Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. Giving radiation during surgery may be an effective treatment for breast cancer.
PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well radiation therapy works in treating older women who are undergoing surgery for invasive breast cancer.
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
Secondary
OUTLINE: This is a non-randomized study.
Patients undergo intraoperative lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy OR standard level I, II axillary dissection to evaluate the lymph nodes followed by intraoperative breast ultrasonography to define the tumor target volume. Patients then undergo intraoperative single-dose partial breast radiotherapy followed by segmental mastectomy (i.e., lumpectomy) of the tumor. Patients with 1 or 2 tumor-involved surgical margins may undergo repeat segmental mastectomy. Patients with > 2 tumor-involved surgical margins undergo mastectomy. Patients determined to have a tumor size > 3 cm or an extensive intraductal component on final pathology evaluation undergo standard external beam radiotherapy after surgery.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed every 3 months for 2 years, every 6 months for 3 years, and then annually thereafter.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 71 patients will be accrued for this study within 2 to 3 years.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Intraoperative Radiation Arm | Experimental | Intraoperative radiotherapy (radiation therapy) during surgery for tumor excision. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| surgery | Procedure | conventional |
| |
| therapy |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Rates of Good/Excellent Cosmesis as Measured by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Cosmetic Rating Scale - Rated by Physician | Rates of good/excellent cosmesis was evaluated using the following criteria: Excellent - when compared to the untreated breast, there is minimal or no difference in the size, shape, or texture of the treated breast. There may be mild thickening or scar tissue within the breast or skin, but not enough to change the appearance. Good - there is mild asymmetry in the size or shape of the treated breast as compared to the normal breast. The thickening or scar tissue within the breast causes only a mild change in the shape. | 1 year follow up visit |
| Rates of Good/Excellent Cosmesis as Measured by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Cosmetic Rating Scale - Rated by Patients | Rates of good/excellent cosmesis was evaluated using the following criteria: Excellent - when compared to the untreated breast, there is minimal or no difference in the size, shape, or texture of the treated breast. There may be mild thickening or scar tissue within the breast or skin, but not enough to change the appearance. Good - there is mild asymmetry in the size or shape of the treated breast as compared to the normal breast. The thickening or scar tissue within the breast causes only a mild change in the shape. | 1 year follow up visit |
| Incidence of Grade 3/4 Toxicity | Skin and subcutaneous toxicity were graded by a radiation oncologist according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events version 3.0. Toxicities directly, probably, or possibly related to the radiation were included. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE v3.0 displays Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each adverse event (AE) based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild Adverse Event Grade 2 Moderate Adverse Event Grade 3 Severe Adverse Event Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling Adverse Event Grade 5 Death related to Adverse Event | 3 months |
| Ipsilateral Breast Recurrence |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Association of Phosphorylated Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) , Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2), p44/42 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase (MAPK), and Protein Kinase B (Akt) in Breast Tumors and Normal Tissue Before and After IORT | 3 months | |
| Association of Nuclear Factor Kappa-light-chain-enhancer of Activated B Cells (NFkB) Expression in Tumor and Normal Tissue Before and After IORT |
Not provided
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
Histologically confirmed primary invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast
Candidate for breast-conserving therapy, as determined by the surgical and radiation oncologist
No bilateral breast cancer
No clinical or radiographic multifocal disease not amenable to single segmental mastectomy
Hormone receptor status:
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age
Sex
Menopausal status
Performance status
Life expectancy
Hematopoietic
Hepatic
Renal
Other
Not pregnant
Fertile patients must use effective contraception
No collagen vascular disease
No medical condition that would preclude surgery
Other prior malignancy allowed provided the following criteria are met:
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy
Chemotherapy
Endocrine therapy
Radiotherapy
Surgery
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| David Olilla, MD | UNC Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | 27599-7295 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17091330 | Background | Ollila DW, Klauber-DeMore N, Tesche LJ, Kuzmiak CM, Pavic D, Goyal LK, Lian J, Chang S, Livasy CA, Sherron RF, Sartor CI. Feasibility of breast preserving therapy with single fraction in situ radiotherapy delivered intraoperatively. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Feb;14(2):660-9. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9154-1. | |
| 17235715 | Background |
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center | View source |
Not provided
89 patients consented. Of those 89, 18 were not treated for the following reasons: tumor not seen on ultrasound (2), tumor too close to chest wall (7), tumor too large (1), ineligible pathology (1), ineligible nodal status (1), operating room logistical errors (3), patients withdrew (2), not eligible for anesthesia (1).
March 2003 to July 2007
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Intraoperative Radiation Arm | Intraoperative radiotherapy (radiation therapy) during surgery for tumor excision. surgery: conventional therapy: neoadjuvant radiation therapy: intraoperative radiation therapy |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Intraoperative Radiation Arm | Intraoperative radiotherapy (radiation therapy) during surgery for tumor excision. surgery: conventional therapy: neoadjuvant radiation therapy: intraoperative radiation therapy |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Rates of Good/Excellent Cosmesis as Measured by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Cosmetic Rating Scale - Rated by Physician | Rates of good/excellent cosmesis was evaluated using the following criteria: Excellent - when compared to the untreated breast, there is minimal or no difference in the size, shape, or texture of the treated breast. There may be mild thickening or scar tissue within the breast or skin, but not enough to change the appearance. Good - there is mild asymmetry in the size or shape of the treated breast as compared to the normal breast. The thickening or scar tissue within the breast causes only a mild change in the shape. | Patients who received intraoperative radiation therapy (IORT) alone. 56 patients were assessed. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 1 year follow up visit |
|
Acute toxicity was evaluated 1 week and 3 months after IORT
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Intraoperative Radiation Arm | Intraoperative radiotherapy (radiation therapy) during surgery for tumor excision. surgery: conventional therapy: neoadjuvant radiation therapy: intraoperative radiation therapy |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Alopecia | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robin V Johnson | University of North Carolina Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center | 919-966-1125 | Robin_V_Johnson@med.unc.edu |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001943 | Breast Neoplasms |
| D018270 | Carcinoma, Ductal, Breast |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D001941 | Breast Diseases |
| D012871 | Skin Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D011878 | Radiotherapy |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Procedure |
neoadjuvant |
|
| radiation therapy | Radiation | intraoperative radiation therapy |
|
Percentage of participants who experienced a ipsilateral breast event (tumor bed recurrence versus elsewhere in breast).
| 5 years |
| 3 months |
| Association of Nuclear p53 Expression in Tumor and Normal Tissue Before and After IORT | 3 months |
| Stitzenberg KB, Klauber-Demore N, Chang XS, Calvo BF, Ollila DW, Goyal LK, Meyers MO, Kim HJ, Tepper JE, Sartor CI. In vivo intraoperative radiotherapy: a novel approach to radiotherapy for early stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Apr;14(4):1515-6. doi: 10.1245/s10434-006-9152-3. |
| 21061074 | Result | Kimple RJ, Klauber-DeMore N, Kuzmiak CM, Pavic D, Lian J, Livasy CA, Chiu WM, Moore DT, Sartor CI, Ollila DW. Local control following single-dose intraoperative radiotherapy prior to surgical excision of early-stage breast cancer. Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Apr;18(4):939-45. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1392-6. |
| 23361892 | Result | Vanderwalde NA, Jones EL, Kimple RJ, Moore DT, Klauber-Demore N, Sartor CI, Ollila DW. Phase 2 study of pre-excision single-dose intraoperative radiation therapy for early-stage breast cancers: six-year update with application of the ASTRO accelerated partial breast irradiation consensus statement criteria. Cancer. 2013 May 1;119(9):1736-43. doi: 10.1002/cncr.27915. Epub 2013 Jan 29. |
| 20395062 | Result | Kimple RJ, Klauber-DeMore N, Kuzmiak CM, Pavic D, Lian J, Livasy CA, Esler L, Moore DT, Sartor CI, Ollila DW. Cosmetic outcomes for accelerated partial breast irradiation before surgical excision of early-stage breast cancer using single-dose intraoperative radiotherapy. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Feb 1;79(2):400-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.10.032. Epub 2010 Apr 13. |
| years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Region of Enrollment | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Clinical Staging | The TNM Classification of Malignant Tumours (TNM) is a cancer staging notation system that describes the stage of a cancer which originates from a solid tumor with alphanumeric codes. Higher numbers mean the cancer is more advanced. T describes the size of the original (primary) tumor and whether it has invaded nearby tissue, N describes nearby (regional) lymph nodes that are involved, M describes distant metastasis (spread of cancer from one part of the body to another). | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Grade | Tumor grade is the description of a tumor based on how abnormal the tumor cells and the tumor tissue look under a microscope. It is an indicator of how quickly a tumor is likely to grow and spread. The grading system is as follows: grade I - cancer cells that resemble normal cells and aren't growing rapidly. grade II - cancer cells that don't look like normal cells and are growing faster than normal cells. grade III - cancer cells that look abnormal and may grow or spread more aggressively | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Markers | Tumor markers are substances that are produced by cancer or by other cells of the body in response to cancer or certain benign (noncancerous) conditions. The following markers are proteins. | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
|
|
| Primary | Rates of Good/Excellent Cosmesis as Measured by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) Cosmetic Rating Scale - Rated by Patients | Rates of good/excellent cosmesis was evaluated using the following criteria: Excellent - when compared to the untreated breast, there is minimal or no difference in the size, shape, or texture of the treated breast. There may be mild thickening or scar tissue within the breast or skin, but not enough to change the appearance. Good - there is mild asymmetry in the size or shape of the treated breast as compared to the normal breast. The thickening or scar tissue within the breast causes only a mild change in the shape. | Patients who received IORT alone. 42 patients assessed their cosmetic outcome. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 1 year follow up visit |
|
|
|
| Primary | Incidence of Grade 3/4 Toxicity | Skin and subcutaneous toxicity were graded by a radiation oncologist according to the common terminology criteria for adverse events version 3.0. Toxicities directly, probably, or possibly related to the radiation were included. Grade refers to the severity of the AE. The CTCAE v3.0 displays Grades 1 through 5 with unique clinical descriptions of severity for each adverse event (AE) based on this general guideline: Grade 1 Mild Adverse Event Grade 2 Moderate Adverse Event Grade 3 Severe Adverse Event Grade 4 Life-threatening or disabling Adverse Event Grade 5 Death related to Adverse Event | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 3 months |
|
|
|
| Primary | Ipsilateral Breast Recurrence | Percentage of participants who experienced a ipsilateral breast event (tumor bed recurrence versus elsewhere in breast). | There were 71 patients who received IORT. Of those 71 patients, 18 received further local therapy due to "high risk" pathology. The results include the 53 patients who received IORT without further local therapy. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage of participants | 5 years |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Association of Phosphorylated Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) , Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2), p44/42 Mitogen-activated Protein Kinase (MAPK), and Protein Kinase B (Akt) in Breast Tumors and Normal Tissue Before and After IORT | No data were collected for any of these biomarkers. Although samples were obtained from patients, they were never processed and analyzed. | Posted | 3 months |
|
|
| Secondary | Association of Nuclear Factor Kappa-light-chain-enhancer of Activated B Cells (NFkB) Expression in Tumor and Normal Tissue Before and After IORT | No data were collected for this biomarker. Although samples were obtained from patients, they were never processed and analyzed. | Posted | 3 months |
|
|
| Secondary | Association of Nuclear p53 Expression in Tumor and Normal Tissue Before and After IORT | No data were collected for this biomarker. Although samples were obtained from patients, they were never processed and analyzed. | Posted | 3 months |
|
|
| 6 |
| 71 |
| 0 |
| 71 |
| 11 |
| 71 |
| Low blood counts | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Breast pain | Reproductive system and breast disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Bruising (in absence of Grade 3 or 4 thrombocytopenia) | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Congestive heart failure (CHF) | Cardiac disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Chest wall pain | Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Constipation | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Ecchymosis | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Seroma | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Dyspnea (shortness of breath) | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Edema: limb | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Fatigue (asthenia, lethargy, malaise) | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Fracture | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Infection with unknown ANC - Urinary tract NOS | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Infections and infestations - Other, specify | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Intraoperative breast injury | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Myocardial infarction | Cardiac disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Changes in vision | Eye disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Pain - Head/headache | Nervous system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
| Skin (cellulitis) | Infections and infestations | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D017437 |
| Skin and Connective Tissue Diseases |
| D044584 | Carcinoma, Ductal |
| D000230 | Adenocarcinoma |
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
| D018299 | Neoplasms, Ductal, Lobular, and Medullary |