Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
The fit of the residual limb within a prosthetic socket is a primary concern for many amputees. A poor fit can lead to skin irritation, tissue breakdown, and pain. Further, amputees with diabetes or vascular dysfunction often have difficulty maintaining healthy residual limb tissue; a condition that could be mitigated by the application of negative pressure (i.e., vacuum suspension). The aim of this research is to characterize the residual limb response to a vacuum suspension system and to measure prosthetic performance in comparison to a typical suction suspension system.
The proposed research plan involves two sets of human subject experiments: (1) prospective, randomized cross-over study to quantify performance of a vacuum suspension system as compared to a total surface bearing suction socket in terms of pistoning, maintaining limb volume, step counts, and subjective measures of fit and (2) measurement of transcutaneous oxygen tension as a function of vacuum pressure.
A proper fitting prosthetic socket provides the amputee with a comfortable system allowing them to pursue many of their desired vocational and recreational goals. Unfortunately, many amputees live with an ill-fitting socket and can experience limb pistoning within the socket, which in turn may result in skin irritation, tissue breakdown, discomfort, and a reduction in activity. One of the key factors affecting fit is intraday residual limb volume changes. For an amputee with dysvascular conditions, the implications of a poor fitting socket are exacerbated by poor circulation, reduced healing potential and the compressive forces exerted by their prosthesis.
Vacuum suspension systems may have the potential to alleviate these conditions for healthy and dysvascular amputees. The purported benefits of vacuum suspension systems include, but are not limited to: improved suspension (reduction in the amount of pistoning), maintenance of limb volume throughout the day, and increased tissue oxygenation to the residual limb.
Our first objective is to characterize performance, as related to socket fit, of a vacuum suspension system using objective and subjective measures. We will do this by conducting a within-subject experiment to measure pistoning in three dimensions while walking, overall and regional changes in limb volume before and after a thirty-minute treadmill walk, mobility (step counts) and the perception of socket fit (questionnaire) as a function of prosthetic prescription (vacuum suspension system vs. total surface bearing suction socket).
Our second objective is to determine the effect of pressures within a prosthetic socket on residual limb transcutaneous oxygen tension (tcpO2) levels. We will conduct laboratory-based, in situ testing to determine how the transcutaneous oxygen tension levels, at six sites on the residual limb, respond to pressures simulating those within a vacuum suspension system and a total surface bearing suction socket.
The proposed research will allow us to understand how suspension systems influence prosthetic socket fit and residual limb tissue health and to formulate a knowledge base on two suspension systems providing prosthetists and clinicians the objective data to make better prescription decisions. In addition, the methods utilized in this study (e.g., a residual limb limb volume scanner and assessing dynamic pistoning) can be used to study current and novel suspension systems, liners, and prosthetic socket designs to provide a standard for comparison.
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Label | Type | Description | Intervention Names |
|---|---|---|---|
| Arm 1 | Active Comparator | Current clinical practice |
|
| Arm 2 | Experimental | Novel socket system |
|
| Name | Type | Description | Arm Group Labels | Other Names |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Total Surface Bearing Suction Socket | Device | Current clinical practice |
| |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Limb Volume | Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks | |
| Activity Level | Total number of steps during a two week period ending in the fourth week for each study prosthesis (PIN and VASS). | Two weeks |
| Limb Pistoning | Limb pistoning is the change in the resultant distance between the prosthetic-side knee joint marker triad and the residual limb thigh triad measured using a 12-camera motion analysis system while subjects weighted and un-weighted their prosthesis standing in place. | Measurements were taken after wearing the study prosthesis for three weeks |
| Measure | Description | Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
| Residual Limb Health (PEQ Scale) | Qualitative differences between the study limbs were assessed using the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ). This standardized, self-report instrument is specific to persons with lower limb amputations and is used to evaluate prosthetic care with regard to prescription and prosthesis-related quality of life. The Residual Limb Health scale examines: sweat, smell, volume changes, rashes, ingrown hairs, and blisters. The scale is scored from 0 to 100 where 100 indicates the best outcome (i.e., most healthful). |
Not provided
Inclusion Criteria:
Exclusion Criteria:
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Name | Affiliation | Role |
|---|---|---|
| Glenn K. Klute, PhD | VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle | Principal Investigator |
| Facility | Status | City | State | ZIP | Country | Contacts |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| VA Puget Sound Health Care System, Seattle | Seattle | Washington | 98108 | United States |
| PubMed Identifier | Type | Citation | Retractions |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21963124 | Derived | Klute GK, Berge JS, Biggs W, Pongnumkul S, Popovic Z, Curless B. Vacuum-assisted socket suspension compared with pin suspension for lower extremity amputees: effect on fit, activity, and limb volume. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Oct;92(10):1570-5. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.05.019. |
Not provided
Not provided
The prostheses used in this study were built and aligned by a certified and licensed prosthetist prior to beginning starting the protocol. 20 individuals gave informed consent but 3 withdrew prior to starting: 1 had contralateral knee surgery, 1 became a bi-lateral amputee, and 1 was withdrawn by the participant's physician.
Recruitment for this study was conducted at the VA Puget Sound Health Care System (Seattle VA hospital). Recruitment began on March 28, 2007. The study was closed to enrollment on March 30, 2012.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| FG000 | Entire Study Population | This is a randomized cross-over study. Each participant wore both study prostheses: (1) a total surface bearing socket with a vacuum-assisted suspension system (VASS) and (2) a modified patellar tendon bearing socket with a pin lock suspension system (PIN). Subjects were randomized, provided with one of two study prostheses, and asked to wear it for three weeks. Data was then collected during laboratory visit one, and, following one more week of wearing the first study prosthesis, during laboratory visit two. Participants were then provided with the second study intervention and asked to wear it for three weeks. Data was then collected during laboratory visit three, and, following one more week of wearing the second study intervention, during laboratory visit four. Data was not collected on the order in which participants received each study intervention |
| Title | Milestones | Reasons Not Completed | ||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Overall Study |
|
|
The sample population descriptors are based on the participants who completed the study protocol.
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description |
|---|---|---|
| BG000 | Entire Study Population | Includes participants randomized to receive PIN first and VASS first. |
| Units | Counts |
|---|---|
| Participants |
|
| Title | Description | Population Description | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Denominator Units Selected | Denominators | Classes |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical | Count of Participants |
| Type | Title | Description | Population Description | Reporting Status | Anticipated Posting Date | Parameter Type | Dispersion Type | Unit of Measure | Calculate Percentage | Time Frame | Units Analyzed | Denominator Units Selected | Arm/Group Information | Denominators | Classes | Analyses | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Primary | Limb Volume | The number of participants for analysis is equal to the number of participants who completed the study protocol. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | liters | Measurements were taken after wearing the study prostheses for three weeks |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| ID | Title | Description | Deaths (Affected) | Deaths (At Risk) | Serious Events (Affected) | Serious Events (At Risk) | Other Events (Affected) | Other Events (At Risk) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EG000 | Entire Study Population | Includes participants randomized to receive PIN first and VASS first. |
Not provided
| Term | Organ System | Source Vocabulary | Assessment Type | Notes | Statistical Information |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Prosthesis failure | Injury, poisoning and procedural complications | Non-systematic Assessment | Socket fracture during routine activity preventing further use. Participant was wearing VASS at time of failure. |
The small number of participants who completed the protocol precluded a statistical analysis on the secondary outcome measures.
| Title | Organization | Phone | Extension | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Glenn K. Klute, PhD | Dept. of Veterans Affairs, Rehabilitation Research & Development Service | 206-277-6724 | Glenn.Klute@va.gov |
Not provided
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D003920 | Diabetes Mellitus |
| D007869 | Leg Injuries |
| D000673 | Amputation, Traumatic |
| ID | Term |
|---|---|
| D044882 | Glucose Metabolism Disorders |
| D008659 | Metabolic Diseases |
| D009750 | Nutritional and Metabolic Diseases |
| D004700 | Endocrine System Diseases |
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| Vacuum assisted socket system |
| Device |
Novel socket system |
|
| Measurements were taken after wearing the study prosthesis for four weeks |
| Ambulation (PEQ Scale) | Qualitative differences between the study limbs were assessed using the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ). This standardized, self-report instrument is specific to persons with lower limb amputations and is used to evaluate prosthetic care with regard to prescription and prosthesis-related quality of life. The Ambulation scale queries the ability to walk in general, in close spaces, on stairs and ramps, in urban environments, and on slippery surfaces. The scale is scored from 0 to 100 where 100 indicates the best outcome (i.e., easiest to walk on). | Measurements were taken after wearing the study prosthesis for four weeks |
| Frustration (PEQ Scale) | Qualitative differences between the study limbs were assessed using the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ). This standardized, self-report instrument is specific to persons with lower limb amputations and is used to evaluate prosthetic care with regard to prescription and prosthesis-related quality of life. Frustration was assessed by frequency of occurrence and rating. The scale is scored from 0 to 100 where 100 indicates the best outcome (i.e., least frustrating). | Measurements were taken after wearing the study prosthesis for four weeks |
| Participants |
|
| Age, Continuous | Mean | Standard Deviation | years |
|
| Sex: Female, Male | Count of Participants | Participants |
|
| Amputation etiology | Number | Participants |
|
| Years post-amputation | Mean | Standard Deviation | Years |
|
| Weight | Mean | Standard Deviation | kg |
|
| Height | Mean | Standard Deviation | m |
|
| Units |
|---|
| Counts |
|---|
| Participants |
|
|
|
| Primary | Activity Level | Total number of steps during a two week period ending in the fourth week for each study prosthesis (PIN and VASS). | The number of participants for analysis is equal to the number of participants who completed the study protocol. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | steps (in thousands) | Two weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Primary | Limb Pistoning | Limb pistoning is the change in the resultant distance between the prosthetic-side knee joint marker triad and the residual limb thigh triad measured using a 12-camera motion analysis system while subjects weighted and un-weighted their prosthesis standing in place. | The number of participants for analysis is equal to the number of participants who completed the study protocol. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | mm | Measurements were taken after wearing the study prosthesis for three weeks |
|
|
|
|
| Secondary | Residual Limb Health (PEQ Scale) | Qualitative differences between the study limbs were assessed using the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ). This standardized, self-report instrument is specific to persons with lower limb amputations and is used to evaluate prosthetic care with regard to prescription and prosthesis-related quality of life. The Residual Limb Health scale examines: sweat, smell, volume changes, rashes, ingrown hairs, and blisters. The scale is scored from 0 to 100 where 100 indicates the best outcome (i.e., most healthful). | The number of participants for analysis is equal to the number of participants who completed the study protocol. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Measurements were taken after wearing the study prosthesis for four weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Ambulation (PEQ Scale) | Qualitative differences between the study limbs were assessed using the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ). This standardized, self-report instrument is specific to persons with lower limb amputations and is used to evaluate prosthetic care with regard to prescription and prosthesis-related quality of life. The Ambulation scale queries the ability to walk in general, in close spaces, on stairs and ramps, in urban environments, and on slippery surfaces. The scale is scored from 0 to 100 where 100 indicates the best outcome (i.e., easiest to walk on). | The number of participants for analysis is equal to the number of participants who completed the study protocol. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Measurements were taken after wearing the study prosthesis for four weeks |
|
|
|
| Secondary | Frustration (PEQ Scale) | Qualitative differences between the study limbs were assessed using the Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire (PEQ). This standardized, self-report instrument is specific to persons with lower limb amputations and is used to evaluate prosthetic care with regard to prescription and prosthesis-related quality of life. Frustration was assessed by frequency of occurrence and rating. The scale is scored from 0 to 100 where 100 indicates the best outcome (i.e., least frustrating). | The number of participants for analysis is equal to the number of participants who completed the study protocol. | Posted | Mean | Standard Deviation | units on a scale | Measurements were taken after wearing the study prosthesis for four weeks |
|
|
|
| 0 |
| 17 |
| 1 |
| 17 |
|
Not provided
Not provided
Not provided
| D014947 | Wounds and Injuries |