Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
To assess motor function and quality of life (QoL) in Parkinson's disease (PD) subjects with end-of-dose wearing off, comparing immediate and delayed switch to carbidopa/levodopa and entacapone.
This was a prospective, multi-center, randomized, open-label study with blinded raters to evaluate the effects of immediate versus delayed switch to carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone on motor function and quality of life in patients with Parkinson's disease with end-of-dose wearing off.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Immediate switch | Experimental | Patients were switched the day after randomization from combined carbidopa/levodopa to combined carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients received the same doses of carbidopa (12.5, 25.0, or 37.5 mg) and levodopa (50, 100, or 150 mg) they were receiving prior to the switch, combined with 200 mg of entacapone. The frequency of doses per day prior to the switch remained the same after the switch. |
|
| Delayed switch | Active Comparator | Patients were switched 4 weeks after randomization from combined carbidopa/levodopa to combined carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients received the same doses of carbidopa (12.5, 25.0, or 37.5 mg) and levodopa (50, 100, or 150 mg) they were receiving prior to the switch, combined with 200 mg of entacapone. The frequency of doses per day prior to the switch remained the same after the switch. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone | Drug | Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone was administered in 1 of 3 dose combinations: 12.5/50/200 mg, 25/100/200 mg, or 37.5/150/200 mg. The selected combination dose contained the same doses of carbidopa and levodopa the patient was receiving prior to switching to carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score From Baseline to Week 4 | Motor function was assessed with the UPDRS part III. There are 14 items in the instrument, each measured on a 5 point scale (0-4): Speech, facial expression, tremor at rest, action tremor, rigidity, finger taps, hand movements, hand pronation and supination, leg agility, arising from chair, posture, gait, postural stability, and body bradykinesia. The sum of scores can range from 0 to 56; a higher score indicates greater disability. A negative change score indicates improvement. | Baseline to Week 4 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Change in Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Score From Baseline to Week 4 | Quality of life was assessed with the Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Instrument (PDQUALIF), a 33-item self-reported questionnaire which includes seven domains: Social/role function, self-imaging/sexuality, sleep, outlook, physical function, independence, and urinary function. Questions are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (sometimes) to 5 (always). The 1 to 5 range was recoded to 0 to 4 for the analysis. The total score can range from 0 to 132. A lower score indicates better quality of life. A negative change score indicates improvement. |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Other protocol-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria applied to this study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Phoenix | Arizona | 85006 | United States | |||
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Immediate Switch | Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone was administered in 1 of 3 dose combinations: 12.5/50/200 mg, 25/100/200 mg, or 37.5/150/200 mg. The selected combination dose contained the same doses of carbidopa and levodopa the patient was receiving prior to switching to carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients were switched the day after randomization from combined carbidopa/levodopa to combined carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients received the same doses of carbidopa (12.5, 25.0, or 37.5 mg) and levodopa (50, 100, or 150 mg) they were receiving prior to the switch, combined with 200 mg of entacapone. The frequency of doses per day prior to the switch remained the same after the switch. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Treatment Phase - 16 Weeks |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| Baseline to Week 4 |
| Change in Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Score From Baseline to Week 8 | Quality of life was assessed with the Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Instrument (PDQUALIF), a 33-item self-reported questionnaire which includes seven domains: Social/role function, self-imaging/sexuality, sleep, outlook, physical function, independence, and urinary function. Questions are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (sometimes) to 5 (always). The 1 to 5 range was recoded to 0 to 4 for the analysis. The total score can range from 0 to 132. A lower score indicates better quality of life. A negative change score indicates improvement. | Baseline to Week 8 |
| Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score From Baseline to Week 8 | Motor function was assessed with the UPDRS part III. There are 14 items in the instrument, each measured on a 5-point scale (0-4): Speech, facial expression, tremor at rest, action tremor, rigidity, finger taps, hand movements, hand pronation and supination, leg agility, arising from chair, posture, gait, postural stability, and body bradykinesia. The sum of scores can range from 0 to 56; a higher score indicates greater disability. A negative change score indicates improvement. | Baseline to Week 8 |
| Change in the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Total Score From Baseline to Week 4 | The PDQ-39 is another instrument used to assess quality of life in individuals with Parkinson's disease. The questionnaire provides scores on eight scales: Mobility, activities of daily living, emotions, stigma, social support, cognition, communication, and bodily discomfort. Questions are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (sometimes) to 5 (always). The 1 to 5 range was recoded to 0 to 4 for the analysis. The total score can range from 0 to 156. A lower score indicates better quality of life. A negative change score indicates an improvement. | Baseline to Week 4 |
| Change in the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Total Score From Baseline to Week 8 | The PDQ-39 is another instrument used to assess quality of life in individuals with Parkinson's disease. The questionnaire provides scores on eight scales: Mobility, activities of daily living, emotions, stigma, social support, cognition, communication, and bodily discomfort. Questions are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (sometimes) to 5 (always). The 1 to 5 range was recoded to 0 to 4 for the analysis. The total score can range from 0 to 156. A lower score indicates better quality of life. A negative change score indicates an improvement. | Baseline to Week 8 |
| Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score From Baseline to End of Treatment | Motor function was assessed with the UPDRS part III. There are 14 items in the instrument, each measured on a 5 point scale (0-4): Speech, facial expression, tremor at rest, action tremor, rigidity, finger taps, hand movements, hand pronation and supination, leg agility, arising from chair, posture, gait, postural stability, and body bradykinesia. The sum of scores can range from 0 to 56; a higher score indicates greater disability. A negative change score indicates improvement. | Baseline to end of treatment (Week 16 in the Immediate Switch group, Week 20 in the Delayed Switch group) |
| Change in Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Score From Baseline to End of Treatment | Quality of life was assessed with the Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Instrument (PDQUALIF), a 33-item self-reported questionnaire which includes seven domains: Social/role function, self-imaging/sexuality, sleep, outlook, physical function, independence, and urinary function. Questions are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (sometimes) to 5 (always). The 1 to 5 range was recoded to 0 to 4 for the analysis. The total score can range from 0 to 132. A lower score indicates better quality of life. A negative change score indicates improvement. | Baseline to end of treatment (Week 16 in the Immediate Switch group, Week 20 in the Delayed Switch group) |
| Change in the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Total Score From Baseline to End of Treatment | The PDQ-39 is another instrument used to assess quality of life in individuals with Parkinson's disease. The questionnaire provides scores on eight scales: Mobility, activities of daily living, emotions, stigma, social support, cognition, communication, and bodily discomfort. Questions are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (sometimes) to 5 (always). The 1 to 5 range was recoded to 0 to 4 for the analysis. The total score can range from 0 to 156. A lower score indicates better quality of life. A negative change score indicates an improvement. | Baseline to end of treatment (Week 16 in the Immediate Switch group, Week 20 in the Delayed Switch group) |
| Fullerton |
| California |
| 92835 |
| United States |
| Irvine | California | 92618 | United States |
| La Jolla | California | 92037 | United States |
| Los Angeles | California | 90033 | United States |
| Pasadena | California | 91105 | United States |
| Reseda | California | 91355 | United States |
| Stanford | California | 94305 | United States |
| Fort Collins | Colorado | 80524 | United States |
| Washington D.C. | District of Columbia | 20007 | United States |
| Boca Raton | Florida | 33486 | United States |
| Bradenton | Florida | 34205 | United States |
| Fort Lauderdale | Florida | 33308 | United States |
| Hollywood | Florida | 33021 | United States |
| Naples | Florida | 34102 | United States |
| Palm Beach | Florida | 33418 | United States |
| Plantation | Florida | 33324 | United States |
| Pompano Beach | Florida | 33060 | United States |
| Port Charlotte | Florida | 33952 | United States |
| Chicago | Illinois | 60637 | United States |
| Flossmoor | Illinois | 60402 | United States |
| Lenexa | Kansas | 66214 | United States |
| Topeka | Kansas | 66606 | United States |
| Baltimore | Maryland | 21201 | United States |
| Bingham Farms | Michigan | 48025 | United States |
| Southfield | Michigan | 48034 | United States |
| Hattiesburg | Mississippi | 39401 | United States |
| Columbia | Missouri | 65201 | United States |
| St Louis | Missouri | 63141 | United States |
| Ridgewood | New Jersey | 07450 | United States |
| Commack | New York | 11725 | United States |
| Durham | North Carolina | 27705 | United States |
| Raleigh | North Carolina | 27607 | United States |
| Bellevue | Ohio | 44811 | United States |
| Canton | Ohio | 44718 | United States |
| Tualatin | Oregon | 97602 | United States |
| East Stroudsburg | Pennsylvania | 18301 | United States |
| Houston | Texas | 77030 | United States |
| Spokane | Washington | 99204 | United States |
| Tacoma | Washington | 98405 | United States |
| Milwaukee | Wisconsin | 53233 | United States |
| Carolina | 00983 | Puerto Rico |
| FG001 | Delayed Switch | Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone was administered in 1 of 3 dose combinations: 12.5/50/200 mg, 25/100/200 mg, or 37.5/150/200 mg. The selected combination dose contained the same doses of carbidopa and levodopa the patient was receiving prior to switching to carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients were switched 4 weeks after randomization from combined carbidopa/levodopa to combined carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients received the same doses of carbidopa (12.5, 25.0, or 37.5 mg) and levodopa (50, 100, or 150 mg) they were receiving prior to the switch, combined with 200 mg of entacapone. The frequency of doses per day prior to the switch remained the same after the switch. |
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Extension Phase - 8 Weeks |
|
|
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Immediate Switch | Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone was administered in 1 of 3 dose combinations: 12.5/50/200 mg, 25/100/200 mg, or 37.5/150/200 mg. The selected combination dose contained the same doses of carbidopa and levodopa the patient was receiving prior to switching to carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients were switched the day after randomization from combined carbidopa/levodopa to combined carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients received the same doses of carbidopa (12.5, 25.0, or 37.5 mg) and levodopa (50, 100, or 150 mg) they were receiving prior to the switch, combined with 200 mg of entacapone. The frequency of doses per day prior to the switch remained the same after the switch. |
| BG001 | Delayed Switch | Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone was administered in 1 of 3 dose combinations: 12.5/50/200 mg, 25/100/200 mg, or 37.5/150/200 mg. The selected combination dose contained the same doses of carbidopa and levodopa the patient was receiving prior to switching to carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients were switched 4 weeks after randomization from combined carbidopa/levodopa to combined carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients received the same doses of carbidopa (12.5, 25.0, or 37.5 mg) and levodopa (50, 100, or 150 mg) they were receiving prior to the switch, combined with 200 mg of entacapone. The frequency of doses per day prior to the switch remained the same after the switch. |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
| |||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score From Baseline to Week 4 | Motor function was assessed with the UPDRS part III. There are 14 items in the instrument, each measured on a 5 point scale (0-4): Speech, facial expression, tremor at rest, action tremor, rigidity, finger taps, hand movements, hand pronation and supination, leg agility, arising from chair, posture, gait, postural stability, and body bradykinesia. The sum of scores can range from 0 to 56; a higher score indicates greater disability. A negative change score indicates improvement. | Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable. Only patients with baseline and Week 4 UPDRS part III scores were included in the analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | Baseline to Week 4 |
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Score From Baseline to Week 4 | Quality of life was assessed with the Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Instrument (PDQUALIF), a 33-item self-reported questionnaire which includes seven domains: Social/role function, self-imaging/sexuality, sleep, outlook, physical function, independence, and urinary function. Questions are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (sometimes) to 5 (always). The 1 to 5 range was recoded to 0 to 4 for the analysis. The total score can range from 0 to 132. A lower score indicates better quality of life. A negative change score indicates improvement. | Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable. Only patients with baseline and Week 4 PDQUALIF scores were included in the analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | Baseline to Week 4 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Score From Baseline to Week 8 | Quality of life was assessed with the Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Instrument (PDQUALIF), a 33-item self-reported questionnaire which includes seven domains: Social/role function, self-imaging/sexuality, sleep, outlook, physical function, independence, and urinary function. Questions are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (sometimes) to 5 (always). The 1 to 5 range was recoded to 0 to 4 for the analysis. The total score can range from 0 to 132. A lower score indicates better quality of life. A negative change score indicates improvement. | Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable. Only patients with baseline and Week 8 PDQUALIF scores were included in the analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | Baseline to Week 8 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score From Baseline to Week 8 | Motor function was assessed with the UPDRS part III. There are 14 items in the instrument, each measured on a 5-point scale (0-4): Speech, facial expression, tremor at rest, action tremor, rigidity, finger taps, hand movements, hand pronation and supination, leg agility, arising from chair, posture, gait, postural stability, and body bradykinesia. The sum of scores can range from 0 to 56; a higher score indicates greater disability. A negative change score indicates improvement. | Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable. Only patients with baseline and Week 8 UPDRS part III scores were included in the analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | Baseline to Week 8 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Total Score From Baseline to Week 4 | The PDQ-39 is another instrument used to assess quality of life in individuals with Parkinson's disease. The questionnaire provides scores on eight scales: Mobility, activities of daily living, emotions, stigma, social support, cognition, communication, and bodily discomfort. Questions are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (sometimes) to 5 (always). The 1 to 5 range was recoded to 0 to 4 for the analysis. The total score can range from 0 to 156. A lower score indicates better quality of life. A negative change score indicates an improvement. | Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable. Only patients with baseline and Week 4 PDQ-39 scores were included in the analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | Baseline to Week 4 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Total Score From Baseline to Week 8 | The PDQ-39 is another instrument used to assess quality of life in individuals with Parkinson's disease. The questionnaire provides scores on eight scales: Mobility, activities of daily living, emotions, stigma, social support, cognition, communication, and bodily discomfort. Questions are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (sometimes) to 5 (always). The 1 to 5 range was recoded to 0 to 4 for the analysis. The total score can range from 0 to 156. A lower score indicates better quality of life. A negative change score indicates an improvement. | Intent-to-treat (ITT) population: All randomized patients who received at least one dose of study drug and had at least one post-baseline assessment of the primary efficacy variable. Only patients with baseline and Week 8 PDQ-39 scores were included in the analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | Baseline to Week 8 |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale (UPDRS) Part III Score From Baseline to End of Treatment | Motor function was assessed with the UPDRS part III. There are 14 items in the instrument, each measured on a 5 point scale (0-4): Speech, facial expression, tremor at rest, action tremor, rigidity, finger taps, hand movements, hand pronation and supination, leg agility, arising from chair, posture, gait, postural stability, and body bradykinesia. The sum of scores can range from 0 to 56; a higher score indicates greater disability. A negative change score indicates improvement. | ITT population - For each patient, the last post-baseline measurement during the treatment phase was used as the end-of-treatment measurement. Only patients with baseline and end-of-treatment UPDRS part III scores were included in the analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | Baseline to end of treatment (Week 16 in the Immediate Switch group, Week 20 in the Delayed Switch group) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Score From Baseline to End of Treatment | Quality of life was assessed with the Parkinson's Disease Quality of Life Instrument (PDQUALIF), a 33-item self-reported questionnaire which includes seven domains: Social/role function, self-imaging/sexuality, sleep, outlook, physical function, independence, and urinary function. Questions are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (sometimes) to 5 (always). The 1 to 5 range was recoded to 0 to 4 for the analysis. The total score can range from 0 to 132. A lower score indicates better quality of life. A negative change score indicates improvement. | ITT population - For each patient, the last post-baseline measurement during the treatment phase was used as the end-of-treatment measurement. Only patients with baseline and end-of-treatment PDQUALIF scores were included in the analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | Baseline to end of treatment (Week 16 in the Immediate Switch group, Week 20 in the Delayed Switch group) |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Change in the 39-item Parkinson's Disease Questionnaire (PDQ-39) Total Score From Baseline to End of Treatment | The PDQ-39 is another instrument used to assess quality of life in individuals with Parkinson's disease. The questionnaire provides scores on eight scales: Mobility, activities of daily living, emotions, stigma, social support, cognition, communication, and bodily discomfort. Questions are scored on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 1 (never) to 3 (sometimes) to 5 (always). The 1 to 5 range was recoded to 0 to 4 for the analysis. The total score can range from 0 to 156. A lower score indicates better quality of life. A negative change score indicates an improvement. | ITT population - For each patient, the last post-baseline measurement during the treatment phase was used as the end-of-treatment measurement. Only patients with baseline and end-of-treatment PDQ-39 scores were included in the analysis. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Units on a scale | Baseline to end of treatment (Week 16 in the Immediate Switch group, Week 20 in the Delayed Switch group) |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Immediate Switch | Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone was administered in 1 of 3 dose combinations: 12.5/50/200 mg, 25/100/200 mg, or 37.5/150/200 mg. The selected combination dose contained the same doses of carbidopa and levodopa the patient was receiving prior to switching to carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients were switched the day after randomization from combined carbidopa/levodopa to combined carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients received the same doses of carbidopa (12.5, 25.0, or 37.5 mg) and levodopa (50, 100, or 150 mg) they were receiving prior to the switch, combined with 200 mg of entacapone. The frequency of doses per day prior to the switch remained the same after the switch. | 8 | 180 | 100 | 180 | ||
| EG001 | Delayed Switch | Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone was administered in 1 of 3 dose combinations: 12.5/50/200 mg, 25/100/200 mg, or 37.5/150/200 mg. The selected combination dose contained the same doses of carbidopa and levodopa the patient was receiving prior to switching to carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients were switched 4 weeks after randomization from combined carbidopa/levodopa to combined carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients received the same doses of carbidopa (12.5, 25.0, or 37.5 mg) and levodopa (50, 100, or 150 mg) they were receiving prior to the switch, combined with 200 mg of entacapone. The frequency of doses per day prior to the switch remained the same after the switch. | 12 | 179 | 66 | 179 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Anaemia | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Atrial fibrillation | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bradycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cardiac failure congestive | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Sinus bradycardia | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vision blurred | Eye disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Duodenal ulcer perforation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pancreatitis acute | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Vomiting | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Abscess | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Bronchitis | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Viral infection | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Humerus fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Intentional overdose | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Joint dislocation | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Anorexia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dehydration | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypokalaemia | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Back pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chest wall pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Non-small cell lung cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Papillary thyroid cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal cancer | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal cell carcinoma stage unspecified | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Renal neoplasm | Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps) | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cerebrovascular accident | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Global amnesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypoaesthesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Presyncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Syncope | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Major depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Suicidal ideation | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Breast pain | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Ovarian cyst | Reproductive system and breast disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Cold sweat | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dermatitis allergic | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Hypotension | Vascular disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Fatigue | General disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Pain in extremity | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Dyskinesia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Tremor | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
| |
| Chromaturia | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 11.0 | Systematic Assessment |
|
The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of the pooled data (ie, data from all sites) in the clinical trial.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Study Director | Novartis Pharmaceuticals | 862-778-8300 |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D010300 | Parkinson Disease |
| D014202 | Tremor |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D020734 | Parkinsonian Disorders |
| D001480 | Basal Ganglia Diseases |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
| D009069 | Movement Disorders |
| D000080874 | Synucleinopathies |
| D019636 | Neurodegenerative Diseases |
| D020820 | Dyskinesias |
| D009461 | Neurologic Manifestations |
| D012816 | Signs and Symptoms |
| D013568 | Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C481098 | Stalevo |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Male |
|
| OG001 | Delayed Switch | Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone was administered in 1 of 3 dose combinations: 12.5/50/200 mg, 25/100/200 mg, or 37.5/150/200 mg. The selected combination dose contained the same doses of carbidopa and levodopa the patient was receiving prior to switching to carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients were switched 4 weeks after randomization from combined carbidopa/levodopa to combined carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients received the same doses of carbidopa (12.5, 25.0, or 37.5 mg) and levodopa (50, 100, or 150 mg) they were receiving prior to the switch, combined with 200 mg of entacapone. The frequency of doses per day prior to the switch remained the same after the switch. |
|
|
| OG001 | Delayed Switch | Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone was administered in 1 of 3 dose combinations: 12.5/50/200 mg, 25/100/200 mg, or 37.5/150/200 mg. The selected combination dose contained the same doses of carbidopa and levodopa the patient was receiving prior to switching to carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients were switched 4 weeks after randomization from combined carbidopa/levodopa to combined carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients received the same doses of carbidopa (12.5, 25.0, or 37.5 mg) and levodopa (50, 100, or 150 mg) they were receiving prior to the switch, combined with 200 mg of entacapone. The frequency of doses per day prior to the switch remained the same after the switch. |
|
|
| OG001 | Delayed Switch | Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone was administered in 1 of 3 dose combinations: 12.5/50/200 mg, 25/100/200 mg, or 37.5/150/200 mg. The selected combination dose contained the same doses of carbidopa and levodopa the patient was receiving prior to switching to carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients were switched 4 weeks after randomization from combined carbidopa/levodopa to combined carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients received the same doses of carbidopa (12.5, 25.0, or 37.5 mg) and levodopa (50, 100, or 150 mg) they were receiving prior to the switch, combined with 200 mg of entacapone. The frequency of doses per day prior to the switch remained the same after the switch. |
|
|
| OG001 | Delayed Switch | Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone was administered in 1 of 3 dose combinations: 12.5/50/200 mg, 25/100/200 mg, or 37.5/150/200 mg. The selected combination dose contained the same doses of carbidopa and levodopa the patient was receiving prior to switching to carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients were switched 4 weeks after randomization from combined carbidopa/levodopa to combined carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients received the same doses of carbidopa (12.5, 25.0, or 37.5 mg) and levodopa (50, 100, or 150 mg) they were receiving prior to the switch, combined with 200 mg of entacapone. The frequency of doses per day prior to the switch remained the same after the switch. |
|
|
| OG001 | Delayed Switch | Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone was administered in 1 of 3 dose combinations: 12.5/50/200 mg, 25/100/200 mg, or 37.5/150/200 mg. The selected combination dose contained the same doses of carbidopa and levodopa the patient was receiving prior to switching to carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients were switched 4 weeks after randomization from combined carbidopa/levodopa to combined carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients received the same doses of carbidopa (12.5, 25.0, or 37.5 mg) and levodopa (50, 100, or 150 mg) they were receiving prior to the switch, combined with 200 mg of entacapone. The frequency of doses per day prior to the switch remained the same after the switch. |
|
|
| OG001 | Delayed Switch | Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone was administered in 1 of 3 dose combinations: 12.5/50/200 mg, 25/100/200 mg, or 37.5/150/200 mg. The selected combination dose contained the same doses of carbidopa and levodopa the patient was receiving prior to switching to carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients were switched 4 weeks after randomization from combined carbidopa/levodopa to combined carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients received the same doses of carbidopa (12.5, 25.0, or 37.5 mg) and levodopa (50, 100, or 150 mg) they were receiving prior to the switch, combined with 200 mg of entacapone. The frequency of doses per day prior to the switch remained the same after the switch. |
|
|
| OG001 | Delayed Switch | Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone was administered in 1 of 3 dose combinations: 12.5/50/200 mg, 25/100/200 mg, or 37.5/150/200 mg. The selected combination dose contained the same doses of carbidopa and levodopa the patient was receiving prior to switching to carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients were switched 4 weeks after randomization from combined carbidopa/levodopa to combined carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients received the same doses of carbidopa (12.5, 25.0, or 37.5 mg) and levodopa (50, 100, or 150 mg) they were receiving prior to the switch, combined with 200 mg of entacapone. The frequency of doses per day prior to the switch remained the same after the switch. |
|
|
| OG001 | Delayed Switch | Carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone was administered in 1 of 3 dose combinations: 12.5/50/200 mg, 25/100/200 mg, or 37.5/150/200 mg. The selected combination dose contained the same doses of carbidopa and levodopa the patient was receiving prior to switching to carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients were switched 4 weeks after randomization from combined carbidopa/levodopa to combined carbidopa/levodopa/entacapone. Patients received the same doses of carbidopa (12.5, 25.0, or 37.5 mg) and levodopa (50, 100, or 150 mg) they were receiving prior to the switch, combined with 200 mg of entacapone. The frequency of doses per day prior to the switch remained the same after the switch. |
|
|