Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Achieving independent ambulation is an important goal of hip fracture rehabilitation, as it is predictive of returning to the community and of future health problems. Current research regarding post-hip fracture rehabilitation is sparse. Body weight supported treadmill training (BWSTT) is a novel approach to retrain walking abilities. BWSTT may be ideal for retraining walking after hip fracture, as it is task-specific and alleviates the demands of maintaining balance while walking skills are trained. The use of the harness may provide a sense of security for the patient, facilitating walking training. The proposed project will investigate the feasibility and tolerability of BWSTT after hip fracture, and its impact on function, mobility, quality of life and fear of falling. It is hypothesized that BWSTT 3-5 times weekly in acute hip fracture patients will improve function, mobility, quality of life and reduce fear of falling.
Morbidity and mortality rates associated with hip fracture are enormous. Current literature regarding post-hip fracture rehabilitation is sparse. A recent Cochrane review suggested that the potential for enhancing the recovery of mobility in hip fracture patients with treadmill gait retraining warrants further research in this area. Body weight supported treadmill training (BWSTT) is a novel approach to retraining ambulation, and has been successfully implemented in other patient populations. BWSTT may be ideal for retraining gait after hip fracture, as it is task-specific and alleviates the demands of maintaining equilibrium while walking skills are trained. The objectives of the proposed pilot study are to evaluate the feasibility and tolerability of using BWSTT as a gait retraining strategy in individuals who have experienced a hip fracture, and to explore whether it can improve mobility, fear of falling and function. Participants' feedback will be sought regarding the BWSTT experience for use in planning future clinical trials, to be submitted to CIHR. Quantitative outcomes will be assessed at baseline, and after 4 weeks of training 3-5 times per week. Outcome measures include: the Lower Extremity Functional Scale, health-related quality of life (SF-36), Falls-Efficacy Scale and the 2-minute walk test. Based on previous research experience with the frail elderly, we anticipate that many patients will be receptive to rehabilitation in the form of BWSTT. We hypothesize that BWSTT after hip fracture will result in significant gains in ambulatory capacity, as well as improvements in quality of life and functional independence. In addition, we anticipate that BWSTT will prove to be a feasible and effective gait retraining strategy.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| BWSTT | Experimental | Body weight supported treadmill training |
|
| Usual care | No Intervention | Usual care |
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Body weight supported treadmill training | Procedure | hip fracture patients walk on a treadmill with body weight support |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Feasibility - # With > or = 60% Compliance, # Agreeing to Participate, # Returning for 3 Month Follow-up | Compliance to BWSTT only, | 3 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Timed up and Go | discharge | |
| Falls Self Efficacy | discharge | |
| 2 Minute Walk Test |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Lora Giangregorio, PhD | University of Waterloo | Principal Investigator |
| Alexandra Papaioannou, MD, MSc | Hamilton Health Sciences and McMaster University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hamilton Health Sciences | Hamilton | Ontario | L9C7N4 | Canada |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 19969179 | Result | Giangregorio LM, Thabane L, Debeer J, Farrauto L, McCartney N, Adachi JD, Papaioannou A. Body weight-supported treadmill training for patients with hip fracture: a feasibility study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Dec;90(12):2125-30. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.06.022. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Patients treated for a hip fracture by orthopedic surgeons and admitted to the inpatient rehabilitation floor of a teaching hospital between September 2006 and November 2007 were considered for participation. A break in recruitment was implemented from November to early January to avoid variation in physiotherapy care related to holidays.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | BWSTT | Body weight supported treadmill training |
| FG001 | Control | Usual care |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline to Discharge |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Follow-up |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | BWSTT | Body weight supported treadmill training |
| BG001 | Control | Usual care |
| BG002 |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Feasibility - # With > or = 60% Compliance, # Agreeing to Participate, # Returning for 3 Month Follow-up | Compliance to BWSTT only, | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 3 months |
|
|
inpatient stay: varies
Only collected adverse events reported by participants or therapists as related to treatment as patients were already in hospital
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | BWSTT | Body weight supported treadmill training: hip fracture patients walk on a treadmill with body weight support |
Not provided
Not provided
It was not possible to blind outcome assessors. We did not randomize participants because we wanted a minimum of 12 to test feasibility of intervention. Control group had a longer average length of stay, and may have received more physiotherapy.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dr. Lora Giangregorio | University of Waterloo | 5198884567 | 36357 | lmgiangr@uwaterloo.ca |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006620 | Hip Fractures |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D005264 | Femoral Fractures |
| D050723 | Fractures, Bone |
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |
| D025981 | Hip Injuries |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| discharge |
| Lower Extremity Functional Scale | discharge |
| Physician Decision |
|
| Protocol Violation |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| Total |
Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Timed up and go time | Some participants could not complete performance based measures at baseline. | Mean | Standard Deviation | seconds |
|
| 2 Minute Walk Test time | Some participants could not perform performance based measures at baseline | Mean | Standard Deviation | metres |
|
| Lower Extremity Functional Score | range 0-80 higher mean better functioning | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
| Falls Self-efficacy Scale | 0-40, higher means greater efficacy | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale |
|
|
| Secondary | Timed up and Go | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | seconds | discharge |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Falls Self Efficacy | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | discharge |
|
|
|
| Secondary | 2 Minute Walk Test | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | metres | discharge |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Lower Extremity Functional Scale | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | discharge |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 12 |
| 0 |
| 12 |
| EG001 | Usual Care | Usual care rehabilitation | 0 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
Not provided
Not provided
| D007869 |
| Leg Injuries |