categories (+,++,+++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Protein Status 'Trace' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Protein Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace, positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive category (+, ++, +++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Protein Status 'Positive +' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Protein Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace, positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive category (+, ++, +++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Protein Status 'Positive ++' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Protein Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace, positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive category (+, ++, +++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Blood Status 'Negative' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Blood Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace (N), trace (H), positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive category (+, ++, +++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Blood Status 'Trace (N)' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Blood Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace (N), trace (H), positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive category (+, ++, +++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Blood Status 'Trace (H)' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Blood Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace (N), trace (H), positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive category (+, ++, +++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Blood Status 'Positive +' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Blood Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace (N), trace (H), positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive category (+, ++, +++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Blood Status 'Positive ++' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Blood Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace (N), trace (H), positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive category (+, ++, +++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Ketone Status 'Negative' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Ketone Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace (N), trace, small, moderate, not done (data not available). | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Ketone Status 'Trace' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Ketone Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace (N), trace, small, moderate, not done (data not available). | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Ketone Status 'Small' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Ketone Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace (N), trace, small, moderate, not done (data not available). | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Ketone Status 'Moderate' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Ketone Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace (N), trace, small, moderate, not done (data not available). | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Bilirubin Status 'Negative' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Bilirubin Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, positive +, positive ++, not done (data not available). Positive category (+, ++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Bilirubin Status 'Positive +' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Bilirubin Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, positive +, positive ++, not done (data not available). Positive category (+, ++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Bilirubin Status 'Positive ++' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Bilirubin Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, positive +, positive ++, not done (data not available). Positive category (+, ++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Glucose Value 'Negative' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Glucose Value at Last Visit | Categories are as following: negative, 5.5 mmol/l, 14 mmol/l, 28 mmol/l, 55 mmol/l, >= 111 mmol/l, not done (data not available). | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Glucose Value 5.5 mmol/l at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Glucose Value at Last Visit | Categories are as following: negative, 5.5 mmol/l, 14 mmol/l, 28 mmol/l, 55 mmol/l, >= 111 mmol/l, not done (data not available). | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Glucose Value 14 mmol/l at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Glucose Value at Last Visit | Categories are as following: negative, 5.5 mmol/l, 14 mmol/l, 28 mmol/l, 55 mmol/l, >= 111 mmol/l, not done (data not available). | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Glucose Value 28 mmol/l at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Glucose Value at Last Visit | Categories are as following: negative, 5.5 mmol/l, 14 mmol/l, 28 mmol/l, 55 mmol/l, >= 111 mmol/l, not done (data not available). | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Glucose Value 55 mmol/l at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Glucose Value at Last Visit | Categories are as following: negative, 5.5 mmol/l, 14 mmol/l, 28 mmol/l, 55 mmol/l, >= 111 mmol/l, not done (data not available). | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Glucose Value >=111 mmol/l at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Glucose Value at Last Visit | Categories are as following: negative, 5.5 mmol/l, 14 mmol/l, 28 mmol/l, 55 mmol/l, >= 111 mmol/l, not done (data not available). | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Percentage of Subjects With Marked Abnormalities in Vital Signs After Start of Treatment | Changes in vital signs examination findings is reported as percentage of subjects with marked abnormalities in - Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) >=180 mmHg and increase of >=20 mmHg - Systolic Blood Pressure >=90 mmHg and decrease of >=20 mmHg - Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) >=105 mmHg and increase of >=15 mmHg - Diastolic Blood Pressure >=50 mmHg and decrease of >=15 mmHg - Pulse Rate (PR) >=120 beats/min and increase of >=15 beats/min - Pulse Rate >=50 beats/min and decrease of >=15 beats/min | During study period (up to 140 weeks) |
| Percentage of Subjects With Marked Abnormalities in Physical Examination Findings After Start of Treatment. | Changes in physical examination findings is reported as percentage of subjects with marked abnormalities in following categories: - Ears, Eyes, Nose, Mouth, Throat - Cardiovascular - Peripheral vascular - Pulmonary - Musculoskeletal - Hepato- / Gastrointestinal - Renal / Genitourological - Neurological - Metabolic / Endocrine - Psychiatric - Hematological / Lymphatic Nodes - Dermatological - Other The percentages are based on the number of subjects with examinations done at each visit for each body system. | Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Percentage of Subjects With Marked Abnormalities in Neurological Examination Findings After Start of Treatment | Changes in neurological examination findings is reported as percentage of subjects with marked abnormalities in following categories: - General - Cranial Nerves - Reflexes - Muscle Strength and Tone - Coordination and Cerebellar Function - Motor System - Sensation: Upper Extremities - Sensation: Lower Extremities The percentages are based on the number of subjects with examinations done at last visit for each category or parameter. | Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Percentage of Subjects With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | Changes in 12-lead ECGs is reported as percentage of subjects with abnormal ECG findings categorized in 'Abnormal, possibly insignificant' and 'Abnormal, possibly significant' based on the alert criterion by the ECG vendor and not on the investigator's assessment. | Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Percentage of Subjects Who Withdrew Due to Adverse Events (AEs) | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. | During the study period (up to 140 weeks) |
| Number of Subjects With Urine Protein Status 'Positive +++' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Protein Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace, positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive category (+, ++, +++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
| Baseline, Visit 2.1, Visit 2.2, Visit 2.4, Visit 2.5, Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6, Visit 7, Visit 8, Visit 9.0, Visit 9.1, Visit 9.2, Visit 9.3, Visit 9.4, Visit 9.5, Visit 9.6, Visit 9.7, Visit 9.8, Visit 9.9 |
| Change in Average Pain Interference With General Activity From the Baseline Week to the 7 Days Prior to Each Visit | Pain interference scores at each visit (sleep and activity respectively) were defined as the average of the respective daily interference scores during the 7 last available days prior to the corresponding visit. An 11-point Likert scale was used to assess the subject's sleep. The subject rated how the pain had interfered with sleep over the past 12 hours, from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. Subjects rated pain interference over the past 12 hours for 7 days prior to each visit and an average value was calculated for each subject. | Baseline, Visit 2.1, Visit 2.2, Visit 2.4, Visit 2.5, Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6, Visit 7, Visit 8, Visit 9.0, Visit 9.1, Visit 9.2, Visit 9.3, Visit 9.4, Visit 9.5, Visit 9.6, Visit 9.7, Visit 9.8, Visit 9.9 |
| Change in Current Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Each Subsequent Visit as Measured by a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | A 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess the subject's current pain. The subject rated their current pain from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain). A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms. | Baseline, Visit 2.1, Visit 2.2, Visit 2.4, Visit 2.5, Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6, Visit 7, Visit 8, Visit 9.0, Visit 9.1, Visit 9.2, Visit 9.3, Visit 9.4, Visit 9.5, Visit 9.6, Visit 9.7, Visit 9.8, Visit 9.9 |
| Percentage of Patients With Categorized Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) at Visit 4 | The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the change in his/her pain since starting trial medication. Categories are as following: much worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, no change, mildly better, moderately better, much better. | Visit 4 |
| Percentage of Patients With Categorized Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) at Visit 6 | The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the change in his/her pain since starting trial medication. Categories are as following: much worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, no change, mildly better, moderately better, much better. | Visit 6 |
| Percentage of Patients With Categorized Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) at Visit 9.0 | The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the change in his/her pain since starting trial medication. Categories are as following: much worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, no change, mildly better, moderately better, much better. | Visit 9.0 |
| Percentage of Patients With Categorized Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) at Visit 9.1 | The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the change in his/her pain since starting trial medication. Categories are as following: much worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, no change, mildly better, moderately better, much better. | Visit 9.1 |
| Percentage of Patients With Categorized Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) at Visit 9.2 | The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the change in his/her pain since starting trial medication. Categories are as following: much worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, no change, mildly better, moderately better, much better. | Visit 9.2 |
| Percentage of Patients With Categorized Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) at Visit 9.3 | The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the change in his/her pain since starting trial medication. Categories are as following: much worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, no change, mildly better, moderately better, much better. | Visit 9.3 |
| Percentage of Patients With Categorized Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) at Visit 9.4 | The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the change in his/her pain since starting trial medication. Categories are as following: much worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, no change, mildly better, moderately better, much better. | Visit 9.4 |
| Percentage of Patients With Categorized Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) at Visit 9.5 | The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the change in his/her pain since starting trial medication. Categories are as following: much worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, no change, mildly better, moderately better, much better. | Visit 9.5 |
| Percentage of Patients With Categorized Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) at Visit 9.6 | The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the change in his/her pain since starting trial medication. Categories are as following: much worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, no change, mildly better, moderately better, much better. | Visit 9.6 |
| Percentage of Patients With Categorized Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) at Visit 9.7 | The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the change in his/her pain since starting trial medication. Categories are as following: much worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, no change, mildly better, moderately better, much better. | Visit 9.7 |
| Percentage of Patients With Categorized Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) at Visit 9.8 | The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the change in his/her pain since starting trial medication. Categories are as following: much worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, no change, mildly better, moderately better, much better. | Visit 9.8 |
| Percentage of Patients With Categorized Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) at Termination Visit | The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the change in his/her pain since starting trial medication. Categories are as following: much worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, no change, mildly better, moderately better, much better. | Termination Visit (last treatment visit) |
| Change in Different Symptoms of Neuropathic Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 4 | Subjects were asked to assess different symptoms of neuropathic pain with respect to severity using the Neuropathic Pain Symptoms Inventory (NPSI) at different visits. It comprised of 10 descriptive symptom questions (pain feels like burning, squeezing, pressure electric shocks, stabbing, pins/needles, tingling, provoked or increased by brushing, pressure or contact with something cold), and 2 temporal questions (duration of pain, number of pain attacks). The NPSI scores of the descriptive questions are reported in categories below, which were rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity of pain). Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of pain. A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Baseline, Visit 4 |
| Change in Different Symptoms of Neuropathic Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 6 | Subjects were asked to assess different symptoms of neuropathic pain with respect to severity using the NPSI at different visits. It comprised of 10 descriptive symptom questions (pain feels like burning, squeezing, pressure electric shocks, stabbing, pins/needles, tingling, provoked or increased by brushing, pressure or contact with something cold), and 2 temporal questions (duration of pain, number of pain attacks). The NPSI scores of the descriptive questions are reported in categories below, which were rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity of pain). Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of pain. A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Baseline, Visit 6 |
| Change in Different Symptoms of Neuropathic Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.0 | Subjects were asked to assess different symptoms of neuropathic pain with respect to severity using the NPSI at different visits. It comprised of 10 descriptive symptom questions (pain feels like burning, squeezing, pressure electric shocks, stabbing, pins/needles, tingling, provoked or increased by brushing, pressure or contact with something cold), and 2 temporal questions (duration of pain, number of pain attacks). The NPSI scores of the descriptive questions are reported in categories below, which were rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity of pain). Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of pain. A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Baseline, Visit 9.0 |
| Change in Different Symptoms of Neuropathic Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.1 | Subjects were asked to assess different symptoms of neuropathic pain with respect to severity using the NPSI at different visits. It comprised of 10 descriptive symptom questions (pain feels like burning, squeezing, pressure electric shocks, stabbing, pins/needles, tingling, provoked or increased by brushing, pressure or contact with something cold), which were rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity of pain), and are reported in categories below and 2 temporal questions (duration of pain, number of pain attacks). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. Total NPSI scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (maximum pain). Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of pain. A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. | Baseline, Visit 9.1 |
| Change in Different Symptoms of Neuropathic Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.2 | Subjects were asked to assess different symptoms of neuropathic pain with respect to severity using the NPSI at different visits. It comprised of 10 descriptive symptom questions (pain feels like burning, squeezing, pressure electric shocks, stabbing, pins/needles, tingling, provoked or increased by brushing, pressure or contact with something cold), and 2 temporal questions (duration of pain, number of pain attacks). The NPSI scores of the descriptive questions are reported in categories below, which were rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity of pain). Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of pain. A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Baseline, Visit 9.2 |
| Change in Different Symptoms of Neuropathic Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.3 | Subjects were asked to assess different symptoms of neuropathic pain with respect to severity using the NPSI at different visits. It comprised of 10 descriptive symptom questions (pain feels like burning, squeezing, pressure electric shocks, stabbing, pins/needles, tingling, provoked or increased by brushing, pressure or contact with something cold), and 2 temporal questions (duration of pain, number of pain attacks). The NPSI scores of the descriptive questions are reported in categories below, which were rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity of pain). Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of pain. A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Baseline, Visit 9.3 |
| Change in Different Symptoms of Neuropathic Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.4 | Subjects were asked to assess different symptoms of neuropathic pain with respect to severity using the NPSI at different visits. It comprised of 10 descriptive symptom questions (pain feels like burning, squeezing, pressure electric shocks, stabbing, pins/needles, tingling, provoked or increased by brushing, pressure or contact with something cold), and 2 temporal questions (duration of pain, number of pain attacks). The NPSI scores of the descriptive questions are reported in categories below, which were rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity of pain). Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of pain. A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Baseline, Visit 9.4 |
| Change in Different Symptoms of Neuropathic Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.5 | Subjects were asked to assess different symptoms of neuropathic pain with respect to severity using the NPSI at different visits. It comprised of 10 descriptive symptom questions (pain feels like burning, squeezing, pressure electric shocks, stabbing, pins/needles, tingling, provoked or increased by brushing, pressure or contact with something cold), and 2 temporal questions (duration of pain, number of pain attacks). The NPSI scores of the descriptive questions are reported in categories below, which were rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity of pain). Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of pain. A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Baseline, Visit 9.5 |
| Change in Different Symptoms of Neuropathic Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.6 | Subjects were asked to assess different symptoms of neuropathic pain with respect to severity using the NPSI at different visits. It comprised of 10 descriptive symptom questions (pain feels like burning, squeezing, pressure electric shocks, stabbing, pins/needles, tingling, provoked or increased by brushing, pressure or contact with something cold), and 2 temporal questions (duration of pain, number of pain attacks). The NPSI scores of the descriptive questions are reported in categories below, which were rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity of pain). Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of pain. A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Baseline, Visit 9.6 |
| Change in Different Symptoms of Neuropathic Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.7 | Subjects were asked to assess different symptoms of neuropathic pain with respect to severity using the NPSI at different visits. It comprised of 10 descriptive symptom questions (pain feels like burning, squeezing, pressure electric shocks, stabbing, pins/needles, tingling, provoked or increased by brushing, pressure or contact with something cold), and 2 temporal questions (duration of pain, number of pain attacks). The NPSI scores of the descriptive questions are reported in categories below, which were rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity of pain). Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of pain. A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Baseline, Visit 9.7 |
| Change in Different Symptoms of Neuropathic Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.8 | Subjects were asked to assess different symptoms of neuropathic pain with respect to severity using the NPSI at different visits. It comprised of 10 descriptive symptom questions (pain feels like burning, squeezing, pressure electric shocks, stabbing, pins/needles, tingling, provoked or increased by brushing, pressure or contact with something cold), and 2 temporal questions (duration of pain, number of pain attacks). The NPSI scores of the descriptive questions are reported in categories below, which were rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity of pain). Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of pain. A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Baseline, Visit 9.8 |
| Change in Different Symptoms of Neuropathic Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Termination Visit | Subjects were asked to assess different symptoms of neuropathic pain with respect to severity using the NPSI at different visits. It comprised of 10 descriptive symptom questions (pain feels like burning, squeezing, pressure electric shocks, stabbing, pins/needles, tingling, provoked or increased by brushing, pressure or contact with something cold), and 2 temporal questions (duration of pain, number of pain attacks). The NPSI scores of the descriptive questions are reported in categories below, which were rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity of pain). Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of pain. A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Baseline, Termination Visit (last treatment visit) |
| Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Visit 2 (Baseline) | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Visit 2 (Baseline) |
| Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Visit 4 | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Visit 4 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Visit 6 | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Visit 6 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Visit 9.0 | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Visit 9.0 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Visit 9.1 | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Visit 9.1 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Visit 9.2 | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Visit 9.2 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Visit 9.3 | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Visit 9.3 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Visit 9.4 | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Visit 9.4 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Visit 9.5 | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Visit 9.5 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Visit 9.6 | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Visit 9.6 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Visit 9.7 | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Visit 9.7 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Visit 9.8 | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Visit 9.8 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Termination Visit | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Termination Visit (last treatment visit) |
| Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Visit 2 (Baseline) | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Visit 2 (Baseline) |
| Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Visit 4 | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Visit 4 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Visit 6 | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Visit 6 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Visit 9.0 | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Visit 9.0 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Visit 9.1 | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Visit 9.1 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Visit 9.2 | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Visit 9.2 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Visit 9.3 | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Visit 9.3 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Visit 9.4 | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Visit 9.4 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Visit 9.5 | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Visit 9.5 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Visit 9.6 | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Visit 9.6 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Visit 9.7 | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Visit 9.7 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Visit 9.8 | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Visit 9.8 |
| Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Termination Visit | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Termination Visit (last treatment visit) |
| Change in Quality of Life From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 4 | Quality of life was analyzed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire which consists of 8 sub-scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better health state. The sub-scores are: 1. Physical Functioning, 2. Role-Physical, 3. Bodily Pain, 4. General Health, 5. Vitality, 6. Social Functioning, 7. Role-Emotional, 8. Mental Health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component Summary (PCS) score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary (MCS) score of the SF-36. The PCS and MCS were based on the standardized values of the 8 domains. The maximum and minimum possible values for PCS and MCS is 0-100, where higher scores indicate good condition. A positive value indicates improvement from baseline in quality of life. | Baseline, Visit 4 |
| Change in Quality of Life From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 6 | Quality of life was analyzed using the SF-36 Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire which consists of 8 sub-scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better health state. The sub-scores are: 1. Physical Functioning, 2. Role-Physical, 3. Bodily Pain, 4. General Health, 5. Vitality, 6. Social Functioning, 7. Role-Emotional, 8. Mental Health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. The PCS and MCS were based on the standardized values of the 8 domains. The maximum and minimum possible values for PCS and MCS is 0-100, where higher scores indicate good condition. A positive value indicates improvement from baseline in quality of life. | Baseline, Visit 6 |
| Change in Quality of Life From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.0 | Quality of life was analyzed using the SF-36 Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire which consists of 8 sub-scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better health state. The sub-scores are: 1. Physical Functioning, 2. Role-Physical, 3. Bodily Pain, 4. General Health, 5. Vitality, 6. Social Functioning, 7. Role-Emotional, 8. Mental Health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. The PCS and MCS were based on the standardized values of the 8 domains. The maximum and minimum possible values for PCS and MCS is 0-100, where higher scores indicate good condition. A positive value indicates improvement from baseline in quality of life. | Baseline, Visit 9.0 |
| Change in Quality of Life From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.1 | Quality of life was analyzed using the SF-36 Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire which consists of 8 sub-scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better health state. The sub-scores are: 1. Physical Functioning, 2. Role-Physical, 3. Bodily Pain, 4. General Health, 5. Vitality, 6. Social Functioning, 7. Role-Emotional, 8. Mental Health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. The PCS and MCS were based on the standardized values of the 8 domains. The maximum and minimum possible values for PCS and MCS is 0-100, where higher scores indicate good condition. A positive value indicates improvement from baseline in quality of life. | Baseline, Visit 9.1 |
| Change in Quality of Life From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.2 | Quality of life was analyzed using the SF-36 Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire which consists of 8 sub-scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better health state. The sub-scores are: 1. Physical Functioning, 2. Role-Physical, 3. Bodily Pain, 4. General Health, 5. Vitality, 6. Social Functioning, 7. Role-Emotional, 8. Mental Health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. The PCS and MCS were based on the standardized values of the 8 domains. The maximum and minimum possible values for PCS and MCS is 0-100, where higher scores indicate good condition. A positive value indicates improvement from baseline in quality of life. | Baseline, Visit 9.2 |
| Change in Quality of Life From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.3 | Quality of life was analyzed using the SF-36 Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire which consists of 8 sub-scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better health state. The sub-scores are: 1. Physical Functioning, 2. Role-Physical, 3. Bodily Pain, 4. General Health, 5. Vitality, 6. Social Functioning, 7. Role-Emotional, 8. Mental Health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. The PCS and MCS were based on the standardized values of the 8 domains. The maximum and minimum possible values for PCS and MCS is 0-100, where higher scores indicate good condition. A positive value indicates improvement from baseline in quality of life. | Baseline, Visit 9.3 |
| Change in Quality of Life From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.4 | Quality of life was analyzed using the SF-36 Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire which consists of 8 sub-scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better health state. The sub-scores are: 1. Physical Functioning, 2. Role-Physical, 3. Bodily Pain, 4. General Health, 5. Vitality, 6. Social Functioning, 7. Role-Emotional, 8. Mental Health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. The PCS and MCS were based on the standardized values of the 8 domains. The maximum and minimum possible values for PCS and MCS is 0-100, where higher scores indicate good condition. A positive value indicates improvement from baseline in quality of life. | Baseline, Visit 9.4 |
| Change in Quality of Life From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.5 | Quality of life was analyzed using the SF-36 Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire which consists of 8 sub-scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better health state. The sub-scores are: 1. Physical Functioning, 2. Role-Physical, 3. Bodily Pain, 4. General Health, 5. Vitality, 6. Social Functioning, 7. Role-Emotional, 8. Mental Health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. The PCS and MCS were based on the standardized values of the 8 domains. The maximum and minimum possible values for PCS and MCS is 0-100, where higher scores indicate good condition. A positive value indicates improvement from baseline in quality of life. | Baseline, Visit 9.5 |
| Change in Quality of Life From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.6 | Quality of life was analyzed using the SF-36 Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire which consists of 8 sub-scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better health state. The sub-scores are: 1. Physical Functioning, 2. Role-Physical, 3. Bodily Pain, 4. General Health, 5. Vitality, 6. Social Functioning, 7. Role-Emotional, 8. Mental Health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. The PCS and MCS were based on the standardized values of the 8 domains. The maximum and minimum possible values for PCS and MCS is 0-100, where higher scores indicate good condition. A positive value indicates improvement from baseline in quality of life. | Baseline, Visit 9.6 |
| Change in Quality of Life From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.7 | Quality of life was analyzed using the SF-36 Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire which consists of 8 sub-scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better health state. The sub-scores are: 1. Physical Functioning, 2. Role-Physical, 3. Bodily Pain, 4. General Health, 5. Vitality, 6. Social Functioning, 7. Role-Emotional, 8. Mental Health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. The PCS and MCS were based on the standardized values of the 8 domains. The maximum and minimum possible values for PCS and MCS is 0-100, where higher scores indicate good condition. A positive value indicates improvement from baseline in quality of life. | Baseline, Visit 9.7 |
| Change in Quality of Life From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.8 | Quality of life was analyzed using the SF-36 Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire which consists of 8 sub-scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better health state. The sub-scores are: 1. Physical Functioning, 2. Role-Physical, 3. Bodily Pain, 4. General Health, 5. Vitality, 6. Social Functioning, 7. Role-Emotional, 8. Mental Health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. The PCS and MCS were based on the standardized values of the 8 domains. The maximum and minimum possible values for PCS and MCS is 0-100, where higher scores indicate good condition. A positive value indicates improvement from baseline in quality of life. | Baseline, Visit 9.8 |
| Change in Quality of Life From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Termination Visit | Quality of life was analyzed using the SF-36 Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire which consists of 8 sub-scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better health state. The sub-scores are: 1. Physical Functioning, 2. Role-Physical, 3. Bodily Pain, 4. General Health, 5. Vitality, 6. Social Functioning, 7. Role-Emotional, 8. Mental Health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. The PCS and MCS were based on the standardized values of the 8 domains. The maximum and minimum possible values for PCS and MCS is 0-100, where higher scores indicate good condition. A positive value indicates improvement from baseline in quality of life. | Baseline, Termination Visit (last treatment visit) |
| Protocol Violation |
|
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Other |
|
| Unsatisfactory compliance |
|
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Subjects With Marked Abnormalities in Hematology Parameters After Start of Treatment During the Titration Period | Changes in hematology parameters is reported as incidence of marked abnormalities in - Hematocrit (<=.85x Lower Limit Normal [LLN] or >= 1.15x Upper Limit Normal [ULN] - Hemoglobin (<=.85x LLN or >=1.15x ULN) - White Blood Cell (WBC) Count (<=3.0 or >=16.0 G/l) - Basophils (>=5.0%) - Eosinophils (>=10%) - Monocytes (>=20%) - Platelet Count (<=100 or >=600 G/l) | Safety Set included 371 subjects. Only subjects with valid data for hematology parameters are included in the analysis. Here, Number analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable for different hematologic parameters. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | During the titration period (up to Week 8) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Subjects With Marked Abnormalities in Hematology Parameters After Start of Treatment During the Maintenance Period | Changes in hematology parameters is reported as incidence of marked abnormalities in - Hematocrit (<=.85x Lower Limit Normal [LLN] or >= 1.15x Upper Limit Normal [ULN] - Hemoglobin (<=.85x LLN or >=1.15x ULN) - White Blood Cell (WBC) Count (<=3.0 or >=16.0 G/l) - Basophils (>=5.0%) - Eosinophils (>=10%) - Monocytes (>=20%) - Platelet Count (<=100 or >=600 G/l) | Safety Set included 371 subjects. Only subjects with valid data for hematology parameters are included in the analysis. Here, Number analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable for different hematologic parameters. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | During the maintenance period (up to 136 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Subjects With Marked Abnormalities Clinical Chemistry Parameters After Start of Treatment During the Titration Period | Changes in clinical chemistry parameters is reported as incidence of marked abnormalities in - Alanine aminotransferase ([ALT] 3x ULN) - Alanine aminotransferase ([ALT] 5x ULN) - Alanine aminotransferase [(ALT] 10x ULN) - Aspartate aminotransferase ([AST] 3x ULN) - Aspartate aminotransferase ([AST] 5x ULN) - Aspartate aminotransferase ([AST] 10x ULN) - Alkaline Phosphatase (3x ULN) - Gamma-glutamyltransferase ([GGT] 3x ULN) - Total Bilirubin (2x ULN) - Albumin (<26 g/l) - Blood Urea Nitrogen (>=14.28 mmol/l) - Creatinine (>=2.0 mg/dl) - Calcium (<=7.6 or >=11.0 mg/dl) - Chloride (<=90 or >=112 mmol/l) - Phosphorus (<=2.0 or >=6.0 mg/dl) - Potassium (<=3.0 or >=6.0 mmol/l) - Sodium (<127 or >151 mmol/l) - Glucose (<50 or >=200 mg/dl) - Total Cholesterol (>6.5 mmol/l) - Uric Acid (>565.06 umol/l) | Safety Set included 371 subjects. Only subjects with valid data for clinical chemistry parameters are included in the analysis. Here, Number analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable for different clinical chemistry parameters. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | During the titration period (up to Week 8) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Subjects With Marked Abnormalities Clinical Chemistry Parameters After Start of Treatment During the Maintenance Period | Changes in clinical chemistry parameters is reported as incidence of marked abnormalities in - Alanine aminotransferase ([ALT] 3x ULN) - Alanine aminotransferase ([ALT] 5x ULN) - Alanine aminotransferase [(ALT] 10x ULN) - Aspartate aminotransferase ([AST] 3x ULN) - Aspartate aminotransferase ([AST] 5x ULN) - Aspartate aminotransferase ([AST] 10x ULN) - Alkaline Phosphatase (3x ULN) - Gamma-glutamyltransferase ([GGT] 3x ULN) - Total Bilirubin (2x ULN) - Albumin (<26 g/l) - Blood Urea Nitrogen (>=14.28 mmol/l) - Creatinine (>=2.0 mg/dl) - Calcium (<=7.6 or >=11.0 mg/dl) - Chloride (<=90 or >=112 mmol/l) - Phosphorus (<=2.0 or >=6.0 mg/dl) - Potassium (<=3.0 or >=6.0 mmol/l) - Sodium (<127 or >151 mmol/l) - Glucose (<50 or >=200 mg/dl) - Total Cholesterol (>6.5 mmol/l) - Uric Acid (>565.06 umol/l) | Safety Set included 371 subjects. Only subjects with valid data for clinical chemistry parameters are included in the analysis. Here, Number analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable for different clinical chemistry parameters. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | During the maintenance period (up to 136 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine pH= 5.0 at Baseline, Categorized by Urine pH at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: pH= 5.0, pH= 6.0, pH= 6.5, pH= 7.0, pH= 7.5, pH= 8.0, pH= 8.5, not done (data not available). Baseline value taken at Visit 2 or at screening for parameters not collected at Visit 2. Last visit is the last post-baseline visit observed under exposure of trial medication, including unscheduled visits. | Only subjects with urine pH= 5.0 at baseline are included in this analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine pH= 6.0 at Baseline, Categorized by Urine pH at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: pH= 5.0, pH= 6.0, pH= 6.5, pH= 7.0, pH= 7.5, pH= 8.0, pH= 8.5, not done (data not available). Baseline value taken at Visit 2 or at screening for parameters not collected at Visit 2. Last visit is the last post-baseline visit observed under exposure of trial medication, including unscheduled visits. | Only subjects with urine pH= 6.0 at baseline are included in this analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine pH= 6.5 at Baseline, Categorized by Urine pH at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: pH= 5.0, pH= 6.0, pH= 6.5, pH= 7.0, pH= 7.5, pH= 8.0, pH= 8.5, not done (data not available). Baseline value taken at Visit 2 or at screening for parameters not collected at Visit 2. Last visit is the last post-baseline visit observed under exposure of trial medication, including unscheduled visits. | Only subjects with urine pH= 6.5 at baseline are included in this analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine pH= 7.0 at Baseline, Categorized by Urine pH at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: pH= 5.0, pH= 6.0, pH= 6.5, pH= 7.0, pH= 7.5, pH= 8.0, pH= 8.5, not done (data not available). Baseline value taken at Visit 2 or at screening for parameters not collected at Visit 2. Last visit is the last post-baseline visit observed under exposure of trial medication, including unscheduled visits. | Only subjects with urine pH= 7.0 at baseline are included in this analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine pH= 7.5 at Baseline, Categorized by Urine pH at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: pH= 5.0, pH= 6.0, pH= 6.5, pH= 7.0, pH= 7.5, pH= 8.0, pH= 8.5, not done (data not available). Baseline value taken at Visit 2 or at screening for parameters not collected at Visit 2. Last visit is the last post-baseline visit observed under exposure of trial medication, including unscheduled visits. | Only subjects with urine pH= 7.5 at baseline are included in this analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine pH= 8.0 at Baseline, Categorized by Urine pH at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: pH= 5.0, pH= 6.0, pH= 6.5, pH= 7.0, pH= 7.5, pH= 8.0, pH= 8.5, not done (data not available). Baseline value taken at Visit 2 or at screening for parameters not collected at Visit 2. Last visit is the last post-baseline visit observed under exposure of trial medication, including unscheduled visits. | Only subjects with urine pH= 8.0 at baseline are included in this analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine White Blood Cell Count 'Negative' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine White Blood Cell Count at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace, positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive categories (+,++,+++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Only subjects with urine White Blood Cell Count 'Negative' at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine White Blood Cell Count 'Trace' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine White Blood Cell Count at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace, positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive categories (+,++,+++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Only subjects with urine White Blood Cell Count 'Trace' at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine White Blood Cell Count 'Positive +' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine White Blood Cell Count at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace, positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive categories (+,++,+++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Only subjects with urine White Blood Cell Count 'Positive +' at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine White Blood Cell Count 'Positive ++' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine White Blood Cell Count at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace, positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive categories (+,++,+++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Only subjects with urine White Blood Cell Count 'Positive ++' at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Nitrite Status 'Negative' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Nitrite Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, positive, not done (data not available). Positive category indicate worsening from Baseline. | Only subjects with Urine Nitrite status 'Negative' at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Nitrite Status 'Positive' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Nitrite Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, positive, not done (data not available). Positive category indicate worsening from Baseline. | Only subjects with Urine Nitrite status 'Positive' at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Urobilinogen Value 3 µmol/l at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Urobilinogen Value at Last Visit | Categories are as following: 3 µmol/l, 16 µmol/l, 33 µmol/l, 66 µmol/l, not done (data not available). | Only subjects with Urine Urobilinogen value 3 µmol/l at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Urobilinogen Value 16 µmol/l at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Urobilinogen Value at Last Visit | Categories are as following: 3 µmol/l, 16 µmol/l, 33 µmol/l, 66 µmol/l, not done (data not available). | Only subjects with Urine Urobilinogen value 16 µmol/l at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Urobilinogen Value 66 µmol/l at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Urobilinogen Value at Last Visit | Categories are as following: 3 µmol/l, 16 µmol/l, 33 µmol/l, 66 µmol/l, not done (data not available). | Only subjects with Urine Urobilinogen value 66 µmol/l at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Protein Status 'Negative' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Protein Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace, positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive categories (+,++,+++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Only subjects with Urine Protein status 'Negative' at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Protein Status 'Trace' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Protein Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace, positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive category (+, ++, +++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Only subjects with Urine Protein status 'Trace' at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Protein Status 'Positive +' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Protein Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace, positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive category (+, ++, +++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Only subjects with Urine Protein status 'Positive +' at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Protein Status 'Positive ++' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Protein Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace, positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive category (+, ++, +++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Only subjects with Urine Protein status 'Positive ++' at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Blood Status 'Negative' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Blood Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace (N), trace (H), positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive category (+, ++, +++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Only subjects with Urine Blood status 'Negative' at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Blood Status 'Trace (N)' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Blood Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace (N), trace (H), positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive category (+, ++, +++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Only subjects with Urine Blood status 'Trace (N)' at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Blood Status 'Trace (H)' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Blood Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace (N), trace (H), positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive category (+, ++, +++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Only subjects with Urine Blood status 'Trace (H)' at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Blood Status 'Positive +' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Blood Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace (N), trace (H), positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive category (+, ++, +++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Only subjects with Urine Blood status 'Positive +' at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Blood Status 'Positive ++' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Blood Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace (N), trace (H), positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive category (+, ++, +++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Only subjects with Urine Blood status 'Positive ++' at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Ketone Status 'Negative' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Ketone Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace (N), trace, small, moderate, not done (data not available). | Only subjects with Urine Ketone status 'Negative' at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Ketone Status 'Trace' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Ketone Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace (N), trace, small, moderate, not done (data not available). | Only subjects with Urine Ketone status 'Trace' at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Ketone Status 'Small' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Ketone Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace (N), trace, small, moderate, not done (data not available). | Only subjects with Urine Ketone status 'Small' at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Ketone Status 'Moderate' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Ketone Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace (N), trace, small, moderate, not done (data not available). | Only subjects with Urine Ketone status 'Moderate' at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Bilirubin Status 'Negative' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Bilirubin Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, positive +, positive ++, not done (data not available). Positive category (+, ++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Only subjects with Urine Bilirubin status 'Negative' at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Bilirubin Status 'Positive +' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Bilirubin Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, positive +, positive ++, not done (data not available). Positive category (+, ++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Only subjects with Urine Bilirubin status 'Positive +' at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Bilirubin Status 'Positive ++' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Bilirubin Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, positive +, positive ++, not done (data not available). Positive category (+, ++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Only subjects with Urine Bilirubin status 'Positive ++' at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Glucose Value 'Negative' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Glucose Value at Last Visit | Categories are as following: negative, 5.5 mmol/l, 14 mmol/l, 28 mmol/l, 55 mmol/l, >= 111 mmol/l, not done (data not available). | Only subjects with Urine Glucose value 'Negative' at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Glucose Value 5.5 mmol/l at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Glucose Value at Last Visit | Categories are as following: negative, 5.5 mmol/l, 14 mmol/l, 28 mmol/l, 55 mmol/l, >= 111 mmol/l, not done (data not available). | Only subjects with Urine Glucose value 5.5 mmol/l at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Glucose Value 14 mmol/l at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Glucose Value at Last Visit | Categories are as following: negative, 5.5 mmol/l, 14 mmol/l, 28 mmol/l, 55 mmol/l, >= 111 mmol/l, not done (data not available). | Only subjects with Urine Glucose value 14 mmol/l at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Glucose Value 28 mmol/l at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Glucose Value at Last Visit | Categories are as following: negative, 5.5 mmol/l, 14 mmol/l, 28 mmol/l, 55 mmol/l, >= 111 mmol/l, not done (data not available). | Only subjects with Urine Glucose value 28 mmol/l at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Glucose Value 55 mmol/l at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Glucose Value at Last Visit | Categories are as following: negative, 5.5 mmol/l, 14 mmol/l, 28 mmol/l, 55 mmol/l, >= 111 mmol/l, not done (data not available). | Only subjects with Urine Glucose value 55 mmol/l at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Glucose Value >=111 mmol/l at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Glucose Value at Last Visit | Categories are as following: negative, 5.5 mmol/l, 14 mmol/l, 28 mmol/l, 55 mmol/l, >= 111 mmol/l, not done (data not available). | Only subjects with Urine Glucose value >=111 mmol/l at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Baseline, Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Subjects With Marked Abnormalities in Vital Signs After Start of Treatment | Changes in vital signs examination findings is reported as percentage of subjects with marked abnormalities in - Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) >=180 mmHg and increase of >=20 mmHg - Systolic Blood Pressure >=90 mmHg and decrease of >=20 mmHg - Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) >=105 mmHg and increase of >=15 mmHg - Diastolic Blood Pressure >=50 mmHg and decrease of >=15 mmHg - Pulse Rate (PR) >=120 beats/min and increase of >=15 beats/min - Pulse Rate >=50 beats/min and decrease of >=15 beats/min | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | During study period (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Subjects With Marked Abnormalities in Physical Examination Findings After Start of Treatment. | Changes in physical examination findings is reported as percentage of subjects with marked abnormalities in following categories: - Ears, Eyes, Nose, Mouth, Throat - Cardiovascular - Peripheral vascular - Pulmonary - Musculoskeletal - Hepato- / Gastrointestinal - Renal / Genitourological - Neurological - Metabolic / Endocrine - Psychiatric - Hematological / Lymphatic Nodes - Dermatological - Other The percentages are based on the number of subjects with examinations done at each visit for each body system. | 371 subjects were included in the safety set. Here, Number analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable for prespecified categories. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Subjects With Marked Abnormalities in Neurological Examination Findings After Start of Treatment | Changes in neurological examination findings is reported as percentage of subjects with marked abnormalities in following categories: - General - Cranial Nerves - Reflexes - Muscle Strength and Tone - Coordination and Cerebellar Function - Motor System - Sensation: Upper Extremities - Sensation: Lower Extremities The percentages are based on the number of subjects with examinations done at last visit for each category or parameter. | 371 subjects were included in the safety set. Here, Number analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable for prespecified categories. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Subjects With Abnormal Electrocardiogram (ECG) Findings | Changes in 12-lead ECGs is reported as percentage of subjects with abnormal ECG findings categorized in 'Abnormal, possibly insignificant' and 'Abnormal, possibly significant' based on the alert criterion by the ECG vendor and not on the investigator's assessment. | Only subjects with a last visit assessment who had a normal assessment at Baseline where Baseline is defined as the last ECG assessment prior to the first dose of trial medication are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Percentage of Subjects Who Withdrew Due to Adverse Events (AEs) | An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a patient or clinical investigation subject administered a pharmaceutical product that does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this treatment. | The Safety Set was defined as all subjects who signed the informed consent form and took at least 1 dose of trial medication. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | During the study period (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Average Pain Interference With Sleep From the Baseline Week to the 7 Days Prior to Each Visit | Pain interference scores at each visit (sleep and activity respectively) were defined as the average of the respective daily interference scores during the 7 last available days prior to the corresponding visit. An 11-point Likert scale was used to assess the subject's sleep. The subject rated how the pain had interfered with sleep over the past 12 hours, from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. Subjects rated pain interference over the past 12 hours for 7 days prior to each visit and an average value was calculated for each subject. | 371 subjects were included in the Safety set. Only subjects with available data for Pain Interference with sleep at the respective visit are included in the analysis. Here, Number analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable for each visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Visit 2.1, Visit 2.2, Visit 2.4, Visit 2.5, Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6, Visit 7, Visit 8, Visit 9.0, Visit 9.1, Visit 9.2, Visit 9.3, Visit 9.4, Visit 9.5, Visit 9.6, Visit 9.7, Visit 9.8, Visit 9.9 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Average Pain Interference With General Activity From the Baseline Week to the 7 Days Prior to Each Visit | Pain interference scores at each visit (sleep and activity respectively) were defined as the average of the respective daily interference scores during the 7 last available days prior to the corresponding visit. An 11-point Likert scale was used to assess the subject's sleep. The subject rated how the pain had interfered with sleep over the past 12 hours, from 0 (no interference) to 10 (complete interference). A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. Subjects rated pain interference over the past 12 hours for 7 days prior to each visit and an average value was calculated for each subject. | 371 subjects were included in the Safety set. Only subjects with available data for Pain Interference with general activity at the respective visit are included in the analysis. Here, Number analyzed signifies those subjects who were who were evaluable for each visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Visit 2.1, Visit 2.2, Visit 2.4, Visit 2.5, Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6, Visit 7, Visit 8, Visit 9.0, Visit 9.1, Visit 9.2, Visit 9.3, Visit 9.4, Visit 9.5, Visit 9.6, Visit 9.7, Visit 9.8, Visit 9.9 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Current Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Each Subsequent Visit as Measured by a 100 mm Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) | A 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) was used to assess the subject's current pain. The subject rated their current pain from 0 (no pain) to 100 (worst possible pain). A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms. | 371 subjects were included in the Safety set. Only subjects with available data for current pain measured by a 100 mm visual analogue scale (VAS) at the respective visit are included in the analysis. Here, Number of subjects analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable for each visit. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Visit 2.1, Visit 2.2, Visit 2.4, Visit 2.5, Visit 3, Visit 4, Visit 5, Visit 6, Visit 7, Visit 8, Visit 9.0, Visit 9.1, Visit 9.2, Visit 9.3, Visit 9.4, Visit 9.5, Visit 9.6, Visit 9.7, Visit 9.8, Visit 9.9 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With Categorized Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) at Visit 4 | The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the change in his/her pain since starting trial medication. Categories are as following: much worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, no change, mildly better, moderately better, much better. | Only patients with available data for Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 4 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With Categorized Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) at Visit 6 | The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the change in his/her pain since starting trial medication. Categories are as following: much worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, no change, mildly better, moderately better, much better. | Only patients with available data for Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 6 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With Categorized Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) at Visit 9.0 | The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the change in his/her pain since starting trial medication. Categories are as following: much worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, no change, mildly better, moderately better, much better. | Only patients with available data for Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.0 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With Categorized Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) at Visit 9.1 | The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the change in his/her pain since starting trial medication. Categories are as following: much worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, no change, mildly better, moderately better, much better. | Only patients with available data for Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.1 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With Categorized Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) at Visit 9.2 | The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the change in his/her pain since starting trial medication. Categories are as following: much worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, no change, mildly better, moderately better, much better. | Only patients with available data for Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.2 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With Categorized Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) at Visit 9.3 | The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the change in his/her pain since starting trial medication. Categories are as following: much worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, no change, mildly better, moderately better, much better. | Only patients with available data for Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.3 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With Categorized Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) at Visit 9.4 | The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the change in his/her pain since starting trial medication. Categories are as following: much worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, no change, mildly better, moderately better, much better. | Only patients with available data for Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.4 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With Categorized Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) at Visit 9.5 | The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the change in his/her pain since starting trial medication. Categories are as following: much worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, no change, mildly better, moderately better, much better. | Only patients with available data for Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.5 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With Categorized Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) at Visit 9.6 | The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the change in his/her pain since starting trial medication. Categories are as following: much worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, no change, mildly better, moderately better, much better. | Only patients with available data for Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.6 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With Categorized Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) at Visit 9.7 | The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the change in his/her pain since starting trial medication. Categories are as following: much worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, no change, mildly better, moderately better, much better. | Only patients with available data for Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.7 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With Categorized Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) at Visit 9.8 | The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the change in his/her pain since starting trial medication. Categories are as following: much worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, no change, mildly better, moderately better, much better. | Only patients with available data for Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.8 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Patients With Categorized Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) at Termination Visit | The PGIC is a 7-point categorical rating scale in which the subject rates the change in his/her pain since starting trial medication. Categories are as following: much worse, moderately worse, mildly worse, no change, mildly better, moderately better, much better. | Only patients with available data for Patient's Global Impression of Change in Pain (PGIC) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Termination Visit (last treatment visit) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Different Symptoms of Neuropathic Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 4 | Subjects were asked to assess different symptoms of neuropathic pain with respect to severity using the Neuropathic Pain Symptoms Inventory (NPSI) at different visits. It comprised of 10 descriptive symptom questions (pain feels like burning, squeezing, pressure electric shocks, stabbing, pins/needles, tingling, provoked or increased by brushing, pressure or contact with something cold), and 2 temporal questions (duration of pain, number of pain attacks). The NPSI scores of the descriptive questions are reported in categories below, which were rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity of pain). Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of pain. A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | 371 subjects were included in the Safety Set. Only patients with available data for different symptoms of neuropathic pain are included in the analysis. Here, Number Analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable at prespecified categories. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Visit 4 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Different Symptoms of Neuropathic Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 6 | Subjects were asked to assess different symptoms of neuropathic pain with respect to severity using the NPSI at different visits. It comprised of 10 descriptive symptom questions (pain feels like burning, squeezing, pressure electric shocks, stabbing, pins/needles, tingling, provoked or increased by brushing, pressure or contact with something cold), and 2 temporal questions (duration of pain, number of pain attacks). The NPSI scores of the descriptive questions are reported in categories below, which were rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity of pain). Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of pain. A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for different symptoms of neuropathic pain are included in the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Visit 6 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Different Symptoms of Neuropathic Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.0 | Subjects were asked to assess different symptoms of neuropathic pain with respect to severity using the NPSI at different visits. It comprised of 10 descriptive symptom questions (pain feels like burning, squeezing, pressure electric shocks, stabbing, pins/needles, tingling, provoked or increased by brushing, pressure or contact with something cold), and 2 temporal questions (duration of pain, number of pain attacks). The NPSI scores of the descriptive questions are reported in categories below, which were rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity of pain). Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of pain. A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | 371 subjects were included in the Safety Set. Only patients with available data for different symptoms of neuropathic pain are included in the analysis. Here, Number Analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable at prespecified categories. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Visit 9.0 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Different Symptoms of Neuropathic Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.1 | Subjects were asked to assess different symptoms of neuropathic pain with respect to severity using the NPSI at different visits. It comprised of 10 descriptive symptom questions (pain feels like burning, squeezing, pressure electric shocks, stabbing, pins/needles, tingling, provoked or increased by brushing, pressure or contact with something cold), which were rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity of pain), and are reported in categories below and 2 temporal questions (duration of pain, number of pain attacks). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. Total NPSI scale ranged from 0 (no pain) to 100 (maximum pain). Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of pain. A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. | Only patients with available data for different symptoms of neuropathic pain are included in the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Visit 9.1 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Different Symptoms of Neuropathic Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.2 | Subjects were asked to assess different symptoms of neuropathic pain with respect to severity using the NPSI at different visits. It comprised of 10 descriptive symptom questions (pain feels like burning, squeezing, pressure electric shocks, stabbing, pins/needles, tingling, provoked or increased by brushing, pressure or contact with something cold), and 2 temporal questions (duration of pain, number of pain attacks). The NPSI scores of the descriptive questions are reported in categories below, which were rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity of pain). Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of pain. A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | 371 subjects were included in the Safety Set. Only patients with available data for different symptoms of neuropathic pain are included in the analysis. Here, Number Analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable at prespecified categories. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Visit 9.2 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Different Symptoms of Neuropathic Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.3 | Subjects were asked to assess different symptoms of neuropathic pain with respect to severity using the NPSI at different visits. It comprised of 10 descriptive symptom questions (pain feels like burning, squeezing, pressure electric shocks, stabbing, pins/needles, tingling, provoked or increased by brushing, pressure or contact with something cold), and 2 temporal questions (duration of pain, number of pain attacks). The NPSI scores of the descriptive questions are reported in categories below, which were rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity of pain). Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of pain. A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for different symptoms of neuropathic pain are included in the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Visit 9.3 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Different Symptoms of Neuropathic Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.4 | Subjects were asked to assess different symptoms of neuropathic pain with respect to severity using the NPSI at different visits. It comprised of 10 descriptive symptom questions (pain feels like burning, squeezing, pressure electric shocks, stabbing, pins/needles, tingling, provoked or increased by brushing, pressure or contact with something cold), and 2 temporal questions (duration of pain, number of pain attacks). The NPSI scores of the descriptive questions are reported in categories below, which were rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity of pain). Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of pain. A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for different symptoms of neuropathic pain are included in the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Visit 9.4 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Different Symptoms of Neuropathic Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.5 | Subjects were asked to assess different symptoms of neuropathic pain with respect to severity using the NPSI at different visits. It comprised of 10 descriptive symptom questions (pain feels like burning, squeezing, pressure electric shocks, stabbing, pins/needles, tingling, provoked or increased by brushing, pressure or contact with something cold), and 2 temporal questions (duration of pain, number of pain attacks). The NPSI scores of the descriptive questions are reported in categories below, which were rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity of pain). Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of pain. A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for different symptoms of neuropathic pain are included in the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Visit 9.5 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Different Symptoms of Neuropathic Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.6 | Subjects were asked to assess different symptoms of neuropathic pain with respect to severity using the NPSI at different visits. It comprised of 10 descriptive symptom questions (pain feels like burning, squeezing, pressure electric shocks, stabbing, pins/needles, tingling, provoked or increased by brushing, pressure or contact with something cold), and 2 temporal questions (duration of pain, number of pain attacks). The NPSI scores of the descriptive questions are reported in categories below, which were rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity of pain). Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of pain. A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for different symptoms of neuropathic pain are included in the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Visit 9.6 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Different Symptoms of Neuropathic Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.7 | Subjects were asked to assess different symptoms of neuropathic pain with respect to severity using the NPSI at different visits. It comprised of 10 descriptive symptom questions (pain feels like burning, squeezing, pressure electric shocks, stabbing, pins/needles, tingling, provoked or increased by brushing, pressure or contact with something cold), and 2 temporal questions (duration of pain, number of pain attacks). The NPSI scores of the descriptive questions are reported in categories below, which were rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity of pain). Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of pain. A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for different symptoms of neuropathic pain are included in the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Visit 9.7 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Different Symptoms of Neuropathic Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.8 | Subjects were asked to assess different symptoms of neuropathic pain with respect to severity using the NPSI at different visits. It comprised of 10 descriptive symptom questions (pain feels like burning, squeezing, pressure electric shocks, stabbing, pins/needles, tingling, provoked or increased by brushing, pressure or contact with something cold), and 2 temporal questions (duration of pain, number of pain attacks). The NPSI scores of the descriptive questions are reported in categories below, which were rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity of pain). Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of pain. A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for different symptoms of neuropathic pain are included in the analysis. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Visit 9.8 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Different Symptoms of Neuropathic Pain From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Termination Visit | Subjects were asked to assess different symptoms of neuropathic pain with respect to severity using the NPSI at different visits. It comprised of 10 descriptive symptom questions (pain feels like burning, squeezing, pressure electric shocks, stabbing, pins/needles, tingling, provoked or increased by brushing, pressure or contact with something cold), and 2 temporal questions (duration of pain, number of pain attacks). The NPSI scores of the descriptive questions are reported in categories below, which were rated on an 11-point scale from 0 (absence of pain) to 10 (maximum intensity of pain). Higher scores indicate a greater intensity of pain. A negative value indicates improvement in symptoms from Baseline. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | 371 subjects were included in the Safety Set. Only patients with available data for different symptoms of neuropathic pain are included in the analysis. Here, Number Analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable at prespecified categories. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Termination Visit (last treatment visit) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Visit 2 (Baseline) | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 2 (Baseline) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Visit 4 | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 4 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Visit 6 | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 6 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Visit 9.0 | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.0 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Visit 9.1 | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.1 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Visit 9.2 | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.2 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Visit 9.3 | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.3 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Visit 9.4 | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.4 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Visit 9.5 | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.5 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Visit 9.6 | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.6 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Visit 9.7 | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.7 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Visit 9.8 | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.8 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Presence of Spontaneous Pain Categorized by Duration of Pain at Termination Visit | Presence of spontaneous pain was analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of duration of pain are as following: permanently, between 8 and 12 h, between 4 and 7 h, between 1 and 3 h, Less than 1 h. This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Termination Visit (last treatment visit) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Visit 2 (Baseline) | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 2 (Baseline) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Visit 4 | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 4 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Visit 6 | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 6 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Visit 9.0 | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.0 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Visit 9.1 | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.1 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Visit 9.2 | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.2 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Visit 9.3 | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.3 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Visit 9.4 | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.4 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Visit 9.5 | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.5 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Visit 9.6 | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.6 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Visit 9.7 | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.7 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Visit 9.8 | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Visit 9.8 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Subjects With Pain Attacks in Last the 24 Hours Categorized by Number of Pain Attacks at Termination Visit | Pain attacks were analyzed using the Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI). This questionnaire comprises 10 descriptive questions, which are rated on 0 to 10 point scales, and 2 temporal questions. Categories of number of pain attacks are as following: no pain attack, between 1 and 5, between 6 and 10, between 11 and 20, more than 20, not done (data not available). This assessment was done only in subjects from countries in which a validated version of the NPSI was available. | Only patients with available data for Neuropathic Pain Symptom Inventory (NPSI) are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | percentage of participants | Termination Visit (last treatment visit) |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Quality of Life From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 4 | Quality of life was analyzed using the Short Form-36 (SF-36) Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire which consists of 8 sub-scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better health state. The sub-scores are: 1. Physical Functioning, 2. Role-Physical, 3. Bodily Pain, 4. General Health, 5. Vitality, 6. Social Functioning, 7. Role-Emotional, 8. Mental Health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the physical component Summary (PCS) score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the mental component summary (MCS) score of the SF-36. The PCS and MCS were based on the standardized values of the 8 domains. The maximum and minimum possible values for PCS and MCS is 0-100, where higher scores indicate good condition. A positive value indicates improvement from baseline in quality of life. | 371 subjects were included in the Safety Set. Only patients with available data for different sub-scores of SF-36 are included in the analysis. Here, Number Analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable at prespecified categories. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Visit 4 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Quality of Life From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 6 | Quality of life was analyzed using the SF-36 Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire which consists of 8 sub-scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better health state. The sub-scores are: 1. Physical Functioning, 2. Role-Physical, 3. Bodily Pain, 4. General Health, 5. Vitality, 6. Social Functioning, 7. Role-Emotional, 8. Mental Health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. The PCS and MCS were based on the standardized values of the 8 domains. The maximum and minimum possible values for PCS and MCS is 0-100, where higher scores indicate good condition. A positive value indicates improvement from baseline in quality of life. | 371 subjects were included in the Safety Set. Only patients with available data for different sub-scores of SF-36 are included in the analysis. Here, Number Analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable at prespecified categories. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Visit 6 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Quality of Life From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.0 | Quality of life was analyzed using the SF-36 Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire which consists of 8 sub-scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better health state. The sub-scores are: 1. Physical Functioning, 2. Role-Physical, 3. Bodily Pain, 4. General Health, 5. Vitality, 6. Social Functioning, 7. Role-Emotional, 8. Mental Health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. The PCS and MCS were based on the standardized values of the 8 domains. The maximum and minimum possible values for PCS and MCS is 0-100, where higher scores indicate good condition. A positive value indicates improvement from baseline in quality of life. | 371 subjects were included in the Safety Set. Only patients with available data for different sub-scores of SF-36 are included in the analysis. Here, Number Analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable at prespecified categories. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Visit 9.0 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Quality of Life From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.1 | Quality of life was analyzed using the SF-36 Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire which consists of 8 sub-scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better health state. The sub-scores are: 1. Physical Functioning, 2. Role-Physical, 3. Bodily Pain, 4. General Health, 5. Vitality, 6. Social Functioning, 7. Role-Emotional, 8. Mental Health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. The PCS and MCS were based on the standardized values of the 8 domains. The maximum and minimum possible values for PCS and MCS is 0-100, where higher scores indicate good condition. A positive value indicates improvement from baseline in quality of life. | 371 subjects were included in the Safety Set. Only patients with available data for different sub-scores of SF-36 are included in the analysis. Here, Number Analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable at prespecified categories. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Visit 9.1 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Quality of Life From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.2 | Quality of life was analyzed using the SF-36 Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire which consists of 8 sub-scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better health state. The sub-scores are: 1. Physical Functioning, 2. Role-Physical, 3. Bodily Pain, 4. General Health, 5. Vitality, 6. Social Functioning, 7. Role-Emotional, 8. Mental Health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. The PCS and MCS were based on the standardized values of the 8 domains. The maximum and minimum possible values for PCS and MCS is 0-100, where higher scores indicate good condition. A positive value indicates improvement from baseline in quality of life. | 371 subjects were included in the Safety Set. Only patients with available data for different sub-scores of SF-36 are included in the analysis. Here, Number Analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable at prespecified categories. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Visit 9.2 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Quality of Life From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.3 | Quality of life was analyzed using the SF-36 Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire which consists of 8 sub-scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better health state. The sub-scores are: 1. Physical Functioning, 2. Role-Physical, 3. Bodily Pain, 4. General Health, 5. Vitality, 6. Social Functioning, 7. Role-Emotional, 8. Mental Health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. The PCS and MCS were based on the standardized values of the 8 domains. The maximum and minimum possible values for PCS and MCS is 0-100, where higher scores indicate good condition. A positive value indicates improvement from baseline in quality of life. | 371 subjects were included in the Safety Set. Only patients with available data for different sub-scores of SF-36 are included in the analysis. Here, Number Analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable at prespecified categories. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Visit 9.3 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Quality of Life From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.4 | Quality of life was analyzed using the SF-36 Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire which consists of 8 sub-scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better health state. The sub-scores are: 1. Physical Functioning, 2. Role-Physical, 3. Bodily Pain, 4. General Health, 5. Vitality, 6. Social Functioning, 7. Role-Emotional, 8. Mental Health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. The PCS and MCS were based on the standardized values of the 8 domains. The maximum and minimum possible values for PCS and MCS is 0-100, where higher scores indicate good condition. A positive value indicates improvement from baseline in quality of life. | 371 subjects were included in the Safety Set. Only patients with available data for different sub-scores of SF-36 are included in the analysis. Here, Number Analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable at prespecified categories. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Visit 9.4 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Quality of Life From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.5 | Quality of life was analyzed using the SF-36 Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire which consists of 8 sub-scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better health state. The sub-scores are: 1. Physical Functioning, 2. Role-Physical, 3. Bodily Pain, 4. General Health, 5. Vitality, 6. Social Functioning, 7. Role-Emotional, 8. Mental Health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. The PCS and MCS were based on the standardized values of the 8 domains. The maximum and minimum possible values for PCS and MCS is 0-100, where higher scores indicate good condition. A positive value indicates improvement from baseline in quality of life. | 371 subjects were included in the Safety Set. Only patients with available data for different sub-scores of SF-36 are included in the analysis. Here, Number Analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable at prespecified categories. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage of participants | Baseline, Visit 9.5 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Quality of Life From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.6 | Quality of life was analyzed using the SF-36 Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire which consists of 8 sub-scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better health state. The sub-scores are: 1. Physical Functioning, 2. Role-Physical, 3. Bodily Pain, 4. General Health, 5. Vitality, 6. Social Functioning, 7. Role-Emotional, 8. Mental Health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. The PCS and MCS were based on the standardized values of the 8 domains. The maximum and minimum possible values for PCS and MCS is 0-100, where higher scores indicate good condition. A positive value indicates improvement from baseline in quality of life. | 371 subjects were included in the Safety Set. Only patients with available data for different sub-scores of SF-36 are included in the analysis. Here, Number Analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable at prespecified categories. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Visit 9.6 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Quality of Life From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.7 | Quality of life was analyzed using the SF-36 Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire which consists of 8 sub-scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better health state. The sub-scores are: 1. Physical Functioning, 2. Role-Physical, 3. Bodily Pain, 4. General Health, 5. Vitality, 6. Social Functioning, 7. Role-Emotional, 8. Mental Health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. The PCS and MCS were based on the standardized values of the 8 domains. The maximum and minimum possible values for PCS and MCS is 0-100, where higher scores indicate good condition. A positive value indicates improvement from baseline in quality of life. | 371 subjects were included in the Safety Set. Only patients with available data for different sub-scores of SF-36 are included in the analysis. Here, Number Analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable at prespecified categories. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Visit 9.7 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Quality of Life From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Visit 9.8 | Quality of life was analyzed using the SF-36 Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire which consists of 8 sub-scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better health state. The sub-scores are: 1. Physical Functioning, 2. Role-Physical, 3. Bodily Pain, 4. General Health, 5. Vitality, 6. Social Functioning, 7. Role-Emotional, 8. Mental Health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. The PCS and MCS were based on the standardized values of the 8 domains. The maximum and minimum possible values for PCS and MCS is 0-100, where higher scores indicate good condition. A positive value indicates improvement from baseline in quality of life. | 371 subjects were included in the Safety Set. Only patients with available data for different sub-scores of SF-36 are included in the analysis. Here, Number Analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable at prespecified categories. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Visit 9.8 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Change in Quality of Life From Visit 2 (Baseline) to Termination Visit | Quality of life was analyzed using the SF-36 Health Survey quality of life questionnaire. The SF-36 is a participant self-rated questionnaire which consists of 8 sub-scores ranging from 0-100 with higher scores indicating a better health state. The sub-scores are: 1. Physical Functioning, 2. Role-Physical, 3. Bodily Pain, 4. General Health, 5. Vitality, 6. Social Functioning, 7. Role-Emotional, 8. Mental Health. Items 1-4 primarily contribute to the PCS score of the SF-36. Items 5-8 primarily contribute to the MCS score of the SF-36. The PCS and MCS were based on the standardized values of the 8 domains. The maximum and minimum possible values for PCS and MCS is 0-100, where higher scores indicate good condition. A positive value indicates improvement from baseline in quality of life. | 371 subjects were included in the Safety Set. Only patients with available data for different sub-scores of SF-36 are included in the analysis. Here, Number Analyzed signifies those subjects who were evaluable at prespecified categories. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Baseline, Termination Visit (last treatment visit) |
|
|
|
| Primary | Number of Subjects With Urine Protein Status 'Positive +++' at Baseline, Categorized by Urine Protein Status at Last Visit | Urinalysis was performed locally at all visits using a urine dipstick test. Categories are as following: negative, trace, positive +, positive ++, positive +++, not done (data not available). Positive category (+, ++, +++) indicate worsening from Baseline. | Only subjects with Urine Protein status 'Positive +++' at baseline are included in the analysis. | Posted | Number | Participants | Last Visit (up to 140 weeks) |
|
|
|
| 7 |
| 371 |
| 83 |
| 371 |
| 229 |
| 371 |
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Angina pectoris | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Myocardial ischaemia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Coronary artery disease | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Arteriosclerosis coronary artery | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pericardial haemorrhage | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Cardio-respiratory arrest | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Cardiac failure | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Bundle branch block right | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Bundle branch block left | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Aortic valve stenosis | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Acute myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Cardiac failure acute | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Vestibular disorder | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Primary hyperaldosteronism | Endocrine disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Retinal detachment | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Diabetic retinopathy | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Cataract | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Vitreous haemorrhage | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Eye haemorrhage | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Diplopia | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Cataract diabetic | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Corneal degeneration | Eye disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Umbilical hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pancreatitis acute | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pancreatitis | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastritis erosive | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Abdominal hernia | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastric haemorrhage | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Non-cardiac chest pain | General disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Multi-organ failure | General disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Cholelithiasis | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Biliary colic | Hepatobiliary disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Appendicitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Urinary tract infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Prostatic abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Postoperative wound infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hepatitis B | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastroenteritis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Diabetic gangrene | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Cellulitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pneumonia | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Lower limb fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Fall | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pubic rami fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Joint sprain | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Head injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Brain herniation | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Ankle fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Investigation | Investigations | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Echocardiogram abnormal | Investigations | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Diabetes mellitus | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hyperglycaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Diabetic foot | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Diabetes mellitus non-insulin- dependent | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Intervertebral disc protrusion | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Osteoarthritis | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Rotator cuff syndrome | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Musculoskeletal pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Toe deformity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Colon cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Bronchial carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Bladder transitional cell carcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastric neoplasm | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Colon adenoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Leukaemia | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Adenocarcinoma | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Cerebrovascular accident | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Carotid artery stenosis | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Neuritis | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Transient ischaemic attack | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Syncope vasovagal | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Presyncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Neuralgia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Lumbosacral plexus lesion | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Cerebral haemorrhage | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Brain oedema | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Suicide attempt | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Mental disorder | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Renal failure | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Menorrhagia | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Stent placement | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastric banding | Surgical and medical procedures | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Circulatory collapse | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Phlebitis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Peripheral arterial occlusive disease | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypotension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypertensive crisis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Femoral arterial stenosis | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Arterial haemorrhage | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Shock haemorrhagic | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Influenza | Infections and infestations | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Somnolence | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Tremor | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypertension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Vertigo | Ear and labyrinth disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Oedema peripheral | General disorders | MedDRA | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
| Acids, Acyclic |
| D002264 | Carboxylic Acids |
|
| White Blood Cell |
|
|
| Basophils |
|
|
| Eosinophils |
|
|
| Monocytes |
|
|
| Platelet Count |
|
|
|
| WBC Count |
|
|
| Basophils |
|
|
| Eosinophils |
|
|
| Monocytes |
|
|
| Platelet Count |
|
|
|
| ALT 10xULN |
|
|
| AST 3xULN |
|
|
| AST 5xULN |
|
|
| AST 10xULN |
|
|
| Alkaline Phosphatase |
|
|
| GGT 3xULN |
|
|
| Total Bilirubin |
|
|
| Albumin |
|
|
| Blood Urea Nitrogen |
|
|
| Creatinine |
|
|
| Calcium |
|
|
| Chloride |
|
|
| Phosphorus |
|
|
| Potassium |
|
|
| Sodium |
|
|
| Glucose |
|
|
| Total Cholesterol |
|
|
| Uric Acid |
|
|
|
| ALT 10xULN |
|
|
| AST 3xULN |
|
|
| AST 5xULN |
|
|
| AST 10xULN |
|
|
| Alkaline Phosphatase |
|
|
| GGT 3xULN |
|
|
| Total Bilirubin |
|
|
| Albumin |
|
|
| Blood Urea Nitrogen |
|
|
| Creatinine |
|
|
| Calcium |
|
|
| Chloride |
|
|
| Phosphorus |
|
|
| Potassium |
|
|
| Sodium |
|
|
| Glucose |
|
|
| Total Cholesterol |
|
|
| Uric Acid |
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| pH= 7.0 |
|
| pH= 7.5 |
|
| pH= 8.0 |
|
| pH= 8.5 |
|
| not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| pH= 7.0 |
|
| pH= 7.5 |
|
| pH= 8.0 |
|
| pH= 8.5 |
|
| not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| pH= 7.0 |
|
| pH= 7.5 |
|
| pH= 8.0 |
|
| pH= 8.5 |
|
| not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| pH= 7.0 |
|
| pH= 7.5 |
|
| pH= 8.0 |
|
| pH= 8.5 |
|
| not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| pH= 7.0 |
|
| pH= 7.5 |
|
| pH= 8.0 |
|
| pH= 8.5 |
|
| not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| pH= 7.0 |
|
| pH= 7.5 |
|
| pH= 8.0 |
|
| pH= 8.5 |
|
| not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| positive ++ |
|
| positive +++ |
|
| not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| positive ++ |
|
| positive +++ |
|
| not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| positive ++ |
|
| positive +++ |
|
| not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| positive ++ |
|
| positive +++ |
|
| not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| 66 µmol/l |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| 66 µmol/l |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| 66 µmol/l |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| Positive ++ |
|
| Positive +++ |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| Positive ++ |
|
| Positive +++ |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| Positive ++ |
|
| Positive +++ |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| Positive ++ |
|
| Positive +++ |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| Positive + |
|
| Positive ++ |
|
| Positive +++ |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| Positive + |
|
| Positive ++ |
|
| Positive +++ |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| Positive + |
|
| Positive ++ |
|
| Positive +++ |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| Positive + |
|
| Positive ++ |
|
| Positive +++ |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| Positive + |
|
| Positive ++ |
|
| Positive +++ |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| Moderate |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| Moderate |
|
| Not Done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| Moderate |
|
| Not Done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| Moderate |
|
| Not Done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| 28 mmol/l |
|
| 55 mmol/l |
|
| >=111 mmol |
|
| Not Done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| 28 mmol/l |
|
| 55 mmol/l |
|
| >=111 mmol |
|
| Not Done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| 28 mmol/l |
|
| 55 mmol/l |
|
| >=111 mmol |
|
| Not Done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| 28 mmol/l |
|
| 55 mmol/l |
|
| >=111 mmol |
|
| Not Done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| 28 mmol/l |
|
| 55 mmol/l |
|
| >=111 mmol |
|
| Not Done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| 28 mmol/l |
|
| 55 mmol/l |
|
| >=111 mmol |
|
| Not Done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| DBP <=50 and decrease of >=15 mmHg |
|
| PR >=120 and increase of >=15 beats/min |
|
| PR <=50 and decrease of >=15 beats/min |
|
|
| Peripheral vascular |
|
|
| Pulmonary |
|
|
| Musculoskeletal |
|
|
| Hepato- / Gastrointestinal |
|
|
| Renal / Genitourological |
|
|
| Neurological |
|
|
| Metabolic / Endocrine |
|
|
| Psychiatric |
|
|
| Hematological / Lymphatic Nodes |
|
|
| Dermatological |
|
|
| Other |
|
|
|
| Reflexes |
|
|
| Muscle Strength and Tone |
|
|
| Coordination and Cerebellar Function |
|
|
| Motor System |
|
|
| Sensation: Upper Extremities |
|
|
| Sensation: Lower Extremities |
|
|
|
| Visit 2.3 |
|
|
| Visit 2.4 |
|
|
| Visit 2.5 |
|
|
| Visit 3 |
|
|
| Visit 4 |
|
|
| Visit 5 |
|
|
| Visit 6 |
|
|
| Visit 7 |
|
|
| Visit 8 |
|
|
| Visit 9.0 |
|
|
| Visit 9.1 |
|
|
| Visit 9.2 |
|
|
| Visit 9.3 |
|
|
| Visit 9.4 |
|
|
| Visit 9.5 |
|
|
| Visit 9.6 |
|
|
| Visit 9.7 |
|
|
| Visit 9.8 |
|
|
| Visit 9.9 |
|
|
|
| Visit 2.3 |
|
|
| Visit 2.4 |
|
|
| Visit 2.5 |
|
|
| Visit 3 |
|
|
| Visit 4 |
|
|
| Visit 5 |
|
|
| Visit 6 |
|
|
| Visit 7 |
|
|
| Visit 8 |
|
|
| Visit 9.0 |
|
|
| Visit 9.1 |
|
|
| Visit 9.2 |
|
|
| Visit 9.3 |
|
|
| Visit 9.4 |
|
|
| Visit 9.5 |
|
|
| Visit 9.6 |
|
|
| Visit 9.7 |
|
|
| Visit 9.8 |
|
|
| Visit 9.9 |
|
|
|
| Visit 2.3 |
|
|
| Visit 2.4 |
|
|
| Visit 2.5 |
|
|
| Visit 3 |
|
|
| Visit 4 |
|
|
| Visit 5 |
|
|
| Visit 6 |
|
|
| Visit 7 |
|
|
| Visit 8 |
|
|
| Visit 9.0 |
|
|
| Visit 9.1 |
|
|
| Visit 9.2 |
|
|
| Visit 9.3 |
|
|
| Visit 9.4 |
|
|
| Visit 9.5 |
|
|
| Visit 9.6 |
|
|
| Visit 9.7 |
|
|
| Visit 9.8 |
|
|
| Visit 9.9 |
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| No Change |
|
| Mildly Better |
|
| Moderately Better |
|
| Much Better |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| No Change |
|
| Mildly Better |
|
| Moderately Better |
|
| Much Better |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| No Change |
|
| Mildly Better |
|
| Moderately Better |
|
| Much Better |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| No Change |
|
| Mildly Better |
|
| Moderately Better |
|
| Much Better |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| No Change |
|
| Mildly Better |
|
| Moderately Better |
|
| Much Better |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| No Change |
|
| Mildly Better |
|
| Moderately Better |
|
| Much Better |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| No Change |
|
| Mildly Better |
|
| Moderately Better |
|
| Much Better |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| No Change |
|
| Mildly Better |
|
| Moderately Better |
|
| Much Better |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| No Change |
|
| Mildly Better |
|
| Moderately Better |
|
| Much Better |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| No Change |
|
| Mildly Better |
|
| Moderately Better |
|
| Much Better |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| No Change |
|
| Mildly Better |
|
| Moderately Better |
|
| Much Better |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| No Change |
|
| Mildly Better |
|
| Moderately Better |
|
| Much Better |
|
|
| Pressure |
|
|
| Electric shocks |
|
|
| Stabbing |
|
|
| Brushing |
|
|
| Increased by pressure |
|
|
| Contact with cold |
|
|
| Pins and needles |
|
|
| Tingling |
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Electric shocks |
|
| Stabbing |
|
| Brushing |
|
| Increased by pressure |
|
| Contact with cold |
|
| Pins and needles |
|
| Tingling |
|
|
| Pressure |
|
|
| Electric shocks |
|
|
| Stabbing |
|
|
| Brushing |
|
|
| Increased by pressure |
|
|
| Contact with cold |
|
|
| Pins and needles |
|
|
| Tingling |
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Electric shocks |
|
| Stabbing |
|
| Brushing |
|
| Increased by pressure |
|
| Contact with cold |
|
| Pins and needles |
|
| Tingling |
|
|
| Pressure |
|
|
| Electric shocks |
|
|
| Stabbing |
|
|
| Brushing |
|
|
| Increased by pressure |
|
|
| Contact with cold |
|
|
| Pins and needles |
|
|
| Tingling |
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Electric shocks |
|
| Stabbing |
|
| Brushing |
|
| Increased by pressure |
|
| Contact with cold |
|
| Pins and needles |
|
| Tingling |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Electric shocks |
|
| Stabbing |
|
| Brushing |
|
| Increased by pressure |
|
| Contact with cold |
|
| Pins and needles |
|
| Tingling |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Electric shocks |
|
| Stabbing |
|
| Brushing |
|
| Increased by pressure |
|
| Contact with cold |
|
| Pins and needles |
|
| Tingling |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Electric shocks |
|
| Stabbing |
|
| Brushing |
|
| Increased by pressure |
|
| Contact with cold |
|
| Pins and needles |
|
| Tingling |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Electric shocks |
|
| Stabbing |
|
| Brushing |
|
| Increased by pressure |
|
| Contact with cold |
|
| Pins and needles |
|
| Tingling |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Electric shocks |
|
| Stabbing |
|
| Brushing |
|
| Increased by pressure |
|
| Contact with cold |
|
| Pins and needles |
|
| Tingling |
|
|
| Pressure |
|
|
| Electric shocks |
|
|
| Stabbing |
|
|
| Brushing |
|
|
| Increased by pressure |
|
|
| Contact with cold |
|
|
| Pins and needles |
|
|
| Tingling |
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 1 and 3 h |
|
| Less than 1 h |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 1 and 3 h |
|
| Less than 1 h |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 1 and 3 h |
|
| Less than 1 h |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 1 and 3 h |
|
| Less than 1 h |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 1 and 3 h |
|
| Less than 1 h |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 1 and 3 h |
|
| Less than 1 h |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 1 and 3 h |
|
| Less than 1 h |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 1 and 3 h |
|
| Less than 1 h |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 1 and 3 h |
|
| Less than 1 h |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 1 and 3 h |
|
| Less than 1 h |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 1 and 3 h |
|
| Less than 1 h |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 1 and 3 h |
|
| Less than 1 h |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 1 and 3 h |
|
| Less than 1 h |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 11 and 20 |
|
| More than 20 |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 11 and 20 |
|
| More than 20 |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 11 and 20 |
|
| More than 20 |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 11 and 20 |
|
| More than 20 |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 11 and 20 |
|
| More than 20 |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 11 and 20 |
|
| More than 20 |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 11 and 20 |
|
| More than 20 |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 11 and 20 |
|
| More than 20 |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 11 and 20 |
|
| More than 20 |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 11 and 20 |
|
| More than 20 |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 11 and 20 |
|
| More than 20 |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 11 and 20 |
|
| More than 20 |
|
| Not done |
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|---|
|
| Between 11 and 20 |
|
| More than 20 |
|
| Not done |
|
|
| Bodily Pain |
|
|
| General health |
|
|
| Vitality |
|
|
| Social Functioning |
|
|
| Role-Emotional |
|
|
| Mental Health |
|
|
| PCS |
|
|
| MCS |
|
|
|
| Bodily Pain |
|
|
| General health |
|
|
| Vitality |
|
|
| Social Functioning |
|
|
| Role-Emotional |
|
|
| Mental Health |
|
|
| PCS |
|
|
| MCS |
|
|
|
| Bodily Pain |
|
|
| General health |
|
|
| Vitality |
|
|
| Social Functioning |
|
|
| Role-Emotional |
|
|
| Mental Health |
|
|
| PCS |
|
|
| MCS |
|
|
|
| Bodily Pain |
|
|
| General health |
|
|
| Vitality |
|
|
| Social Functioning |
|
|
| Role-Emotional |
|
|
| Mental Health |
|
|
| PCS |
|
|
| MCS |
|
|
|
| Bodily Pain |
|
|
| General health |
|
|
| Vitality |
|
|
| Social Functioning |
|
|
| Role-Emotional |
|
|
| Mental Health |
|
|
| PCS |
|
|
| MCS |
|
|
|
| Bodily Pain |
|
|
| General health |
|
|
| Vitality |
|
|
| Social Functioning |
|
|
| Role-Emotional |
|
|
| Mental Health |
|
|
| PCS |
|
|
| MCS |
|
|
|
| Bodily Pain |
|
|
| General health |
|
|
| Vitality |
|
|
| Social Functioning |
|
|
| Role-Emotional |
|
|
| Mental Health |
|
|
| PCS |
|
|
| MCS |
|
|
|
| Bodily Pain |
|
|
| General health |
|
|
| Vitality |
|
|
| Social Functioning |
|
|
| Role-Emotional |
|
|
| Mental Health |
|
|
| PCS |
|
|
| MCS |
|
|
|
| Bodily Pain |
|
|
| General health |
|
|
| Vitality |
|
|
| Social Functioning |
|
|
| Role-Emotional |
|
|
| Mental Health |
|
|
| PCS |
|
|
| MCS |
|
|
|
| Bodily Pain |
|
|
| General Health |
|
|
| Vitality |
|
|
| Social Functioning |
|
|
| Role-Emotional |
|
|
| Mental Health |
|
|
| PCS |
|
|
| MCS |
|
|
|
| Bodily Pain |
|
|
| General health |
|
|
| Vitality |
|
|
| Social Functioning |
|
|
| Role-Emotional |
|
|
| Mental Health |
|
|
| PCS |
|
|
| MCS |
|
|
|
| Bodily Pain |
|
|
| General Health |
|
|
| Vitality |
|
|
| Social Functioning |
|
|
| Role-Emotional |
|
|
| Mental Health |
|
|
| PCS |
|
|
| MCS |
|
|
| Title | Measurements |
|---|
|
| Positive ++ |
|
| Positive +++ |
|
| Not done |
|