Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of the study is to evaluate the benefit of interventricular (V-V) delay optimization in reducing the non-responder rate in patients with cardiac resynchronization defibrillator (CRT-D) devices. The primary endpoint of this study is CRT responder rate.
For patients enrolled with new CRT-D systems, patients are considered non-responders if BOTH of the following requirements are fulfilled:
For those receiving CRT-D devices as replacements of older CRT-D systems, patients are considered non-responders if BOTH of the following requirements are fulfilled:
Study Methods
This is a prospective, randomized (simultaneous biventricular (BiV) pacing vs. sequential BiV pacing) study.
Any patient that receives an FDA approved St. Jude Medical (SJM) CRT-D with V-V timing is eligible for enrollment.
At 3 months post enrollment (or at implant for CRT-D replacements), patients screened as non-responders are randomized to either simultaneous or sequential BiV pacing. Patients requiring a replacement CRT-D device that are identified as non-responders to CRT are enrolled at the screening/randomization visit.
Patients are followed for a period of 6 months post randomization:
Total # of centers - 80 centers
Sample size - 800 patients screened for CRT non-responders
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simultaneous VV Pacing | Active Comparator | Programmed to simultaneous biventricular pacing |
|
| Sequential VV Pacing | Active Comparator | Programmed to sequential biventricular pacing |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simultaneous VV Pacing | Device | Right ventricular and left ventricular pacing delivered simultaneously. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| CRT Responder Rate | Patients underwent baseline NYHA class and 6-minute hall walk distance (6-MHWD) assessment. After device implantation AV delays were optimized and all patients were programmed to simultaneous biventricular (BiV) pacing. At the 3-month follow-up, the NYHA class and 6-MHWD were reassessed. Non-responders were randomized 1:1 to either sequential BiV pacing with VV optimization or simultaneous BiV pacing. The responder rate at 6 months post randomization was compared between the two groups. Which is why the numbers are broken further down in the Outcome Measure table. | 6 months |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| NYHA Class Progression | New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification provides a way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It places patients in one of four categories based on how much they are limited during physical activity; the limitations/symptoms are in regard to normal breathing and varying degrees in shortness of breath and/or angina pain. | 6 months |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient has a standard indication for a CRT-D.
Patient has the ability to complete a 6-minute hall walk with the only limiting factor to be fatigue or shortness of breath.
Patient is geographically stable and willing to comply with the required follow-up schedule.
Prior to 1 month of randomization, patient's HF medications are maintained stable and remain stable throughout the study.
Patients requiring a CRT-D replacement must comply with BOTH of the following:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Raul Weiss, MD | Ohio State University | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ohio State University | Columbus | Ohio | 43210 | United States |
102 of the patients were non-responders, but only 93 were randomized of which 57 completed the study and had data available for analysis. of the 816 participants screened only 93 wre randomized to treatment. This statement is accurate and appropriate.
816 patients were enrolled in the trial. Of the patients screened at the 3-month follow up, 572 patients were classified as responders and 102 patients as non-responders.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Simultaneous Pacing V-V Timing | Patients maintained on simultaneous V-V delay |
| FG001 | Sequential VV Pacing | V-V delay was optimized |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Simultaneous Pacing V-V Timing | Patients maintained on simultaneous V-V delay |
| BG001 | Sequential VV Pacing | V-V delay was optimized |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | CRT Responder Rate | Patients underwent baseline NYHA class and 6-minute hall walk distance (6-MHWD) assessment. After device implantation AV delays were optimized and all patients were programmed to simultaneous biventricular (BiV) pacing. At the 3-month follow-up, the NYHA class and 6-MHWD were reassessed. Non-responders were randomized 1:1 to either sequential BiV pacing with VV optimization or simultaneous BiV pacing. The responder rate at 6 months post randomization was compared between the two groups. Which is why the numbers are broken further down in the Outcome Measure table. | Per protocol analysis. | Posted | Number | participants | 6 months |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Simultaneous Pacing V-V Timing | Patients maintained on simultaneous V-V delay |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ONSET OF ATRIAL FIBRILLATION | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| DIAPHRAGMATIC CAPTURE BY ATRIAL LEAD | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
Due to the lower than expected non-responder rate at 3 months, the study did not reach the target randomized sample size.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ashish Oza | St. Jude Medical | (818) 493-3648 | aoza@sjm.com |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006333 | Heart Failure |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D006331 | Heart Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Sequential VV Pacing | Device | Right ventricular and left ventricular pacing delivered sequentially. |
|
| 6 Minute Hall Walk Distance Test (6-MHWD) | Patients were considered non-responders if the 6-MHWD had not improved by greater than or equal to 10% compared to baseline. This statement is accurate and appropriate. | 6 months |
| Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) | Ejection fraction is a measurement of the percentage of blood leaving your heart each time it contracts. The left ventricle is the heart's main pumping chamber, so ejection fraction is usually measured only in the left ventricle (LV). | Randomization and 9 months |
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Number | participants |
|
| Sequential VV Pacing |
V-V delay was optimized per protocol |
|
|
| Secondary | NYHA Class Progression | New York Heart Association (NYHA) functional classification provides a way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It places patients in one of four categories based on how much they are limited during physical activity; the limitations/symptoms are in regard to normal breathing and varying degrees in shortness of breath and/or angina pain. | Per protocol analysis | Posted | Number | participants | 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | 6 Minute Hall Walk Distance Test (6-MHWD) | Patients were considered non-responders if the 6-MHWD had not improved by greater than or equal to 10% compared to baseline. This statement is accurate and appropriate. | Posted | Number | participants | 6 months |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) | Ejection fraction is a measurement of the percentage of blood leaving your heart each time it contracts. The left ventricle is the heart's main pumping chamber, so ejection fraction is usually measured only in the left ventricle (LV). | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | percentage | Randomization and 9 months |
|
|
|
| 8 |
| 31 |
| 7 |
| 31 |
| EG001 | Sequential VV Pacing | V-V delay was optimized | 2 | 26 | 12 | 26 |
| RV Lead Dislodgment or Migration | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| RV Elevated Pacing Thresholds | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| RV Decreased R/P-Wave Amplitude/Loss of Sensing | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| LEFT BRAIN TIA | Nervous system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| LV Loss of capture | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| BACTEREMIA | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Therapy/Aborted Therapy for Non-Ventricular Rhythm:AF/AFL | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| MULTIPLE ICD FIRING, NSTEMI | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| CHEST PAIN AND AICD FIRING | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| CHF EXACERBATION | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| CHF EXACERBATION + NEAR SYNCOPE | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| SHORTNESS OF BREATH | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| NEAR SYNCOPE WITH GENERAL WEAKNESS | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| HOSPITALIZATION FOR WEAKNESS WITH ICD FIRING X 2 | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| PNEUMONIA AND WORSENING KIDNEY FUNCTION | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| END STAGE RENAL DZ - (WORSENING OF KNOWN DISEASE) | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| MRSA INFECTED LEFT ARM DIALYSIS GRAFT | Infections and infestations | Systematic Assessment |
|
| HOSPITALIZATION FOR NEAR SYNCOPE | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| DIZZY SPELL | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| ANEMIA | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| ACUTE VIRAL PERICARDITIS | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| ABDOMINAL AORTIC ANEURYSM | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| SYNCOPE | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| SINUS INFECTION | General disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| COPD (CHRONIC) | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| EXACERBATION CONGESTIVE HEART FAILURE | Cardiac disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
| WORSENING RENAL FUNCTION | Renal and urinary disorders | Systematic Assessment |
|
Publications and presentation should be presented to sponsor 30 days (manuscripts) or 7 days (abstracts) prior to submission for publication. The sponsor reserves the right to deny submission of study results if based on data owned by sponsor.
| NYHA Class Unchanged |
|
| NYHA Class Worsened |
|