Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The purpose of the study is to demonstrate equivalence in the safety and performance of the RX ACCUNET when used with the RX ACCULINK, to that of the ACCULINK and ACCUNET devices, in the treatment of high risk surgical patients and patients with anatomical risks who require treatment for carotid artery disease.
Patients in ARCHeR RX will be followed after the index procedure at one, six and 12 months. Equivalence in safety will be demonstrated by comparing 30-day rates of DSMI for ARCHeR Amendment 2 and ARCHeR RX. Secondary analyses will be performed on the rate of ipsilateral stroke between 31 days and 12 months, target lesion revascularization at six and 12 months, acute device success for the RX ACCULINK and RX ACCUNET Systems, clinical success, and access site complications requiring treatment. Additionally, the stented segment will be evaluated by carotid duplex ultrasound at six and 12 months. Serious adverse events (SAE) of death or ipsilateral stroke that occur anytime during the follow-up period will be identified and reported, and will be adjudicated if indicated.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Experimental | To evaluate the safety and efficacy of the over-the-wire (OTW) ACCULINK (tm) System in patients deemed to be either at high risk or unsuitable for carotid endarterectomy (CEA) To evaluate the efficacy of the OTW ACCUNET System in patients deemed to be either at high risk or unsuitable for carotid endarterectomy (CEA). To demonstrate equivalence in the safety and performance of the RX ACCULINK Carotid Stent System and RX ACCUNET Embolic Protection System and the corresponding OTW devices. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Over-the-wire & Rapid Exchange ACCULINK (tm) Carotid Stent & ACCUNET (tm) embolic protection system | Device | Two rapid exchange devices will be evaluated: the RX ACCUNET Embolic Protection System ("RX ACCUNET") and the RX ACCULINK Carotid Stent System ("RX ACCULINK"). The RX ACCUNET Embolic Protection System is intended to facilitate the placement of diagnostic and therapeutic devices during interventional procedures and to capture embolic material that may be present during carotid artery interventional procedures. The RX ACCULINKâ„¢ Carotid Stent System is intended for the treatment of carotid artery stenosis in the internal carotid artery (ICA), with or without involvement of the contiguous common carotid artery (CCA), in asymptomatic patients and symptomatic patients. |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| All Stroke, death and MI | within 30 days |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Ipsilateral stroke | between 31 days and 12 months | |
| 2. Target vessel revascularization | six and 12 months | |
| 3. Ultrasound evaluation |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient age >=18.
Symptomatic patient: Transient ischemic attack (TIA), amaurosis fugax, or minor/non-disabling stroke (in the hemisphere supplied by the target vessel) within 180 days of enrollment; asymptomatic patient: meets angiographic and clinical inclusion criteria.
Patient has no childbearing potential or a negative pregnancy test within 30 days of study procedure.
Patient or legally authorized representative, and the patient's physician, agree to have the patient return for all required clinical contacts following study enrollment.
Patient or legally authorized representative has been informed of the nature of the study, and has provided written informed consent, approved by the appropriate Institutional Review Board (IRB)/Medical Ethics Committee (MEC) of the respective clinical site. (Sample consent - Appendix A-2).
Patient must meet two or more of the criteria listed in a-e OR one or more of the criteria listed in f-q below:
1. Patient has a discrete lesion located in the ICA (with or without involvement of the contiguous CCA).
2. Carotid stenosis must be >= 50% by angiography (symptomatic patient) or >= 80% by angiography (asymptomatic patient).
3. Target ICA vessel reference diameter must be >=4.0 mm and =<9.0 mm by angiography.
NOTE: Patients with bilateral carotid stenosis are eligible. Management of the non-study stenosis may be done in accordance with local Principal Investigator recommendation. Treatment of the non-study artery must take place either >30 days before or >30 days after the study procedure is completed.
Specific for the ACCUNET System 4. Expected ability to deliver the ACCUNET System distal to the lesion (absence of excessive tortuosity) and an available straight or mildly angulated segment >= 4 cm, by angiography, in the distal ICA (prior to the petrous portion of the vessel) in which to place the embolic protection device.
5. The diameter of the straight or mildly angulated segment, in the distal ICA prior to the petrous portion of the vessel, must be >= 3.25 mm and =< 7.5 mm by angiography.
Exclusion Criteria:
Candidates will be ineligible for enrollment in the study if any one of the following conditions apply:
Anatomic Exclusions
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| L. Nelson Hopkins, M.D. | Millard Fillmore Hospital, Buffalo, NY | Principal Investigator |
| Mark H. Wholey, MD | Shadyside Medical Center, Pittsburgh, PA | Principal Investigator |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 17210414 | Background | Naylor AR. Regarding "Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results". J Vasc Surg. 2007 Jan;45(1):222-3; author reply 223-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.08.089. No abstract available. | |
| 16890850 | Background | Gray WA, Hopkins LN, Yadav S, Davis T, Wholey M, Atkinson R, Cremonesi A, Fairman R, Walker G, Verta P, Popma J, Virmani R, Cohen DJ; ARCHeR Trial Collaborators. Protected carotid stenting in high-surgical-risk patients: the ARCHeR results. J Vasc Surg. 2006 Aug;44(2):258-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2006.03.044. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002340 | Carotid Artery Diseases |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D002561 | Cerebrovascular Disorders |
| D001927 | Brain Diseases |
| D002493 | Central Nervous System Diseases |
| D009422 | Nervous System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
|
| six and 12 months |
| 4. Acute device success for the RX ACCULINK System | Acute |
| 5. Acute device success for the RX ACCUNET Embolic Protection System | Acute |
| 6. Clinical Success | Acute |
| 7. Access site complications requiring treatment. | Acute |
| 16572087 | Background | Schonholz CJ, Uflacker R, Parodi JC, Hannegan C, Selby B. Is there evidence that cerebral protection is beneficial? Clinical data. J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino). 2006 Apr;47(2):137-41. |
| 16110380 | Background | Kasirajan K. What is the latest in inventory for carotid stenting and cerebral protection? Perspect Vasc Surg Endovasc Ther. 2005 Jun;17(2):135-41. doi: 10.1177/153100350501700217. |
| 15788981 | Background | Gray WA. Endovascular treatment of extra-cranial carotid artery bifurcation disease. Minerva Cardioangiol. 2005 Feb;53(1):69-77. |
| 15120818 | Background | Gray WA. A cardiologist in the carotids. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004 May 5;43(9):1602-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2003.11.051. |
| 12618695 | Background | Illig KA, Zhang R, Tanski W, Benesch C, Sternbach Y, Green RM. Is the rationale for carotid angioplasty and stenting in patients excluded from NASCET/ACAS or eligible for ARCHeR justified? J Vasc Surg. 2003 Mar;37(3):575-81. doi: 10.1067/mva.2003.79. |
| D014652 | Vascular Diseases |
| D002318 | Cardiovascular Diseases |