Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| A7501008 | Other Identifier | Organon | |
| 2004-003927-11 | EudraCT Number | ||
| MK-8274-017 | Other Identifier | Merck Protocol Number | |
| P05844 | Other Identifier | Schering-Plough |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
This is a 12-week study that will test the safety and efficacy of asenapine when used in addition to lithium or valproate for subjects with acute manic or mixed episodes of Bipolar I Disorder.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Asenapine | Experimental | Participants received asenapine as a fast-dissolving sublingual (SL) tablet, given twice daily (BID). On Day 1, participants received asenapine 5 mg, BID. On Days 2 to 84, asenapine was dosed flexibly: BID at either 5 or 10 mg. Asenapine doses were up- or down-titrated based on efficacy, safety, and tolerability. |
|
| Placebo | Placebo Comparator | Participants received placebo on Days 1-84 as a fast-dissolving SL tablet, BID. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Asenapine | Drug | Asenapine fast dissolving SL tablets 5 and 10 mg; starting dose 5 mg BID on Day 1; 5-10 mg BID after Day 1. |
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Score at Day 21 | The least squares mean change from baseline in Y-MRS score at day 21 was assessed. The Y-MRS is a clinician-rated instrument used for assessing the symptoms of mania, composed of 11 items. For the 11 items, scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to, depending on the item, either 4 (7 items) or 8 (4 items). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-60), with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Baseline and Day 21 |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE) | The number of participants experiencing an AE was assessed. An AE is any untoward or unfavorable medical occurrence in a participant, including any abnormal sign, symptom, or disease, temporally associated with the use of the investigational product, whether or not considered related to the investigational product. | Up to Day 114 |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Medical Director | Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC | Study Director |
Not provided
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 22198448 | Result | Szegedi A, Calabrese JR, Stet L, Mackle M, Zhao J, Panagides J; Apollo Study Group. Asenapine as adjunctive treatment for acute mania associated with bipolar disorder: results of a 12-week core study and 40-week extension. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2012 Feb;32(1):46-55. doi: 10.1097/JCP.0b013e31823f872f. |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Placebo | Participants received placebo on Days 1-84 as a fast-dissolving sublingual (SL) tablet, given twice daily (BID). |
| FG001 | Asenapine | Participants received asenapine as a fast-dissolving SL tablet, BID. On Day 1, participants received asenapine 5 mg, BID. On Days 2 to 84, asenapine was dosed flexibly: BID at either 5 or 10 mg. Asenapine doses were up- or down-titrated based on efficacy, safety, and tolerability. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
Includes all participants receiving study treatment.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Placebo | Participants received placebo on Days 1-84 as a fast-dissolving sublingual (SL) tablet, given twice daily (BID). |
| BG001 | Asenapine | Participants received asenapine as a fast-dissolving SL tablet, BID. On Day 1, participants received asenapine 5 mg, BID. On Days 2 to 84, asenapine was dosed flexibly: BID at either 5 or 10 mg. Asenapine doses were up- or down-titrated based on efficacy, safety, and tolerability. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Mean |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Score at Day 21 | The least squares mean change from baseline in Y-MRS score at day 21 was assessed. The Y-MRS is a clinician-rated instrument used for assessing the symptoms of mania, composed of 11 items. For the 11 items, scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to, depending on the item, either 4 (7 items) or 8 (4 items). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-60), with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a last observation carried forward (LOCF) analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, having ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a Scale | Baseline and Day 21 |
|
Up to Day 114
Includes all participants receiving study treatment. Additionally, serious adverse events were coded using MedDRA 10, while other adverse events were coded using MedDRA 9.1.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Placebo | Participants received placebo on Days 1-84 as a fast-dissolving sublingual (SL) tablet, given twice daily (BID). |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Arteriosclerosis Coronary Artery | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 10 | Systematic Assessment |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Diarrhoea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Systematic Assessment |
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Senior Vice President, Global Clinical Development | Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. | 1-800-672-6372 | ClinicalTrialsDisclosure@merck.com |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D001714 | Bipolar Disorder |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000068105 | Bipolar and Related Disorders |
| D019964 | Mood Disorders |
| D001523 | Mental Disorders |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| C522667 | asenapine |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Placebo | Drug | Placebo fast dissolving SL tablets, BID |
|
| Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE | The number of participants discontinuing study treatment due to an AE was assessed. An AE is any untoward or unfavorable medical occurrence in a participant, including any abnormal sign, symptom, or disease, temporally associated with the use of the investigational product, whether or not considered related to the investigational product. | Up to Day 84 |
| Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Score at Day 42 | The least squares mean change from baseline in Y-MRS score at day 42 was assessed. The Y-MRS is a clinician-rated instrument used for assessing the symptoms of mania, composed of 11 items. For the 11 items, scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to, depending on the item, either 4 (7 items) or 8 (4 items). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-60), with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Baseline and Day 42 |
| Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Score at Day 84 | The least squares mean change from baseline in Y-MRS score at day 84 was assessed. The Y-MRS is a clinician-rated instrument used for assessing the symptoms of mania, composed of 11 items. For the 11 items, scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to, depending on the item, either 4 (7 items) or 8 (4 items). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-60), with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Baseline and Day 84 |
| Number of Participants Achieving Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Responder Status | The Y-MRS is a clinician-rated instrument used for assessing the symptoms of mania, composed of 11 items. For the 11 items, scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to, depending on the item, either 4 (7 items) or 8 (4 items). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-60), with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. At pre-specified time points, the number of participants achieving Y-MRS responder status was assessed, defined as the number of participants with a 50% decrease from baseline in Y-MRS total score. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Up to Day 84 |
| Number of Participants Achieving Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Remitter Status | The Y-MRS is a clinician-rated instrument used for assessing the symptoms of mania, composed of 11 items. For the 11 items, scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to, depending on the item, either 4 (7 items) or 8 (4 items). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-60), with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. At pre-specified time points, the number of participants achieving Y-MRS remitter status was assessed, defined as the number of participants with a Y-MRS total score of 12 or lower. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Up to Day 84 |
| Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions for Use in Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Severity of Mania Score at Day 21 | The least squares mean change from baseline in CGI-BP severity of mania score at day 21 was assessed. The CGI-BP severity of mania scale is a clinician-rated scale for assessing the severity of manic symptoms of bipolar disorder, with scores ranging from 1 (normal) to 7 (very severely ill). Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Baseline and Day 21 |
| Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions for Use in Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Severity of Mania Score at Day 84 | The least squares mean change from baseline in CGI-BP severity of mania score at day 84 was assessed. The CGI-BP severity of mania scale is a clinician-rated scale for assessing the severity of manic symptoms of bipolar disorder, with scores ranging from 1 (normal) to 7 (very severely ill). Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Baseline and Day 84 |
| Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions for Use in Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Severity of Depression Score at Day 21 | The least squares mean change from baseline in CGI-BP severity of depression score at day 21 was assessed. The CGI-BP severity of depression scale is a clinician-rated scale for assessing the severity of depressive symptoms of bipolar disorder, with scores ranging from 1 (normal) to 7 (very severely ill). Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Baseline and Day 21 |
| Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions for Use in Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Severity of Depression Score at Day 84 | The least squares mean change from baseline in CGI-BP severity of depression score at day 84 was assessed. The CGI-BP severity of depression scale is a clinician-rated scale for assessing the severity of depressive symptoms of bipolar disorder, with scores ranging from 1 (normal) to 7 (very severely ill). Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Baseline and Day 84 |
| Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions for Use in Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Severity of Overall Bipolar Illness Score at Day 21 | The least squares mean change from baseline in CGI-BP severity of severity of overall bipolar illness score at day 21 was assessed. The CGI-BP severity of overall bipolar illness scale is a clinician-rated scale for assessing the severity of overall symptoms of bipolar disorder, with scores ranging from 1 (normal) to 7 (very severely ill). Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Baseline and Day 21 |
| Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions for Use in Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Severity of Overall Bipolar Illness Score at Day 84 | The least squares mean change from baseline in CGI-BP severity of severity of overall bipolar illness score at day 84 was assessed. The CGI-BP severity of overall bipolar illness scale is a clinician-rated scale for assessing the severity of overall symptoms of bipolar disorder, with scores ranging from 1 (normal) to 7 (very severely ill). Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Baseline and Day 84 |
| Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score at Day 21 | The least squares mean change from baseline in MADRS score at day 21 was assessed. The MARDS is a clinician-rated scale for assessing the severity of symptoms of depression, composed of 10 items. For the 10 items, scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to 6 (severe). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-60), with higher scores indicating greater severity of depression. Further, decreases in depression severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Baseline and Day 21 |
| Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score at Day 84 | The least squares mean change from baseline in MADRS score at day 84 was assessed. The MARDS is a clinician-rated scale for assessing the severity of symptoms of depression, composed of 10 items. For the 10 items, scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to 6 (severe). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-60), with higher scores indicating greater severity of depression. Further, decreases in depression severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Baseline and Day 84 |
| Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Score at Day 21 | The least squares mean change from baseline in PANSS score at day 21 was assessed. The PANSS assesses the severity of schizophrenia symptoms through a clinician-rated inventory of 30 items organized in 3 subscales: 1) positive subscale (7 items); 2) negative subscale (7 items); and 3) general psychopathology subscale (16 items). For each item, symptoms are scored from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme) and add to a total PANSS score (range: 30-210). Higher scores reflect more severe symptoms of schizophrenia. Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Baseline and Day 21 |
| Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Score at Day 84 | The least squares mean change from baseline in PANSS score at day 84 was assessed. The PANSS assesses the severity of schizophrenia symptoms through a clinician-rated inventory of 30 items organized in 3 subscales: 1) positive subscale (7 items); 2) negative subscale (7 items); and 3) general psychopathology subscale (16 items). For each item, symptoms are scored from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme) and add to a total PANSS score (range: 30-210). Higher scores reflect more severe symptoms of schizophrenia. Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Baseline and Day 84 |
| Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Score at Day 21 | The least squares mean change from baseline in HAM-A score at day 21 was assessed. The HAM-A is a clinician-rated instrument for assessing anxiety symptoms, composed of 14 items. For the 14 items, scores range from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-56), with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety. Further, decreases in anxiety severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Baseline and Day 21 |
| Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Score at Day 84 | The least squares mean change from baseline in HAM-A score at day 84 was assessed. The HAM-A is a clinician-rated instrument for assessing anxiety symptoms, composed of 14 items. For the 14 items, scores range from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-56), with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety. Further, decreases in anxiety severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Baseline and Day 84 |
| Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in InterSePT Scale for Suicidal Thinking - Modified Version (ISST-Modified) Score at Day 21 | The least squares mean change from baseline in ISST-Modified score at day 21 was assessed. The ISST-Modified is a clinician-rated scale for rating suicidality, composed of 12 items (score range: 0-2). Scores for the 12 items add to a total ISST-Modified score (range: 0-24), with higher scores indicating increased severity of suicidal thinking. Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Baseline and Day 21 |
| Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in InterSePT Scale for Suicidal Thinking - Modified Version (ISST-Modified) Score at Day 84 | The least squares mean change from baseline in ISST-Modified score at day 84 was assessed. The ISST-Modified is a clinician-rated scale for rating suicidality, composed of 12 items (score range: 0-2). Scores for the 12 items add to a total ISST-Modified score (range: 0-24), with higher scores indicating increased severity of suicidal thinking. Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Baseline and Day 84 |
| Mean Change From Baseline (CFB) at Day 21 in Neurocognitive Function as Determined by Central Nervous System Vital Signs (CNS-VS) Test Battery | Nine neurocognitive tests with higher scores indicating better performance:
| Baseline and Day 21 |
| Mean Change From Baseline (CFB) at Day 84 in Neurocognitive Function as Determined by Central Nervous System Vital Signs (CNS-VS) Test Battery | Nine neurocognitive tests with higher scores indicating better performance:
| Baseline and Day 84 |
| Percentage of Participants Determined to be Ready to Discharge at Day 84 (Kaplan-Meier Estimation) | The percentage of participants determined to be ready to discharge at day 84 was estimated (Kaplan-Meier), using the readiness to discharge questionnaire (RDQ). The RDQ is clinician-rated scale to assess readiness for discharge, composed of 7 items. Of the 7 items, only the first 5 items were utilized:
For the 5 items, the clinician provided a response (Strongly Disagree; Disagree; Agree; or Strongly Agree) at each pre-specified visit. The first visit at which the responses to the first 5 items on the RDQ are "Strongly Agree" or "Agree," was defined as the point a participant was ready to discharge. | Day 84 |
| Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q), General Activities Subscale Score at Day 21 | The least squares mean change from baseline in Q-LES-Q score at day 21 was assessed. The Q-LES-Q is a participant-completed questionnaire to assess general satisfaction with activities such as physical health, mood, work, household tasks, social and family relationships, leisure activities, and overall satisfaction, composed of 16 items. For each of the 16 items, scores range from 0 (very poor) to 5 (very good), with scores for all items adding to a total score (range: 0-80); higher scores indicate better quality of life. Further, decreases in quality of life are reflected by a negative change from baseline. | Baseline and Day 21 |
| Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q), General Activities Subscale Score at Day 84 | The least squares mean change from baseline in Q-LES-Q score at day 84 was assessed. The Q-LES-Q is a participant-completed questionnaire to assess general satisfaction with activities such as physical health, mood, work, household tasks, social and family relationships, leisure activities, and overall satisfaction, composed of 16 items. For each of the 16 items, scores range from 0 (very poor) to 5 (very good), with scores for all items adding to a total score (range: 0-80); higher scores indicate better quality of life. Further, decreases in quality of life are reflected by a negative change from baseline. | Baseline and Day 84 |
| Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline at Day 21 in Quality of Life as Determined by Short Form-36 Version 2 (SF-36v2) | Least squares mean change from baseline at day 21 in quality of life was assessed, as determined by SF-36v2. The SF-36v2 is a self-administered questionnaire, measuring 8 domains: Physical Functioning (PF); Role-Physical (RP); Bodily Pain (BP); General Health (GH); Vitality (VT); Social Functioning (SF); Role-Emotional (RE); and Mental Health (MH). These 8 concepts are further organized into a Physical Component Summary (PCS; composite of PF, RP, BP, and GH) and a Mental Component Summary (MCS; composite of VT, SF, RE, and MH). The SF-36v2 domains and composite summaries were scored using a norm-based scoring approach, yielding a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 based on the norms from the 1998 SF-36 United States general population norms. For the PCS and MCS, scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Further, decreases in quality of life (by PCS and MCS) are reflected by a negative change from baseline. | Baseline and Day 21 |
| Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline at Day 84 in Quality of Life as Determined by Short Form-36 Version 2 (SF-36v2) | Least squares mean change from baseline at day 84 in quality of life was assessed, as determined by SF-36v2. The SF-36v2 is a self-administered questionnaire, measuring 8 domains: Physical Functioning (PF); Role-Physical (RP); Bodily Pain (BP); General Health (GH); Vitality (VT); Social Functioning (SF); Role-Emotional (RE); and Mental Health (MH). These 8 concepts are further organized into a Physical Component Summary (PCS; composite of PF, RP, BP, and GH) and a Mental Component Summary (MCS; composite of VT, SF, RE, and MH). The SF-36v2 domains and composite summaries were scored using a norm-based scoring approach, yielding a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 based on the norms from the 1998 SF-36 United States general population norms. For the PCS and MCS, scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Further, decreases in quality of life (by PCS and MCS) are reflected by a negative change from baseline. | Baseline and Day 21 |
| Withdrawal by Subject |
|
| Lost to Follow-up |
|
| Reason Not Reported |
|
| BG002 | Total | Total of all reporting groups |
| Years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Placebo |
Participants received placebo on Days 1-84 as a fast-dissolving sublingual (SL) tablet, given twice daily (BID). |
| OG001 | Asenapine | Participants received asenapine as a fast-dissolving SL tablet, BID. On Day 1, participants received asenapine 5 mg, BID. On Days 2 to 84, asenapine was dosed flexibly: BID at either 5 or 10 mg. Asenapine doses were up- or down-titrated based on efficacy, safety, and tolerability. |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants Experiencing an Adverse Event (AE) | The number of participants experiencing an AE was assessed. An AE is any untoward or unfavorable medical occurrence in a participant, including any abnormal sign, symptom, or disease, temporally associated with the use of the investigational product, whether or not considered related to the investigational product. | Includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to Day 114 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants Discontinuing Study Treatment Due to an AE | The number of participants discontinuing study treatment due to an AE was assessed. An AE is any untoward or unfavorable medical occurrence in a participant, including any abnormal sign, symptom, or disease, temporally associated with the use of the investigational product, whether or not considered related to the investigational product. | Includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to Day 84 |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Score at Day 42 | The least squares mean change from baseline in Y-MRS score at day 42 was assessed. The Y-MRS is a clinician-rated instrument used for assessing the symptoms of mania, composed of 11 items. For the 11 items, scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to, depending on the item, either 4 (7 items) or 8 (4 items). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-60), with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, having ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a Scale | Baseline and Day 42 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Score at Day 84 | The least squares mean change from baseline in Y-MRS score at day 84 was assessed. The Y-MRS is a clinician-rated instrument used for assessing the symptoms of mania, composed of 11 items. For the 11 items, scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to, depending on the item, either 4 (7 items) or 8 (4 items). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-60), with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, having ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a Scale | Baseline and Day 84 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants Achieving Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Responder Status | The Y-MRS is a clinician-rated instrument used for assessing the symptoms of mania, composed of 11 items. For the 11 items, scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to, depending on the item, either 4 (7 items) or 8 (4 items). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-60), with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. At pre-specified time points, the number of participants achieving Y-MRS responder status was assessed, defined as the number of participants with a 50% decrease from baseline in Y-MRS total score. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, having ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to Day 84 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Number of Participants Achieving Young-Mania Rating Scale (Y-MRS) Remitter Status | The Y-MRS is a clinician-rated instrument used for assessing the symptoms of mania, composed of 11 items. For the 11 items, scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to, depending on the item, either 4 (7 items) or 8 (4 items). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-60), with higher scores indicating greater symptom severity. At pre-specified time points, the number of participants achieving Y-MRS remitter status was assessed, defined as the number of participants with a Y-MRS total score of 12 or lower. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, having ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | Up to Day 84 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions for Use in Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Severity of Mania Score at Day 21 | The least squares mean change from baseline in CGI-BP severity of mania score at day 21 was assessed. The CGI-BP severity of mania scale is a clinician-rated scale for assessing the severity of manic symptoms of bipolar disorder, with scores ranging from 1 (normal) to 7 (very severely ill). Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Per protocol, the overall analysis population includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, with ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. For Baseline / Change from Baseline data, includes only participants of the overall analysis population with an observation at the time indicated for the respective endpoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a Scale | Baseline and Day 21 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions for Use in Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Severity of Mania Score at Day 84 | The least squares mean change from baseline in CGI-BP severity of mania score at day 84 was assessed. The CGI-BP severity of mania scale is a clinician-rated scale for assessing the severity of manic symptoms of bipolar disorder, with scores ranging from 1 (normal) to 7 (very severely ill). Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Per protocol, the overall analysis population includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, with ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. For Baseline / Change from Baseline data, includes only participants of the overall analysis population with an observation at the time indicated for the respective endpoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a Scale | Baseline and Day 84 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions for Use in Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Severity of Depression Score at Day 21 | The least squares mean change from baseline in CGI-BP severity of depression score at day 21 was assessed. The CGI-BP severity of depression scale is a clinician-rated scale for assessing the severity of depressive symptoms of bipolar disorder, with scores ranging from 1 (normal) to 7 (very severely ill). Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Per protocol, the overall analysis population includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, with ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. For Baseline / Change from Baseline data, includes only participants of the overall analysis population with an observation at the time indicated for the respective endpoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a Scale | Baseline and Day 21 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions for Use in Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Severity of Depression Score at Day 84 | The least squares mean change from baseline in CGI-BP severity of depression score at day 84 was assessed. The CGI-BP severity of depression scale is a clinician-rated scale for assessing the severity of depressive symptoms of bipolar disorder, with scores ranging from 1 (normal) to 7 (very severely ill). Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Per protocol, the overall analysis population includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, with ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. For Baseline / Change from Baseline data, includes only participants of the overall analysis population with an observation at the time indicated for the respective endpoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a Scale | Baseline and Day 84 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions for Use in Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Severity of Overall Bipolar Illness Score at Day 21 | The least squares mean change from baseline in CGI-BP severity of severity of overall bipolar illness score at day 21 was assessed. The CGI-BP severity of overall bipolar illness scale is a clinician-rated scale for assessing the severity of overall symptoms of bipolar disorder, with scores ranging from 1 (normal) to 7 (very severely ill). Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Per protocol, the overall analysis population includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, with ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. For Baseline / Change from Baseline data, includes only participants of the overall analysis population with an observation at the time indicated for the respective endpoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a Scale | Baseline and Day 21 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impressions for Use in Bipolar Disorder (CGI-BP) Severity of Overall Bipolar Illness Score at Day 84 | The least squares mean change from baseline in CGI-BP severity of severity of overall bipolar illness score at day 84 was assessed. The CGI-BP severity of overall bipolar illness scale is a clinician-rated scale for assessing the severity of overall symptoms of bipolar disorder, with scores ranging from 1 (normal) to 7 (very severely ill). Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Per protocol, the overall analysis population includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, with ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. For Baseline / Change from Baseline data, includes only participants of the overall analysis population with an observation at the time indicated for the respective endpoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a Scale | Baseline and Day 84 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score at Day 21 | The least squares mean change from baseline in MADRS score at day 21 was assessed. The MARDS is a clinician-rated scale for assessing the severity of symptoms of depression, composed of 10 items. For the 10 items, scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to 6 (severe). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-60), with higher scores indicating greater severity of depression. Further, decreases in depression severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Per protocol, the overall analysis population includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, with ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. For Baseline / Change from Baseline data, includes only participants of the overall analysis population with an observation at the time indicated for the respective endpoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a Scale | Baseline and Day 21 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Score at Day 84 | The least squares mean change from baseline in MADRS score at day 84 was assessed. The MARDS is a clinician-rated scale for assessing the severity of symptoms of depression, composed of 10 items. For the 10 items, scores range from 0 (symptoms absent) to 6 (severe). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-60), with higher scores indicating greater severity of depression. Further, decreases in depression severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Per protocol, the overall analysis population includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, with ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. For Baseline / Change from Baseline data, includes only participants of the overall analysis population with an observation at the time indicated for the respective endpoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a Scale | Baseline and Day 84 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Score at Day 21 | The least squares mean change from baseline in PANSS score at day 21 was assessed. The PANSS assesses the severity of schizophrenia symptoms through a clinician-rated inventory of 30 items organized in 3 subscales: 1) positive subscale (7 items); 2) negative subscale (7 items); and 3) general psychopathology subscale (16 items). For each item, symptoms are scored from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme) and add to a total PANSS score (range: 30-210). Higher scores reflect more severe symptoms of schizophrenia. Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Per protocol, the overall analysis population includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, with ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. For Baseline / Change from Baseline data, includes only participants of the overall analysis population with an observation at the time indicated for the respective endpoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a Scale | Baseline and Day 21 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Score at Day 84 | The least squares mean change from baseline in PANSS score at day 84 was assessed. The PANSS assesses the severity of schizophrenia symptoms through a clinician-rated inventory of 30 items organized in 3 subscales: 1) positive subscale (7 items); 2) negative subscale (7 items); and 3) general psychopathology subscale (16 items). For each item, symptoms are scored from 1 (absent) to 7 (extreme) and add to a total PANSS score (range: 30-210). Higher scores reflect more severe symptoms of schizophrenia. Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Per protocol, the overall analysis population includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, with ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. For Baseline / Change from Baseline data, includes only participants of the overall analysis population with an observation at the time indicated for the respective endpoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a Scale | Baseline and Day 84 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Score at Day 21 | The least squares mean change from baseline in HAM-A score at day 21 was assessed. The HAM-A is a clinician-rated instrument for assessing anxiety symptoms, composed of 14 items. For the 14 items, scores range from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-56), with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety. Further, decreases in anxiety severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Per protocol, the overall analysis population includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, with ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. For Baseline / Change from Baseline data, includes only participants of the overall analysis population with an observation at the time indicated for the respective endpoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a Scale | Baseline and Day 21 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) Score at Day 84 | The least squares mean change from baseline in HAM-A score at day 84 was assessed. The HAM-A is a clinician-rated instrument for assessing anxiety symptoms, composed of 14 items. For the 14 items, scores range from 0 (not present) to 4 (severe). Scores for individual items add to a total score (range: 0-56), with higher scores indicating greater severity of anxiety. Further, decreases in anxiety severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Per protocol, the overall analysis population includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, with ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. For Baseline / Change from Baseline data, includes only participants of the overall analysis population with an observation at the time indicated for the respective endpoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a Scale | Baseline and Day 84 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in InterSePT Scale for Suicidal Thinking - Modified Version (ISST-Modified) Score at Day 21 | The least squares mean change from baseline in ISST-Modified score at day 21 was assessed. The ISST-Modified is a clinician-rated scale for rating suicidality, composed of 12 items (score range: 0-2). Scores for the 12 items add to a total ISST-Modified score (range: 0-24), with higher scores indicating increased severity of suicidal thinking. Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Per protocol, the overall analysis population includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, with ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. For Baseline / Change from Baseline data, includes only participants of the overall analysis population with an observation at the time indicated for the respective endpoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a Scale | Baseline and Day 21 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in InterSePT Scale for Suicidal Thinking - Modified Version (ISST-Modified) Score at Day 84 | The least squares mean change from baseline in ISST-Modified score at day 84 was assessed. The ISST-Modified is a clinician-rated scale for rating suicidality, composed of 12 items (score range: 0-2). Scores for the 12 items add to a total ISST-Modified score (range: 0-24), with higher scores indicating increased severity of suicidal thinking. Further, decreases in symptom severity over time would be reflected by negative changes from baseline. For evaluation of this endpoint, a LOCF analysis was used; baseline values are not eligible to be carried forward to missing post-baseline assessments. | Per protocol, the overall analysis population includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, with ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. For Baseline / Change from Baseline data, includes only participants of the overall analysis population with an observation at the time indicated for the respective endpoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a Scale | Baseline and Day 84 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline (CFB) at Day 21 in Neurocognitive Function as Determined by Central Nervous System Vital Signs (CNS-VS) Test Battery | Nine neurocognitive tests with higher scores indicating better performance:
| Per protocol, the overall analysis population includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, with ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. For Baseline / Change from Baseline data, includes only participants of the overall analysis population with an observation at the time indicated for the respective endpoint. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a Scale | Baseline and Day 21 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Mean Change From Baseline (CFB) at Day 84 in Neurocognitive Function as Determined by Central Nervous System Vital Signs (CNS-VS) Test Battery | Nine neurocognitive tests with higher scores indicating better performance:
| Per protocol, the overall analysis population includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, with ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. For Baseline / Change from Baseline data, includes only participants of the overall analysis population with an observation at the time indicated for the respective endpoint. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | Score on a Scale | Baseline and Day 84 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Percentage of Participants Determined to be Ready to Discharge at Day 84 (Kaplan-Meier Estimation) | The percentage of participants determined to be ready to discharge at day 84 was estimated (Kaplan-Meier), using the readiness to discharge questionnaire (RDQ). The RDQ is clinician-rated scale to assess readiness for discharge, composed of 7 items. Of the 7 items, only the first 5 items were utilized:
For the 5 items, the clinician provided a response (Strongly Disagree; Disagree; Agree; or Strongly Agree) at each pre-specified visit. The first visit at which the responses to the first 5 items on the RDQ are "Strongly Agree" or "Agree," was defined as the point a participant was ready to discharge. | Per protocol, the analysis population for this endpoint includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, with ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | Percentage of Participants | Day 84 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q), General Activities Subscale Score at Day 21 | The least squares mean change from baseline in Q-LES-Q score at day 21 was assessed. The Q-LES-Q is a participant-completed questionnaire to assess general satisfaction with activities such as physical health, mood, work, household tasks, social and family relationships, leisure activities, and overall satisfaction, composed of 16 items. For each of the 16 items, scores range from 0 (very poor) to 5 (very good), with scores for all items adding to a total score (range: 0-80); higher scores indicate better quality of life. Further, decreases in quality of life are reflected by a negative change from baseline. | Per protocol, the overall analysis population includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, with ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. For Baseline / Change from Baseline data, includes only participants of the overall analysis population with an observation at the time indicated for the respective endpoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a Scale | Baseline and Day 21 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline in Quality of Life Enjoyment and Satisfaction Questionnaire (Q-LES-Q), General Activities Subscale Score at Day 84 | The least squares mean change from baseline in Q-LES-Q score at day 84 was assessed. The Q-LES-Q is a participant-completed questionnaire to assess general satisfaction with activities such as physical health, mood, work, household tasks, social and family relationships, leisure activities, and overall satisfaction, composed of 16 items. For each of the 16 items, scores range from 0 (very poor) to 5 (very good), with scores for all items adding to a total score (range: 0-80); higher scores indicate better quality of life. Further, decreases in quality of life are reflected by a negative change from baseline. | Per protocol, the overall analysis population includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, with ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. For Baseline / Change from Baseline data, includes only participants of the overall analysis population with an observation at the time indicated for the respective endpoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a Scale | Baseline and Day 84 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline at Day 21 in Quality of Life as Determined by Short Form-36 Version 2 (SF-36v2) | Least squares mean change from baseline at day 21 in quality of life was assessed, as determined by SF-36v2. The SF-36v2 is a self-administered questionnaire, measuring 8 domains: Physical Functioning (PF); Role-Physical (RP); Bodily Pain (BP); General Health (GH); Vitality (VT); Social Functioning (SF); Role-Emotional (RE); and Mental Health (MH). These 8 concepts are further organized into a Physical Component Summary (PCS; composite of PF, RP, BP, and GH) and a Mental Component Summary (MCS; composite of VT, SF, RE, and MH). The SF-36v2 domains and composite summaries were scored using a norm-based scoring approach, yielding a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 based on the norms from the 1998 SF-36 United States general population norms. For the PCS and MCS, scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Further, decreases in quality of life (by PCS and MCS) are reflected by a negative change from baseline. | Per protocol, the overall analysis population includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, with ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. For Baseline / Change from Baseline data, includes only participants of the overall analysis population with an observation at the time indicated for the respective endpoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a Scale | Baseline and Day 21 |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Least Squares Mean Change From Baseline at Day 84 in Quality of Life as Determined by Short Form-36 Version 2 (SF-36v2) | Least squares mean change from baseline at day 84 in quality of life was assessed, as determined by SF-36v2. The SF-36v2 is a self-administered questionnaire, measuring 8 domains: Physical Functioning (PF); Role-Physical (RP); Bodily Pain (BP); General Health (GH); Vitality (VT); Social Functioning (SF); Role-Emotional (RE); and Mental Health (MH). These 8 concepts are further organized into a Physical Component Summary (PCS; composite of PF, RP, BP, and GH) and a Mental Component Summary (MCS; composite of VT, SF, RE, and MH). The SF-36v2 domains and composite summaries were scored using a norm-based scoring approach, yielding a mean of 50 and standard deviation of 10 based on the norms from the 1998 SF-36 United States general population norms. For the PCS and MCS, scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. Further, decreases in quality of life (by PCS and MCS) are reflected by a negative change from baseline. | Per protocol, the overall analysis population includes all randomized participants receiving ≥1 dose of study treatment, with ≥1 post-dose Y-MRS assessment. For Baseline / Change from Baseline data, includes only participants of the overall analysis population with an observation at the time indicated for the respective endpoint. | Posted | Least Squares Mean | Standard Error | Score on a Scale | Baseline and Day 21 |
|
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 166 |
| 24 |
| 166 |
| 76 |
| 166 |
| EG001 | Asenapine | Participants received asenapine as a fast-dissolving SL tablet, BID. On Day 1, participants received asenapine 5 mg, BID. On Days 2 to 84, asenapine was dosed flexibly: BID at either 5 or 10 mg. Asenapine doses were up- or down-titrated based on efficacy, safety, and tolerability. | 0 | 158 | 21 | 158 | 91 | 158 |
| Cardiac Failure Congestive | Cardiac disorders | MedDRA 10 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Arthritis Bacterial | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 10 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Gastroenteritis Viral | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 10 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Malaria | Infections and infestations | MedDRA 10 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Accidental Overdose | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 10 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Intentional Overdose | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | MedDRA 10 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Diabetes Mellitus | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | MedDRA 10 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Alcoholism | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Bipolar I Disorder | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Depressive Symptom | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Major Depression | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Mania | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Psychotic Disorder | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Suicidal Ideation | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Suicide Attempt | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 10 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nephrolithiasis | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 10 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Renal Failure | Renal and urinary disorders | MedDRA 10 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Drug Abuser | Social circumstances | MedDRA 10 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dystonia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 10 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Psychomotor Hyperactivity | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 10 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Transient Ischaemic Attack | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 10 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Nausea | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Hypoaesthesia Oral | Gastrointestinal disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Weight Increased | Investigations | MedDRA 9.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Headache | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Tremor | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Akathisia | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Sedation | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Somnolence | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Dizziness | Nervous system disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Agitation | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Insomnia | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
| Mania | Psychiatric disorders | MedDRA 9.1 | Systematic Assessment |
|
Except for compelling legal reasons, neither the sponsor nor the investigator will communicate to third parties any result of the clinical trial before the clinical trial report (CTR) has been released by the sponsor.
| Day 7 |
|
|
| Day 14 |
|
|
| Day 21 |
|
|
| Day 42 |
|
|
| Day 63 |
|
|
| Day 84 |
|
|
Based on Pearson's chi-squared test. |
| 0.7923 |
| Superiority |
| Day 14 | Chi-squared | Based on Pearson's chi-squared test. | 0.0701 | Superiority |
| Day 21 | Chi-squared | Based on Pearson's chi-squared test. | 0.1634 | Superiority |
| Day 42 | Chi-squared | Based on Pearson's chi-squared test. | 0.0370 | Superiority |
| Day 63 | Chi-squared | Based on Pearson's chi-squared test. | 0.0488 | Superiority |
| Day 84 | Chi-squared | Based on Pearson's chi-squared test. | 0.0152 | Superiority |
| Day 7 |
|
|
| Day 14 |
|
|
| Day 21 |
|
|
| Day 42 |
|
|
| Day 63 |
|
|
| Day 84 |
|
|
Based on Pearson's chi-squared test. |
| 0.8837 |
| Superiority |
| Day 14 | Chi-squared | Based on Pearson's chi-squared test. | 0.1153 | Superiority |
| Day 21 | Chi-squared | Based on Pearson's chi-squared test. | 0.0158 | Superiority |
| Day 42 | Chi-squared | Based on Pearson's chi-squared test. | 0.0143 | Superiority |
| Day 63 | Chi-squared | Based on Pearson's chi-squared test. | 0.0196 | Superiority |
| Day 84 | Chi-squared | Based on Pearson's chi-squared test. | 0.0148 | Superiority |
| Change from Baseline at Day 21 |
|
|
| Change from Baseline at Day 84 |
|
|
| Change from Baseline at Day 21 |
|
|
| Change from Baseline at Day 84 |
|
|
| Change from Baseline at Day 21 |
|
|
| Change from Baseline at Day 84 |
|
|
| Change from Baseline at Day 21 |
|
|
| Change from Baseline at Day 84 |
|
|
| Change from Baseline at Day 21 |
|
|
| Change from Baseline at Day 84 |
|
|
| Change from Baseline at Day 21 |
|
|
| Change from Baseline at Day 84 |
|
|
| Change from Baseline at Day 21 |
|
|
| Change from Baseline at Day 84 |
|
|
| Visual Memory - Baseline |
|
|
| Processing Speed - Baseline |
|
|
| Social Acuity - Baseline |
|
|
| Reasoning - Baseline |
|
|
| Executive Functioning - Baseline |
|
|
| Working Memory - Baseline |
|
|
| Sustained Attention - Baseline |
|
|
| Composite Memory - Baseline |
|
|
| Verbal Memory - CFB at Day 21 |
|
|
| Visual Memory - CFB at Day 21 |
|
|
| Processing Speed - CFB at Day 21 |
|
|
| Social Acuity - CFB at Day 21 |
|
|
| Reasoning - CFB at Day 21 |
|
|
| Executive Functioning - CFB at Day 21 |
|
|
| Working Memory - CFB at Day 21 |
|
|
| Sustained Attention - CFB at Day 21 |
|
|
| Composite Memory - CFB at Day 21 |
|
|
Visual Memory - CFB at Day 21 |
| ANCOVA |
Based on an ANCOVA model with treatment and pooled investigative site as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. |
| 0.7469 |
P-value based on the difference in the LS means for asenapine versus placebo. |
| Superiority |
| Processing Speed - CFB at Day 21 | ANCOVA | Based on an ANCOVA model with treatment and pooled investigative site as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. | 0.3253 | P-value based on the difference in the LS means for asenapine versus placebo. | Superiority |
| Social Acuity - CFB at Day 21 | ANCOVA | Based on an ANCOVA model with treatment and pooled investigative site as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. | 0.3885 | P-value based on the difference in the LS means for asenapine versus placebo. | Superiority |
| Reasoning - CFB at Day 21 | ANCOVA | Based on an ANCOVA model with treatment and pooled investigative site as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. | 0.5975 | P-value based on the difference in the LS means for asenapine versus placebo. | Superiority |
| Executive Functioning - CFB at Day 21 | ANCOVA | Based on an ANCOVA model with treatment and pooled investigative site as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. | 0.0690 | P-value based on the difference in the LS means for asenapine versus placebo. | Superiority |
| Working Memory - CFB at Day 21 | ANCOVA | Based on an ANCOVA model with treatment and pooled investigative site as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. | 0.7970 | P-value based on the difference in the LS means for asenapine versus placebo. | Superiority |
| Sustained Attention - CFB at Day 21 | ANCOVA | Based on an ANCOVA model with treatment and pooled investigative site as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. | 0.8339 | P-value based on the difference in the LS means for asenapine versus placebo. | Superiority |
| Composite Memory - CFB at Day 21 | ANCOVA | Based on an ANCOVA model with treatment and pooled investigative site as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. | 0.2101 | P-value based on the difference in the LS means for asenapine versus placebo. | Superiority |
| Visual Memory - Baseline |
|
|
| Processing Speed - Baseline |
|
|
| Social Acuity - Baseline |
|
|
| Reasoning - Baseline |
|
|
| Executive Functioning - Baseline |
|
|
| Working Memory - Baseline |
|
|
| Sustained Attention - Baseline |
|
|
| Composite Memory - Baseline |
|
|
| Verbal Memory - CFB at Day 84 |
|
|
| Visual Memory - CFB at Day 84 |
|
|
| Processing Speed - CFB at Day 84 |
|
|
| Social Acuity - CFB at Day 84 |
|
|
| Reasoning - CFB at Day 84 |
|
|
| Executive Functioning - CFB at Day 84 |
|
|
| Working Memory - CFB at Day 84 |
|
|
| Sustained Attention - CFB at Day 84 |
|
|
| Composite Memory - CFB at Day 84 |
|
|
Visual Memory - CFB at Day 84 |
| ANCOVA |
Based on an ANCOVA model with treatment and pooled investigative site as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. |
| 0.8805 |
P-value based on the difference in the LS means for asenapine versus placebo. |
| Superiority |
| Processing Speed - CFB at Day 84 | ANCOVA | Based on an ANCOVA model with treatment and pooled investigative site as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. | 0.4878 | P-value based on the difference in the LS means for asenapine versus placebo. | Superiority |
| Social Acuity - CFB at Day 84 | ANCOVA | Based on an ANCOVA model with treatment and pooled investigative site as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. | 0.8051 | P-value based on the difference in the LS means for asenapine versus placebo. | Superiority |
| Reasoning - CFB at Day 84 | ANCOVA | Based on an ANCOVA model with treatment and pooled investigative site as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. | 0.1925 | P-value based on the difference in the LS means for asenapine versus placebo. | Superiority |
| Executive Functioning - CFB at Day 84 | ANCOVA | Based on an ANCOVA model with treatment and pooled investigative site as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. | 0.0514 | P-value based on the difference in the LS means for asenapine versus placebo. | Superiority |
| Working Memory - CFB at Day 84 | ANCOVA | Based on an ANCOVA model with treatment and pooled investigative site as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. | 0.9898 | P-value based on the difference in the LS means for asenapine versus placebo. | Superiority |
| Sustained Attention - CFB at Day 84 | ANCOVA | Based on an ANCOVA model with treatment and pooled investigative site as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. | 0.5683 | P-value based on the difference in the LS means for asenapine versus placebo. | Superiority |
| Composite Memory - CFB at Day 84 | ANCOVA | Based on an ANCOVA model with treatment and pooled investigative site as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. | 0.8907 | P-value based on the difference in the LS means for asenapine versus placebo. | Superiority |
| Change from Baseline at Day 21 |
|
|
| Change from Baseline at Day 84 |
|
|
| PCS - Change from Baseline at Day 21 |
|
|
| MCS - Baseline |
|
|
| MCS - Change from Baseline at Day 21 |
|
|
MCS - Change from Baseline at Day 21 |
| ANCOVA |
Based on an ANCOVA model with treatment and pooled investigative site as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. |
| 0.0215 |
P-value based on the difference in the LS means for asenapine versus placebo. |
| Superiority |
| PCS - Change from Baseline at Day 84 |
|
|
| MCS - Baseline |
|
|
| MCS - Change from Baseline at Day 84 |
|
|
MCS - Change from Baseline at Day 84 |
| ANCOVA |
Based on an ANCOVA model with treatment and pooled investigative site as fixed effects and baseline as a covariate. |
| 0.2024 |
P-value based on the difference in the LS means for asenapine versus placebo. |
| Superiority |