| ID | Type | Description | Link |
|---|---|---|---|
| ACRIN-6673 | Other Identifier | CIP | |
| U01CA080098 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source | |
| U01CA079778 | U.S. NIH Grant/Contract | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Class |
|---|---|
| National Cancer Institute (NCI) | NIH |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
RATIONALE: Radiofrequency ablation uses a high-frequency, electric current to kill tumor cells. CT-, MRI-, or ultrasound-guided radiofrequency ablation may be an effective treatment for liver cancer and cirrhosis.
PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying how well radiofrequency ablation works in treating patients with liver cancer and cirrhosis.
OBJECTIVES:
Primary
Secondary
OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to hepatic dysfunction using the MELD score (< 15 vs 15-25 vs > 25).
Patients undergo placement of an ablation electrode percutaneously into the tumor(s) by CT scan, MRI, or ultrasound guidance. Patients then undergo percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) directly to the tumor(s) for 12 minutes. Patients undergo CT scan of the liver within 1 week after RFA treatment and then every 3 months for up to 18 months. Patients with residual or recurrent intrahepatic tumor(s) detectable on the 3-month or subsequent CT scan undergo repeat RFA as is technically feasible and clinically indicated for up to 15 months after initial RFA treatment.
After completion of study treatment, patients are followed at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, and then every 3 months for up to 18 months.
PROJECTED ACCRUAL: A total of 40 patients will be accrued for this study.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| All Patients | Other | patients with cirrhosis undergoing solitary or repetitive percutaneous RFA treatment sessions for the treatment of HCC. |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| radiofrequency ablation | Device |
|
|
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Proportion of Participants With Successful Control of Disease at 18 Months | Outcome is positive (success) if alive and no disease is observed by CT at 18 months post start of therapy Outcome is negative if the patient was deceased or disease was observed by CT at 18 months post start of therapy Success rate it the fraction of eligible patients who were alive and disease free at 18 months. | 18 months after start of therapy |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Success in Those Who Received Solitary vs Repetitive Radiofrequency Ablation | this outcome measures the impact of Solitary vs repetitive radiofrequency ablation on success. Success is defined as the number of patients centrally determined to be alive and tumor-free 18 months after start of therapy, corrected for repetitive RFA. | 18 months after start of therapy |
Not provided
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS:
Diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), meeting 1 of the following criteria:
Histologically confirmed HCC
Discrete non-biopsied hepatic tumors, meeting 1 of the following criteria:
Discrete non-biopsied hypervascular hepatic tumors by 2 consecutive imaging studies (e.g., CT scan or MRI) with documented tumor growth > 1 cm in diameter
Histologically confirmed cirrhosis OR typical findings of cirrhosis (i.e., nodular liver, splenomegaly, varices, or ascites) by CT scan and/or MRI scan
Single hepatic tumor > 3.0 cm but ≤ 5.0 cm in diameter OR 3 or fewer hepatic tumors ≤ 3.0 cm in diameter
Tumor(s) ≥ 1 cm from the main, right, and left portal veins and hollow viscera
Tumor(s) > 1 cm treatable by percutaneous radiofrequency ablation
No extrahepatic tumor
Not a surgical candidate due to any of the following reasons:
PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS:
Age
Performance status
Life expectancy
Hematopoietic
Hepatic
Renal
Other
PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY:
Biologic therapy
Chemotherapy
Endocrine therapy
Radiotherapy
Surgery
Other
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Gerald D. Dodd, MD | The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio | Study Chair |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lurleen Wallace Comprehensive Cancer at University of Alabama - Birmingham | Birmingham | Alabama | 35294 | United States | ||
Not provided
| Label | URL |
|---|---|
| Clinical trial summary from the National Cancer Institute's PDQ® database | View source |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | All Patients | patients with cirrhosis undergoing solitary or repetitive percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatment sessions for the treatment of HCC. |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Effect of Tumor Size on Successful Control of Disease at 18 Months | Outcome is positive (success) if alive and no disease is observed by CT at 18 months post start of therapy Outcome is negative if the patient was deceased or disease was observed by CT at 18 months post start of therapy Success rate it the fraction of eligible patients who were alive and disease free at 18 months. Tumor size is a continuous variable as measured at imaging. | 18 months after start of therapy |
| Local Tumor Recurrence (Control) Rates | local tumor control rate is defined as a tumor that was ablated and was not seen again within the 18 month period | 18 months after start of therapy |
| Impact of Tumor Size on Local Control Rates | Lesion level local control is defined as a success if a tumor is ablated and does not recur in 18 mo. | 18 months after start of therapy |
| Development of Extra-hepatic Tumor | Whether or not extrahepatic tumors were seen at 18months post ablation will be compared with the number of RFA sessions. | 18 months after start of therapy |
| Local Tumor Eradication Rate by Examination of Liver Via Autopsy or Transplant vs That Determined by CT Scan | the primary outcome was evidence of existing tumor on pathologic review of the liver at the time or transplant or autopsy within the 18 month observational period. This outcome was compared to the CT HCC detection. | 18 months after start of therapy |
| Remote Tumor Occurrence Rates | remote tumor occurrence rate is defined as a new intrahepatic tumor that developed remote from the ablation site within the 18 month period | 18 months after start of therapy |
| Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute at Cedars-Sinai Medical Center |
| Los Angeles |
| California |
| 90048 |
| United States |
| Jonsson Comprehensive Cancer Center at UCLA | Los Angeles | California | 90095-1781 | United States |
| University of California Davis Cancer Center | Sacramento | California | 95817 | United States |
| Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University | Atlanta | Georgia | 30322 | United States |
| Massachusetts General Hospital | Boston | Massachusetts | 02114 | United States |
| Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center | Boston | Massachusetts | 02215 | United States |
| UMASS Memorial Cancer Center - University Campus | Worcester | Massachusetts | 01655 | United States |
| William Beaumont Hospital - Royal Oak Campus | Royal Oak | Michigan | 48073 | United States |
| Mayo Clinic Cancer Center | Rochester | Minnesota | 55905 | United States |
| Lineberger Comprehensive Cancer Center at University of North Carolina - Chapel Hill | Chapel Hill | North Carolina | 27599-7295 | United States |
| Wake Forest University Comprehensive Cancer Center | Winston-Salem | North Carolina | 27157-1096 | United States |
| Abramson Cancer Center of the University of Pennsylvania | Philadelphia | Pennsylvania | 19104-4283 | United States |
| Rhode Island Hospital Comprehensive Cancer Center | Providence | Rhode Island | 02903 | United States |
| Hollings Cancer Center at Medical University of South Carolina | Charleston | South Carolina | 29425 | United States |
| M. D. Anderson Cancer Center at University of Texas | Houston | Texas | 77030-4009 | United States |
| University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio | San Antonio | Texas | 78229-3900 | United States |
| Scott and White Cancer Institute | Temple | Texas | 76508 | United States |
| Eligible |
|
| COMPLETED |
|
| NOT COMPLETED |
|
|
| 3 Months Post Ablation |
|
|
| 6 Months Post Ablation |
|
|
| 9 Months Post Ablation |
|
|
| 12 Months Post Ablation |
|
|
| 15 Months Post Ablation |
|
|
| 18 Months Post Ablation |
|
|
Eligible patient with cirrhosis being treated with RFA for HCC
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | All Patients | patients with cirrhosis undergoing solitary or repetitive percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFA) treatment sessions for the treatment of HCC. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Continuous | Median | Full Range | years |
| |||||||||||||||||
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
| ||||||||||||||||||
| Race (NIH/OMB) | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Proportion of Participants With Successful Control of Disease at 18 Months | Outcome is positive (success) if alive and no disease is observed by CT at 18 months post start of therapy Outcome is negative if the patient was deceased or disease was observed by CT at 18 months post start of therapy Success rate it the fraction of eligible patients who were alive and disease free at 18 months. | Patients not reaching 18mo were considered failures | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | proportion of participants | 18 months after start of therapy |
|
|
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Number of Participants With Success in Those Who Received Solitary vs Repetitive Radiofrequency Ablation | this outcome measures the impact of Solitary vs repetitive radiofrequency ablation on success. Success is defined as the number of patients centrally determined to be alive and tumor-free 18 months after start of therapy, corrected for repetitive RFA. | of the 45 participants, 35 had single ablate therapy while 10 received multiple RFA sessions. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 18 months after start of therapy |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Effect of Tumor Size on Successful Control of Disease at 18 Months | Outcome is positive (success) if alive and no disease is observed by CT at 18 months post start of therapy Outcome is negative if the patient was deceased or disease was observed by CT at 18 months post start of therapy Success rate it the fraction of eligible patients who were alive and disease free at 18 months. Tumor size is a continuous variable as measured at imaging. | 8 participants has successful control at 18mo; 37 participants did not. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | centimeters | 18 months after start of therapy |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Local Tumor Recurrence (Control) Rates | local tumor control rate is defined as a tumor that was ablated and was not seen again within the 18 month period | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percentage recurring | 18 months after start of therapy |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Impact of Tumor Size on Local Control Rates | Lesion level local control is defined as a success if a tumor is ablated and does not recur in 18 mo. | local tumor control rate (No Recurrence) is defined as a tumor that was ablated and was not seen again | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | cm | 18 months after start of therapy | lesions | lesions |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Development of Extra-hepatic Tumor | Whether or not extrahepatic tumors were seen at 18months post ablation will be compared with the number of RFA sessions. | Posted | Count of Participants | Participants | 18 months after start of therapy |
|
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Local Tumor Eradication Rate by Examination of Liver Via Autopsy or Transplant vs That Determined by CT Scan | the primary outcome was evidence of existing tumor on pathologic review of the liver at the time or transplant or autopsy within the 18 month observational period. This outcome was compared to the CT HCC detection. | 14 cases (13 transplanted cases and 1 deceased case) had pathology available for review, representing 16 specimens (12 tumors in 14 livers)) | Posted | Count of Units | specimen | 18 months after start of therapy | specimen | specimen |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Secondary | Remote Tumor Occurrence Rates | remote tumor occurrence rate is defined as a new intrahepatic tumor that developed remote from the ablation site within the 18 month period | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | percent occuring | 18 months after start of therapy |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Post-Hoc | Rate of Successful Control of Disease at 18 Months, Including Transplants | Outcome is positive (success) if the participant received a liver transplant or no diseaseis was observed by CT at 18 months after start of therapy Success rate it the fraction of eligible patients who are successes at 18 months. | Posted | Number | 95% Confidence Interval | proportion of successes to eligible | 18 months after start of therapy |
|
|
from initial ablation to 18 months
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | All Patients | patients with cirrhosis undergoing solitary or repetitive percutaneous RFA treatment sessions for the treatment of HCC. radiofrequency ablation | 3 | 45 | 5 | 45 | 26 | 45 |
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Death | Hepatobiliary disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Progression of disease |
|
| hemorrage with ablation/ procedure | Surgical and medical procedures | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Post-Procedural hemorrage |
|
| Hematoma | Hepatobiliary disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Hematoma |
|
| Death | Hepatobiliary disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Multi organ failure |
|
| renal failure | Hepatobiliary disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Acute renal failure |
|
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bruising | Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Bruising |
|
| Chills | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Chills |
|
| Hematoma | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Hematoma |
|
| Hemorrhage with surgery | Blood and lymphatic system disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | hemorrage with ablation/ procedure |
|
| Metabolic/Lab - Other | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Metabolic/Lab-Other LDH |
|
| Metabolic/Lab - Other | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Metabolic/Lab-Other AFP |
|
| Metabolic/Lab - Other | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Metabolic/Lab-Other ALT |
|
| Metabolic/Lab - Other | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Metabolic/Lab-Other ALT, SGPT |
|
| Metabolic/Lab - Other | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Metabolic/Lab-Other Ammonia |
|
| Metabolic/Lab - Other | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Metabolic/Lab-Other AST |
|
| Metabolic/Lab - Other | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Metabolic/Lab-Other AST,SGOT |
|
| Metabolic/Lab - Other | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Metabolic/Lab-Other Bilirubin |
|
| Metabolic/Lab - Other | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Metabolic/Lab-Other GGT |
|
| Metabolic/Lab - Other | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Metabolic/Lab-Other Hematocrit |
|
| Metabolic/Lab - Other | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Metabolic/Lab-Other Hemoglobin (Hgb) |
|
| Metabolic/Lab - Other | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Metabolic/Lab-Other HYPERGLYCEMIA |
|
| Metabolic/Lab - Other | Metabolism and nutrition disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Metabolic/Lab-Other LDH |
|
| Pain | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Pain - Liver |
|
| Pain | General disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | Pain - Other |
|
| pneumothorax | Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders | CTCAE (3.0) | Non-systematic Assessment | pneumothorax |
|
Not provided
Not provided
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Donna Harfeil, Director of Protocol Management | American College of Radiology Imaging Network | 215-717-2765 | Donna Hartfeil <dhartfeil@acr.org> |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D008113 | Liver Neoplasms |
| D006528 | Carcinoma, Hepatocellular |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D004067 | Digestive System Neoplasms |
| D009371 | Neoplasms by Site |
| D009369 | Neoplasms |
| D004066 | Digestive System Diseases |
| D008107 | Liver Diseases |
| D000230 | Adenocarcinoma |
| D002277 | Carcinoma |
| D009375 | Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial |
| D009370 | Neoplasms by Histologic Type |
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000078703 | Radiofrequency Ablation |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D000078702 | Radiofrequency Therapy |
| D013812 | Therapeutics |
| D055011 | Ablation Techniques |
| D013514 | Surgical Procedures, Operative |
Not provided
Not provided
| non-protocol Treatment |
|
| Non-Protocol Treatment |
|
| ExtraHepatic tumor |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander |
|
| Black or African American |
|
| White |
|
| More than one race |
|
| Unknown or Not Reported |
|
| Success rate |
| 0.19 |
| 2-Sided |
| 95 |
| 0.136 |
| 0.252 |
| Other |
|
|
|
|
| Title | Denominators | Categories |
|---|
|
| lesions |
|
|
|
|
| specimen |
|
|
|
| Title | Denominators | Categories | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|